Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Statistical Surveys Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Nonresponse and Untruthful Answering

verfasst von : Andreas Quatember

Erschienen in: Pseudo-Populations

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Classical sampling theory considers only sampling errors and the effects of different sampling designs on this type of errors. Therefore, it can be said to be a pure full response theory with no place for nonresponse or untruthful answers. However, the practice of surveys does not comply with these assumptions. Nonresponse and untruthful answering are sources of so-called non-sampling errors. This term implies that such errors can also occur in a census.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Pseudo-Population Concept
Nächstes Kapitel Simulation Studies in Survey Sampling
Literatur
Alfons, A., Kraft, S., Templ, M., & Filzmoser, P. (2011a). Simulation of close-to-reality population data for household surveys with application to EU-SILC. Statistical Methods and Applications, 20(3), 383–407.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Antal, E., & Tillé, Y. (2011). A direct bootstrap method for complex sampling designs from a finite population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 534–543.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Ardilly, P., & Tillé, Y. (2006). Sampling methods: Exercises and solutions. New York: Springer.
Bar-Lev, S. K., Bobovitch, E., & Boukai, B. (2004). A note on randomized response models for quantitative data. Metrika, 60, 255–260.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Barbiero, A., & Mecatti, F. (2010). Bootstrap algorithms for variance estimation in πPS sampling. In P. Mantovan, P. Secchi (Eds.), Complex data modeling and computationally intensive statistical methods (pp. 57–69). Milan: Springer.CrossRef
Bauer, A. (2011). Genauigkeitsanalysen zu den Österreich-Ergebnissen der PISA-Studie 2009. Master Thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz.
Beatty, P., & Herrmann, D. (1995). A framework for evaluating “Don’t Know” responses in surveys. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 1005–1010.
Beatty, P., & Herrmann, D. (2002). To answer or not to answer: Decision processes related to survey item nonresponse. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 71–86). New York: Wiley.
Bellhouse, D. R. (1988). A brief history of random sampling methods. In P. R. Krishnaiah, & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bethlehem, J. (2002). Weighting nonresponse adjustments based on auxiliary information. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 275–287). New York: Wiley.
Bhargava, M., & Singh, R. (2000). A modified randomization device for Warner’s model. Statistica, LX, 315–321.
Bickel, P. J., & Freedman, D. A. (1984). Asymptotic normality and the bootstrap in stratified sampling. The Annals of Statistics, 12(2), 470–482.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Boeije, H., & Lensvelt-Mulders, G. (2002). Honest by chance: A qualitative study to clarify respondents’ (non-)compliance with computer-assisted randomized response. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 75, 24–39.CrossRef
Booth, J. G., Butler, R. W., & Hall, P. (1994). Bootstrap methods for finite populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1282–1289.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Boruch, R. F. (1971). Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies. The American Sociologist, 6, 308–311.
Botman, S. L., & Thornberry, O. T. (1992). Survey design features correlates of nonresponse. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 309–314.
Bourke, P. D. (1984). Estimation of proportions using symmetric randomized response designs. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 166–172.CrossRef
Bourke, P. D., & Dalenius, T. (1976). Some new ideas in the realm of randomized inquiries. International Statistical Review, 44(2), 219–221.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Bourke, P. D., & Moran, M. M. (1988). Estimating proportions from randomized response data using the EM algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 964–968.CrossRef
Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical inference (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning, Brooks/Cole.
Chang, H. -J., Wang, C. -L., & Huang, K. -C. (2004). On estimating the proportion of a qualitative sensitive character using randomized response sampling. Quality & Quantity, 38, 675–680.CrossRef
Chao, M. -T., & Lo, S. -H. (1985). A bootstrap method for finite populations. Sankhya, Series A, 47, 399–405.MathSciNetMATH
Chao, M. -T., & Lo, S. -H. (1994). Maximum likelihood summary and the bootstrap method in structured finite populations. Statistica Sinica, 4, 389–406.MathSciNetMATH
Chaudhuri, A. (2001). Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 94, 37–42.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Randomized response and indirect questioning techniques in surveys. Boca Raton: CRC Press.MATH
Chaudhuri, A., & Christofides, T. C. (2013). Indirect questioning in sample surveys. Heidelberg: Springer.MATHCrossRef
Church, A. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 62–79.CrossRef
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.MATH
Dalenius, T., & Reiss, S. P. (1982). Data-swapping: A technique for disclosure control. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 6, 73–85.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Defays, D., & Anwar, M. N. (1998). Masking microdata using micro-aggregation. Journal of Official Statistics, 14(4), 449–461.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1), 1–38.MathSciNetMATH
Diana, G., Giordan, M., & Perri, P. F. (2013). Randomized response surveys: A note on some privacy protection measures. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 8, 19–28.
Diana, G., & Perri, P. F. (2009). Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information. Statistical Papers, 50, 661–672.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Diekmann, A. (2012). Making use of “Benford’s Law” for the randomized response technique. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(2), 325–334.MathSciNetCrossRef
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley InterScience.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys. New York: Wiley.
Dillman, D. A., Singer, E., Clark, J. R., & Treat, J. B. (1996). Effects of benefits appeals, mandatory appeals, and variations in statements of confidentiality on completion rates for census questionnaires. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(3), 376–389.CrossRef
Drechsler, J., Bender, S. & Rässler, S. (2008). Comparing fully and partially synthetic datasets for statistical disclosure control in the German IAB establishment panel. Transactions on Data Privacy, 1, 1002–1050.
Eichhorn, B. H., & Hayre, L. S. (1983). Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 7, 307–316.CrossRef
Fay, R. E. (1989). Theory and application of replicate weighting for variance calculations. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 212–217.
Fienberg, S. E. (1992). Bibliography on capture-recapture modelling with application to census undercount adjustment. Survey Methodology, 18(1), 143–154.
Fuller, W. A. (1993). Masking procedures for microdata disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics, 9(2), 383–406.
Gabler, S., & Häder, S. (2009). Die Kombination von Mobilfunk- und Festnetzstichproben in Deutschland. In M. Weichbold, J. Bacher, & C. Wolf (Eds.), Umfrageforschung (pp. 499–512). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fär Sozialwissenschaften.
Gabler, S., & Quatember, A. (2012). Das Problem mit der Repräsentativität von Stichprobenerhebungen. In vsms (Verband Schweizer Markt-und Sozialforschung) (Ed.), Jahrbuch 2012 (pp. 17–19). Zürich: vsms.
Gabler, S., & Quatember, A. (2013). Repräsentativität von Subgruppen bei geschichteten Zufallsstichproben. AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 7, 105–119.CrossRef
Gjestvang, C. R., & Singh, S. (2007). Forced quantitative randomized response model: A new device. Metrika, 66, 243–257.MathSciNetCrossRef
Gouweleeuw, J. M., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L. C. R. J., & de Wolf, P. -P. (1998). Post randomisation for statistical disclosure control: Theory and implementation. Journal of Official Statistics, 14(4), 463–478.
Greenberg, B. G., Abul-Ela, A. -L. A., Simmons, W. R., & Horvitz, D. G. (1969). The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(326), 520–539.MathSciNetCrossRef
Greenberg, B. G., Kuebler, R. R. Jr., Abernathy, J. R., & Horvitz, D. G. (1971). Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(334), 243–250.CrossRef
Gross, S. (1980). Median estimation in sample surveys. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 181–184.
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken: Wiley.MATH
Groves, R. M., & Heeringa, S. G. (2006). Responsive design for household surveys: Tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 169(3), 439–457.MathSciNetCrossRef
Guerriero, M., & Sandri, M. F. (2007). A note on the comparison of some randomized response procedures. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 2184–2190.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Hansen, M. H., & Hurwitz, W. N. (1943). On the theory of sampling from finite populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 333–362.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447–462.CrossRef
Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010). Measuring voter turnout by using the randomized response technique. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(2), 328–343.CrossRef
Holmberg, A. (1998). A bootstrap approach to probability proportional-to-size sampling. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 378–383.
Holt, A., & Elliot, D. (1991). Methods of weighting for unit-nonresponse. The Statistician, 40(3), 333–342.CrossRef
Horvitz, D. G., Shah, B. V., & Simmons, W. R. (1967). The unrelated question randomized response model. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 65–72.
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–685.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. (1995a). Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: History and theoretical development. American Journal of Epidemiology, 142(10), 1047–1058.
International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. (1995b). Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: Applications in human diseases. American Journal of Epidemiology, 142(10), 1059–1068.
James, J. M., & Bolstein, R. (1990). The effect of monetary incentives and follow-up mailings on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(3), 346–361.CrossRef
Judkins, D. R. (1990). Fay’s method for variance estimation. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(3), 223–239.
Kreuter, F. (2008). Interviewer effects. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 369–371). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Kruskal, W., & Mosteller, F. (1980). Representative sampling, IV: The history of the concept in statistics, 1895–1939. International Statistical Review, 48, 169–195.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Kuk, A. Y. C. (1989). Double bootstrap estimation of variance under systematic sampling with probability proportional to Size. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 31, 73–82.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Lahiri, P. (2003). On the impact of bootstrap in survey sampling and small-area estimation. Statistical Science, 18(2), 199–210.MathSciNetCrossRef
Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Meta-analysis of randomized response research. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(3), 319–348.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.MATHCrossRef
Liu, P. T., & Chow, L. P. (1976). A new discrete quantitative randomized response model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(353), 30–31.CrossRef
Lohr, S. L. (2010). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Boston: Brooks/Cole.
Lumley, T. (2010). Complex surveys - a guide to analysis using R. Hoboken: John Wiley.
Mangat, N. S. (1992). Two stage randomized response sampling procedure using unrelated question. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 44, 82–87.MathSciNet
Mangat, N. S., & Singh, R. (1991). An alternative approach to randomized response survey. Statistica, 3, 327–332.MathSciNet
Mangat, N. S., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (1993). On the use of a modified randomization device in randomized response inquiries. Metron, 51, 211–216.MathSciNetMATH
Mangat, N. S., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (1995). On use of a modified randomization device in Warner’s model. Journal of Indian Society of Statistics & Operations Research, 16, 65–69.MathSciNet
Matthews, G. J., & Harel, O. (2011). Data confidentiality: A review of methods for statistical disclosure limitation and methods for assessing privacy. Statistics Surveys, 5, 1–29.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
McCarthy, P. J., & Snowden, C. B. (1985). The bootstrap and finite population sampling. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 95, Public Health Service, Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56(2), 177–196.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Münnich, R., Schürle, J., Bihler, W., Boonstra, H. -J., Eckmair, D., Haslinger, A., et al. (2003). Monte-Carlo simulation study of European surveys. Research Project Report WP3 (D3.1 and 3.2), IST-2000-26057 DACSEIS. Available on [September 10, 2015]: http://​www.​uni-trier.​de/​index.​php?​id=​29730.
Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 39–40.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Peeters, C. F. W., Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., & Lasthuizen, K. (2010). A note on a simple and practical randomized response framework for eliciting sensitive dichotomous and quantitative information. Sociological Methods & Research, 39(2), 283–296.
Perri, P. F. (2008). Modified randomized devices for Simmons’ model. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 3, 233–239.MathSciNetMATH
Pollock, K. H., & Bek, Y. (1976). A comparison of three randomized response models for quantitative data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 884–886.MATHCrossRef
Poole, W. K. (1974). Estimation of the distribution function of a contiunous type random variable through randomized response. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(348), 1002–1005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Quatember, A. (1996a). Das Problem mit dem Begriff Reprsentativität. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 80(2), 236–241.
Quatember, A. (1996b). Das Quotenverfahren. Linz: Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner.
Quatember, A. (2001a). Das Jahrhundert der Stichproben. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 30(1), 45–60.
Quatember, A. (2001b). Die Quotenverfahren. Stichprobentheorie und -praxis. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Quatember, A. (2009). A standardization of randomized response strategies. Survey Methodology, 35(2), 143–152.
Quatember, A. (2012). An extension of the standardized randomized response technique to a multi-stage setup. Statistical Methods & Applications, 21(4), 475–484.MathSciNetCrossRef
Quatember, A. (2014a). A randomized response design for a polychotomous sensitive population and its application to opinion polls. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 9, 11–23.
Quatember, A. (2014b). The finite population bootstrap - from the maximum likelihood to the Horvitz-Thompson approach. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 43(2), 93–102.CrossRef
Quatember, A., & Bauer, A. (2012). Genauigkeitsanalysen zu den Österreich-Ergebnissen der PISA-Studie 2009. In F. Eder (Ed.), PISA 2009 - Nationale Zusatzanalysen (pp. 534–550). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Quatember, A., & Hausner, M. C. (2013). A family of methods for statistical disclosure control. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40(2), 337–346.MathSciNetCrossRef
Ranalli, M. G., & Mecatti, F. (2012). Comparing recent approaches for bootstrapping sample survey data: A first step towards a unified approach. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 4088–4099.
Rao, J. N. K., & Thomas, D. R. (1988). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data from complex surveys. Sociological Methodology, 18, 213–269.CrossRef
Rao, J. N. K., & Wu, C. F. J. (1988). Resampling inference with complex survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 231–241.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Reiter, J. P. (2003). Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodology, 29(2), 181–188.
Rosén, B. (1997). On sampling with probability proportional to size. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 62, 159–191.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
Rubin, D. B. (1993). Discussion: Statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics, 9(2), 461–468.
Ryu, J. -B., Kim, J. -M., Heo, T. -Y., & Park, C. G. (2005). On stratified randomized response sampling. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 1(1), 31–36.MathSciNet
Seber, G. A. F. (1970). The effect of trap response on tag recapture estimates. Biometrics, 26, 13–22.CrossRef
Sekar, C., & Deming, E. W. (1949). On a method of estimating birth and death rates and extent of registration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 101–115.MATHCrossRef
Sen, A. R. (1953). On the estimate of the variance in sampling with varying probabilities. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 5, 119–127.MathSciNet
Shao, J., & Sitter, R. R. (1996). Bootstrap for imputed survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1278–1288.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Singer, E. (2002). The use of incentives to reduce nonresponse in household surveys. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 163–178). New York: Wiley.
Singer, E., Mathiowetz, N. A., & Couper, M. P. (1993). The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on survey participation: The case of the 1990 U.S. census. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(4), 465–482.CrossRef
Singer, E., von Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Raghunathan, T., & McGonagle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 217–230.
Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., & Maher, M. P. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 171–188.CrossRef
Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., & Neugebauer, R. J. (2003). Attitudes and behavior: The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on participation in the 2000 census. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 368–384.CrossRef
Singer, E., von Thurn, D. R., & Miller, E. R. (1995). Confidentiality assurances and response: A quantitative review of the experimental literature. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(1), 66–77.CrossRef
Singh, S., Horn, S., Singh, R., & Mangat, N. S. (2003). On the use of modified randomization device for estimating the prevalence of a sensitive attribute. Statistics in Transition, 6, 515–522.
Singh, S., & Sedory, S. A. (2011). Cramer-Rao lower bound of variance in randomized response sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(3), 536–546.MathSciNetCrossRef
Singh, S., Singh, R., Mangat, N. S., & Tracy, D. S. (1994). An alternative device for randomized responses. Statistica, 54, 233–243.MathSciNetMATH
Singh, R., Singh, S., Mangat, N. S., & Tracy, D. S. (1995). An improved two stage randomized response strategy. Statistical Papers, 36, 265–271.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Sitter, R. R. (1992a). A resampling procedure for complex survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 755–765.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Sitter, R. R. (1992b). Comparing three bootstrap methods for survey data. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 20(2), 135–154.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Särndal, C. -E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (1992). Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer.MATHCrossRef
Tan, M. T., Tian, G. L., & Tang, M. L. (2009). Sample surveys with sensitive questions: A nonrandomized response approach. The American Statistician, 63, 9–16.MathSciNetCrossRef
Templ, M. (2008). Statistical disclosure control for microdata using the R-package sdcMicro. Transactions on Data Privacy, 1, 67–85MathSciNet
Thomas, D. R., Singh, A. C., & Roberts, G. R. (1995). Independence tests for two-way tables under cluster sampling. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 885–890.
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 275–304.CrossRef
Traugott, M. W., Groves, R. M., & Lepkowski, J. M. (1987). Using dual frame designs to reduce nonresponse in telephone surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4), 522–539.CrossRef
van den Hout, A., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2002). Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: A review. International Statistical Review, 70(2), 269–288.MATHCrossRef
Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.MATHCrossRef
Warner, S. L. (1971). The linear randomized response model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 884–888.CrossRef
Warner, S. L. (1986). The omitted digit randomized response model for telephone applications. Proceedings of the Social Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 441–443.
Willenborg, L., & de Waal, T. (1996). Statistical disclosure control in practice. New York: Springer.MATHCrossRef
Willenborg, L., & de Waal, T. (2001). Elements of statistical disclosure control. New York: Springer.MATHCrossRef
Winkler, W. E. (2004). Masking and re-identification methods for public-use microdata: Overview and research problems. Research Report Series of the Statistical Research Division of the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2004–2006.
Wolter, K. M. (2007). Introduction to variance estimation. New York: Springer.MATH
Yates, F., & Grundy, P. M. (1953). Selection without replacement from within strata with probability proportional to size. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 15, 235–261.
Young, T., & Ludloff, M. E. (2011). Privacy and big data. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
Zaizai, Y., Jingyu, W., & Junfeng, L. (2009). An efficiency and protection degree-based comparison among the quantitative randomized response strategies. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 38(3), 400–408.MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
Nonresponse and Untruthful Answering
verfasst von
Andreas Quatember
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Pseudo-Populations

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11784-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-11785-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11785-0_3