Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
As fuel costs are the largest component of the shipping industry’s operating costs, this study examines whether ocean carriers pass fuel cost increases through to freight rates more quickly than they pass through fuel cost decreases. The focal price collusion theory suggests that such asymmetric pass-through could be a result of collusive behavior because collusion is easier to sustain when costs are falling than when costs are rising. Using a lag-adjustment model as the econometric framework, findings from this study show strong evidence for asymmetric adjustments of the US inbound freight rates in response to fuel cost changes. Such asymmetry persisted after the passage of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. Moreover, the findings do not support the consumer search theory as an alternative explanation for the freight rate asymmetry.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Bachmeier, L., & Griffin, J. M. (2003). New evidence on asymmetric gasoline price responses. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 772–776. CrossRef
Benabou, R., & Gertner, R. (1993). Search with Learning from Prices: Does Increased Inflationary Uncertainty Lead to Higher Markups?’. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 69–94. CrossRef
Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1989). The price-concentration relationship in banking. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291–299. CrossRef
Beverelli, C. (2010). Oil prices and maritime freight rates: An empirical investigation. Technical Report UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/2009/2. (Paper presented at the United Nations conference on trade and development).
Borenstein, S., Cameron, A. C., & Gilbert, R. (1997). Do gasoline prices respond asymmetrically to crude oil price changes? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 305–339. CrossRef
Bresnahan, T. F., & Spiller, P. T. (1986). Futures market backwardation under risk neutrality. Economic Inquiry, XXIV, 429–441. CrossRef
Cabral, L., & Fishman, A. (2012). Business as usual: A consumer search theory of sticky prices and asymmetric price adjustment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30, 371–376. CrossRef
Clarke, R. L. (1997). An analysis of the international ocean shipping conference system. Transportation journal, 36(4), 17–29.
Clyde, P. S., & Reitzes, J. D. (1998). Market power and collusion in the ocean shipping industry: is a bigger cartel a better cartel? Economic Inquiry, 36, 292–304. CrossRef
Eckert, A. (2002). Retail price cycles and response asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(1), 52–77. CrossRef
Elliott, G., & Müller, U. K. (2006). Efficient tests for general persistent time variation in regression coefficients. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 907–940. CrossRef
Fox, N. R. (1992). An empirical analysis of ocean liner shipping. International Journal of Transport Economics, 19, 205–225.
Fox, N. R. (1995). Some effects of the U.S. Shipping Act of 1984 on ocean liner shipping conferences. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 26, 531–544.
Fusillo, M. (2004). Is liner shipping supply fixed. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 220–235. CrossRef
Fusillo, M. (2009). Structural factors underlying mergers and acquisitions in liner shipping. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 11(2), 209–226. CrossRef
Fusillo, M. (2013). The stability of market shares in liner shipping. Review of Industrial Organization, 42, 85–106. CrossRef
Goldberg, M. A. (1984). The sensitivity of the prime rate to money market conditions. Journal of Financial Research, VII(4), 269–280.
Green, E., & Porter, R. (1984). Non-cooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica, LII, 87–100. CrossRef
Hannan, T. H. (1991). Inferring market power from time-series data: The case of the banking firm. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Hannan, T. H., & Berger, A. N. (1991). The rigidity of prices: Evidence from the banking industry. American Economic Review, 81(4), 938–945.
Harrison, R., & Figliozzi, M. (2001). Impacts of containership size, service routes, and demand on Texas Gulf ports. Research Report Number 0–1833-3, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin.
Lewis, I., & Vellenga, D. B. (2000). The Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. Transportation Journal, 39(4), 27–34.
Lewis, M. (2003), Asymmetric price adjustment and consumer search: An examination of the retail gasoline market’, Working paper No. 120, Center for the Study of Energy Markets.
Marlow, P., & Nair, R. (2008). Service contracts—An instrument of international logistics supply chain: Under United States and European Union regulatory frameworks. Marine Policy, 32, 489–496. CrossRef
Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1988). A theory of dynamic oligopoly II: Price competition, kinked demand curves, and Edgeworth cycles. Econometrica, 56, 571–599. CrossRef
Neumark, D., & Sharpe, S. A. (1992). Market structure and the nature of price rigidity: Evidence from the market for consumer deposits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 657–680. CrossRef
Noel, M. D. (2009). Do retail gasoline prices respond asymmetrically to cost shocks? The influence of Edgeworth cycles. Rand Journal of Economics, 40(3), 582–595. CrossRef
Pollard, P. S., & Coughlin, C. C. (2003). Size matters: Asymmetric exchange rate pass-through at the industry level. Working Paper 2003–029C. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Peltzman, S. (2000). Prices rise faster than they fall. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 466–502. CrossRef
Radchenko, S. (2004). Anticipated and unanticipated effects of crude oil prices and gasoline inventory changes on gasoline prices. EconWPA Working Paper 0406001.
Reagan, P. B., & Weitzman, M. L. (1982). Asymmetries in price and quantity adjustments by the competitive firm. Journal of Economic Theory, XXVII, 410–420. CrossRef
Sicotte, R. (2001). International Shipping Cartels, in Robert Whaples (Eds), EH.Net Encyclopedia ( http://eh.net/encyclopedia/)
Sjostrom, W. (2004). Ocean shipping cartels: A survey. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 107–134. CrossRef
Subiotto, R., & Snelders, R. (2003). Antitrust Developments in Europe. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Swammy, P., & Thruman, S. (1994). Exchange rate episodes and the pass-through of exchange rates to import prices. Journal of Policy Modeling, 16(6), 609–623. CrossRef
Tkacz, G. (2001). Endogenous thresholds and tests for asymmetry in US prime rate movements. Economics Letters, 73, 207–211. CrossRef
Wickremasinghe, G. B., & Silvapulle, P. (2004). Exchange rate pass-through to manufactured import prices: The case of japan. EconWPA Working Paper 0406006.
Yang, J. (2007). Is exchange rate pass-through symmetric? Evidence from US imports. Applied Economics, 39, 169–178. CrossRef
Yang, H., & Ye, L. (2008). Search with learning: Understanding asymmetric price adjustments. Rand Journal of Economics, 39, 547–564. CrossRef
- Ocean Carriers’ Collusion Under Antitrust Immunity: Evidence of Asymmetric Pass-Through
Michael K. Fung
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta