nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

22. Ökodesign

Entwicklung von Produkten mit verbesserter Ökobilanz

verfasst von : Tim C. McAloone, Daniela C. A. Pigosso

Erschienen in: Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Jedes Produkt hat über seinen gesamten Lebenszyklus hinweg Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt (z.Bs. durch den Verbrauch von Ressourcen und die Entstehung von Abfällen). Es wird zunehmend anerkannt, dass Hersteller und Verbraucher eine gemeinsame Verantwortung tragen, dafür zu sorgen, dass die negativen Umweltauswirkungen, die durch die Herstellung und den Konsum von Produkten und Systemen entstehen, so gering wie möglich sind, oder dass wir sicherstellen können, dass wir positive (oder netto-neutrale) Auswirkungen aus unserer Nutzung der Ressourcen des Planeten ziehen. Ökodesign ist ein Weg, um den Produktentwickler durch einen strukturierten Ansatz zur Verbesserung der Umwelt in jeder Phase des Produktentwicklungsprozesses und unter Berücksichtigung aller Phasen des Produktlebenszyklus zu unterstützen. Dieses Kapitel stellt eine kurze Geschichte und den aktuellen Stand der Praxis des Ökodesigns vor und führt einen strukturierten Ansatz für das Ökodesign ein, der sich auf zwei komplementäre Ansichten konzentriert: top-down, den designgetriebenen Ansatz und bottom-up, den ökologischen Lebenszyklusansatz. Verwandte Praktiken, Strategien, Richtlinien und Werkzeuge werden vorgestellt, um zu veranschaulichen, wie Ökodesign in den Entwicklungsprozess integriert werden kann.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Kostenmanagement

Nächstes Kapitel Umgang mit Normen und Normung

Baumann, H., Boons, F., & Bragd, A. (2002). Mapping the green product development field: Engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-XCrossRef

Bey, N., Hauschild, M. Z., & McAloone, T. C. (2013). Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 62, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.001CrossRef

Bhamra, T., & Lofthouse, V. (2007). Design for sustainability: A practical approach (1. Aufl.). Hampshire: Gower Publishing Limited.

Boks, C., & Diehl, J. C. (2005). EcoBenchmarking for All. In: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2005. Proceedings. EcoDesign’2005. S. 792–798

Boks, C., & Stevels, A. (2003). Theory and practice of environmental benchmarking in a major consumer electronics company. Benchmarking An International Journal, 10, 120–135.CrossRef

Brink, S., Diehl, J. C., & Stevels, A. B. (1998). Eco-Quest, an ecodesign self audit tool for suppliers of the electronics industry. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1998 (Cat. No. 98CH36145) (S. 129–132). IEEE.

Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024CrossRef

Cramer, J., & Stevels, A. (1997). Strategic environmental product planning within Philips sound & vision. Environmental Quality Management, 7, 91–102.CrossRef

Danish Ministry of the Environment. (2005). Impact categories, normalisation and weighting in LCA: update on selected EDIP97-data

Dekoninck, E. A., Domingo, L., O’Hare, J. A., et al. (2016). Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: Development and consolidation of a framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.045CrossRef

Donnelly, K., Olds, R., Blechinger, F., et al. (2006). ISO 14001 – Effective management of sustainable design. Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 4, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10970-006-0004-9CrossRef

Eagan, P., Finster, M., & Hussey, D. (2001). Creating business value by linking industrial ecology with business strategy and product design. In Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (S. 842–847). IEEE.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation & McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. (2015). Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

Ernzer, M., Oberender, C., & Birkhofer, H. (2002). Methods to support ecodesign in the product development process. Going Green-Care Innovation, (S. 25–28).

European Commission (2003). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the “Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – Integrated Product Policy, Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking” (COM(2003) 302 final). Document 52003AE1598. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1601456694354&uri=CELEX:52003AE1598

European Commission (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Document 32006R1907. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32006R1907

European Commission (2009). Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. Document 32009L0125. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0125

European Commission (2012). Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union, 197(55), 38–71. Document 32012L0019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012L0019

European Commission (2017). Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU. Document 32017R1369. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32017R1369

European Commission (2019). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan. com/2019/190 Final. Document 52019DC0190. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1551871195772&uri=CELEX:52019DC0190

Fitzgerald, D. P., Herrmann, J. W., & Schmidt, L. C. (2006). Improving environmental design using TRIZ inventive principles. In Proceedings of the 16th CIRP International Design Seminar.

Hochschorner, E., & Finnveden, G. (2003). Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 119–128.CrossRef

IHS Markit (2020) Environmental and Export Compliance, London. https://ihsmarkit.com/products/environmental-export-compliance.html.

ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040: Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Framework. Environmental Management, 3, 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtrCrossRef

ISO. (2006b). Environmental Management—Life cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (S. 46).

Issa, I. I., Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Rozenfeld, H. (2015). Leading product-related environmental performance indicators: A selection guide and database. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.088CrossRef

Jeswiet, J., & Hauschild, M. (2005). EcoDesign and future environmental impacts. Materials and Design, 26, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.016CrossRef

Johansson, G. (2002). Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development: A review of state of the art. Environmental Management and Health, 13, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/09566160210417868CrossRef

Kjaer, L. L., Pigosso, D. C. A., Niero, M., et al. (2018). Product/service-systems for a circular economy: The route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12747CrossRef

Lagerstedt, J., Luttropp, C., & Lindfors, L.-G. (2003). Functional priorities in LCA and design for environment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 160–166.CrossRef

Luttropp, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Prod, 14, 1396–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022CrossRef

Mathieux, F., Froelich, D., & Moszkowicz, P. (2001). Development of recovery indicators to be used during product design process: method, potentialities and limits. In Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (S. 281–286). IEEE.

McAloone, T. C., & Bey, N. (2011). Environmental improvement through product development—A guide (1. Aufl.). Copenhagen: Denmark.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the way we make things. Macmillan: USA. ISBN: 9780865475878.

Mestre, A., & Diehl, J. C. (2005). Ecodesign and renewable energy: How to integrate renewable energy technologies into consumer products. Power. (S. 282–288)

Pigosso. D. C. A.. (2012). Ecodesign Maturity Model: A framework to support companies in the selection and implementation of ecodesign practices. University of São Paulo

Pigosso, D. C. A., Ferraz, M., Teixeira, C. E., & Rozenfeld, H. (2016). The deployment of product-related environmental legislation into product requirements. Sustain, 8(4), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040332CrossRef

Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2016). Maturity-based approach for the development of environmentally sustainable product/service-systems. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 15, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.04.003CrossRef

Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Rozenfeld, H. (2014). Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation. International Design Conference - DESIGN 2014 (S. 1651–1662). Croatia: Dubrovnik.

Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Rozenfeld, H. (2015). Characterization of the state-of-the-art and identification of main trends for Ecodesign tools and methods: Classifying three decades of research and implementation. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 95, 405–427.

Pigosso, D. C. A., Rozenfeld, H., & McAloone, T. C. (2013). Ecodesign maturity model: A management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–14,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040

Plouffe, S., Lanoie, P., Berneman, C., & Vernier, M.-F. (2011). Economic benefits tied to ecodesign. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003CrossRef

Rodrigues, V. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2016). Process-related key performance indicators for measuring sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.046CrossRef

Rodrigues, V. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2017). Measuring the implementation of ecodesign management practices: A review and consolidation of process-oriented performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.049CrossRef

Stevels, A. (2001) Application of EcoDesign: Ten years of dynamic development. Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. (S. 905–915).

Stevels, A. (2007). Adventures in EcoDesign of Electronic Products (1993–2007). Enschede: PrintPartners Ipskamp.

UNEP (2004). Guidelines for the Integration of Cleaner Production and Energy Efficiency. United Nations Environment Programme: Washington, DC, USA.

United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development – Our Common Future. Newyork.

Van Der, Z. F., & Bhamra, T. (2003). Alternative function fulfilment: Incorporating environmental considerations into increased design space. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00161-0CrossRef

van Weenen, J. (1995). Towards sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3, 95–100.CrossRef

Verghese, K. L., Horne, R., & Carre, A. (2010). PIQET: The design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2CrossRef

Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for environmental sustainability (1. Aufl.). London: Springer.

Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M. Z., & Alting, L. (2000). Environmental Assessment of Products: Bd. 1. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Springer Science & Business Media.

Wever, R., Boks, C., Es H., & Van Stevels, A. (2005) Benchmarking Analysis implications. S. 799–806

Wever, R., Boks, C., Marinelli, T., & Stevels, A. (2007). Increasing the benefits of product-level benchmarking for strategic eco-efficient decision making. Benchmarking An International Journal, 14, 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770710834509CrossRef

Willems, B., Seliger, G., Duflou, J., & Basdere, B. (2003) Contribution to design for adaptation: Method to Assess the Adaptability of Products (MAAP). In: Ecodesign 2003

Wimmer, W., Pamminger, R., Stachura, M., & Grab, R. (2005) ECODESIGN in the electronics industry - achieving legal compliance with the EU-directives and environmentally improving products by using the new EEE-PILOT. In: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2005. Eco Design 2005. Fourth International Symposium on. S. 671–677

Yanagisawa, H., Masuda, F., Suzuki, K., & Suzuki, M. (2003). Analysis on the potential of eco-materials, from the “design” perspective. In: Ecodesign 2003. S. 3

Yu, S. Y., Zhang, H., & Ertas, A. (1999). Environmental Conscious design : An introduction To EDST. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 3, 27–38.

Titel: Ökodesign
verfasst von: Tim C. McAloone
Daniela C. A. Pigosso
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57302-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-57303-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_22

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten