nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. New Data and Methods for Modelling Future Urban Travel Demand: A State of the Art Review

verfasst von : Sara A. Puignau Arrigain, Jordi Pons-Prats, Sergi Saurí Marchán

Erschienen in: Computation and Big Data for Transport

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper aims is to provide an overview of how new data collection methods and the various advances in urban travel demand modelling are improving the understanding of mobility. These new modelling applications and data allow for a study of both new disruptive transport services and changes in travel behaviours in the “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS) context that needs to be overcome in the future.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Operation of Transport and Logistics in a Time of (Cyber)Insecurity

Nächstes Kapitel Maritime Transport and the Threat of Bio Invasion and the Spread of Infectious Disease

Aditjandra PT, Cao XJ, Mulley C (2012) Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(1):22–32

Agatz N, Erera AL, Savelsbergh MWP, Wang X (2011) Dynamic ride-sharing: a simulation study in metro Atlanta. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 17:532–550

Anda C, Erath A, Fourie PJ (2017) Transport modelling in the age of big data. Int J Urban Sci 21(sup1):19–42

Arentze T, Hofman F, van Mourik H, Timmermans H (2000) ALBATROSS: multiagent, rule-based model of activity pattern decisions. Transp Res Rec 1706(1):136–144

Auld J, Mohammadian AK (2012) Activity planning processes in the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(8):1386–1403

Bahamonde-Birke FJ, Kunert U, Link H, de Dios Ortúzar J (2017) About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models. Transportation 44(3):475–493

Bao Q, Kochan B, Bellemans T, Janssens D, Wets G (2015) Investigating micro-simulation error in activity-based travel demand forecasting: a case study of the FEATHERS framework. Transp Plan Technol 38(4):425–441

Bao Q, Kochan B, Shen Y, Bellemans T, Janssens D, Wets G (2016) Activity-based travel demand modeling framework FEATHERS: sensitivity analysis with decision trees. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 89–99

Bekhor S, Dobler C, Axhausen KW (2010) Integration of activity-based with agent-based models: an example from the tel aviv model and MATSim. Arb Verk Raumplan 628

10.

Bekhor S, Kheifits L, Sorani, M (2014) Stability analysis of activity-based models: case study of the Tel Aviv transportation model. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 14(4)

11.

Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions. Handbook of transportation science. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–33

12.

Ben-Akiva M, Walker J, Bernardino AT, Gopinath DA, Morikawa T, Polydoropoulou A (2002) Integration of choice and latent variable models. Perpetual motion, travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges, pp 431–470

13.

Berrada J, Leurent F (2017) Modeling transportation systems involving autonomous vehicles: a state of the art. Transp Res Procedia 27:215–221

14.

Bischoff J, Nagel K (2017) Integrating explicit parking search into a transport simulation. Procedia Comput Sci 109:881–886

15.

Bohte W, Maat K (2009) Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: a large-scale application in the Netherlands. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 17(3):285–297

16.

Bowman JL, Ben-Akiva ME (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 35(1):1–28

17.

Bricka SG, Sen S, Paleti R, Bhat CR (2012) An analysis of the factors influencing differences in survey-reported and GPS-recorded trips. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 21(1):67–88

18.

Calabrese F, Diao M, Di Lorenzo G, Ferreira J Jr, Ratti C (2013) Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: a mobile phone trace example. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 26:301–313

19.

Calabrese F, Ferrari L, Blondel Vincent D (2015) Urban sensing using mobile phone network data: a survey of research. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 47(2):25

20.

Carreira R, Patrício L, Jorge RN, Magee C (2014) Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider-a quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transp Policy 31:35–46

21.

Castiglione J, Freedman J, Bradley M (2003) Systematic investigation of variability due to random simulation error in an activity-based microsimulation forecasting model. Transp Res Rec 1831(1):76–88

22.

Castiglione J, Bradley M, Gliebe J (2015) Activity-based travel demand models: a primer

23.

Chen C, Ma J, Susilo Y, Liu Y, Wang M (2016) The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 68:285–299

24.

Chorus CG, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2008) A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 42(1):1–18

25.

Cich G, Knapen L, Maciejewski M, Bellemans T, Janssens D et al (2017) Modeling demand responsive transport using SARL and MATSim. Procedia Comput Sci 109:1074–1079

26.

Davis B, Dutzik T, Baxandall P (2012) Transportation and the new generation. Why young people are driving less and what it means for transportation policy. Frontier Group

27.

de Barcelona A (2013). Pla de Mobilitat Urbana de Barcelona 2013–2018

28.

de Dios Ortuzar J, Willumsen, LG (2011) Modal split and direct demand models. Modelling transport, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 207–225

29.

De Oña J, De Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp Policy 29:219–226

30.

Delbosc A, Currie G (2015) Does information and communication technology complement or replace social travel among young adults? Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 76–82

31.

Diana M, Mokhtarian PL (2009) Grouping travelers on the basis of their different car and transit levels of use. Transportation 36(4):455–467

32.

Djavadian S, Chow JYJ (2017) An agent-based day-to-day adjustment process for modeling mobility as a service with a two-sided flexible transport market. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 104:36–57

33.

Du Y, Zhao C, Zhang X, Sun L (2015) Microscopic simulation evaluation method on access traffic operation. Simul Model Pract Theory 53:139–148

34.

e Silva JDA, Morency C, Goulias KG (2012) Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(8):1252–1264

35.

Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. J Public Transp 10(3):2

36.

Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2010) How to capture the passengers’ point of view on a transit service through rating and choice options. Transp Rev 30(4):435–450

37.

Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 40:1–13

38.

Feng T, Timmermans HJP (2014) Extracting activity-travel diaries from GPS data: towards integrated semi-automatic imputation. Procedia Environ Sci 22:178–185

39.

Fifer S, Rose J, Greaves S (2014) Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it? Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 61:164–177

40.

Furuhata M, Dessouky M, Ordóñez F, Brunet M-E, Wang X, Koenig S (2013) Ridesharing: the state-of-the-art and future directions. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 57:28–46

41.

Garikapati VM, Pendyala RM, Morris EA, Mokhtarian PL, McDonald N (2016) Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: a generation in transition? Transp Rev 36(5):558–584

42.

Ghasri M, Rashidi TH, Waller ST (2017) Developing a disaggregate travel demand system of models using data mining techniques. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 105:138–153

43.

Giesecke R, Surakka T, Hakonen M (2016) Conceptualising mobility as a service. In: 2016 11th international conference on ecological vehicles and renewable energies (EVER). IEEE, pp 1–11

44.

Group, Resource Systems (2012) The ARC and SACOG experience with activity-based models: synthesis and lessons learned. Washington, DC

45.

Guiliano G, Hayden SA (2005) Marketing public transport. Handbooks in transport, vol 6

46.

Gundlegård D, Rydergren C, Breyer N, Rajna B (2016) Travel demand estimation and network assignment based on cellular network data. Comput Commun 95:29–42

47.

Habib KMN (2011) A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: application in weekend activity scheduling. Transportation 38(1):123–151

48.

Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV (2014) Urban activity pattern classification using topic models from online geo-location data. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 44:363–381

49.

He Q, Head KL, Ding J (2014) Multi-modal traffic signal control with priority, signal actuation and coordination. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 46:65–82

50.

Heilig M, Mallig N, Schröder O, Kagerbauer M, Vortisch P (2018) Implementation of free-floating and station-based carsharing in an agent-based travel demand model. Travel Behav Soc 12:151–158

51.

Huang A, Gallegos L, Lerman K (2017) Travel analytics: understanding how destination choice and business clusters are connected based on social media data. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 77:245–256

52.

Ingvardson JB, Kaplan S, Nielsen OA, Di Ciommo F, de Abreu e Silva J, Shiftan Y (2017) The Commuting habit loop: the role of satisfying existence, relatedness, and growth needs in modal choice. Technical report

53.

Injadat M, Salo F, Nassif AB (2016) Data mining techniques in social media: a survey. Neurocomputing 214:654–670

54.

Johansson MV, Heldt T, Johansson P (2006) The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 40(6):507–525

55.

Jurdak R, Zhao K, Liu J, AbouJaoude M, Cameron M, Newth D (2015) Understanding human mobility from Twitter. PloS One 10(7):e0131469

56.

Kamargianni M, Polydoropoulou A (2014) Generation Y’s travel behavior and perceptions of walkability constraints. Transp Res Rec 2430(1):59–71

57.

Kamargianni M, Li W, Matyas M, Schäfer A (2016) A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp Res Procedia 14:3294–3303

58.

Kaplan S, e Silva JDA, Di Ciommo F (2014) The relationship between young people’ s transit use and their perceptions of equity concepts in transit service provision. Transp Policy 36:79–87

59.

Kelen C, Vilarino P, Christou G (2017) Advanced demand data collection technologies for multi modal strategic modelling. Transp Res Procedia 27:1058–1065

60.

Koppelman FS, Bhat C (2006) A self instructing course in mode choice modeling: multinomial and nested logit models

61.

Kroesen M, Handy SL (2015) Is the rise of the e-society responsible for the decline in car use by young adults? Results from the Netherlands. Transp Res Rec 2496(1):28–35

62.

Kuflik T, Minkov E, Nocera S, Grant-Muller S, Gal-Tzur A, Shoor I (2017) Automating a framework to extract and analyse transport related social media content: the potential and the challenges. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 77:275–291

63.

Kuhnimhof T, Buehler R, Dargay J (2011) A new generation: travel trends for young Germans and Britons. Transp Res Rec 2230(1):58–67

64.

Li Q, Liao F, Timmermans HJP, Huang H, Zhou J (2018) Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: a demand-side model. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 107:102–123

65.

Linares MP, Barceló J, Carmona C, Montero L (2017) Analysis and operational challenges of dynamic ride sharing demand responsive transportation models. Transp Res Procedia 21:110–129

66.

Mans J, Interrante E, Lem L, Mueller J, Lawrence M (2012) Next generation of travel behavior: potential impacts related to household use of information and communication technology. Transp Res Rec 2323(1):90–98

67.

Matyas MB, Kamargianni M (2017) A holistic overview of the mobility-as-a-service. In: Hungarian transport research conference

68.

McNally MG (2000) The activity-based approachPergamon. In: Hensher DA, Button K (eds) Hand Book of Transport Modelling

69.

Miller EJ (2017) Modeling the demand for new transportation services and technologies. Transp Res Rec 2658(1):1–7

70.

Nourinejad M, Roorda MJ (2016) Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 64:117–132

71.

Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, Shiwakoti N (2014) Social media use during unplanned transit network disruptions: a review of literature. Transp Rev 34(4):501–521

72.

Petrik O, Adnan M, Basak K, Ben-Akiva M (2018) Uncertainty analysis of an activity-based microsimulation model for Singapore. Future Gener Comput Syst

73.

Pournarakis DE, Sotiropoulos DN, Giaglis GM (2017) A computational model for mining consumer perceptions in social media. Decis Support Syst 93:98–110

74.

Rashidi TH, Abbasi A, Maghrebi M, Hasan S, Waller TS (2017) Exploring the capacity of social media data for modelling travel behaviour: opportunities and challenges. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 75:197–211

75.

Rasouli S (2016) Uncertainty in modeling activity-travel demand in complex urban systems. TRAIL Research School

76.

Ribeiro MD, Larrañaga AM, Arellana J, Cybis HBB (2014) Influence of GPS and self-reported data in travel demand models. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 162:467–476

77.

Saleem M, Västberg OB, Karlström A (2018) An activity based demand model for large scale simulations. Procedia Comput Sci 130:920–925

78.

Shiftan Y, Ben-Akiva M (2011) A practical policy-sensitive, activity-based, travel-demand model. Ann Reg Sci 47(3):517–541

79.

Shiftan Y, Outwater ML, Zhou Y (2008) Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transp Policy 15(3):186–195

80.

Shiftan Y, Barlach Y, Shefer D (2015) Measuring passenger loyalty to public transport modes. J Public Transp 18(1):7

81.

Şimşekoğlu Ö, Nordfjærn T, Rundmo T (2015) The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transp Policy 42:113–120

82.

Sivakumar A (2007) Modelling transport: a synthesis of transport modelling methodologies. Imperial College of London

83.

Stathopoulos A, Cirillo C, Cherchi E, Ben-Elia E, Li Y-T, Schmöcker J-D (2017) Innovation adoption modeling in transportation: new models and data. J Choice Model

84.

Stock K (2018) Mining location from social media: a systematic review. Comput Environ Urban Syst

85.

Tan W, Chai Y, Wang W, Liu Y (2012) General modeling and simulation for enterprise operational decision-making problem: a policy-combination perspective. Simul Model Pract Theory 21(1):1–20

86.

Tyrinopoulos Y, Aifadopoulou G (2008) A complete methodology for the quality control of passenger services in the public transport business. Eur Transp 38(38):1–16

87.

Van Acker V, Mokhtarian PL, Witlox F (2014) Car availability explained by the structural relationships between lifestyles, residential location, and underlying residential and travel attitudes. Transp Policy 35:88–99

88.

Van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A (2016) Enjoying loyalty: the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res Transp Econ 59:50–59

89.

Van Wee B (2002) Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. J Transp Geogr 10(4):259–271

90.

Veldhuisen J, Timmermans H, Kapoen L (2000) Microsimulation model of activity-travel patterns and traffic flows: specification, validation tests, and Monte Carlo error. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 126–135

91.

Wang Y, Szeto WY, Han K, Friesz TL (2018) Dynamic traffic assignment: a review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications. Transp Res Part B: Methodol

92.

Wegener M (2013) The future of mobility in cities: challenges for urban modelling. Transp Policy 29:275–282

93.

Wismans L, De Romph E, Friso K, Zantema K (2014) Real time traffic models, decision support for traffic management. Procedia Environ Sci 22:220–235

94.

Xiong Y, Zhang J (2016) Effects of land use and transport on young adults’ quality of life. Travel Behav Soc 5:37–47

95.

Ye R, Titheridge H (2017) Satisfaction with the commute: the role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 52:535–547

96.

Zhang J, Chikaraishi M, Xiong Y, Jiang Y, Seya H (2016) Young people’s life choices and travel behavior: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. In: A discussion paper for the workshop ‘Young People’s Life Choices and Travel...’

97.

Zheng H, Son Y-J, Chiu Y-C, Head L, Feng Y, Xi H, Kim S, Hickman M, et al (2013) A primer for agent-based simulation and modeling in transportation applications. Technical report, United States, Federal Highway Administration

98.

Zhuge C, Shao C, Wang S, Hu Y (2019) Sensitivity analysis of integrated activity-based model: using MATSim as an example. Transp Lett 11(2):93–103

Titel: New Data and Methods for Modelling Future Urban Travel Demand: A State of the Art Review
verfasst von: Sara A. Puignau Arrigain
Jordi Pons-Prats
Sergi Saurí Marchán
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Computation and Big Data for Transport
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37751-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-37752-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37752-6_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner