Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Marketing Letters 1/2017

09.10.2015

“No sale” items in auctions: do they really matter?

verfasst von: Bruce L. Alford, Otis W. Gilley, Charles M. Wood, Obinna Obilo

Erschienen in: Marketing Letters | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research interest in auctions has grown steadily in nearly every business discipline because of the distinctive constructs and processes that the data analyses yield. Auction data present researchers with a particular challenge because of the presence of no sale items. Researchers have varied in their accommodation of no sale items and the analysis technique, which may lead to biases in the analyses. The first question is how should no sale items be treated? To address this, the type of data generated by auctions must be examined, since various methods handle no sale items differently. Additional questions are: What analysis technique is preferred for this type of data? What is the effect of using other analysis techniques? The results suggest that including no sale items improves estimation accuracy. Also, we found that using ordinary least squares with censored data provides results that are much better than using truncated data.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Graphs illustrating the simulation equations are available from the authors upon request.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2003). The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. The Rand Journal of Economics, 34, 329–355. Summer.CrossRef Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2003). The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. The Rand Journal of Economics, 34, 329–355. Summer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Economics, 1, 29–54 (January).CrossRef Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Economics, 1, 29–54 (January).CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cheema, A., Chakravarti, D., & Sinha, A. R. (2012). Bidding behavior in descending and ascending auctions. Marketing Science, 31, 779–800. Sep/Oct.CrossRef Cheema, A., Chakravarti, D., & Sinha, A. R. (2012). Bidding behavior in descending and ascending auctions. Marketing Science, 31, 779–800. Sep/Oct.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dholakia, U. M., & Soltysinski, K. (2001). Coveted or overlooked? The psychology of bidding for comparable listings in digital auctions. Marketing Letters, 12, 225–237 (August).CrossRef Dholakia, U. M., & Soltysinski, K. (2001). Coveted or overlooked? The psychology of bidding for comparable listings in digital auctions. Marketing Letters, 12, 225–237 (August).CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dholakia, U. M., Basuroy, S., & Soltysinski, K. (2002). Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 115–130.CrossRef Dholakia, U. M., Basuroy, S., & Soltysinski, K. (2002). Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 115–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gilley, O. W., & Karels, G. V. (1981). The competitive effect in bonus bidding: new evidence. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 637–648. Autumn.CrossRef Gilley, O. W., & Karels, G. V. (1981). The competitive effect in bonus bidding: new evidence. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 637–648. Autumn.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., & Trognon, A. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica, 52, 701–720.CrossRef Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., & Trognon, A. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica, 52, 701–720.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Saddle Ridge, New Jersey: Prentice Hall (Chapter 22). Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Saddle Ridge, New Jersey: Prentice Hall (Chapter 22).
Zurück zum Zitat Greenleaf, E. (2004). Reserves, regret, and rejoicing in open English auctions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 264–273. September.CrossRef Greenleaf, E. (2004). Reserves, regret, and rejoicing in open English auctions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 264–273. September.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haruvy, E., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2010). Search and choice in online consumer auctions. Marketing Science, 29, 1152–1164. Nov/Dec.CrossRef Haruvy, E., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2010). Search and choice in online consumer auctions. Marketing Science, 29, 1152–1164. Nov/Dec.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Häubl, G., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2003). Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Science Institute Reports, 3(03-117), 115–41. Häubl, G., & Leszczyc, P. T. L. P. (2003). Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Science Institute Reports, 3(03-117), 115–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hou, J., & Blodgett, J. (2012). Do bidders compensate for shipping fees in online auctions? Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 435–443.CrossRef Hou, J., & Blodgett, J. (2012). Do bidders compensate for shipping fees in online auctions? Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 435–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jap, S. D. (2003). An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. The Journal of Marketing, 67, 96–107. July.CrossRef Jap, S. D. (2003). An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. The Journal of Marketing, 67, 96–107. July.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kamins, M. A., Dreze, X., & Folkes, V. S. (2004). Effects of seller-supplied prices on buyers’ product evaluations: reference prices in an internet auction context. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 622–628. March.CrossRef Kamins, M. A., Dreze, X., & Folkes, V. S. (2004). Effects of seller-supplied prices on buyers’ product evaluations: reference prices in an internet auction context. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 622–628. March.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leszczyc, P. T. L. P., & Häubl, G. (2010). To bundle or not to bundle: determinants of the profitability of multi-item auctions. The Journal of Marketing, 74, 110–124.CrossRef Leszczyc, P. T. L. P., & Häubl, G. (2010). To bundle or not to bundle: determinants of the profitability of multi-item auctions. The Journal of Marketing, 74, 110–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Sun, B. (2009). Internet auction features as quality signals. The Journal of Marketing, 73, 75–92. Jan.CrossRef Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Sun, B. (2009). Internet auction features as quality signals. The Journal of Marketing, 73, 75–92. Jan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Massad, V. J., & Tucker, J. M. (2000). Comparing bidding and pricing between in-person and online auctions. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(5), 325–332.CrossRef Massad, V. J., & Tucker, J. M. (2000). Comparing bidding and pricing between in-person and online auctions. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(5), 325–332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds, K. E., Gilkeson, J. H., & Niedrich, R. W. (2009). The influence of seller strategy on the winning price in online auctions: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 22–30.CrossRef Reynolds, K. E., Gilkeson, J. H., & Niedrich, R. W. (2009). The influence of seller strategy on the winning price in online auctions: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 22–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sinha, A. R., & Greenleaf, E. A. (2000). The impact of discrete bidding and bidder aggressiveness on sellers’ strategies in open English auctions: reserves and covert shilling. Marketing Science, 19, 244–265. Summer.CrossRef Sinha, A. R., & Greenleaf, E. A. (2000). The impact of discrete bidding and bidder aggressiveness on sellers’ strategies in open English auctions: reserves and covert shilling. Marketing Science, 19, 244–265. Summer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Standifird, S. S. (2001). Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27, 279–295.CrossRef Standifird, S. S. (2001). Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27, 279–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walley, M. J. C., & Fortin, D. R. (2005). Behavioral outcomes from online auctions: reserve price, reserve disclosure, and initial bidding influences in the decision process. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1409–1418. Oct.CrossRef Walley, M. J. C., & Fortin, D. R. (2005). Behavioral outcomes from online auctions: reserve price, reserve disclosure, and initial bidding influences in the decision process. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1409–1418. Oct.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberg, B. D., & Davis, L. (2005). Exploring the WOW in online-auction feedback. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1609–1621 (Nov).CrossRef Weinberg, B. D., & Davis, L. (2005). Exploring the WOW in online-auction feedback. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1609–1621 (Nov).CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcox, R. T. (2000). Experts and amateurs: the role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Letters, 11, 363–374. Nov.CrossRef Wilcox, R. T. (2000). Experts and amateurs: the role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Letters, 11, 363–374. Nov.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
“No sale” items in auctions: do they really matter?
verfasst von
Bruce L. Alford
Otis W. Gilley
Charles M. Wood
Obinna Obilo
Publikationsdatum
09.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Marketing Letters / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9398-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Marketing Letters 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe