Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Advances in Manufacturing
Erschienen in: Advances in Manufacturing 2/2014

01.06.2014

Ontology-based interoperability solutions for textile supply chain

verfasst von: Rishad Rayyaan, Yi Wang, Richard Kennon

Erschienen in: Advances in Manufacturing | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Existence of interoperability within the enterprises is essential for textile supply chain to efficiently face the challenges from contemporary competitors, to find new business opportunities and to render better customer service. Exchange of business documents, being semantically consistent, is the way to achieve interoperability. However, heterogeneity of the structures of the enterprises poses challenges for establishing interoperability. Ontology based semantic interoperability framework has now been proven as an effective solution for enterprise interoperability. In this paper, the existing ontology-based interoperability solutions in the context of textile supply chain have been compiled and research gaps have been identified. The ontological methods, such as unified process for ontology (UPON) and methontology have been analyzed, and UPON have been shown as a suitable ontology development method for textile supply chain.
Vorheriger Artikel Guest editorial of “Intelligent logistics and supply chains”
Nächster Artikel Intelligent and integrated RFID (II-RFID) system for improving traceability in manufacturing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Ramdas K, Spekman RE (2000) Chain or shackles: understanding what drives supply-chain performance. Interfaces 30(4):3–21CrossRef
2.
Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200CrossRef
3.
Rosenzweig ED, Roth AV, Dean JW Jr (2003) The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. J Oper Manag 21(4):437–456CrossRef
4.
Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2004) Lean, agile and traditional supply: how do they impact manufacturing performance? J Purch Supply Manag 10(4):151–164CrossRef
5.
Teng SG, Jaramillo H (2006) Integrating the US textile and apparel supply chain with small companies in South America. Supply Chain Manag Int J 11(1):44–55CrossRef
6.
Handfield RB, Nichols EL (1999) Introduction to supply chain management, vol 183. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
7.
Muñoza E, Capón-Garcíab E, Miguel LJ et al (2013) Integration of enterprise levels based on an ontological framework. Chem Eng Res Des 91(8):1542–1556
8.
Grubic T, Fan I-S (2010) Supply chain ontology: review, analysis and synthesis. Comput Ind 61(8):776–786CrossRef
9.
Kumar K (2001) Technology for supporting supply chain management: introduction. Commun ACM 44(6):58–61CrossRef
10.
Buxmann P et al (2004) Usage and evaluation of supply chain management software—results of an empirical study in the European automotive industry. Inf Syst J 14(3):295–309CrossRef
11.
Gunasekaran A, Ngai EW (2004) Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur J Oper Res 159(2):269–295CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
12.
Gessa N et al (2003) MODAML, an interoperability framework for the textile-clothing sector. In: IADIS international conference
13.
IEEE office (1990) IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. p 43
14.
Guo J, Hu Z (2008) Common textile vocabularies and documents. ICE-B 2008, p 81
15.
Davenport TH, Brooks JD (2004) Enterprise systems and the supply chain. J Enterp Inf Manag 17(1):8–19
16.
Hillegersberg Jv, Kumar K (2000) ERP experience and evolution. Commun ACM 43(4):23–26
17.
Akkermans HA et al (2003) The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study. Eur J Oper Res 146(2):284–301CrossRefMATH
18.
Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2006) The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(3):282–299CrossRef
19.
Pant S, Sethi R, Bhandari M (2003) Making sense of the e-supply chain landscape: an implementation framework. Int J Inf Manage 23(3):201–221CrossRef
20.
Uschold M, Gruninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl Eng Rev 11(2):93–136CrossRef
21.
Smith B, Welty C (2001) Ontology: towards a new synthesis. In: Formal ontology in information systems. ACM Press, New York, pp iii–x
22.
Guarino N (1998) Formal onthology in information systems: proceedings of the first international conference [FIOS’98], vol 46, June 6–8, Trento, Italy
23.
Kishore R, Sharman R, Ramesh R (2004) Computational ontologies and information systems: I. foundations. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 14:158–183
24.
De Sabbta P et al (2006) Providing a semantic description for an interoperability framework using ontologies. pp 197–204
25.
Duque A et al (2009) An ontological solution to support interoperability in the textile industry. Springer, pp 38–51
26.
Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(5):907–928CrossRef
27.
Pinto HS, Martins JP (2004) Ontologies: how can they be built? Knowl Inf Syst 6(4):441–464CrossRef
28.
Berge J (1991) The EDIFACT standards. Wiley-Blackwell
29.
TEDIS TE (1992) Systems programme, interim report. Office for official publications of the European Community, ISBN-92-826-5658-6
30.
Robinet P, Dufour J. HLQ: description of the eTeXML project, Annex
31.
32.
Dogac A et al (2008) iSURF: an interoperability service utility for collaborative supply chain planning across multiple domains. In: Proceedings of the eChallanges conference, Stockholm
33.
Spohrer J, Kwan SK (2009) Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): An emerging discipline-outline & references. Int J Inf Syst Serv Sect 1(3):1–31CrossRef
34.
Hofman W (2011) Design of large-scale enterprise interoperable value webs. In: Workshop on the move to meaningful Internet systems, pp 122–135
35.
Ponn J, Lindemann U (2006) Intelligent search for product development information—an ontology-based approach. In: Marjanovic D (ed) 9th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia
36.
Lemaignan S et al (2006) MASON: a proposal for an ontology of manufacturing domain. In: IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications, Prague, 15–16 June 2006
37.
Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A (2002) Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Knowl Eng Rev 17(2):129–156CrossRef
38.
IEEE (1997) IEEE standard for developing software life-cycle process. In: IEEE Std 1074-1997, USA
39.
Rajpathak D, Chougule R (2011) A generic ontology development framework for data integration and decision support in a distributed environment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(2):154–170CrossRef
40.
De Nicola A, Missikoff M, Navigli R (2005) A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: UPON. In: Database and expert systems applications. Springer
41.
Uschold M et al (1998) The enterprise ontology. Knowl Eng Rev 13(01):31–89CrossRef
42.
de Sousa JP (2000) Distributed planning and control systems for the virtual enterprise: organizational requirements and development life-cycle. J Intell Manuf 11(3):253–270CrossRefMathSciNet
43.
Madni AM, Lin W, Madni CC (2001) IDEONTM: an extensible ontology for designing, integrating, and managing collaborative distributed enterprises. Syst Eng 4(1):35–48CrossRef
44.
Lin H-K, Harding JA, Shahbaz M (2004) Manufacturing system engineering ontology for semantic interoperability across extended project teams. Int J Prod Res 42(24):5099–5118
45.
Ye Y et al (2008) An ontology-based architecture for implementing semantic integration of supply chain management. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 21(1):1–18CrossRefMATH
46.
Pourabbas E, Taglino F (2012) A semantic platform for enterprise knowledge interoperability. In: Poler R et al (ed) Enterprise interoperability V. Springer, London, pp 119–128
47.
Gessa N et al (2006) Extracting a semantic view from an ebusiness vocabulary. In: The 8th IEEE international conference on and enterprise computing and the 3rd IEEE international conference on E-commerce, and E-services. San Francisco, USA, 26–29 June 2006
48.
de Nicola A, Missikoff M, Navigli R (2009) A software engineering approach to ontology building. Inf Syst 34(2):258–275CrossRef
49.
Jacobson I (1999) The unified software development process. 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, US
50.
Guizzardi G, Herre H, Wagner G (2002) Towards ontological foundations for UML conceptual models. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. Springer, pp 1100–1117
51.
Daft R, Kendrick M, Vershinna N (2010) Management, 9th edn., Chap. 8. Cengage Learning EMEA, Hampshire
52.
Golicic S, Davis D, McCarthy T, Mentzer J (2002) The impact of e-commerce on supply chain relationships. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manag 32(10)851–871
53.
Hoek R (2001) E-supply chains—virtually non-existing. Supply Chain Manag Int J 6(1):21–28
54.
Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R (2007) Operations management, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex, pp 423–424
55.
Buchanan S, Gibb F (1998) The information audit: an integrated strategic approach. Int J Inf Manag 18(I)
56.
Wagner C, Sweeney E (2010) E-business in supply chain management. In: Electronic supply network coordination in intelligent and dynamic environments, modelling and Hershey, PA: IGI Global, Chap 2, pp 24–42
Metadaten
Titel
Ontology-based interoperability solutions for textile supply chain
verfasst von
Rishad Rayyaan
Yi Wang
Richard Kennon
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Shanghai University
Erschienen in
Advances in Manufacturing / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2095-3127
Elektronische ISSN: 2195-3597
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0073-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Advances in Manufacturing 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Incentive regulation of banks on third party logistics enterprises in principal-agent-based inventory financing

OriginalPaper

The fit of planning methods for the part manufacturing industry, a case study

OriginalPaper

A framework for ICT-enabled real-time production planning and control

OriginalPaper

Approaching lean product development using system dynamics: investigating front-load effects

OriginalPaper

Product portfolio map: a visual tool for supporting product variant discovery and structuring

OriginalPaper

Implications of automation in engineer-to-order production: a case study

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise