Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

On the Implausibility of Differing-Inputs Obfuscation and Extractable Witness Encryption with Auxiliary Input

verfasst von : Sanjam Garg, Craig Gentry, Shai Halevi, Daniel Wichs

Erschienen in: Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2014

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

The notion of

differing-inputs obfuscation

(diO) was introduced by Barak et al. (CRYPTO 2001). It guarantees that, for any two circuits

C

0

,

C

1

, if it is difficult to come up with an input

x

on which

C

0

(

x

) ≠ 

C

1

(

x

), then it should also be difficult to distinguish the obfuscation of

C

0

from that of

C

1

. This is a strengthening of

indistinguishability obfuscation

, where the above is only guaranteed for circuits that agree on all inputs:

C

0

(

x

) = 

C

1

(

x

) for all

x

. Two recent works of Ananth et al. (ePrint 2013) and Boyle et al. (TCC 2014) study the notion of diO in the setting where the attacker is also given some auxiliary information related to the circuits, showing that this notion leads to many interesting applications.

In this work, we show that the existence of

general-purpose

diO with

general

auxiliary input has a surprising consequence: it implies that a

specific

circuit

C

*

with

specific

auxiliary input

aux

* cannot be obfuscated in a way that hides some

specific

information. In other words, under the conjecture that such

special-purpose obfuscation

exists, we show that general-purpose diO cannot exist. We do not know if this special-purpose obfuscation assumption is implied by diO itself, and hence we do not get an unconditional impossibility result. However, the special-purpose obfuscation assumption is a falsifiable assumption which we do not know how to break for candidate obfuscation schemes. Showing the existence of general-purpose diO with general auxiliary input would necessitate showing how to break this assumption.

We also show that the special-purpose obfuscation assumption implies the impossibility of

extractable witness encryption

with auxiliary input, a notion proposed by Goldwasser et al. (CRYPTO 2013). A variant of this assumption also implies the impossibility of

“output-only dependent” hardcore bits

for general one-way functions, as recently constructed by Bellare and Tessaro (ePrint 2013) using diO.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Metadaten
Titel
On the Implausibility of Differing-Inputs Obfuscation and Extractable Witness Encryption with Auxiliary Input
verfasst von
Sanjam Garg
Craig Gentry
Shai Halevi
Daniel Wichs
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2_29