Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 25.03.2025 | Originalarbeit

Optimized Reuse of Tunnel and Excavation Materials in Civil Engineering and Tunnel Construction using AI-supported Sensor Technologies

verfasst von: Elisabeth Hauzinger, Daniel Schneider, Martin Johannes Findl, Klaus Philipp Sedlazeck, Robert Galler

Erschienen in: BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte | Ausgabe 5/2025

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Der Artikel diskutiert die Herausforderungen und Chancen beim Management von Aushubmaterial aus großen Tiefbauprojekten wie dem Future Circular Collider und dem Transeuropäischen Verkehrsnetz. Er betont die erheblichen Abfallmengen und die Notwendigkeit einer nachhaltigen Wiederverwendung im Einklang mit der europäischen Kreislaufwirtschaft. Die rechtlichen Aspekte der Einstufung von Aushubmaterial als Abfall oder Nebenprodukt werden eingehend untersucht, was Klarheit über die Bedingungen für die Aufhebung des Abfallstatus und die Kriterien für den Status von Nebenprodukten schafft. Der Artikel stellt KI-gestützte Klassifizierungsmethoden vor, einschließlich spektralsensorbasierter Technologien und hyperspektraler Bildgebung, die eine Materialanalyse und -charakterisierung in Echtzeit während des Tunnelbohrprozesses ermöglichen. Diese Technologien sind von entscheidender Bedeutung für die Optimierung der Materialsortierung und die Verringerung des Bedarfs an Zwischenlagern. Der Artikel untersucht auch moderne Methoden der Materialverarbeitung, wie die Nassverarbeitung in einem geschlossenen Wasserkreislauf, und die möglichen Einsatzmöglichkeiten von verarbeiteten Materialien im Bauwesen und in der Landwirtschaft. Abschließend wird der ökologische, wirtschaftliche und soziale Nutzen einer qualitativ hochwertigen Materialnutzung hervorgehoben, unterstützt durch Studien, die deutliche Kostensenkungen beim Materialmanagement auf Baustellen belegen.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

As part of large-scale civil engineering projects, such as the construction of the Future Circular Collider (FCC) and the Einstein Telescope research facility, or the expansion of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for rail freight transport—for example, the extension of the Brenner Basis Tunnel or the Lyon-Turin connection—significant amounts of excavated materials are generated. These materials consist of both soft rocks (sedimentary) and hard rocks (igneous and metamorphic), making it difficult to achieve an optimal sustainable use and waste reduction [1, 2]. Excavated materials account for 37.5% of the annual waste generated in Europe. As a result, only 46% across Europe and just 8% in Austria are used for low-value reuse instead of disposal [3, 4]. In 2021, excavated materials accounted for around 59% of the total waste generated in Austria [4], amounting to 46 million tons. According to [5], 35 million tons are classified as uncontaminated excavated soil of the highest quality class according to Austrian guidelines. 62% of this uncontaminated excavated soil is landfilled. Out of a total of 1111 landfills in Austria, 932 are specifically used for the disposal of excavation as of 2020 [5]. Landfilling is not a solution in line with the European circular economy, which is why modern strategies focus on processing and reuse of these materials. In particular, AI-driven technologies offer promising approaches to maximize the efficiency and sustainability of resource recovery, especially for those excavation materials where no utilization possibilities exist yet [1, 2]. Building on the results of the HORIZON 2020 project DRAGON, which was completed in 2015, the currently running NNATT project designs an AI-supported holistic system for an excavation classification and sustainable use of excavated materials from deep and tunnel engineering. Spectral-sensor-based technologies are employed to enable a concurrent material analysis and characterization along with the tunnel boring process, aligned with the established schedule. Our scientific approach considers the heterogeneous nature of excavated materials, optimized material sorting, and economic aspects to yield a high-quality material utilization as a standard procedure in Austria and beyond in the EU.
Once a material has been classified as waste, it can only lose this status under the conditions defined in § 5 AWG 2002 [6]. According to § 5 AWG 2002, the waste status of a substance or object ends when the legal requirements for ceasing to be waste are met. This can be determined either by a national regulation according to § 5 (2) AWG 2002 [6, 7] or by an EU regulation based on Article 6 (2) of Directive 2008/98/EC [8]. If the waste is prepared for reuse, its waste status ends once the corresponding utilization process is completed. The end of the waste status is contingent on meeting all relevant requirements applicable to raw materials and products. Detailed information, if available, can be found in valid regulations such as the Recycling Construction Materials Ordinance (RBV)—BGBl. II No. 181/2015 [9].
The by-product status can only apply to substances that are not classified as waste under Article 3 (1) of the EU Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC [8]. It is essential that there is neither an intention to dispose of nor an obligation to dispose of the substance. Additionally, according to § 2 (3a) AWG 2002 [6], the following four criteria must be met:
1.
The substance or object must be securely directed to reuse.
 
2.
The substance or object can be used directly without further processing beyond normal industrial procedures.
 
3.
The substance or object must be an integral part of a manufacturing process.
 
4.
Further use must be legally permissible and safe. It must not compromise protected goods in § 1 (3) and must comply with all relevant legal regulations. The substance or object must also be harmless for the intended purpose.
 
One reason for the high landfilling rate of excavated materials is the low contaminated site contribution, which as of 2025 is € 10.60 per ton [10].

2 AI-supported Classification

The chemical-mineralogical and geotechnical classification of the excavated material is significantly affecting its recyclability. Therefore, the geological rock type as well as the excavation and tunneling methods in civil and tunnel engineering play a key role in the reuse of excavated materials. Additionally, anthropogenic contamination lowers the quality class of the excavated material [4]. Excavated and blasted materials can generally be divided into soft (sedimentary) and hard rocks (igneous and metamorphic), which, depending on their petrographic composition and grain size, may exhibit varying degrees of heterogeneity (Table 1; [11]).
TABLE 1
Average composition of tunnel excavation material from hard and soft rock [12, 13]
Lithology
Hard Rock [%]
Soft Rock [%]
Sands & gravels
12
39
Magmatic rocks
8
2
Carbonates
20
11
Clays & marls
4
23
Sedimentary rocks
9
14
Metamorphic rocks
45
10
Detrital rocks
2
1
The goal of a real-time analysis is to divide the excavated material into mass flows as homogeneous as possible, based on mineralogical-chemical composition and grain size. The material flows are then processed using a well-thought-out logistics concept to minimize the need for intermediate storage on the construction site (Fig. 1). Key parameters for classification include grain size and shape, mineralogical-chemical composition, and, in certain cases, geotechnical properties that determine the material’s further reuse path. Similar material stream characterizations are already used in the classification and sorting of municipal waste [14, 15] and in the processing of anthropogenic and geological resources [16], but have not yet been established in tunnel and excavation constructions due to the heterogeneity of the rock materials and environmental parameters. The analysis methods used for the excavation material are either directly installed above the main conveyor belt or on a separate bypass with reduced conveyor speed.
For the concurrent material analysis and characterization along with the tunnel boring process, established methods for determining the element distribution on material surfaces are already in use. These include LIBS (Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy) and PFTNA (Pulsed Fast Thermal Neutron Activation) as alternatives to X‑ray-based methods, which cannot be used on construction sites due to labor law regulations [17]. Photo-optical methods are used to analyze the grain shape and size. An additional technology is Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) combined with visual (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral cameras. The determination of the mineralogical composition can be effectively carried out using Raman spectroscopy. Hereby, the NNATT project concentrates its effort on LIBS as well as VIS/NIR and Raman HSI. An AI-supported decision matrix links the data from the online analysis with the thresholds of current guidelines and regulations, assigning the material to appropriate recovery based on its composition or potential contamination. This matrix is structured like a risk matrix and is based on the multiplication of two ordinal numbers: The first number assesses the degree of reuse, which is derived from the maximum recoverable amount and the effort required. The second number reflects the impact of use or landfilling on the environment, raw material market, and potential buyers [18].

3 Modern Material Processing Methods

The choice of processing methods should generally be based on the extraction method as it influences the fine fraction as well as potential anthropogenic contaminants. This also includes the possible use of conditioning agents, with wet processing in a closed water cycle being preferred. After the excavation material is fed into a hopper, it is transported via a conveyor belt on which the analysis unit for material characterization is installed. By this online analysis, contaminated material can be immediately separated and directed to thermal recovery. Initial binders are then removed in a washing drum, with the sludge-containing wastewater being directed through perforated impact plates. The coarse fraction is separated and sent for crushing. In a second washing process, the material is conveyed through a turbowasher, gradually washing out fine components. The resulting slurry promotes the dissolution and floating of light materials. Using vibratory sieves and decanters, the cleaned coarse fractions are separated from the slurry. This slurry is collected and passed through several hydrocyclone stages, an attrition cell, and a cyclone separator to separate the contained fine fractions. The remaining slurry is treated in a thickener with flocculants to precipitate the solids. The thickened sludge is discharged via a rake, while the clear liquid is pumped back into the process. Potential contaminants accumulate in the recirculated water. Therefore, a supplementary water treatment should be considered. The dewatered sludge is stored in a silo before being further dewatered via chamber filter presses. The goal is to produce seven fractions ranging from 10 μm to 10 mm, which can be applied as concrete sand. Clay and silt particles are suitable for producing low-carbon cement or raw concrete. Figure 2 shows a flowchart of potential processing, which could be used to process excavation material [19].

4 Sustainable Reuse of Excavation Materials

In addition to the traditional use of excavation materials for earthworks and technical fill materials such as rollings, frost protection, or drainage layers, there is the possibility for material utilization on-site and off-site of the excavation site as recycled construction material. After one or more processing stages, the material can be used as an aggregate for concrete and shotcrete, in road and path construction, in railway works, as backfill material, and water construction stones, if the required geotechnical parameters are met. [11]. Another potential use, especially for fine-grained, cohesive materials, lies in the substitution of secondary raw materials such as low-carbon cement, thermally activated clays, raw concrete, raw bricks, or geopolymers [20, 21]. The use of these alternatives allows for a reduction in the demand for conventional raw materials, the production of which is associated with high energy consumption and CO2 emissions (Fig. 3). However, it must be ensured that the substitution material exhibits a comparable quality [9], which is largely determined by the mineralogical and chemical composition as well as the geotechnical properties of the excavation material. An alternative use for excavated lithologies with low contamination is soil engineering, which is used to produce fertile topsoil. By adjusting recipes with excavation materials, the end product can meet specific requirements and be used in agriculture, for greening measures, or for the restoration of various ecosystems. Additionally, each kilogram of newly formed soil stores 14 g of stable carbon, equivalent to approximately 54.38 g of CO2 [22].

5 Conclusion and Outlook

The high-quality utilization of excavation material is an essential component of the European circular economy. It offers significant ecological, economic, and social benefits. Our approach aims to use (raw) mineral resources more efficiently, reduce the burden on landfills, shorten transportation routes, and promote sustainability in the construction industry and agriculture. This is made possible by combining chemical-mineralogical and geotechnical analyses, the development of a database, the use of AI for material classification, spectral data collection in a pilot plant, the application of sustainable material processes to produce alternative building materials as well as soil additives for agriculture [24] and the planning of material sorting methods.
Studies show that, despite the additional effort required for material characterization and processing, the overall costs for material management on construction sites can be reduced by up to 85% [25]. The associated savings enable the optimized investment planning for clients and a more efficient implementation of large construction projects.

Funding

The currently running NNATT project is funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology, and the Research Promotion Agency (FFG Project Number: FO999907606) within the framework of the FTI Initiative Circular Economy (3rd Call, 2023) under open4innovation. The HORIZON 2020 project DRAGON, which was completed in 2015, has received funding from the Seventh Programme of the European Union for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 308389.
Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​deed.​de.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission: EU construction & demolition waste management protocol. Off. J. Eur. Union , 1–22 (2016) European Commission: EU construction & demolition waste management protocol. Off. J. Eur. Union , 1–22 (2016)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat BMK: Die Bestandsaufnahme der Abfallwirtschaft in Österreich. Statusbericht 2023 für das Referenzjahr 2021 (2023) BMK: Die Bestandsaufnahme der Abfallwirtschaft in Österreich. Statusbericht 2023 für das Referenzjahr 2021 (2023)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat BAWP: Bundes-Abfallwirtschaftsplan (2023) BAWP: Bundes-Abfallwirtschaftsplan (2023)
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie über ein Abfallverzeichnis. AVV 2020 (2020) Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie über ein Abfallverzeichnis. AVV 2020 (2020)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat ARRL: Abfallrahmenrichtlinie – Richtlinie 2008/98/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 19. November 2008 über Abfälle und zur Aufhebung bestimmter Richtlinien. ARRL (2008) ARRL: Abfallrahmenrichtlinie – Richtlinie 2008/98/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 19. November 2008 über Abfälle und zur Aufhebung bestimmter Richtlinien. ARRL (2008)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat RBV: Recycling-Baustoffverordnung – BGBl. II Nr. 181/2015. RBV (2015) RBV: Recycling-Baustoffverordnung – BGBl. II Nr. 181/2015. RBV (2015)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat ALSAG: Altlastensanierungsgesetz. ALSAG (2024) ALSAG: Altlastensanierungsgesetz. ALSAG (2024)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Österreichische Bautechnik Vereinigung: Verwendung von Tunnelausbruch. Richtlinie. ÖBV, Wien (2015) Österreichische Bautechnik Vereinigung: Verwendung von Tunnelausbruch. Richtlinie. ÖBV, Wien (2015)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Erben, H.: Real-time material analysis and development of a collaboration and trading platform for mineral resources from underground construction projects. Montanuniversität (2016). Doktoratsarbeit Erben, H.: Real-time material analysis and development of a collaboration and trading platform for mineral resources from underground construction projects. Montanuniversität (2016). Doktoratsarbeit
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauzinger, E., Schneider, D., Galler, R.: KI-gestützte Verwertungs- und Aufbereitungsstrategien von Aushubmaterialien bei Großprojekten des Tiefbaus. In: Vorträge-Konferenzband zur 17. Recy & DepoTech-Konferenz 17. Recy & DepoTech-Konferenz, Montanuniversität Leoben, 13.–15. November 2024. pp. 523–528. (2024). https://www.recydepotech.at/. Accessed 20 February 2025 Hauzinger, E., Schneider, D., Galler, R.: KI-gestützte Verwertungs- und Aufbereitungsstrategien von Aushubmaterialien bei Großprojekten des Tiefbaus. In: Vorträge-Konferenzband zur 17. Recy & DepoTech-Konferenz 17. Recy & DepoTech-Konferenz, Montanuniversität Leoben, 13.–15. November 2024. pp. 523–528. (2024). https://​www.​recydepotech.​at/​. Accessed 20 February 2025
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Voiron, J., Garin, E., Bureau, E., Rutkowski, S., Champeau, B., Guillaume, A., Klein, P., Barnes-Davin, L., Guillemin, H., Venon, S., Martin, J., Bürki, M., Phan, J., Antoni, M., Fayot, B., Bufalo, J., Heck, P., Monin, N., Carron, C.: Molasse is the new ore. for the “Mining the Future” contest (2021). Unpublished Voiron, J., Garin, E., Bureau, E., Rutkowski, S., Champeau, B., Guillaume, A., Klein, P., Barnes-Davin, L., Guillemin, H., Venon, S., Martin, J., Bürki, M., Phan, J., Antoni, M., Fayot, B., Bufalo, J., Heck, P., Monin, N., Carron, C.: Molasse is the new ore. for the “Mining the Future” contest (2021). Unpublished
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlesso, L., Giet, C., Pillet, M., Carraz, R., Fayot, B., Romand, L., Machinet, G., Collet, M.D., Thomas, Y.: From wastes to Soil: Mineral waste reclamation into fertile soil materials. Submission for the “Mining the Future” contest (2021). Unpublished Carlesso, L., Giet, C., Pillet, M., Carraz, R., Fayot, B., Romand, L., Machinet, G., Collet, M.D., Thomas, Y.: From wastes to Soil: Mineral waste reclamation into fertile soil materials. Submission for the “Mining the Future” contest (2021). Unpublished
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Graftieaux, P., Boudrieres, F.: Manufacture of molasses bricks. Einreichung für den Mining-the- Future Wettbewerb (2021). unveröffentlicht Graftieaux, P., Boudrieres, F.: Manufacture of molasses bricks. Einreichung für den Mining-the- Future Wettbewerb (2021). unveröffentlicht
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills, T.H., Showalter, E., Jarman, D.: A cost-effective waste management plan. Cost Eng. 35, (1999) Mills, T.H., Showalter, E., Jarman, D.: A cost-effective waste management plan. Cost Eng. 35, (1999)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chittoori, B., Puppala, A.J., Reddy, R., Marshall, D.: Sustainable reutilization of excavated trench material. In: Hryciw, R.D., Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., Yesiller, N. (eds.) GeoCongress 2012. GeoCongress 2012 March 25–29, 2012. pp. 4280–4289. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston (2012) https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412121.440CrossRef Chittoori, B., Puppala, A.J., Reddy, R., Marshall, D.: Sustainable reutilization of excavated trench material. In: Hryciw, R.D., Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., Yesiller, N. (eds.) GeoCongress 2012. GeoCongress 2012 March 25–29, 2012. pp. 4280–4289. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston (2012) https://​doi.​org/​10.​1061/​9780784412121.​440CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Optimized Reuse of Tunnel and Excavation Materials in Civil Engineering and Tunnel Construction using AI-supported Sensor Technologies
verfasst von
Elisabeth Hauzinger
Daniel Schneider
Martin Johannes Findl
Klaus Philipp Sedlazeck
Robert Galler
Publikationsdatum
25.03.2025
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte / Ausgabe 5/2025
Print ISSN: 0005-8912
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7531
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-025-01579-4

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.