2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel Open Access
powered by
Tipp
Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Erschienen in:
Opening Science
Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this chapter aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measurement school (which is concerned with alternative impact measurement), the democratic school (which is concerned with access to knowledge) and the pragmatic school (which is concerned with collaborative research).
Anzeige
Zurück zum Zitat Altunay, M., et al. (2010). A science driven production Cyberinfrastructure—the Open Science grid. Journal of Grid Computing, 9(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1007/s10723-010-9176-6. CrossRef Altunay, M., et al. (2010). A science driven production Cyberinfrastructure—the Open Science grid.
Journal of Grid Computing,
9(2), 201–218. doi:
10.1007/s10723-010-9176-6.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Antelmann, K. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382. Antelmann, K. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact?
College & Research Libraries,
65(5), 372–382.
Zurück zum Zitat Arazy, O., Morgan, W., & Patterson, R. (2006). Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1025624. Arazy, O., Morgan, W., & Patterson, R. (2006). Wisdom of the Crowds: Decentralized Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia.
SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:
10.2139/ssrn.1025624.
Zurück zum Zitat Auer, S., et al. (2007). DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In K. Aberer et al., (Eds.), The Semantic Web (pp. 722–735). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52. Auer, S., et al. (2007). DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In K. Aberer et al., (Eds.),
The Semantic Web (pp. 722–735). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Available at:
http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulton, G., et al. (2011). Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1633–1635. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60647-8. CrossRef Boulton, G., et al. (2011). Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data.
The Lancet,
377(9778), 1633–1635. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60647-8.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008. CrossRef Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital.
Research Policy,
33(4), 599–616. doi:
10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, E. G., et al. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA, 287(4), 473. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.4.473. CrossRef Campbell, E. G., et al. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: evidence from a national survey.
JAMA,
287(4), 473. doi:
10.1001/jama.287.4.473.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, M. W. (2011). Why full Open Access matters. PLoS Biology, 9(11), p.e1001210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001210. Carroll, M. W. (2011). Why full Open Access matters.
PLoS Biology,
9(11), p.e1001210. doi:
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001210.
Zurück zum Zitat Catlin-Groves, C. L. (2012). The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, 2012, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2012/349630. CrossRef Catlin-Groves, C. L. (2012). The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond.
International Journal of Zoology,
2012, 1–14. doi:
10.1155/2012/349630.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cribb, J., & Sari, T. (2010). Open Science: sharing knowledge in the global century. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing. Cribb, J., & Sari, T. (2010).
Open Science: sharing knowledge in the global century. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat De Roure, D., et al. (2008). myExperiment: defining the social virtual research environment. In IEEE (pp. 182–189). Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4736756. De Roure, D., et al. (2008). myExperiment: defining the social virtual research environment. In IEEE (pp. 182–189). Available at:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4736756.
Zurück zum Zitat De Roure, D., & Goble, C. (2009). Software design for empowering scientists. IEEE Software, 26(1), 88–95. doi: 10.1109/MS.2009.22. CrossRef De Roure, D., & Goble, C. (2009). Software design for empowering scientists.
IEEE Software,
26(1), 88–95. doi:
10.1109/MS.2009.22.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Roure, D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N. R. (2003). The semantic grid: a future e-science infrastructure. In F. Berman, G. Fox, & T. Hey (Eds.), Wiley Series in communications networking & Distributed Systems (pp. 437–470). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. De Roure, D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N. R. (2003). The semantic grid: a future e-science infrastructure. In F. Berman, G. Fox, & T. Hey (Eds.),
Wiley Series in communications networking & Distributed Systems (pp. 437–470). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebner, M., & Maurer, H. (2009). Can Weblogs and Microblogs change traditional scientific writing? Future Internet, 1(1), 47–58. doi: 10.3390/fi1010047. CrossRef Ebner, M., & Maurer, H. (2009). Can Weblogs and Microblogs change traditional scientific writing?
Future Internet,
1(1), 47–58. doi:
10.3390/fi1010047.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foster, I. (2002). The grid: a new infrastructure for 21st century science. Physics Today, 55(2), 42. doi: 10.1063/1.1461327. CrossRef Foster, I. (2002). The grid: a new infrastructure for 21st century science.
Physics Today,
55(2), 42. doi:
10.1063/1.1461327.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gowers, T., & Nielsen, M. (2009). Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, 461(7266), 879–881. doi: 10.1038/461879a. CrossRef Gowers, T., & Nielsen, M. (2009). Massively collaborative mathematics.
Nature,
461(7266), 879–881. doi:
10.1038/461879a.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grand, A., et al. (2012). Open Science: a new “Trust Technology”? Science Communication, 34(5), 679–689. doi: 10.1177/1075547012443021. CrossRef Grand, A., et al. (2012). Open Science: a new “Trust Technology”?
Science Communication,
34(5), 679–689. doi:
10.1177/1075547012443021.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haeussler, C. (2011). Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study. Research Policy, 40(1), 105–122. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.007. CrossRef Haeussler, C. (2011). Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study.
Research Policy,
40(1), 105–122. doi:
10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.007.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hand, E. (2010). Citizen science: people power. Nature, 466(7307), 685–687. doi: 10.1038/466685a. CrossRef Hand, E. (2010). Citizen science: people power.
Nature,
466(7307), 685–687. doi:
10.1038/466685a.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harnad, S., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to Open Access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013. CrossRef Harnad, S., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to Open Access.
Serials Review,
30(4), 310–314. doi:
10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hey, T. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, 308(5723), 817–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1110410. CrossRef Hey, T. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science.
Science,
308(5723), 817–821. doi:
10.1126/science.1110410.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2008). Collaborative research in sociology: trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist, 39(4), 290–306. CrossRef Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2008). Collaborative research in sociology: trends and contributing factors.
The American Sociologist,
39(4), 290–306.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, London. New York: Routledge. Irwin, A. (1995).
Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, London. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “New” scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350. CrossRefMathSciNet Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “New” scientific governance.
Social Studies of Science,
36(2), 299–320. doi:
10.1177/0306312706053350.
CrossRefMathSciNet
Zurück zum Zitat Löh, A., & Hinze, R. (2006). Open data types and open functions (p. 133.). In ACM Press, doi: 10.1145/1140335.1140352. Löh, A., & Hinze, R. (2006). Open data types and open functions (p. 133.). In ACM Press, doi:
10.1145/1140335.1140352.
Zurück zum Zitat McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open Access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Citation Study. In Thomson Scientific. Available at: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf. McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open Access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Citation Study. In Thomson Scientific. Available at:
http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, P., Styles, R., Heath, T. (2008). Open data commons, a license for open data. In Proceedings of the WWW 2008 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web. Miller, P., Styles, R., Heath, T. (2008). Open data commons, a license for open data. In
Proceedings of the WWW 2008 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web.
Zurück zum Zitat Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biology, 9(12), p.e1001195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195. Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science.
PLoS Biology,
9(12), p.e1001195. doi:
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris, T., & Mietchen, D. (2010). Collaborative structuring of knowledge by experts and the public. In Proceedings of the 5th Open Knowledge Conference (pp. 29–41). London, UK. Morris, T., & Mietchen, D. (2010). Collaborative structuring of knowledge by experts and the public. In
Proceedings of the 5th Open Knowledge Conference (pp. 29–41). London, UK.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science. Serials Review, 34(1), 52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2008.01.001. CrossRef Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science.
Serials Review,
34(1), 52–64. doi:
10.1016/j.serrev.2008.01.001.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. Nentwich, M. (2003).
Cyberscience: research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2012). Cyberscience 2.0: research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag. Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2012).
Cyberscience 2.0: research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Neylon, C., & Wu, S. (2009). Open Science: tools, approaches, and implications. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (pp. 540–544). Neylon, C., & Wu, S. (2009). Open Science: tools, approaches, and implications. In
Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (pp. 540–544).
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen, M. A. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Nielsen, M. A. (2012).
Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Phelps, L., Fox, B. A., & Marincola, F. M. (2012). Supporting the advancement of science: Open Access publishing and the role of mandates. Journal of Translational Medicine, 10, 13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-13. CrossRef Phelps, L., Fox, B. A., & Marincola, F. M. (2012). Supporting the advancement of science: Open Access publishing and the role of mandates.
Journal of Translational Medicine,
10, 13. doi:
10.1186/1479-5876-10-13.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 325–342. doi: 10.1177/0270467609336308. CrossRef Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down?
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,
29(4), 325–342. doi:
10.1177/0270467609336308.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Priem, J., et al. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Priem, J., et al. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto.
Altmetrics. Available at:
http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
Zurück zum Zitat Priem, J., et al. (2011). Uncovering impacts: CitedIn and total-impact, two new tools for gathering altmetrics (pp. 9–11). In iConference 2012. Available at: http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/two-altmetrics-tools.pdf. Priem, J., et al. (2011). Uncovering impacts: CitedIn and total-impact, two new tools for gathering altmetrics (pp. 9–11). In iConference 2012. Available at:
http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/two-altmetrics-tools.pdf.
Zurück zum Zitat Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701201. CrossRef Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter.
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
47(1), 1–4. doi:
10.1002/meet.14504701201.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Decoupling the scholarly journal. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00019. Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Decoupling the scholarly journal. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience,
6. doi:
10.3389/fncom.2012.00019.
Zurück zum Zitat Priem, J., Piwowar, H., Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: using social media to explore scholarly impact. In ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop. Evanston, IL, USA. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/priem/. Priem, J., Piwowar, H., Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: using social media to explore scholarly impact. In ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop. Evanston, IL, USA. Available at:
http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/priem/.
Zurück zum Zitat Rufai, R., Gul, S., Shah, T. A. (2012). Open Access journals in library and information science: the story so far. Trends in information management, 7(2). Rufai, R., Gul, S., Shah, T. A. (2012). Open Access journals in library and information science: the story so far.
Trends in information management,
7(2).
Zurück zum Zitat Tacke, O. (2010). Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In T. J. Bastiaens, U. Baumöl, & B. J. Krämer (Eds.), On collective intelligence (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. CrossRef Tacke, O. (2010). Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In T. J. Bastiaens, U. Baumöl, & B. J. Krämer (Eds.),
On collective intelligence (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tacke, O. (2012). Raus aus dem Elfenbeinturm: Open Science. olivertacke.de. Available at: http://www.olivertacke.de/2011/10/23/raus--aus--dem--elfenbeinturm--open--science/. Tacke, O. (2012). Raus aus dem Elfenbeinturm: Open Science.
olivertacke.de. Available at:
http://www.olivertacke.de/2011/10/23/raus--aus--dem--elfenbeinturm--open--science/.
Zurück zum Zitat Vision, T. J. (2010). Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioScience, 60(5), 330–331. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.2. CrossRef Vision, T. J. (2010). Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing.
BioScience,
60(5), 330–331. doi:
10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.2.
CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, A. (2005). The power of collective intelligence. NetWorker, 9(3), 16–23. doi: 10.1145/1086762.1086763. Weiss, A. (2005). The power of collective intelligence.
NetWorker,
9(3), 16–23. doi:
10.1145/1086762.1086763.
Zurück zum Zitat Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In Proceedings of the ACM WebSci’11 (pp. 1–4). Koblenz: ACM Publishers. Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In
Proceedings of the ACM WebSci’11 (pp. 1–4). Koblenz: ACM Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeong, C. H., & Abdullah, B. J. J. (2012). Altmetrics: the right step forward. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 8(3), 1–2. Yeong, C. H., & Abdullah, B. J. J. (2012). Altmetrics: the right step forward.
Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal,
8(3), 1–2.
- Titel
- Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2
- Autoren:
-
Benedikt Fecher
Sascha Friesike
- Sequenznummer
- 2