nach oben

Hydrogeology Journal

Erschienen in:

01.09.2006

Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS

verfasst von: G. P. Panagopoulos, A. K. Antonakos, N. J. Lambrakis

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2006

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution has proved to be an effective tool for the delineation of protection zones in areas affected by groundwater contamination due to intensive fertilizer applications. By modifying and optimizing the well known and widely used DRASTIC model it was possible to predict the intrinsic vulnerability to pollution as well as the groundwater pollution risk more accurately. This method incorporated the use of simple statistical and geostatistical techniques for the revision of the factor ratings and weightings of all the DRASTIC parameters under a GIS environment. The criterion for these modifications was the correlation coefficient of each parameter with the nitrates concentration in groundwater. On the basis of their statistical significance, some parameters were subtracted from the DRASTIC equation, while land use was considered as an additional DRASTIC parameter. Following the above-mentioned modifications, the correlation coefficient between groundwater pollution risk and nitrates concentration was considerably improved and rose to 33% higher than the original method. The model was applied to a part of Trifilia province, Greece, which is considered to be a typical Mediterranean region with readily available hydrogeological and hydrochemical data.

Vorheriger Artikel Characterization of water bursting and discharge into underground mines with multilayered groundwater flow systems in the North China coal basin

Nächster Artikel Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. EPA-600/2-87-035, EPA, Washington, DC

Barringer T, Dunn D, Battaglin W, Vowinkel E, (1990) Problems and methods involved in relating land use to groundwater quality.Water Resour Bull 26:1–9

Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J (2000) The revised and supplemented Corine Land Cover nomenclature. European Environ Agency Tech Report 38:110

Carter AD, Palmer RC, Monkhouse RA (1987) Mapping the vulnerability of groundwater to pollution from agricultural practice, particularly with respect to nitrate. In: Duijvenbooden W, Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proc Info 38:333–342

Durnford DS, Thompson KR, Ellerbrook DA, Loftis JC, Davies GS (1990) Screening methods for ground water pollution potential from pesticide use in Colorado agriculture. Completion Report Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Fort Collins, pp 157–165

Eckhardt DAV, Stackelberg PE (1995) Relation of ground-water quality to land use on Long Island, New York. Groundwater 33:1019–1033

Evans BM, Myers WL (1990) A CIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC. J Soil Water Conserv March-April: 242–245.

Fritch TG, McKnight CL, Yelderman JC, Arnold JG (2000) An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy aquifer, Central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Environ Manage 25:337–345CrossRefPubMed

Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Duijvenbooden W, Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proc Info. 38:69–86

Garrett P, Williams JS, Rossoll CF, Tolman AL (1989) Are ground water vulnerability classification systems workable? In: National Ground Water Association Columbus Proceedings of the FOCUS Conference on Eastern Regional Ground-Water Issues, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, pp 329–343

Halliday SL, Wolfe ML (1991) Assessing ground water pollution potential from nitrogen fertilizer using a geographic information system. Water Resour Bull 27:237–245

Johansson PO, Scharp C, Alveteg T, Choza A (1999) Framework for ground-water protection-the Managua Ground Water System as an example. Ground Water 37(2):204–213CrossRef

Kalinski RJ, Kelly WE, Bogardi I, Ehrman RL, Yamamoto PO (1994) Correlation between DRASTIC vulnerabilities and incidents of VOC contamination of municipal wells in Nebraska. Ground Water 32(1):31–34CrossRef

Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods, 4th edn., Griffin, London

Kim YJ, Hamm S (1999) Assessment of the potential for ground water contamination using the DRASTIC/ EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 7(2):227–235CrossRef

Kolpin DW (1997) Agricultural chemicals in groundwater of the midwestern United States: relations to land use. J Environ Qual 26:1025–1037CrossRef

Lambrakis N, Antonakos A, Panagopoulos G (2004) The use of multicomponent statistical analysis in hydrogeological environmental research. Water Research 38:1862–1872CrossRefPubMed

Lobo-Ferreira JP, Oliveira MM (1997) DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping of Portugal. In: Proceedings from the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, Aug. 10–15, San Francisco, pp 132–137, URL http://www-dh.lnec.pt/gias/novidades/drastic_e.html

LeGrand HE (1964) System for evaluating the contamination potential of some waste sites. J Amer Water Works Assoc 56:959–974

Lynch SD, Reynders AG, Schulze RE (1997) A DRASTIC approach to ground water vulnerability in South Africa. S African J Sci 93(2):59–60

Margat J (1968) Vulnerabilite des nappes d’eau souterraine a la pollution [Ground water vulnerability to contamination]. Bases de la cartographic, (Doc.) BRGM, 68 SGL 198 HYD, Orleans, France [in French]

McKeague JA (ed) (1978) Manual on soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CSSS, Pinawa, Manitoba pp 29–35

McLay CDA, Dragden R, Sparling G, Selvarajah N (2001) Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches. Environ Pollut 115:191–204CrossRefPubMed

Melloul M, Collin M (1998) A proposed index for aquifer water-quality assessment: the case of Israel's Sharon region. J Environ Manage 54(2):131–142CrossRef

Merchant J, (1994) GIS-Based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model, Photogram Eng Remote Sensing 60(9):1117–1127

Ostry RC, Leech REJ, Cooper AJ, Rannie EH (1987) Assessing the susceptibility of ground water supplies to non point-source agricultural contamination in southern Ontario. In: Duijvenbooden W, Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proc Info 38:437–445

Panagopoulos G (2004) Environmental hydrogeological research of the SW Trifilia aquifers. PhD Thesis, University of Patras, Patras, Greece, 395 pp [in Greek]

Pearson K (1896) Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosoph Trans Royal Soc London Ser A 187:253–318

Perrier R (1980) Geological map of Greece, Filiatra sheet, IGME, Athens

Rosen L (1994) A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Ground Water 32:278–285CrossRef

Rupert MG (1998) Probability of detecting atrazine/desethyl-atrazine and elevated concentrations of nitrate (NO₂+NO₃–N) in ground water in the Idaho part of the upper Snake River Basin. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4203, USGS, Reston, VA

Rupert MG (1999) Improvements to the DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping method. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-066-99, USGS, Reston, VA

Rundquist DC, Peters AJ, Di L, Rodekohr DA, Ehrman RL, Murray G (1991) Statewide groundwater-vulnerability assessment in Nebraska using the DRASTIC/ GIS model. Geocarto Int 6(2):51–57CrossRef

Sampatakakis P, Makris A, Gidonis E, Tzoulis H (1994) Phenomena of undergroundwater pollution in Trifilia coastal area from the use of agricultural fertilizers. Bull Geol Soc Greece 30(4)115–125

Shapiro SS, Wilk MB, Chen HJ (1968) A comparative study of various tests of normality. J Amer Statist Assoc 63:1343–1372CrossRef

Secunda S, Collin ML, Melloul AJ (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Sharon region. J Environ Managept 54:39–57CrossRef

Shukla S, Mostaghimi S, Shanholt VO, Collins MC, Ross BB (2000) A county-level assessment of ground water contamination by pesticides. Ground Water Monitor Rev 20(1):104–119

Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water budget and its use in irrigation water in the year book of agriculture. US Dept Agric, pp 346–358, USDA, Washington, DC

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) A review of methods for assessing aquifer sensitivity and ground water vulnerability to pesticide contamination. U.S. EPA/813/R-93/002, EPA, Washington, DC

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Ground water and wellhead protection. Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, EPA 625-R-94-001, EPA, Washington, DC

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Environmental indicators of water quality in the United States: Washington, D.C., Office of Water, EPA 841-R-96-002, EPA, Washington, DC

Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International Association of Hydrogeologists. International contributions to hydrogeology, vol. 16, Heise, Hannover

Wilcoxon F (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr Bull 1:80–83CrossRef

Zabet TA (2002) Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. EnvironGeol 43:203–208

Titel: Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
verfasst von: G. P. Panagopoulos
A. K. Antonakos
N. J. Lambrakis
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2006
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2006

Water resources and geomorphological characteristics of Tushka and west of Lake Nasser, Egypt

Deep groundwater flow and geochemical processes in limestone aquifers: evidence from thermal waters in Derbyshire, England, UK

Henry Darcy in his own words

An approach to interpretation of step drawdown tests

Hydrochemical and isotopic behaviour of a Saharan phreatic aquifer suffering severe natural and anthropic constraints (case of Oued-Souf region, Algeria)

Mixing of shallow and deep groundwater as indicated by the chemistry and age of karstic springs