Skip to main content

2016 | Buch

Optimization Methods for Gas and Power Markets

Theory and Cases

verfasst von: Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Buchreihe : Applied Quantitative Finance

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This is a valuable, quantitative guide to the technicalities of optimization methodologies in gas and power markets, and will be of interest to practitioners in the energy industry and financial sector who work in trading, quantitative analysis and energy risk modeling.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
1. Optimization in Energy Markets
Abstract
In the Preface, we mentioned that optimization problems represent a class of mathematical problems that we cannot consider always homogeneous. Different kinds of problems ask for different representation and solution tools. Hence, a bit of classification may be worthwhile for the sake of clarity.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
2. Optimization Methods
Abstract
Optimization is the branch of mathematics which faces the problem of selecting a best element (with respect to some criteria) from some set of available alternatives. A general optimization problem can be represented in the following way:
$$\begin{gathered} \max \quad f\left( x \right) \hfill \\ \,\;s.t.\quad x\in X \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
where f maps the elements of a set A to the set of real numbers and XA is the set of choices. The simplest optimization problem consists in maximizing a real function over an allowed set. By convention, here the standard form of an optimization problem is stated in terms of maximization, but it is always possible to switch from minimization to maximization using the relationship
$$\mathop{{\min }}\limits_{{x\in X}}f\left( x \right)=-\mathop{{\max }}\limits_{{x\in X}}\left( {-f\left( x \right)} \right).$$
Optimization problems are commonly divided into classes, depending on the mathematical properties of the function f and the geometrical form of X. For every class of problems suitable optimization methods have been developed. When f is a linear function of x, and X can be described using linear (in)equalities, then the problem is said to be a Linear Optimization Problem. This is the subject of Section 2.1. When f is not linear, but constraints satisfy some regularity conditions, then the algorithm to solve the optimization problems differs from the linear case. This is the subject of Section 2.2. Finally, when the quantity we want to optimize is uncertain (for example the profit and loss of a trading position on a stock market), then the optimization problem is called stochastic and the solution methods are slightly different from the deterministic case. This is the subject of Section 2.5.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
3. Cases on Static Optimization
Abstract
Let us consider the case of an investment fund that has to evaluate different investment alternatives. The fund has to invest 250 million euros into investment projects with lifetimes shorter than 25 years, with a target internal rate of return of x%. Let us assume that every investment alternative under evaluation is infinitely divisible since the fund can always decide how much of any single investment to subscribe. In any case, let us assume that all the available capital has to be invested among three alternatives. Optimal proportion of the available capital should then be determined.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
4. Valuing Project Flexibilities Using the Diagrammatic Approach
Abstract
In the analysis of this business case, we will move from static optimization problems to dynamic ones, still, obviously, characterized by uncertainty.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
5. Virtual Power Plant Contracts
Abstract
Virtual Power Plant Contracts (VPP) are energy-structured products built up to replicate the payoff of a real power plant asset. These kinds of structured products are mainly used to hedge the risk exposure of a complex energy portfolio made up of different (for technology, location and efficiency) power generation assets in a more effective way compared with those reachable through standard products like forwards or plain vanilla options.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
6. Algorithms Comparison: The Swing Case
Abstract
In this chapter we model, in a continuous time framework, a gas swing contract in the spirit of [9], with one additional state variable corresponding to a stochastic strike price. In fact, in most real contracts, the strike is not a fixed number, but a market index that is updated monthly: this results in a mixed discrete/continuous stochastic control problem that we reduce to the usual continuous time situation by adding a new state variable, corresponding to an index rolled over in continuous time. The price of a swing contract is then equal to the value function of a sequence of Markov stochastic optimal control problems, each one corresponding to a time interval between two consecutive changing dates of the index, the typical length being one month.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
7. Storage Contracts
Abstract
A storage contract replicates the payoff of a physical storage asset of a commodity (usually natural gas), where the contract holder has the possibility of pumping the commodity in or out of a given reservoir, and this commodity is typically bought or sold (depending on the actions above) at market price. The contract has a fixed maturity T (usually one year later), at which a penalty Ф can be possibly paid depending on the reservoir level.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
8. Optimal Trading Strategies in Intraday Power Markets
Abstract
Traditionally, day-ahead markets have been considered the spot part of electricity markets. The trading and price formation mechanism of day-ahead markets were and are pretty much homogeneous among different power markets around the world. They are auction-based markets with a system marginal price formation mechanism. All the 24 hours of the day following the auction date can be traded, independently or in blocks. However, in recent years the impressive penetration of non-programmable renewable energy sources in many countries has introduced inefficiency into the day-ahead market framework. Wind and solar generation units are not typically able to forecast exactly their production 36–24 hours in advance, hence for them a day-ahead market is not sufficient to avoid dangerous unbalancings. Figure 8.1 displays forecast error reduction for wind generation in Germany as the forecast time horizon reduces.
Enrico Edoli, Stefano Fiorenzani, Tiziano Vargiolu
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Optimization Methods for Gas and Power Markets
verfasst von
Enrico Edoli
Stefano Fiorenzani
Tiziano Vargiolu
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Electronic ISBN
978-1-137-41297-3
Print ISBN
978-1-349-56815-4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412973