nach oben

vorheriges Kapitel Towards Another Scientific Revolution

nächstes Kapitel Excellence by Nonsense: The Competition for Pub...

PatentFit aktivieren

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel Open Access

Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought

Autoren: Benedikt Fecher, Sascha Friesike

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Erschienen in: Opening Science

» Zum Volltext PDF-Version jetzt herunterladen

Abstract

Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this chapter aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measurement school (which is concerned with alternative impact measurement), the democratic school (which is concerned with access to knowledge) and the pragmatic school (which is concerned with collaborative research).

Altunay, M., et al. (2010). A science driven production Cyberinfrastructure—the Open Science grid. Journal of Grid Computing, 9(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1007/s10723-010-9176-6. CrossRef

Antelmann, K. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.

Arazy, O., Morgan, W., & Patterson, R. (2006). Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1025624.

Auer, S., et al. (2007). DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In K. Aberer et al., (Eds.), The Semantic Web (pp. 722–735). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52.

Boulton, G., et al. (2011). Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1633–1635. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60647-8. CrossRef

Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008. CrossRef

Campbell, E. G., et al. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA, 287(4), 473. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.4.473. CrossRef

Carroll, M. W. (2011). Why full Open Access matters. PLoS Biology, 9(11), p.e1001210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001210.

Catlin-Groves, C. L. (2012). The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, 2012, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2012/349630. CrossRef

Cribb, J., & Sari, T. (2010). Open Science: sharing knowledge in the global century. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.

De Roure, D., et al. (2008). myExperiment: defining the social virtual research environment. In IEEE (pp. 182–189). Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4736756.

De Roure, D., & Goble, C. (2009). Software design for empowering scientists. IEEE Software, 26(1), 88–95. doi: 10.1109/MS.2009.22. CrossRef

De Roure, D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N. R. (2003). The semantic grid: a future e-science infrastructure. In F. Berman, G. Fox, & T. Hey (Eds.), Wiley Series in communications networking & Distributed Systems (pp. 437–470). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ebner, M., & Maurer, H. (2009). Can Weblogs and Microblogs change traditional scientific writing? Future Internet, 1(1), 47–58. doi: 10.3390/fi1010047. CrossRef

Foster, I. (2002). The grid: a new infrastructure for 21st century science. Physics Today, 55(2), 42. doi: 10.1063/1.1461327. CrossRef

Gowers, T., & Nielsen, M. (2009). Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, 461(7266), 879–881. doi: 10.1038/461879a. CrossRef

Grand, A., et al. (2012). Open Science: a new “Trust Technology”? Science Communication, 34(5), 679–689. doi: 10.1177/1075547012443021. CrossRef

Haeussler, C. (2011). Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study. Research Policy, 40(1), 105–122. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.007. CrossRef

Hand, E. (2010). Citizen science: people power. Nature, 466(7307), 685–687. doi: 10.1038/466685a. CrossRef

Harnad, S., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to Open Access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013. CrossRef

Hey, T. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, 308(5723), 817–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1110410. CrossRef

Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2008). Collaborative research in sociology: trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist, 39(4), 290–306. CrossRef

Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, London. New York: Routledge.

Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “New” scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350. CrossRefMathSciNet

Löh, A., & Hinze, R. (2006). Open data types and open functions (p. 133.). In ACM Press, doi: 10.1145/1140335.1140352.

McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open Access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Citation Study. In Thomson Scientific. Available at: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf.

Miller, P., Styles, R., Heath, T. (2008). Open data commons, a license for open data. In Proceedings of the WWW 2008 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web.

Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biology, 9(12), p.e1001195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195.

Morris, T., & Mietchen, D. (2010). Collaborative structuring of knowledge by experts and the public. In Proceedings of the 5th Open Knowledge Conference (pp. 29–41). London, UK.

Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science. Serials Review, 34(1), 52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2008.01.001. CrossRef

Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2012). Cyberscience 2.0: research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag.

Neylon, C., & Wu, S. (2009). Open Science: tools, approaches, and implications. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (pp. 540–544).

Nielsen, M. A. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Phelps, L., Fox, B. A., & Marincola, F. M. (2012). Supporting the advancement of science: Open Access publishing and the role of mandates. Journal of Translational Medicine, 10, 13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-13. CrossRef

Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 325–342. doi: 10.1177/0270467609336308. CrossRef

Priem, J., et al. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.

Priem, J., et al. (2011). Uncovering impacts: CitedIn and total-impact, two new tools for gathering altmetrics (pp. 9–11). In iConference 2012. Available at: http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/two-altmetrics-tools.pdf.

Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701201. CrossRef

Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Decoupling the scholarly journal. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00019.

Priem, J., Piwowar, H., Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: using social media to explore scholarly impact. In ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop. Evanston, IL, USA. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/priem/.

Rufai, R., Gul, S., Shah, T. A. (2012). Open Access journals in library and information science: the story so far. Trends in information management, 7(2).

Tacke, O. (2010). Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In T. J. Bastiaens, U. Baumöl, & B. J. Krämer (Eds.), On collective intelligence (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. CrossRef

Tacke, O. (2012). Raus aus dem Elfenbeinturm: Open Science. olivertacke.de. Available at: http://www.olivertacke.de/2011/10/23/raus--aus--dem--elfenbeinturm--open--science/.

Vision, T. J. (2010). Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioScience, 60(5), 330–331. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.2. CrossRef

Weiss, A. (2005). The power of collective intelligence. NetWorker, 9(3), 16–23. doi: 10.1145/1086762.1086763.

Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In Proceedings of the ACM WebSci’11 (pp. 1–4). Koblenz: ACM Publishers.

Yeong, C. H., & Abdullah, B. J. J. (2012). Altmetrics: the right step forward. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 8(3), 1–2.

Titel

Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought

Buch

Opening Science

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00025-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-00026-8

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2

Autoren:

Benedikt Fecher
Sascha Friesike

Verlag

Springer International Publishing

Sequenznummer

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Bildnachweise

MKVS, Nordson/© Nordson, ViscoTec/© ViscoTec, Robatech/© Robatech, Krahn Ceramics/© Krahn Ceramics, Hellmich GmbH/© Hellmich GmbH, Merz+Benteli/© Merz+Benteli, Hermann Otto GmbH/© Hermann Otto GmbH