nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Normative Agents

verfasst von : Michael Luck, Samhar Mahmoud, Felipe Meneguzzi, Martin Kollingbaum, Timothy J. Norman, Natalia Criado, Moser Silva Fagundes

Erschienen in: Agreement Technologies

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In open dynamic societies, agents are required to work with others that do not necessarily have the same set of objectives. If left unchecked, self-interested agents will try to accomplish their individual goals without regard for others. Norms provide a means to regulate agent behaviour, and this requires some consideration of the ways in which norms impact on agent reasoning and behaviour. In this chapter, we review work on the development of normative agents, focussing on agent architectures in which action is determined by norms in a system or environment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel AI and Law

Nächstes Kapitel Norms and Trust

Andrighetto, G., M. Campennì, R. Conte, and M. Paolucci. 2007. On the immergence of norms: A normative agent architecture. In Proceedings of AAAI symposium, social and organizational aspects of intelligence, Washington, DC.

Andrighetto, G., M. Campennì, F. Cecconi, and R. Conte. 2010. The complex loop of norm emergence: A simulation model. In Simulating interacting agents and social phenomena, Agent-based social systems, vol. 7, ed. H. Deguchi et al., 19–35. Tokyo: Springer.

Andrighetto, G., D. Villatoro, and R. Conte. 2010. Norm internalization in artificial societies. AI Communications 23: 325–339.MathSciNet

Boella, G., and R. Damiano. 2002. An architecture for normative reactive agents. In Intelligent agents and multi-agent systems, 5th pacific rim international workshop on multi agents, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2413, ed. K. Kuwabara and J. Lee, 1–17. Berlin: Springer.

Boella, G., L. van der Torre, and H. Verhagen. 2008. Ten challenges for normative multiagent systems. In Programming multi-agent systems, no. 08361 in Dagstuhl seminar proceedings, schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, ed. R. Bordini, M. Dastani, J. Dix, and A.E. Fallah-Seghrouchni.

Broersen, J., M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, Z. Huang, and L. van der Torre. 2001. The BOID architecture: Conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on autonomous agents, 9–16. New York: ACM.

Broersen, J., M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. 2002. Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly Journal 2(3–4): 428–447.

Castelfranchi, C. 2003. Formalising the informal. Journal of Applied Logic 1(1–2): 47–92.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Castelfranchi, C., F. Dignum, C.M. Jonker, and J. Treur. 2000. Deliberative normative agents: Principles and architecture. In Intelligent agents VI: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on agent theories architectures and languages, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 1757, ed. N.R. Jennings and Y. Lespérance, 364–378. Berlin: Springer.

Conte, R., C. Castelfranchi, and F. Dignum. 1999. Autonomous Norm Acceptance. In Intelligent agents V: Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on agent theories architectures and languages, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 1555, ed. J.P. Müller, M.P. Singh, and A.S. Rao, 99–112. Berlin: Springer.

Criado, N., E. Argente, and V. Botti. 2010. Normative deliberation in graded BDI agents. In Multiagent system technologies: Proceedings of the eighth german conference on multi-agent system technologies, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 6251, 52–63. Berlin: Springer.

Criado, N., E. Argente, V. Botti, and P. Noriega. 2011. Reasoning about norm compliance. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 1191–1192. Taipei: Taiwan.

Dignum, F. 1999. Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1): 69–79.CrossRef

Dignum, F., D.N. Morley, L. Sonenberg, and L. Cavedon. 2000. Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on multi-agent systems, Boston, 111–118.

Elster, J. 1989. Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117.MathSciNetCrossRef

Fagundes, M.S., H. Billhardt, and S. Ossowski. 2010. Reasoning about norm compliance with rational agents. In Proceedings of the 19th European conference on artificial intelligence, Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 215, ed. H. Coelho, R. Studer, and M. Wooldridge, 1027–1028. Amsterdam: IOS.

Georgeff, M., and A.L. Lansky. 1987. Reactive reasoning and planning. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on AAAI, Seattle, 677–682.

Joseph, S., C. Sierra, M. Schorlemmer, and P. Dellunde. 2010. Deductive coherence and norm adoption. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18(1): 118–156.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Kollingbaum, M.J., and T.J. Norman. 2003. NoA – A normative agent architecture. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, ed. G. Gottlob and T. Walsh, 1465–1466. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Kollingbaum, M.J., and T.J. Norman. 2003. Norm adoption in the NoA agent architecture. In Proceedings of the second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiAgent Systems, 1038–1039. New York: ACM.

López y López, F., and M. Luck. 2003. Modelling norms for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the fourth Mexican international conference on computer science, Tlaxcala, 238–245.

López y López, F., M. Luck, and M. d’Inverno. 2002. Constraining autonomy through norms. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 674–681. New York: ACM.

López y López, F., M. Luck, and M. d’Inverno. 2004. Normative agent reasoning in dynamic societies. In: Proceedings of the third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 732–739. New York: IEEE Computer Society (2004).

Meneguzzi, F., and M. Luck. 2008. Composing high-level plans for declarative agent programming. In Declarative agent languages and technologies V, proceedings of the fifth international workshop, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4897, ed. M. Baldoni, T.C. Son, M.B. van Riemsdijk, and M. Winikoff, 69–85. Berlin: Springer.

Meneguzzi, F., and M. Luck. 2009. Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Budapest, 177–184.

Rao, A.S., and M.P. Georgeff. 1995. BDI agents: From theory to practice. In Proceedings of the first international conference on multi-agent systems, San Francisco, 312–319.

van der Torre, L.W.N., and Y.H. Tan. 1999. Contrary-to-duty reasoning with preference-based dyadic obligations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27(1–4): 49–78.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Villatoro, D., G. Andrighetto, R. Conte, and J. Sabater-Mir. 2011. Dynamic sanctioning for robust and cost-efficient norm compliance, 414–419. Barcelona: IJCAI/AAAI.

Titel: Normative Agents
verfasst von: Michael Luck
Samhar Mahmoud
Felipe Meneguzzi
Martin Kollingbaum
Timothy J. Norman
Natalia Criado
Moser Silva Fagundes
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Buch: Agreement Technologies
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5582-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-5583-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_14

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"