Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

New Trends in Preference, Utility, and Choice: From a Mono-approach to a Multi-approach

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We give an overview of some new trends in preference modeling, utility representation, and choice rationalization. Several recent contributions on these topics point in the same direction: the use of multiple tools—may they be binary relations, utility functions, or rationales explaining a choice behavior—in place of a single one, in order to more faithfully model economic phenomena. In this stream of research, the two traditional tenets of economic rationality, completeness and transitivity, are partially (and naturally) given up. Here we describe some recent approaches of this kind, namely: (1) utility representations having multiple orderings as a codomain, (2) multi-utility and modal utility representations, (3) a finer classifications of preference structures and forms of choice rationalizability by means of generalized Ferrers properties, (4) a descriptive characterization of all semiorders in terms of shifted types of lexicographic products, (5) bi-preference structures, and, in particular, necessary and possible preferences, (6) simultaneous and sequential multi-rationalizations of choices, and (7) multiple, iterated, and hierarchical resolutions of choice spaces. As multiple criteria decision analysis provides broader models to better fit reality, so does a multi-approach to preference, utility, and choice. The overall goal of this survey is to suggest the naturalness of this general setting, as well as its advantages over the classical mono-approach.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Notice that, since x and y are distinct, this formulation of completeness does not imply reflexivity.
 
2
See Sect. 3.3 of this survey for a discussion on this point in relation to the so-called (mn)-Ferrers properties.
 
3
In case \(\succsim \) is complete, then the following statements are equivalent: (i) \(\succsim \) is quasi-transitive; (ii) for each \(x,y,z \in X\), \(x \succ y \succsim z\) implies \(x \succsim z\); (iii) for each \(x,y,z \in X\), \(x \succsim y \succ z\) implies \(x \succsim z\).
 
4
We follow the approach described in Bouyssou and Pirlot (2004), defining all traces in terms of weak sections, instead of defining strict traces first and then deriving weak traces. The difference is immaterial whenever dealing with complete and quasi-transitive preferences, in particular for interval orders and semiorders. Notice also that the notion of global trace has been recently revised from a different perspective, and renamed transitive core (Nishimura 2018).
 
5
The literature also examines weaker forms of representability of a single binary relation, e.g., the existence of (continuous, semicontinuous) Richter-Peleg utility functions (Alcantud et al. 2016; Peleg 1970; Richter 1966). We shall deal with this topic in Sect. 4.3, where we also discuss some shortcomings of this notion, and introduce multi-utility representations.
 
6
A set \(Y \subseteq X\) is weakly order-dense in X if, for each \(x_1,x_2 \in X\) such that \(x_1 \succ x_2\), there is \(y \in Y\) with the property that \(x_1 \succsim y \succsim x_2\). Such a set is often called Debreu order-dense, and the existence of a countable Debreu order-dense is referred to as Debreu-separability (Bridges and Mehta 1995).
 
7
A jump in an ordered space \((X,\succsim )\) is a pair \((a,b) \in X^2\) such that \(a \succ b\) and there is no point \(c \in X\) such that \(a \succ c \succ b\). The topology \(\tau _\succsim \) is the order topology induced by \(\succsim \). The topological space \((X,\tau _\succsim )\) is separable if it contains a countable set D that intersects each nonempty open set. See Munkres (2000) for topological notions.
 
8
This is not the terminology originally used by the authors.
 
9
An ordinal is a well-ordered set \((X,<)\) such that each \(x \in X\) is equal to its initial segment \(\{y \in X : y < x\}\). The finite ordinals are the natural numbers. The first infinite ordinal is the set \(\omega _0\) of all natural numbers, endowed with the usual order. The first uncountable ordinal is the set \(\omega _1\) of all countable ordinals, endowed with the natural order. The famous continuum hypothesis, formulated by George Cantor in 1878, says that the cardinality of \({\mathbb R}\) is equal to \(\omega _1\) (as a cardinal). In 1963, Paul Cohen proved that the continuum hypothesis is independent from the axioms of ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel axiomatic set theory, plus the Axiom of Choice), in sense that there are models in which it is true, and models in which it is false (because \(\vert {\mathbb R}\vert > \omega _1\) holds). See the classical textbook by Kunen (1980) for ZFC axiomatic set theory.
 
10
Here we use the notion of continuity employed in some standard textbooks in microeconomic theory, such as Mas-Colell et al. (1995, p. 46). Other authors sometimes employ a weaker notion of continuity: see, e.g., Sect. 1.6 of Bridges and Mehta (1995). However, from the point of view of applications, the distinction between the various notions of continuity is often immaterial. See also Evren and Ok (2011, p. 555), and Gerasímou (2013, pp. 2–3).
 
11
Herden and Pallack (2002) provide a very simple counterexample to the equivalence between continuity and bi-semicontinuity for incomplete preferences: in fact, they show that the relation of equality is a bi-semicontinuous non-continuous preorder in any topological space that is \(T_1\) but not Hausdorff. On the topic, see also Gerasímou (2013), who characterizes continuity in terms of closed semicontinuity and a property of “local expansion” of transitivity (Theorem 1 in Gerasímou (2013)).
 
12
The literature on choice theory also consider other types of domains, e.g., for the case of choices arising from consumer demand theory. For the sake of simplicity, here we limit our analysis to the case in which \(\varOmega \) satisfies some rather mild closure properties (see Cantone et al. (2016), Eliaz and Ok (2006) for a justification of this assumption).
 
13
Selected items are underlined: thus, \(\underline{x}\,y\,z\) means \(c(\{x,y,z\}) = \{x\}\), \(\underline{y}\,\underline{z}\) means \(c(\{y,z\}) = \{y,z\}\), etc. Notice that, by the very definition of a choice correspondence, we always have \(c(\{a\}) = \{a\}\) for each \(a \in X\): thus, it suffices to indicate how choices are defined for menus of size at least two.
 
14
By a “divide and conquer” manner, we mean: the menu is split up into smaller sets, a choice is made over each of these sets, the selected items are collected, and finally a choice is made from them.
 
15
We should also distinguish between purely ordinal codomains, and those which also have an algebraic structure. Among the latter, let us mention (without getting into details) representations that employ non-Archimedean ordered fields, introduced by Narens (1985).
 
16
See Kunen (1980) for the undefined notions of regular cardinal and Souslin line.
 
17
The canonical completion of an asymmetric relation transforms incomparability into indifference.
 
18
The transitive closure of a binary relation \(\succsim \) is the smallest transitive relation \(\succsim _{\mathrm {tc}}\) containing \(\succsim \).
 
19
The dimension of a strict semiorder \(\succ \) is the least number of strict linear orders whose intersection gives \(\succ \).
 
20
This is a work in progress (Giarlotta and Watson 2018c).
 
21
The strict Ferrers property and the strict semitransitive property are respectively defined exactly as the Ferrers property and the semitransitive property in Definition 2.2, with \(\succ \) in place of \(\succsim \).
 
22
A linear continuum is a linear ordering with the properties that (i) every nonempty subset with an upper bound has a least upper bound, and (ii) for every pair of distinct elements, we can always find another element strictly in between them.
 
23
For some recent examples of this approach, see Hansson (1993) and Rabinowicz (2008).
 
24
On the other hand, Schick (1986) and McClennen (1990) argue against the possibility of a money-pump phenomenon, observing that, after transactions between indifferent alternatives, an economic agent may well refuse a transaction between strictly preferred alternatives. However, as Piper (2014) notes, the above solutions are based on the (unlikely) circumstance that the economic agent remembers the past and accordingly plans the future.
 
25
For the formal notion of the transitive coherence of two binary relations, see Sect. 4.1 on bi-preferences.
 
26
According to the notation employed in Definition 2.14, we should denote these choice space by \((2^X,c_X)\). However, for the sake of simplicity, here we prefer to use the more direct notation \((X,c_X)\).
 
27
Two choice spaces \((X,c_X)\) and \((W,c_W)\) are isomorphic if there exists a bijection \(\sigma :X \rightarrow W\) that preserves the choice structure, i.e., the equality \(\sigma (c_X(A)) = c_W(\sigma (A))\) holds for each menu \(A \in 2^X\).
 
28
Contractibility is a form of “outer indiscernibility”, in the sense that a contractible menu cannot be distinguished from outside, but it typically has an internally distinguishable structure. In fact, contractibility is a weaker version of revealed indiscernibility, introduced by Cantone et al. (2018b) in the process of dealing with congruence relations (i.e., structure-preserving equivalence relations) on a choice space.
 
29
A menu is proper if it contains more than one item and is different from the ground set.
 
30
This notion was originally introduced by Giarlotta and Greco (2013) under the name of partial NaP-preference. Here we switch to a simpler and more agile terminology, which allows us to qualify special types of bi-preferences, such as “uniform”, “monotonic”, “comonotonic”, etc. (see later in this section).
 
31
The philosophy underlying this distinction will be used again in dealing with (1) simultaneous and sequential multi-rationalizations (Sect. 4.4), and (2) multiple and iterated resolutions (Sect. 4.5).
 
32
A choice is replaceable if the consistency properties \((\alpha )\) and \((\rho )\) hold for it.
 
33
Configurations (2)\('\), (M2)\('\), and (M3)\('\) are dual to, respectively, (2), (M2), and (M3).
 
34
This procedure is reminiscent of the rational shortlist method, a bounded rationality approach to individual choice recently introduced by Manzini and Mariotti (2007). However, in the latter case, the two sequential rationales need not be nested one inside the other, and they fail in general to be transitively coherent. On the point, see Sect. 4.4 of this survey.
 
35
Configurations (2)\('\), (C2)\('\), and (C3)\('\) are dual to, respectively, (2), (C2), and (C3).
 
36
Cf. with the notion of continuity given in Sect. 2.3.
 
37
In fact, Giarlotta and Watson (2018b) constructively characterize strongly comonotonic bi-preferences as those that can be obtained from simpler types of bi-preferences by an operation of resolution (Resolutions of preference structures do have the same flavor as the operation of choice resolution described in Sect. 3.5.).
 
38
The Axiom of Choice (AC) is needed in the proof of Theorem 4.9 to apply Zorn’s Lemma in the case of an uncountable ground set X.
 
39
See Footnote 6.
 
40
A square matrix is bi-stochastic if (i) all of its entries are non-negative, and (ii) all the row and column sums are equal to one.
 
41
Meet-semilattice means that \(\left( \textsf {NaP}(X),\sqsubseteq \right) \) is a poset, and for each \(\left( \succsim ^N_1, \succsim ^P_1\right) ,\left( \succsim ^N_2, \succsim ^P_2\right) \in \textsf {NaP}(X)\), there is a greatest element \(\left( \succsim ^N_3, \succsim ^P_3\right) \) in \(\textsf {NaP}(X)\) such that \(\left( \succsim ^N_3, \succsim ^P_3\right) \sqsubseteq \left( \succsim ^N_1, \succsim ^P_1\right) \) and \(\left( \succsim ^N_3, \succsim ^P_3\right) \sqsubseteq \left( \succsim ^N_2, \succsim ^P_2\right) \).
 
42
For the notions of trapezoidal and quasi-trapezoidal profiles, as well as for their canonical representations by means of quadruples of real numbers in \([-1,1]\), see Sect. 2.3 in Alcantud et al. (2018).
 
43
See also Ok (2002, Theorem 3) and Mandler (2006, Theorem 1) for the existence of special multi-utility representations under suitable order-separability conditions.
 
44
This type of representation has already been mentioned: see (3) in Sect. 4.2.
 
45
A quasi-choice function on X is a map \(c :\varOmega \rightarrow \varOmega \cup \{\emptyset \}\) such that \(c(A) \subseteq A\) and \(0 \le \vert c(A)\vert \le 1\) for all \(A \in \varOmega \). Thus, the agent selects either a single item or no item at all from each menu. Similarly, a quasi-choice correspondence on X is a map \(c :\varOmega \rightarrow \varOmega \cup \{\emptyset \}\) such that \(c(A) \subseteq A\) and \(0 \le \vert c(A)\vert \le \vert A \vert \) for all \(A \in \varOmega \).
 
46
In order to avoid dealing with the theory of infinite cardinals, we limit our analysis to case (1a), that is, we assume that the ground set X is finite.
 
47
“Luce and Raiffa’s dinner” mentioned in the quotation below will be described in Example 4.35.
 
48
It is worth noticing that this is exactly the same underlying philosophy which has inspired those MCDA methodologies that limit comparisons to few points of view a time: the prototype of such an approach is the Pairwise Criterion Comparison Approach (PCCA), originally developed by Matarazzo (1986, 1988a, b, 1990a, b, 1991a, b) and later on by his followers Angilella and Giarlotta (2009); Angilella et al. (2010a), Giarlotta (1998, 2001), Greco (1997, 2005).
 
49
This issue is connected to the problem of the lifting of choices having certain properties: see Cantone et al. (2017) for the general formulation of the problem and its logic-theoretic analysis in some special cases.
 
50
Somehow in between approaches (8a) and (8b) lies the very interesting model constructed by Cherepanov et al. (2013), who provide a general framework for a formal and testable theory of rationalization, in which a decision maker selects her preferred alternative from among those that she can rationalize.
 
51
A very surprising answer to a closely related question is given by Mandler, Manzini, and Mariotti (2012). In their paper, the authors show that “fast and frugal” sequential procedures are not incompatible with utility maximization. In fact, two rather unexpected facts hold: (1) any agent who uses the benchmark model of quickly-executing checklists always has a utility function, and (2) any utility maximizer can make decisions with a quickly-executing checklist (under suitable conditions on the domain). In Mandler et al.’s (2012) words: “Checklists are a fast and frugal way to maximize utility.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agaev, R., & Aleskerov, F. (1993). Interval choice: Classic and general cases. Mathematical Social Sciences, 26, 249–272.CrossRef Agaev, R., & Aleskerov, F. (1993). Interval choice: Classic and general cases. Mathematical Social Sciences, 26, 249–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud, J. C. R., de Andrés, R., & Torrecillas, M. J. M. (2016). Hesitant fuzzy worth: An innovative ranking methodology for hesitant fuzzy subsets. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 232–243.CrossRef Alcantud, J. C. R., de Andrés, R., & Torrecillas, M. J. M. (2016). Hesitant fuzzy worth: An innovative ranking methodology for hesitant fuzzy subsets. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 232–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud, J. C. R., Biondo, A. E., & Giarlotta, A. (2018). Fuzzy politics I: The genesis of parties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 349, 71–98.CrossRef Alcantud, J. C. R., Biondo, A. E., & Giarlotta, A. (2018). Fuzzy politics I: The genesis of parties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 349, 71–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud, J. C. R., Bosi, G., & Zuanon, M. (2016). Richter-Peleg multi-utility representations of preorders. Theory and Decision, 80(3), 443–450.CrossRef Alcantud, J. C. R., Bosi, G., & Zuanon, M. (2016). Richter-Peleg multi-utility representations of preorders. Theory and Decision, 80(3), 443–450.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alcantud, J. C. R., & Giarlotta, A. (2019). Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: A novel model for group decision making. Information Fusion, 46, 63–76.CrossRef Alcantud, J. C. R., & Giarlotta, A. (2019). Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: A novel model for group decision making. Information Fusion, 46, 63–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aleskerov, F., Bouyssou, D., & Monjardet, B. (2007). Utility maximization, choice and preference. Berlin: Springer. Aleskerov, F., Bouyssou, D., & Monjardet, B. (2007). Utility maximization, choice and preference. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., & Lami, I. (2016). Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: An application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1), 427–456.CrossRef Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., & Lami, I. (2016). Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: An application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1), 427–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., & Rizzo, M. (2018). Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 158, 136–153.CrossRef Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., & Rizzo, M. (2018). Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 158, 136–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2014). MUSA-INT: Multicriteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria. Omega, 42(1), 189–200.CrossRef Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2014). MUSA-INT: Multicriteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria. Omega, 42(1), 189–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression and stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model. Omega, 63, 154–169.CrossRef Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression and stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model. Omega, 63, 154–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., & Giarlotta, A. (2009). Implementations of PACMAN. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 474–495.CrossRef Angilella, S., & Giarlotta, A. (2009). Implementations of PACMAN. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 474–495.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Giarlotta, A., & Lamantia, F. (2010a). A linear implementation of PACMAN. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 401–411. Angilella, S., Giarlotta, A., & Lamantia, F. (2010a). A linear implementation of PACMAN. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 401–411.
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010b). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288. Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010b). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.
Zurück zum Zitat Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2009). A theory of reference-dependent behavior. Economic Theory, 40, 427–455.CrossRef Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2009). A theory of reference-dependent behavior. Economic Theory, 40, 427–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2013). Choice by sequential procedures. Games and Economic Behavior, 77, 90–99.CrossRef Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2013). Choice by sequential procedures. Games and Economic Behavior, 77, 90–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, W. E. (1939). The determinateness of the utility function. The Economic Journal, 49(195), 453–467.CrossRef Armstrong, W. E. (1939). The determinateness of the utility function. The Economic Journal, 49(195), 453–467.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K. J. (1959). Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica, 26, 121–127.CrossRef Arrow, K. J. (1959). Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica, 26, 121–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley. Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–295.CrossRef Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.CrossRef Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atanassov, K. T. (1999). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Theory and applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 35. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. Atanassov, K. T. (1999). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Theory and applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 35. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Au, P. H., & Kawai, K. (2011). Sequentially rationalizable choice with transitive rationales. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(2), 608–614.CrossRef Au, P. H., & Kawai, K. (2011). Sequentially rationalizable choice with transitive rationales. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(2), 608–614.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica, 30, 445–462.CrossRef Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica, 30, 445–462.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bade, S. (2005). Nash equilibrium in games with incomplete preferences. Economic Theory, 26, 309–332.CrossRef Bade, S. (2005). Nash equilibrium in games with incomplete preferences. Economic Theory, 26, 309–332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bandyopadhyay, T., & Sengupta, K. (1991). Revealed preference axioms for rational choice. The Economic Journal, 101(405), 202–213.CrossRef Bandyopadhyay, T., & Sengupta, K. (1991). Revealed preference axioms for rational choice. The Economic Journal, 101(405), 202–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bandyopadhyay, T., & Sengupta, K. (1993). Characterization of generalized weak orders and revealed preference. Economic Theory, 3, 571–576.CrossRef Bandyopadhyay, T., & Sengupta, K. (1993). Characterization of generalized weak orders and revealed preference. Economic Theory, 3, 571–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beardon, A. F., Candeal, J. C., Herden, G., Induráin, E., & Mehta, G. B. (2002a). The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 37, 17–38. Beardon, A. F., Candeal, J. C., Herden, G., Induráin, E., & Mehta, G. B. (2002a). The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 37, 17–38.
Zurück zum Zitat Beardon, A. F., Candeal, J. C., Herden, G., Induráin, E., & Mehta, G. B. (2002b). Lexicographic decomposition of chains and the concept of a planar chain. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 37(2), 95–104. Beardon, A. F., Candeal, J. C., Herden, G., Induráin, E., & Mehta, G. B. (2002b). Lexicographic decomposition of chains and the concept of a planar chain. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 37(2), 95–104.
Zurück zum Zitat Beja, A., & Gilboa, I. (1992). Numerical representations of imperfectly ordered preferences. A unified geometric exposition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 426–449.CrossRef Beja, A., & Gilboa, I. (1992). Numerical representations of imperfectly ordered preferences. A unified geometric exposition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 426–449.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operation Research, 30(5), 961–981.CrossRef Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operation Research, 30(5), 961–981.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bewley, T. F. (1972). Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 514–540.CrossRef Bewley, T. F. (1972). Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 514–540.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bewley, T. F. (1986). Knightian decision theory. Part I: Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807. (Reprinted in 2002, Decisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2), 79–110). Bewley, T. F. (1986). Knightian decision theory. Part I: Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807. (Reprinted in 2002, Decisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2), 79–110).
Zurück zum Zitat Birkhoff, G. (1948). Lattice theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publication, Vol. 25. Providence, RI. Birkhoff, G. (1948). Lattice theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publication, Vol. 25. Providence, RI.
Zurück zum Zitat Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1977). Utility vs equity: Some plausible quasi-orderings. Journal of Public Economics, 7, 365–381.CrossRef Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1977). Utility vs equity: Some plausible quasi-orderings. Journal of Public Economics, 7, 365–381.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bleichrodt, H., & Wakker, P. P. (2015). Regret theory: A bold alternative to the alternatives. The Economic Journal, 125, 493–532.CrossRef Bleichrodt, H., & Wakker, P. P. (2015). Regret theory: A bold alternative to the alternatives. The Economic Journal, 125, 493–532.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosi, G., Candeal, J. C., Induráin, E., Olóriz, E., & Zudaire, M. (2001). Numerical representations of interval orders. Order, 18, 171–190.CrossRef Bosi, G., Candeal, J. C., Induráin, E., Olóriz, E., & Zudaire, M. (2001). Numerical representations of interval orders. Order, 18, 171–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosi, G., & Herden, G. (2012). Continuous multi-utility representations of preorders. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 48, 212–218.CrossRef Bosi, G., & Herden, G. (2012). Continuous multi-utility representations of preorders. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 48, 212–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bossert, W. (1999). Intersection quasi-orderings: An alternative proof. Order, 16(3), 221–225.CrossRef Bossert, W. (1999). Intersection quasi-orderings: An alternative proof. Order, 16(3), 221–225.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bouyssou, D., & Pirlot, M. (2004). Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48(3), 167–185.CrossRef Bouyssou, D., & Pirlot, M. (2004). Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48(3), 167–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges, D., & Mehta, G. B. (1995). Representations of preference orderings. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 422. Berlin: Springer. Bridges, D., & Mehta, G. B. (1995). Representations of preference orderings. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 422. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Campión, M. J., Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (2006). The existence of utility functions for weakly continuous preferences on a Banach space. Mathematical Social Sciences, 51, 227–237.CrossRef Campión, M. J., Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (2006). The existence of utility functions for weakly continuous preferences on a Banach space. Mathematical Social Sciences, 51, 227–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campión, M. J., Candeal, J. C., Induráin, E., & Zudaire, M. (2008). Continuous representability of semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 48–54.CrossRef Campión, M. J., Candeal, J. C., Induráin, E., & Zudaire, M. (2008). Continuous representability of semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 48–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (1999). Lexicographic behavior of chains. Archiv der Mathematik, 72, 145–152.CrossRef Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (1999). Lexicographic behavior of chains. Archiv der Mathematik, 72, 145–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (2010). Semiorders and thresholds of utility discrimination: Solving the Scott-Suppes representability problem. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 485–490.CrossRef Candeal, J. C., & Induráin, E. (2010). Semiorders and thresholds of utility discrimination: Solving the Scott-Suppes representability problem. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 485–490.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Candeal, J. C., Estevan, A., Gutiérrez García, J., & Induráin, E. (2012). Semiorders with separability properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 444–451.CrossRef Candeal, J. C., Estevan, A., Gutiérrez García, J., & Induráin, E. (2012). Semiorders with separability properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 444–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., & Watson, S. (2016). \((m, n)\)-rationalizability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 12–27.CrossRef Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., & Watson, S. (2016). \((m, n)\)-rationalizability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 12–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017). The satisfiability for Boolean set theory with a choice correspondence. In Proceedings of the Eight International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification (GandALF 2017), Rome, Italy, 20–22 September. Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017). The satisfiability for Boolean set theory with a choice correspondence. In Proceedings of the Eight International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification (GandALF 2017), Rome, Italy, 20–22 September.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018a). Decomposing choice behavior: One-point resolutions. Mimeo: University of Catania. Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018a). Decomposing choice behavior: One-point resolutions. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018c). Multi-rationalizability. Mimeo: University of Catania. Cantone, D., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018c). Multi-rationalizability. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantor, G. (1895). Beiträge zur begründung der transfinite mengenlehre. Mathematische Annalen, 46, 481–512.CrossRef Cantor, G. (1895). Beiträge zur begründung der transfinite mengenlehre. Mathematische Annalen, 46, 481–512.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caserta, A., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2006). On resolutions of linearly ordered spaces. Applied General Topology, 7(2), 211–231.CrossRef Caserta, A., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2006). On resolutions of linearly ordered spaces. Applied General Topology, 7(2), 211–231.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caserta, A., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2008). Debreu-like properties of utility representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 1161–1179.CrossRef Caserta, A., Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2008). Debreu-like properties of utility representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 1161–1179.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., Maccheroni, F., & Marinacci, M. (2018). Rational preference and rationalizable choice. Economic Theory (forthcoming). Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., Maccheroni, F., & Marinacci, M. (2018). Rational preference and rationalizable choice. Economic Theory (forthcoming).
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers, C. P., & Echenique, F. (2016). Revealed preference theory. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press. Chambers, C. P., & Echenique, F. (2016). Revealed preference theory. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers, C. P., & Miller, A. D. (2018). Benchmarking. Theoretical Economics, 11, 485–504.CrossRef Chambers, C. P., & Miller, A. D. (2018). Benchmarking. Theoretical Economics, 11, 485–504.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2013). Razionalization. Theoretical Economics, 8, 775–800.CrossRef Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2013). Razionalization. Theoretical Economics, 8, 775–800.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chernoff, H. (1954). Rational selection of decision functions. Econometrica, 22, 422–443.CrossRef Chernoff, H. (1954). Rational selection of decision functions. Econometrica, 22, 422–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chipman, J. S. (1960). The foundations of utility. Econometrica, 28, 193–224.CrossRef Chipman, J. S. (1960). The foundations of utility. Econometrica, 28, 193–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chipman, J. S. (1971). On the lexicographic representations of preference orderings. In J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. Richter, & H. F. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Preference, utility and demand (pp. 276–288). New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich. Chipman, J. S. (1971). On the lexicographic representations of preference orderings. In J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. Richter, & H. F. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Preference, utility and demand (pp. 276–288). New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93(2–3), 381–422.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93(2–3), 381–422.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression for decision under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Business Economics, 86(1), 55–83.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression for decision under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Business Economics, 86(1), 55–83.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega, 41(5), 820–846.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega, 41(5), 820–846.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Multiple criteria hierarchy process for ELECTRE Tri methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(1), 191–203.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Multiple criteria hierarchy process for ELECTRE Tri methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(1), 191–203.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Danan, E. (2010). Randomization vs. selection: How to choose in the absence of preference? Management Science, 56, 503–518.CrossRef Danan, E. (2010). Randomization vs. selection: How to choose in the absence of preference? Management Science, 56, 503–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson, D., McKinsey, J. C., & Suppes, P. (1955). Outlines of a formal theory of value, I. Philosophy of Science, 22(2), 140–160.CrossRef Davidson, D., McKinsey, J. C., & Suppes, P. (1955). Outlines of a formal theory of value, I. Philosophy of Science, 22(2), 140–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davis-Stober, C., Doignon, J.-P., Fiorini, S., Glineur, F., & Regenwetter, M. (2018). Extended formulations for order polytopes through network flows. Journal of Mathematical Psychology (forthcoming). Davis-Stober, C., Doignon, J.-P., Fiorini, S., Glineur, F., & Regenwetter, M. (2018). Extended formulations for order polytopes through network flows. Journal of Mathematical Psychology (forthcoming).
Zurück zum Zitat Debreu, G. (1954). Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, & R. L. Davies (Eds.), Decision processes (pp. 159–166). New York: Wiley. Debreu, G. (1954). Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, & R. L. Davies (Eds.), Decision processes (pp. 159–166). New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Debreu, G. (1964). Continuity properties of Paretian utility. International Economic Review, 5, 285–293.CrossRef Debreu, G. (1964). Continuity properties of Paretian utility. International Economic Review, 5, 285–293.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diamond, P. A. (1965). The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica, 33, 70–77.CrossRef Diamond, P. A. (1965). The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica, 33, 70–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1997). Well-graded families of relations. Discrete Mathematics, 173, 35–44.CrossRef Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1997). Well-graded families of relations. Discrete Mathematics, 173, 35–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Del Vasto-Terrientes, L., Valls, A., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2015). ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(11), 4910–4926.CrossRef Del Vasto-Terrientes, L., Valls, A., Słowiński, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2015). ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(11), 4910–4926.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Del Vasto-Terrientes, L., Valls, A., Zielniewicz, P., & Borras, J. (2016). A hierarchical multi-criteria sorting approach for recommender systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 46(2), 313–346.CrossRef Del Vasto-Terrientes, L., Valls, A., Zielniewicz, P., & Borras, J. (2016). A hierarchical multi-criteria sorting approach for recommender systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 46(2), 313–346.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, D., & Weymark, J. A. (1998). A quasi-ordering is the intersection of orderings. Journal of Economic Theory, 78, 382–387.CrossRef Donaldson, D., & Weymark, J. A. (1998). A quasi-ordering is the intersection of orderings. Journal of Economic Theory, 78, 382–387.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., & Ok, E. A. (2004). Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 118–133.CrossRef Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., & Ok, E. A. (2004). Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 118–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dushnik, B., & Miller, E. W. (1941). Partially ordered sets. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 600–610.CrossRef Dushnik, B., & Miller, E. W. (1941). Partially ordered sets. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 600–610.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eilenberg, S. (1941). Ordered topological spaces. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 39–45.CrossRef Eilenberg, S. (1941). Ordered topological spaces. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 39–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eliaz, K., & Ok, E. A. (2006). Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 56, 61–86.CrossRef Eliaz, K., & Ok, E. A. (2006). Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 56, 61–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Estévez, M., & Hervés, C. (1995). On the existence of continuous preference orderings without utility representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24, 305–309.CrossRef Estévez, M., & Hervés, C. (1995). On the existence of continuous preference orderings without utility representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24, 305–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evren, O. (2014). Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations. Journal of Economic Theory, 151, 30–63.CrossRef Evren, O. (2014). Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations. Journal of Economic Theory, 151, 30–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evren, O., & Ok, E. A. (2011). On the multi-utility representation of preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47, 554–563.CrossRef Evren, O., & Ok, E. A. (2011). On the multi-utility representation of preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47, 554–563.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Falmagne, J.-C. (1996). A stochastic theory for the emergence and the evolution of preference relations. Mathematical Social Sciences, 31, 63–84.CrossRef Falmagne, J.-C. (1996). A stochastic theory for the emergence and the evolution of preference relations. Mathematical Social Sciences, 31, 63–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Falmagne, J.-C. (1997). Stochastic token theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(2), 129–143.CrossRef Falmagne, J.-C. (1997). Stochastic token theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(2), 129–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (1997). Stochastic evolution of rationality. Theory and Decisions, 43(2), 107–138.CrossRef Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (1997). Stochastic evolution of rationality. Theory and Decisions, 43(2), 107–138.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (2011). Learning spaces. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (2011). Learning spaces. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, tome I. Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, tome I.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedorcuk, V. V. (1968). Bicompacta with noncoinciding dimensionalities. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 9(5), 1148–1150. Fedorcuk, V. V. (1968). Bicompacta with noncoinciding dimensionalities. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 9(5), 1148–1150.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Semiorders and risky choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 358–361.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Semiorders and risky choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 358–361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 144–149.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 144–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1973a). The theory of social choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fishburn, P. C. (1973a). The theory of social choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1973b). Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10, 91–105. Fishburn, P. C. (1973b). Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10, 91–105.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules. Management Science, 20, 1442–1471.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules. Management Science, 20, 1442–1471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1975). Semiorders and choice functions. Econometrica, 43, 975–977.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1975). Semiorders and choice functions. Econometrica, 43, 975–977.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1982). Nontransitive measurable utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26(1), 31–67.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1982). Nontransitive measurable utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26(1), 31–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1985). Interval orders and interval graphs. New York: Wiley.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1985). Interval orders and interval graphs. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1997). Generalisations of semiorders: A review note. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 357–366.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1997). Generalisations of semiorders: A review note. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 357–366.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C., & Monjardet, B. (1992). Norbert Wiener on the theory of measurement (1914, 1915, 1921). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 165–184.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C., & Monjardet, B. (1992). Norbert Wiener on the theory of measurement (1914, 1915, 1921). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 165–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischer, I. (1961). Numerical representation of utility. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 9(1), 147–150. Fleischer, I. (1961). Numerical representation of utility. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 9(1), 147–150.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischer, I. (1961). Embedding linearly ordered sets in real lexicographic products. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 49, 147–150.CrossRef Fleischer, I. (1961). Embedding linearly ordered sets in real lexicographic products. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 49, 147–150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimoto, K., Murofushi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1998). Canonical hierarchical decomposition of Choquet integral over finite set with respect to null additive fuzzy measure. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 6(4), 345–363.CrossRef Fujimoto, K., Murofushi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1998). Canonical hierarchical decomposition of Choquet integral over finite set with respect to null additive fuzzy measure. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 6(4), 345–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Sanz, M., & Alcantud, J. C. R. (2015). Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 74, 29–33.CrossRef García-Sanz, M., & Alcantud, J. C. R. (2015). Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 74, 29–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gensemer, S. H. (1987). Continuous semiorder representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 275–286.CrossRef Gensemer, S. H. (1987). Continuous semiorder representations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 275–286.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1936). The pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 545–593. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1936). The pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 545–593.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerasímou, G. (2013). On continuity of incomplete preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 157–167.CrossRef Gerasímou, G. (2013). On continuity of incomplete preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 157–167.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., & Marinacci, M. (2004). Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. Journal of Economic Theory, 118, 133–173.CrossRef Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., & Marinacci, M. (2004). Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. Journal of Economic Theory, 118, 133–173.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., & Siniscalchi, M. (2003). A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica, 71, 1897–1908.CrossRef Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., & Siniscalchi, M. (2003). A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica, 71, 1897–1908.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (1998). Passive and active compensability multicriteria analysis (PACMAN). Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 7(4), 204–216.CrossRef Giarlotta, A. (1998). Passive and active compensability multicriteria analysis (PACMAN). Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 7(4), 204–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (2001). Multicriteria compensability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 190–209.CrossRef Giarlotta, A. (2001). Multicriteria compensability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 190–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., (2004a). Lexicographic products of linear orderings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana. Giarlotta, A., (2004a). Lexicographic products of linear orderings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (2004b). Representable lexicographic products. Order, 21, 29–41. Giarlotta, A. (2004b). Representable lexicographic products. Order, 21, 29–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (2005). The representability number of a chain. Topology and its Applications, 150, 157–177.CrossRef Giarlotta, A. (2005). The representability number of a chain. Topology and its Applications, 150, 157–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (2014). A genesis of interval orders and semiorders: Transitive NaP-preferences. Order, 31, 239–258.CrossRef Giarlotta, A. (2014). A genesis of interval orders and semiorders: Transitive NaP-preferences. Order, 31, 239–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A. (2015). Normalized and strict NaP-preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 66, 34–40.CrossRef Giarlotta, A. (2015). Normalized and strict NaP-preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 66, 34–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Greco, S. (2013). Necessary and possible preference structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 42(1), 163–172.CrossRef Giarlotta, A., & Greco, S. (2013). Necessary and possible preference structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 42(1), 163–172.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2009). Pointwise Debreu lexicographic powers. Order, 26(4), 377–409.CrossRef Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2009). Pointwise Debreu lexicographic powers. Order, 26(4), 377–409.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2013). A hierarchy of chains embeddable into the lexicographic power \({\mathbb{R}}^\omega _{\rm lex}\). Order, 30, 463–485.CrossRef Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2013). A hierarchy of chains embeddable into the lexicographic power \({\mathbb{R}}^\omega _{\rm lex}\). Order, 30, 463–485.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2014a). The pseudo-transitivity of preference relations: Strict and weak \((m, n)\)-Ferrers properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, 45–54. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2014a). The pseudo-transitivity of preference relations: Strict and weak \((m, n)\)-Ferrers properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, 45–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2014b). Lexicographic preferences representable by real-branching trees with countable height: A dichotomy result. Indagationes Mathematicae, 25, 78–92. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2014b). Lexicographic preferences representable by real-branching trees with countable height: A dichotomy result. Indagationes Mathematicae, 25, 78–92.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2016). Universal semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 80–93.CrossRef Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2016). Universal semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 80–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017a). Well-graded families of NaP-preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 77, 21–28. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017a). Well-graded families of NaP-preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 77, 21–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017b). Necessary and possible indifferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 98–109. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2017b). Necessary and possible indifferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 98–109.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018a). Strict \((m, 1)\)-Ferrers properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 82, 84–96. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018a). Strict \((m, 1)\)-Ferrers properties. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 82, 84–96.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018b). A general theory of bi-preferences. Mimeo: University of Catania. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018b). A general theory of bi-preferences. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018c). A descriptive classification of universal semiorders. Mimeo: University of Catania. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018c). A descriptive classification of universal semiorders. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018d). Benchmarking: revisited, extended, and generalized. Mimeo: University of Catania. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2018d). Benchmarking: revisited, extended, and generalized. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2019). On the interplay between the two rationality tenets: extending Schmeidler’s theorem to bi-preferences. Mimeo: University of Catania. Giarlotta, A., & Watson, S. (2019). On the interplay between the two rationality tenets: extending Schmeidler’s theorem to bi-preferences. Mimeo: University of Catania.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilboa, I., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., & Schmeidler, D. (2010). Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica, 78(2), 755–770.CrossRef Gilboa, I., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., & Schmeidler, D. (2010). Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica, 78(2), 755–770.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.CrossRef Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S. (1997). A new PCCA method: IDRA. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 587–601.CrossRef Greco, S. (1997). A new PCCA method: IDRA. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 587–601.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S. (Ed.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys., International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Berlin: Springer. Greco, S. (Ed.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys., International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191, 415–435.CrossRef Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191, 415–435.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. (Eds.). (2010a). Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis., International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Berlin: Springer. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. (Eds.). (2010a). Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis., International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2010b). Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1455–1470. Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2010b). Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1455–1470.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson, J. E. (2010). A money-pump for acyclic intransitive preferences. Dialectica, 64(2), 251–257.CrossRef Gustafsson, J. E. (2010). A money-pump for acyclic intransitive preferences. Dialectica, 64(2), 251–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Halphen, E. (1955). La notion de vraisemblance. Inst. de Statistique de l’Université de Paris. Halphen, E. (1955). La notion de vraisemblance. Inst. de Statistique de l’Université de Paris.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson, B. (1968). Choice structures and preference relations. Synthese, 18, 443–458.CrossRef Hansson, B. (1968). Choice structures and preference relations. Synthese, 18, 443–458.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson, S. (1993). Money-pumps, self-torturers and the demons of real life. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(4), 476–485. Hansson, S. (1993). Money-pumps, self-torturers and the demons of real life. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(4), 476–485.
Zurück zum Zitat Herden, G. (1989). On the existence of utility functions. Mathematical Social Sciences, 17, 297–313.CrossRef Herden, G. (1989). On the existence of utility functions. Mathematical Social Sciences, 17, 297–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herden, G., & Mehta, G. B. (2004). The Debreu Gap Lemma and some generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 40, 747–769.CrossRef Herden, G., & Mehta, G. B. (2004). The Debreu Gap Lemma and some generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 40, 747–769.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herden, G., & Pallack, A. (2002). On the continuous analogue of the Szpilrajn theorem I. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 115–134.CrossRef Herden, G., & Pallack, A. (2002). On the continuous analogue of the Szpilrajn theorem I. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 115–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herzberger, H. (1973). Ordinal preference and rational choice. Econometrica, 41(2), 187–237.CrossRef Herzberger, H. (1973). Ordinal preference and rational choice. Econometrica, 41(2), 187–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks, J. (1956). A Revision of Demand Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hicks, J. (1956). A Revision of Demand Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Houthakker, H. S. (1950). Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica, 17, 159–174.CrossRef Houthakker, H. S. (1950). Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica, 17, 159–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffray, J. (1975a). Existence of a continuous utility function: An elementary proof. Econometrica, 43, 981–983. Jaffray, J. (1975a). Existence of a continuous utility function: An elementary proof. Econometrica, 43, 981–983.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffray, J. (1975b). Semicontinuous extension of a partial order. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2, 395–406. Jaffray, J. (1975b). Semicontinuous extension of a partial order. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2, 395–406.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamison, D. T., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Semiorders and the theory of choice. Econometrica, 41, 901–912.CrossRef Jamison, D. T., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Semiorders and the theory of choice. Econometrica, 41, 901–912.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jamison, D. T., & Lau, L. J. (1975). Semiorders and the theory of choice: A correction. Econometrica, 43, 975–977.CrossRef Jamison, D. T., & Lau, L. J. (1975). Semiorders and the theory of choice: A correction. Econometrica, 43, 975–977.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacquet-Lagreze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10(2), 151–164.CrossRef Jacquet-Lagreze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10(2), 151–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalai, G., Rubinstein, A., & Spiegler, R. (2002). Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica, 70(6), 2481–2488.CrossRef Kalai, G., Rubinstein, A., & Spiegler, R. (2002). Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica, 70(6), 2481–2488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski, B. (2007). On quasi-orderings and multi-objective functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1591–1598.CrossRef Kaminski, B. (2007). On quasi-orderings and multi-objective functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1591–1598.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knoblauch, V. (2000). Lexicographic orders and preference representation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34, 255–267.CrossRef Knoblauch, V. (2000). Lexicographic orders and preference representation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34, 255–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kopylov, I. (2009). Choice deferral and ambiguity aversion. Theoretical Economics, 4, 199–225. Kopylov, I. (2009). Choice deferral and ambiguity aversion. Theoretical Economics, 4, 199–225.
Zurück zum Zitat Krantz, D. H. (1967). Extensive measurement in semiorders. Philosophy of Science, 34, 348–362.CrossRef Krantz, D. H. (1967). Extensive measurement in semiorders. Philosophy of Science, 34, 348–362.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kreps, D. M. (2013). Microeconomics Foundations I: Choice and Competitive Markets. Princeton University Press. Kreps, D. M. (2013). Microeconomics Foundations I: Choice and Competitive Markets. Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhlmann, S. (1995). Isomorphisms of lexicographic powers of the reals. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 123(9), 2657–2662.CrossRef Kuhlmann, S. (1995). Isomorphisms of lexicographic powers of the reals. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 123(9), 2657–2662.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kunen, K. (1980). Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier. Kunen, K. (1980). Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehrer, E., & Teper, R. (2011). Justifiable preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 762–774.CrossRef Lehrer, E., & Teper, R. (2011). Justifiable preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 762–774.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehrer, K., & Wagner, C. (1985). Intransitive indifference: The semi-order problem. Synthese, 65, 249–256.CrossRef Lehrer, K., & Wagner, C. (1985). Intransitive indifference: The semi-order problem. Synthese, 65, 249–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levin, V. (1983). Measurable utility theorems for closed and lexicographic preference relations. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 27, 639–643. Levin, V. (1983). Measurable utility theorems for closed and lexicographic preference relations. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 27, 639–643.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy, G. (2004). A model of political parties. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 250–277.CrossRef Levy, G. (2004). A model of political parties. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 250–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lleras, J. S., Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2017). When more is less: Limited consideration. Journal of Economic Theory, 170, 70–85. Lleras, J. S., Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2017). When more is less: Limited consideration. Journal of Economic Theory, 170, 70–85.
Zurück zum Zitat Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). A rationale for preference reversal. Newcastle Discussion Papers in Economics, 63. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). A rationale for preference reversal. Newcastle Discussion Papers in Economics, 63.
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, R. D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178–191.CrossRef Luce, R. D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Wiley. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Maccheroni, F. (2004). Yaari’s dual theory without the completeness axiom. Economic Theory, 23, 701–714.CrossRef Maccheroni, F. (2004). Yaari’s dual theory without the completeness axiom. Economic Theory, 23, 701–714.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Majumdar, M., & Sen, A. (1976). A note on representing partial orderings. Review of Economic Studies, 43, 543–545.CrossRef Majumdar, M., & Sen, A. (1976). A note on representing partial orderings. Review of Economic Studies, 43, 543–545.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manders, K. L. (1981). On JND representations of semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 224–248.CrossRef Manders, K. L. (1981). On JND representations of semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 224–248.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mandler, M. (2006). Cardinality versus ordinality: A suggested compromise. American Economic Review, 96, 1114–1136.CrossRef Mandler, M. (2006). Cardinality versus ordinality: A suggested compromise. American Economic Review, 96, 1114–1136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mandler, M., Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012). A million answers to twenty questions: Choosing by checklist. Journal of Economic Theory, 147, 71–92.CrossRef Mandler, M., Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012). A million answers to twenty questions: Choosing by checklist. Journal of Economic Theory, 147, 71–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review, 97, 1824–1839.CrossRef Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review, 97, 1824–1839.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012). Choice by lexicographic semiorders. Theoretical Economics, 7, 1–23.CrossRef Manzini, P., & Mariotti, M. (2012). Choice by lexicographic semiorders. Theoretical Economics, 7, 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Masatlioglu, Y., & Nakajima, D. (2013). Choice by iterative search. Theoretical Economics, 8, 701–728.CrossRef Masatlioglu, Y., & Nakajima, D. (2013). Choice by iterative search. Theoretical Economics, 8, 701–728.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183–2205.CrossRef Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183–2205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2005). Rational choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121, 1–29.CrossRef Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2005). Rational choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121, 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masin, M., & Bukchin, Y. (2008). Diversity maximization approach for multiobjective optimization. Operations Research, 56, 411–424.CrossRef Masin, M., & Bukchin, Y. (2008). Diversity maximization approach for multiobjective optimization. Operations Research, 56, 411–424.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1986). Multicriterion analysis of preferences by means of pairwise action and criterion comparisons (MAPPAC). Applied Mathematics and Computation, 18(2), 119–141.CrossRef Matarazzo, B. (1986). Multicriterion analysis of preferences by means of pairwise action and criterion comparisons (MAPPAC). Applied Mathematics and Computation, 18(2), 119–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1988a). Preference ranking of global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (PRAGMA). European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 36–49. Matarazzo, B. (1988a). Preference ranking of global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (PRAGMA). European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 36–49.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1988b). A more effective implementation of the MAPPAC and PRAGMA methods. Foundations of Control Engineering, 13, 155–173. Matarazzo, B. (1988b). A more effective implementation of the MAPPAC and PRAGMA methods. Foundations of Control Engineering, 13, 155–173.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1990a). A pairwise criterion comparison approach: The MAPPAC and PRAGMA methods. In: C. A. Bana e Costa (ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 253–273). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Matarazzo, B. (1990a). A pairwise criterion comparison approach: The MAPPAC and PRAGMA methods. In: C. A. Bana e Costa (ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 253–273). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1990b). PCCA and \(k\)-dominance in MCDM. Belgian Journal of Operational Research, Statistics and Computer Science, 30(3), 56–69. Matarazzo, B. (1990b). PCCA and \(k\)-dominance in MCDM. Belgian Journal of Operational Research, Statistics and Computer Science, 30(3), 56–69.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1991a). MAPPAC as a compromise between outranking methods and MAUT. European Journal of Operational Research, 54, 48–65. Matarazzo, B. (1991a). MAPPAC as a compromise between outranking methods and MAUT. European Journal of Operational Research, 54, 48–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarazzo, B. (1991b). PCCA and compensation. In P. Korhonen, A. Lewandowski, & J. Wallenius (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision support (pp. 99–108). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Matarazzo, B. (1991b). PCCA and compensation. In P. Korhonen, A. Lewandowski, & J. Wallenius (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision support (pp. 99–108). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat McClennen, E. F. (1990). Rationality and dynamic choice: Foundational explorations. Cambridge University Press. McClennen, E. F. (1990). Rationality and dynamic choice: Foundational explorations. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta, G. B. (1998). Preference and utility. In S. Barberà, P. Hammond, & C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory (pp. 1–47). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Mehta, G. B. (1998). Preference and utility. In S. Barberà, P. Hammond, & C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory (pp. 1–47). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Zurück zum Zitat Milgram, A. N. (1939). Partially ordered sets, separating systems and inductiveness. In K. Menger (Ed.), Reports of a mathematical colloquium (2nd Series, Vol. 1). University of Notre Dame. Milgram, A. N. (1939). Partially ordered sets, separating systems and inductiveness. In K. Menger (Ed.), Reports of a mathematical colloquium (2nd Series, Vol. 1). University of Notre Dame.
Zurück zum Zitat Minguzzi, E. (2013). Normally preordered spaces and utilities. Order, 30, 137–150.CrossRef Minguzzi, E. (2013). Normally preordered spaces and utilities. Order, 30, 137–150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Monjardet, B. (1978). Axiomatiques et proprietés des quasi-ordres. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 63, 51–62. Monjardet, B. (1978). Axiomatiques et proprietés des quasi-ordres. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 63, 51–62.
Zurück zum Zitat Monteiro, P. K. (1987). Some results on the existence of utility functions on path connected spaces. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 147–156.CrossRef Monteiro, P. K. (1987). Some results on the existence of utility functions on path connected spaces. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 147–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moulin, H. (1985). Choice functions over a finite set: A summary. Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 147–160.CrossRef Moulin, H. (1985). Choice functions over a finite set: A summary. Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 147–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Munkres, J. R. (2000). Topology (2nd Ed.). Prentice-Hall. Munkres, J. R. (2000). Topology (2nd Ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura, Y. (2002). Real interval representations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 140–177.CrossRef Nakamura, Y. (2002). Real interval representations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 140–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Narens, L. (1985). Abstract measurement theory. MIT press. Narens, L. (1985). Abstract measurement theory. MIT press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nau, R. (2006). The shape of incomplete preferences. Annals of Statistics, 34, 2430–2448.CrossRef Nau, R. (2006). The shape of incomplete preferences. Annals of Statistics, 34, 2430–2448.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neuefeind, W. (1972). On continuous utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 174–176.CrossRef Neuefeind, W. (1972). On continuous utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 174–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishimura, I. (2018). The transitive core: Inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations. Theoretical Economics, 13, 579–606.CrossRef Nishimura, I. (2018). The transitive core: Inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations. Theoretical Economics, 13, 579–606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ok, E. A. (2002). Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation. Journal of Economic Theory, 104, 429–449.CrossRef Ok, E. A. (2002). Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation. Journal of Economic Theory, 104, 429–449.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2012). Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes. Econometrica, 80(4), 1791–1808.CrossRef Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2012). Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes. Econometrica, 80(4), 1791–1808.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Öztürk, M. (2008). Ordered sets with interval representations and \((m, n)\)-Ferrers relation. Annals Operations Research, 163, 177–196.CrossRef Öztürk, M. (2008). Ordered sets with interval representations and \((m, n)\)-Ferrers relation. Annals Operations Research, 163, 177–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peleg, B. (1970). Utility functions for partially ordered topological spaces. Econometrica, 38, 93–96.CrossRef Peleg, B. (1970). Utility functions for partially ordered topological spaces. Econometrica, 38, 93–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Piper, A. M. (2014). The money pump is necessarily diachronic. In Adrian Piper Research Archive Foundation Berlin/Philosophy. Piper, A. M. (2014). The money pump is necessarily diachronic. In Adrian Piper Research Archive Foundation Berlin/Philosophy.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirlot, M., & Vincke, P. (1997). Semiorders: properties, representations, applications. Dordrecht: Kluver.CrossRef Pirlot, M., & Vincke, P. (1997). Semiorders: properties, representations, applications. Dordrecht: Kluver.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Plott, C. R. (1973). Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica, 41(6), 1075–1091.CrossRef Plott, C. R. (1973). Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica, 41(6), 1075–1091.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Poincaré, H. (1908). La valeur de la science. E. Flammarion. Poincaré, H. (1908). La valeur de la science. E. Flammarion.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabinovitch, I. (1977). The Scott-Suppes theorem on semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 209–212.CrossRef Rabinovitch, I. (1977). The Scott-Suppes theorem on semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 209–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rabinovitch, I. (1978). The dimension of semiorders. Journal of Combinatorial Theory (A), 25, 50–61.CrossRef Rabinovitch, I. (1978). The dimension of semiorders. Journal of Combinatorial Theory (A), 25, 50–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2010). Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data. Frontiers in Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 1. Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2010). Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data. Frontiers in Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 1.
Zurück zum Zitat Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56.CrossRef Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice: A theoretical essay. New York: Wiley. Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice: A theoretical essay. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, M. K. (1966). Revealed preference theory. Econometrica, 34, 635–645.CrossRef Richter, M. K. (1966). Revealed preference theory. Econometrica, 34, 635–645.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, M. K. (1980). Continuous and semicontinuous utility. International Economic Review, 21, 293–299.CrossRef Richter, M. K. (1980). Continuous and semicontinuous utility. International Economic Review, 21, 293–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rigotti, L., & Shannon, C. (2005). Uncertainty and risk in financial markets. Econometrica, 73, 203–243.CrossRef Rigotti, L., & Shannon, C. (2005). Uncertainty and risk in financial markets. Econometrica, 73, 203–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer, J. E. (1999). The democratic political economy of progressive income taxation. Econometrica, 67, 1–19.CrossRef Roemer, J. E. (1999). The democratic political economy of progressive income taxation. Econometrica, 67, 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritère d’Aide à la décision. Paris: Economica. Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritère d’Aide à la décision. Paris: Economica.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B. (1990a). Decision-aid and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 45, 324–331. Roy, B. (1990a). Decision-aid and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 45, 324–331.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B. (1990b). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: C. A. Bana e Costa (Ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 155–183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Roy, B. (1990b). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: C. A. Bana e Costa (Ed.), Readings in multiple criteria decision aid (pp. 155–183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein, A. (1988). Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox)? Journal of Economic Theory, 46, 145–153.CrossRef Rubinstein, A. (1988). Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox)? Journal of Economic Theory, 46, 145–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein, A., & Salant, Y. (2006). A model of choice from lists. Theoretical Economics, 1, 3–17. Rubinstein, A., & Salant, Y. (2006). A model of choice from lists. Theoretical Economics, 1, 3–17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salant, Y. (2003). Limited computational resources favor rationality. Discussion Paper 320, Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Salant, Y. (2003). Limited computational resources favor rationality. Discussion Paper 320, Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behavior. Economica, 5, 61–71.CrossRef Samuelson, P. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behavior. Economica, 5, 61–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schick, F. (1986). Dutch bookies and money pumps. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(2), 112–119.CrossRef Schick, F. (1986). Dutch bookies and money pumps. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(2), 112–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmeidler, D. (1971). A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations. Econometrica, 39(2), 403–404.CrossRef Schmeidler, D. (1971). A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations. Econometrica, 39(2), 403–404.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schumm, G. F. (1987). Transitivity, preference and indifference. Philosophical Studies, 52(3), 435–437.CrossRef Schumm, G. F. (1987). Transitivity, preference and indifference. Philosophical Studies, 52(3), 435–437.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, T. (1976). Choice functions, “rationality” conditions, and variations on the weak axiom of revealed preference. Journal of Economic Theory, 13, 414–427.CrossRef Schwartz, T. (1976). Choice functions, “rationality” conditions, and variations on the weak axiom of revealed preference. Journal of Economic Theory, 13, 414–427.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, D., & Suppes, P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113–128.CrossRef Scott, D., & Suppes, P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, A. (1971). Choice functions and revealed preferences. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 307–317.CrossRef Sen, A. (1971). Choice functions and revealed preferences. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 307–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, A. (1986). Social choice theory. In: K. J. Arrow & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics (Vol. III, pp. 1073–1181). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. Sen, A. (1986). Social choice theory. In: K. J. Arrow & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics (Vol. III, pp. 1073–1181). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, A. (1993). Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica, 61, 495–521.CrossRef Sen, A. (1993). Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica, 61, 495–521.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRef Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sondermann, D. (1980). Utility representations for partial orders. Journal of Economic Theory, 23, 183–188.CrossRef Sondermann, D. (1980). Utility representations for partial orders. Journal of Economic Theory, 23, 183–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanley, R. P. (1999). Enumerative combinatorics: Volume 2. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 62, New York: Cambridge University Press. Stanley, R. P. (1999). Enumerative combinatorics: Volume 2. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 62, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzumura, K. (1983). Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Suzumura, K. (1983). Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swistak, P. (1980). Some representation problems for semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 124–135.CrossRef Swistak, P. (1980). Some representation problems for semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 124–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539. Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76(1), 31–48.CrossRef Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76(1), 31–48.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A. (1972). Eliminations by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.CrossRef Tversky, A. (1972). Eliminations by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson, C. J. (2013). Behavioral implications of shortlisting procedures. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 941–963.CrossRef Tyson, C. J. (2013). Behavioral implications of shortlisting procedures. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 941–963.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wakker, P. P. (1988). Continuity of preference relations for separable topologies. International Economic Review, 29, 105–110.CrossRef Wakker, P. P. (1988). Continuity of preference relations for separable topologies. International Economic Review, 29, 105–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watson, S. (1992). The construction of topological spaces: Planks and resolutions. In: M. Hus̄ek & J. van Mill (Eds.), Recent progress in general topology (pp. 673–757). North-Holland, Amsterdam. Watson, S. (1992). The construction of topological spaces: Planks and resolutions. In: M. Hus̄ek & J. van Mill (Eds.), Recent progress in general topology (pp. 673–757). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiener, N. (1914). Contribution to the theory of relative position. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 17, 441–449. Wiener, N. (1914). Contribution to the theory of relative position. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 17, 441–449.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee, M., Dahan, E., Hauser, J. R., & Orlin, J. (2007). Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference. Marketing Science, 26(4), 532–549.CrossRef Yee, M., Dahan, E., Hauser, J. R., & Orlin, J. (2007). Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference. Marketing Science, 26(4), 532–549.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
New Trends in Preference, Utility, and Choice: From a Mono-approach to a Multi-approach
verfasst von
Alfio Giarlotta
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_1