Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Opening Government: Open Data and Projects

verfasst von : Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán, Luis F. Luna-Reyes, Dolores E. Luna-Reyes, J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, Gabriel Puron-Cid, Sergio Picazo-Vela

Erschienen in: Building Digital Government Strategies

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One of the most important steps toward open government is the creation of an open data ecosystem (for the purpose of this chapter, open government ecosystem can be defined as “with its emphasis on an evolving, self-organizing system of feedback and adjustment among actors and processes, to be a useful heuristic for approaching the design of effective OGD programs (p. 16)” S. Dawes, L. Vidiasova, O. Parkhimovich. Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach, Government Information Quarterly (2016), Volume 33, Issue 1, 15–27) and an open government culture that emphasizes the need for and benefits of transparency, collaboration, and interaction. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce six interrelated and iterative principles to foster open data projects and establish fundamental components to creating an open government ecosystem.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
McDermott, Patrice. 2010. “Building Open Government.” Government Information Quarterly 27 (4): 401–13. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2010.​07.​002
 
2
Sandoval Almazán, Rodrigo. 2013. La Larga Marcha Del Gobierno Abierto. Teoría, Medición Y Futuro. 1s ed. Mexico City, México: INAP. http://​www.​inap.​mx/​portal/​images/​pdf/​book/​larga_​marcha.​pdf
 
3
Such as Michener, Greg, and Katherine Bersch. 2013. “Identifying Transparency.” Information Polity 18 (3): 233–42. doi:10.​3233/​IP-130299
 
4
Birkinshaw, Patrick. 2006. “Freedom of Information and Openness: Fundamental Human Rights?”. Administrative Law Review 58 (1). American Bar Association: 177–218. http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​40712007. p. 189
 
5
The concept of data protection is more important in countries where government entities have been known to manipulate data and information after its release. The idea is that if information is released in an open format, the public can safeguard this information from subsequent changes by the government.
 
6
Guadarrama (2016) Impacto Social de Mejora tu escuela. IMCO. Online: http://​imco.​org.​mx/​articulo_​es/​el-impacto-social-de-mejora-tu-escuela/​
 
7
Gonzalez-Zapata, Felipe, and Richard Heeks. “The Multiple Meanings of Open Government Data: Understanding Different Stakeholders and Their Perspectives.” Government Information Quarterly, 2015. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2015.​09.​001
 
8
Veljković, Nataša, Sanja Bogdanović-Dinić, and Leonid Stoimenov. 2011. “eGovernment Openness Index.” In 11th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG 2011), 571–77. Ljubljana, Slovenia
 
9
For a ranking of open government data catalogues see Lourenço, Rui Pedro. 2015. “An Analysis of Open Government Portals: A Perspective of Transparency for Accountability.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (3): 323–32. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2015.​05.​006.
 
11
The Open Government Data Catalogue from India is on this webpage: https://​data.​gov.​in/.
 
12
Zacatecas Transparency Portal: http://​transparencia.​zacatecas.​gob.​mx/ (in Spanish)
 
13
Migration and Transparency website can be accessed through http://​migracionytransp​arencia.​org/.
 
14
Tellez (2014) Lanzan Plataforma sobre Migración y Transparencia. Published by NewsPaper EL Universal. Online: http://​archivo.​eluniversal.​com.​mx/​periodismo-datos/​2014/​osc-lanzan-plataforma-sobre-migracion-y-transparencia-96308.​html [last access: 2/18/2016].
 
15
Newsom, Gavin, and Lisa Dickey. 2013. Citizenville: How to Take the Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government. 1st ed. Westminster, London: The Penguin Press HC. http://​www.​amazon.​com/​dp/​1594204721
 
16
This website can be consulted at https://​www.​crimereports.​com/.
 
17
The Ushahidi website is an open-source tool designed to enable data sharing using visualization tools and data collection through mobile phones. http://​www.​ushahidi.​com/
 
18
Bertot and his colleagues explore the idea of promoting culture of transparency in their research. Bertot, John C, Paul T Jaeger, and Justin M Grimes. 2010. “Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies.” Government Information Quarterly 27 (3). University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA: 264–71. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2010.​03.​001. Other scholars conducted similar research. Clarke, Amanda, and Helen Margetts. 2014. “Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other ? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform.” Policy & Internet 6 (4): 393–417. doi:10.​1002/​1944-2866.​POI377. Yang, T.-M., J. Lo, and J. Shiang. 2015. “To Open or Not to Open? Determinants of Open Government Data.” Journal of Information Science, no. 1: 1–17. doi:10.​1177/​0165551515586715​.
 
20
More information about the CDC app can be found in Tolver (2013) CDC Mobile Tools published at Digital Gov. Online: https://​www.​digitalgov.​gov/​2013/​05/​16/​cdc-mobile-tools/​ [last access: 2-18-16].
 
21
These examples were cited by Gonzalez-Zapata, Felipe, and Richard Heeks. “The Multiple Meanings of Open Government Data: Understanding Different Stakeholders and Their Perspectives.” Government Information Quarterly, 2015. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2015.​09.​001.
 
22
See Lathrop, Daniel, and Laurel Ruma. 2010. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. 1st ed. California, Usa: O’reilly. and Luna-Reyes, Luis F., Soon Ae Chun, and Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan. 2012. “Collaborative e-government.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 6 (1): 5–12. doi:10.​1108/​1750616121121486​8.
 
23
Janssen, Marijn, Yannis Charalabidis, and Anneke Zuiderwijk. 2012. “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29 (4): 258–68. doi:10.​1080/​10580530.​2012.​716740
 
24
Yang, Tung Mou, and Yi Jung Wu. 2015. “Examining the Socio-Technical Determinants Influencing Government Agencies’ Open Data Publication: A Study in Taiwan.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (3). Elsevier Inc.: 378–92. doi:10.​1016/​j.​giq.​2016.​05.​003. (pág. 379)
 
25
Harrison, Teresa M., Theresa a. Pardo, and Meghan Cook. 2012. “Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda.” Future Internet 4 (4): 900–928. doi:10.​3390/​fi4040900
 
Metadaten
Titel
Opening Government: Open Data and Projects
verfasst von
Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán
Luis F. Luna-Reyes
Dolores E. Luna-Reyes
J. Ramon Gil-Garcia
Gabriel Puron-Cid
Sergio Picazo-Vela
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60348-3_7