Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Previous research has frequently found a positive relation between religiosity compared to non-religiosity and psychological well-being. Recent studies have demonstrated differences between types of non-religious individuals and the relevance of a fit between individual (non-)religiosity and characteristics of the country a person is living in. This study combined the previous (partially) competing lines of research for the first time and examined the connection between self-identifying as specifically atheist, non-religious without further distinction, weakly religious, or highly religious and life satisfaction. World Values Survey data of 24 countries worldwide that vary in their social norms of religiosity and societal levels of development were used for a quantitative intercultural comparison (N = 33,879). In contrast to most previous research, a multilevel regression analysis showed no differences between highly religious, indistinct non-religious, and atheist individuals’ level of life satisfaction when the fit between individual (non-)religiosity and country characteristics was included. Weakly religious individuals though were significantly less satisfied with life than highly religious individuals. Thus, our results indicate that only in religious societies, identifying as non-religious/atheist is related to lower life satisfaction. When controlling for the context, a curvilinear relation between (non-)religiosity and life satisfaction emerged. Additionally, atheists differed in their sensitivity towards the social norm of religiosity from indistinct non-religious individuals—their well-being varied dependent on living in a country with many other secular individuals or not. These results demonstrate differences between subgroups of (non-)religious individuals and they call into question a general benefit of religiosity for subjective well-being independent of societal context.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Baker, J. O., Stroope, S., & Walker, M. H. (2018). Secularity, religiosity, and health: Physical and mental health differences between atheists, agnostics, and nonaffiliated theists compared to religiously affiliated individuals. Social Science Research, 75, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.07.003. CrossRef
Barber, N. (2011). A cross-national test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(3), 318–333. CrossRef
Central Intelligence Agency. (2014). The CIA world factbook 2015. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015. CrossRef
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 187–194). Oxford: University Press.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290. CrossRef
Doane, M. J., & Elliott, M. (2015). Perceptions of discrimination among atheists: Consequences for atheist identification, psychological and physical well-being. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(2), 130–141. CrossRef
Dobbelaere, K. (2002). Secularization: An analysis at three levels. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Eichhorn, J. (2012). Happiness for believers? Contextualizing the effects of religiosity on life-satisfaction. European Sociological Review, 28(5), 583–593. CrossRef
Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 199–215. CrossRef
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Galen, L. (2015). Atheism, wellbeing, and the wager: Why not believing in God (with others) is good for you. Science, Religion and Culture, 2(3), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.src/2015/188.8.131.52. CrossRef
Galen, L. W., & Kloet, J. D. (2011). Mental well-being in the religious and the non-religious: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 14(7), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.510829. CrossRef
Hadaway, C. K., Marler, P. L., & Chaves, M. (1998). Overreporting church attendance in America: Evidence that demands the same verdict. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 122–130. CrossRef
Halman, L., & Draulans, V. (2006). How secular is Europe? The British Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00109.x. CrossRef
Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–183). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Keysar, A., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2013). A world of atheism: Global demographics. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 553–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, L. (2012). Research note: Talking about a revolution—terminology for the new field of non-religion studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642742. CrossRef
Li, L. M. W., & Bond, M. H. (2010). Does individual secularism promote life satisfaction? The moderating role of societal development. World Values Research, 3(3), 33–47.
Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67. CrossRef
Newport, F., Witters, D., & Agrawal, S. (2012). Religious Americans enjoy higher wellbeing. http://news.gallup.com/poll/152723/religious-americans-enjoy-higher-wellbeing.aspx. Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Pasquale, F. L. (2012). The social science of secularity. Free Inquiry, 33(2), 17–23.
Ross, C. (1990). Religion and psychological distress. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 236–245. CrossRef
Stavrova, O. (2014). Fitting in and getting happy: How conformity to societal norms affects subjective well-being. Frankfurt: Campus.
Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2013). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42, 90–105. CrossRef
Tay, L., Li, M., Myers, D., & Diener, E. (2014). Religiosity and subjective well-being: An international perspective. In C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and spirituality across cultures (Vol. 9, pp. 163–175). Dordrecht: Springer.
United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human development report 2015. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2015_statistical_annex.pdf.
World Values Survey. (2016a). What we do. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp.
World Values Survey. (2016b). World values survey wave 6 2010–2014. Official aggregate 20150418. Madrid: World Values Survey Association.
Zuckerman, P. (2006). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Non-Religious Identities and Life Satisfaction: Questioning the Universality of a Linear Link between Religiosity and Well-Being
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Happiness Studies
An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780