Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 2/2017

22.10.2015

Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures

verfasst von: Shahla Ghobadi, John Campbell, Stewart Clegg

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There has been a growing research interest in understanding knowledge sharing in agile development. Yet, empirical research that sheds light on its underlying practices, such as pair programming, is evolving. This study uses insights from coopetition and software literature to focus inquiry on the relation between coopetitive rewards and high-quality knowledge sharing in pair programming teams. Theoretical hypotheses are developed and validated, suggesting that: ‘coopetitive rewards influence high-quality knowledge sharing both directly and over time through their impact on the level of knowledge sharing satisfaction’, and, ‘the impact of coopetitive rewards on high-quality knowledge sharing is dependent upon task complexity and the history of working under similar reward structure’. This study generates new understanding related to the use of rewards in pair programming teams, and offers a rigorous and replicable seven-step experimental process for simulating coopetitive structures and investigating their role in pair programming and in similar collaborative contexts.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ally, M., Darroch, F., & Toleman, M. (2005). A framework for understanding the factors influencing pair programming success, eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (pp. 1–10). UK: Sheffield. Ally, M., Darroch, F., & Toleman, M. (2005). A framework for understanding the factors influencing pair programming success, eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (pp. 1–10). UK: Sheffield.
Zurück zum Zitat Balijepally, V., Mahapatra, R., Nerur, S., & Price, K. H. (2009). Are two heads better than one for software development? The productivity paradox of pair programming. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 91–118. Balijepally, V., Mahapatra, R., Nerur, S., & Price, K. H. (2009). Are two heads better than one for software development? The productivity paradox of pair programming. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 91–118.
Zurück zum Zitat Beath, C. M., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 350–377.CrossRef Beath, C. M., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 350–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphery, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team Performance: toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 572–590.CrossRef Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphery, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team Performance: toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 572–590.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beersma, B., Hollenback, J. R., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., & Ilgen, D. R. (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: the effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 131–142.CrossRef Beersma, B., Hollenback, J. R., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., & Ilgen, D. R. (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: the effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 131–142.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bellini, E., Canfora, G., García, F., Piattini, M., & Visaggio, C. A. (2005). Pair designing as practice for enforcing and diffusing design knowledge. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17(6), 401–423.CrossRef Bellini, E., Canfora, G., García, F., Piattini, M., & Visaggio, C. A. (2005). Pair designing as practice for enforcing and diffusing design knowledge. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17(6), 401–423.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biron, M., & Bamberger, P. (2010). The impact of structural empowerment on individual well-being and performance: taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints into account. Human Relations, 63(2), 163–191.CrossRef Biron, M., & Bamberger, P. (2010). The impact of structural empowerment on individual well-being and performance: taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints into account. Human Relations, 63(2), 163–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition: a revolutionary mindset that combines competition and co-operation. New York: Bantam Dell Pub Group. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition: a revolutionary mindset that combines competition and co-operation. New York: Bantam Dell Pub Group.
Zurück zum Zitat Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191–213.CrossRef Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: a review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52. Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: a review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52.
Zurück zum Zitat Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., & Visaggio, C. A. (2007). Evaluating performances of pair designing in industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(8), 1317–1327.CrossRef Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., & Visaggio, C. A. (2007). Evaluating performances of pair designing in industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(8), 1317–1327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, F. K. Y., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2009). Acceptance of agile methodologies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 803–814.CrossRef Chan, F. K. Y., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2009). Acceptance of agile methodologies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 803–814.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chau, T., & Maurer, F. (2004). Knowledge sharing in agile software teams. In L. Wolfgang (Ed.), Logic versus approximation (pp. 173–183). United States: Springer.CrossRef Chau, T., & Maurer, F. (2004). Knowledge sharing in agile software teams. In L. Wolfgang (Ed.), Logic versus approximation (pp. 173–183). United States: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cockburn, A. (2006). Agile software development: the cooperative game (agile software development series). Boston, United States: Addison-Wesley Professional. Cockburn, A. (2006). Agile software development: the cooperative game (agile software development series). Boston, United States: Addison-Wesley Professional.
Zurück zum Zitat Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development: the people factor. Computer, 34(11), 131–133.CrossRef Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development: the people factor. Computer, 34(11), 131–133.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X., & Pikkarainen, M. (2010). People over process: key people challenges in agile development. IEEE Software, 99(1), 47–57. Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X., & Pikkarainen, M. (2010). People over process: key people challenges in agile development. IEEE Software, 99(1), 47–57.
Zurück zum Zitat Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (2009). The bureaucratic phenomenon. London: Transaction Pub. Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (2009). The bureaucratic phenomenon. London: Transaction Pub.
Zurück zum Zitat Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129–152.CrossRef Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V. G., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213–1221.CrossRef Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V. G., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213–1221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esterhuizen, D., Schutte, C. S. L., & Du Toit, A. S. A. (2012). Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 32(4), 354–364.CrossRef Esterhuizen, D., Schutte, C. S. L., & Du Toit, A. S. A. (2012). Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 32(4), 354–364.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31.CrossRef Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fu, F.-L., Wu, Y.-L., & Ho, H.-C. (2009). An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 550–562.CrossRef Fu, F.-L., Wu, Y.-L., & Ho, H.-C. (2009). An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 550–562.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garvey, C. (2002). Steer teams with the right pay. HR Magazine, 47(1), 71–78. Garvey, C. (2002). Steer teams with the right pay. HR Magazine, 47(1), 71–78.
Zurück zum Zitat Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.CrossRef Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S. (2014). What drives knowledge sharing in software team: a review and classification framework. Information Management, 52(1), 82–97.CrossRef Ghobadi, S. (2014). What drives knowledge sharing in software team: a review and classification framework. Information Management, 52(1), 82–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2011a). Coopetitive relationships in cross-functional software development teams: how to model and measure? Journal of Systems and Software, 85(5), 1096–1104.CrossRef Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2011a). Coopetitive relationships in cross-functional software development teams: how to model and measure? Journal of Systems and Software, 85(5), 1096–1104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2011b). Coopetitive knowledge sharing: an analytical review of literature. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 307–317. Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2011b). Coopetitive knowledge sharing: an analytical review of literature. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 307–317.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams: a coopetitive model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 285–301.CrossRef Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams: a coopetitive model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 285–301.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2013). Modeling high-quality knowledge sharing in cross-functional software development teams. Information Processing and Management, 49(1), 138–157.CrossRef Ghobadi, S., & D’ambra, J. (2013). Modeling high-quality knowledge sharing in cross-functional software development teams. Information Processing and Management, 49(1), 138–157.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobadi, S., & Mathiassen, L. (2014). Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in Agile software teams. Information Systems Journal. doi:10.1111/isj.12053. Ghobadi, S., & Mathiassen, L. (2014). Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in Agile software teams. Information Systems Journal. doi:10.​1111/​isj.​12053.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon, F. M., Welch, K. R., Offringa, G., & Katz, N. (2000). The complexity of social outcomes from cooperative, competitive, and individualistic reward systems. Social Justice Research, 13(3), 237–269.CrossRef Gordon, F. M., Welch, K. R., Offringa, G., & Katz, N. (2000). The complexity of social outcomes from cooperative, competitive, and individualistic reward systems. Social Justice Research, 13(3), 237–269.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta, N. & Bajwa, J. K. (2012) Analysis of knowledge sharing practices in distributed agile environment. International Journal of Computer and Communication Technology, 3(6), 6–11. Gupta, N. & Bajwa, J. K. (2012) Analysis of knowledge sharing practices in distributed agile environment. International Journal of Computer and Communication Technology, 3(6), 6–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanks, B. (2008). Empirical evaluation of distributed pair programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 530–544.CrossRef Hanks, B. (2008). Empirical evaluation of distributed pair programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 530–544.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045.CrossRef Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer, 34(9), 120–127.CrossRef Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer, 34(9), 120–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hulkko, H. & Abrahamsson, P. (2005). A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering: ACM, 495–504, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Hulkko, H. & Abrahamsson, P. (2005). A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering: ACM, 495–504, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: theory and research. MN, US: Interaction Book Company. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: theory and research. MN, US: Interaction Book Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, 4, 9–36.CrossRef Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, 4, 9–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2006). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.CrossRef Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2006). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., Jundt, D., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 103–119.CrossRef Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., Jundt, D., & Meyer, C. J. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 103–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, C., & Hsieh, C. (2009). The impact of knowledge stickiness on knowledge transfer implementation, internalization, and satisfaction for multinational corporations. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 425–435.CrossRef Li, C., & Hsieh, C. (2009). The impact of knowledge stickiness on knowledge transfer implementation, internalization, and satisfaction for multinational corporations. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 425–435.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2010). Withholding effort in knowledge contribution: the role of social exchange and social cognitive on project teams. Information Management, 47(1), 188–196.CrossRef Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2010). Withholding effort in knowledge contribution: the role of social exchange and social cognitive on project teams. Information Management, 47(1), 188–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2008). An exploratory model of knowledge flow barriers within healthcare organizations. Information Management, 45(5), 331–339.CrossRef Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2008). An exploratory model of knowledge flow barriers within healthcare organizations. Information Management, 45(5), 331–339.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, S. P., Wang, Y. C., Yuan-Hui, T., & Hsu, Y. F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: a survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 1598–1606.CrossRef Lin, S. P., Wang, Y. C., Yuan-Hui, T., & Hsu, Y. F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: a survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 1598–1606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loebbecke, C., Van Fenema, P. C., & Powell, P. (1999). Co-Opetition and knowledge transfer. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30(2), 14–25.CrossRef Loebbecke, C., Van Fenema, P. C., & Powell, P. (1999). Co-Opetition and knowledge transfer. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30(2), 14–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lucker, G. W., Rosenfield, D., Sikes, J., & Aronson, E. (1976). Performance in the interdependent classroom: a field study. American Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 115–123.CrossRef Lucker, G. W., Rosenfield, D., Sikes, J., & Aronson, E. (1976). Performance in the interdependent classroom: a field study. American Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 115–123.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mcgrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105.CrossRef Mcgrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Müller, M. M. (2005). Two controlled experiments concerning the comparison of pair programming to peer review. Journal of Systems and Software, 78(2), 166–179.CrossRef Müller, M. M. (2005). Two controlled experiments concerning the comparison of pair programming to peer review. Journal of Systems and Software, 78(2), 166–179.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Müller, M. M. (2007). Do programmer pairs make different mistakes than solo programmers? Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1460–1471.CrossRef Müller, M. M. (2007). Do programmer pairs make different mistakes than solo programmers? Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1460–1471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R. K., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72–78.CrossRef Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R. K., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 72–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pais, L., & dos Santos, N. R. (2015). Knowledge-sharing, cooperation and personal development. In K. Kraiger, J. Passmore, N. R. dos Santos & Sigmar Malvezzi (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement (pp. 278-302). UK, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. Pais, L., & dos Santos, N. R. (2015). Knowledge-sharing, cooperation and personal development. In K. Kraiger, J. Passmore, N. R. dos Santos & Sigmar Malvezzi (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement (pp. 278-302). UK, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Pee, L. G., Kankanhalli, A., & Kim, H. W. (2010). Knowledge sharing in information systems development: a social interdependence perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 550–575. Pee, L. G., Kankanhalli, A., & Kim, H. W. (2010). Knowledge sharing in information systems development: a social interdependence perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 550–575.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., & Cao, L. (2012). Ambidexterity in agile distributed development: an empirical investigation. Information System Research, 23(2), 323–339.CrossRef Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., & Cao, L. (2012). Ambidexterity in agile distributed development: an empirical investigation. Information System Research, 23(2), 323–339.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan, S., & O’connor, R. V. (2009). Development of a team measure for tacit knowledge in software development teams. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(2), 229–240.CrossRef Ryan, S., & O’connor, R. V. (2009). Development of a team measure for tacit knowledge in software development teams. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(2), 229–240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Serrano, J. M., & Pons, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: we can also do it without task structure. Intercultural Education, 18(3), 215–230.CrossRef Serrano, J. M., & Pons, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: we can also do it without task structure. Intercultural Education, 18(3), 215–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sharp, H., & Robinson, H. (2008). Collaboration and co-ordination in mature eXtreme programming teams. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 506–518.CrossRef Sharp, H., & Robinson, H. (2008). Collaboration and co-ordination in mature eXtreme programming teams. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 506–518.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shih, H.-P., & Huang, E. (2014). Influences of Web interactivity and social identity and bonds on the quality of online discussion in a virtual community. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(4), 627–641.CrossRef Shih, H.-P., & Huang, E. (2014). Influences of Web interactivity and social identity and bonds on the quality of online discussion in a virtual community. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(4), 627–641.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shih, M.-H., Tsai, H.-T., & Wu, C.-C. (2006). A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: game and co-opetition perspectives. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 354–366.CrossRef Shih, M.-H., Tsai, H.-T., & Wu, C.-C. (2006). A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: game and co-opetition perspectives. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 354–366.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sjøberg, D. I., Hannay, J. E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V. B., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N.-K., & Rekdal, A. C. (2005). A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(9), 733–753.CrossRef Sjøberg, D. I., Hannay, J. E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V. B., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N.-K., & Rekdal, A. C. (2005). A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(9), 733–753.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slavin, R. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure: an analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47(4), 633–650.CrossRef Slavin, R. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure: an analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47(4), 633–650.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Speier, C., Vessey, I., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 771–797.CrossRef Speier, C., Vessey, I., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 771–797.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, E. Z. (2006). The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: an experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 103–116.CrossRef Taylor, E. Z. (2006). The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: an experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 103–116.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 139–158.CrossRef Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 139–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, G. A., Liu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, M., & Fan, W. (2015). Examining micro-level knowledge sharing discussions in online communities. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9566-1. Wang, G. A., Liu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, M., & Fan, W. (2015). Examining micro-level knowledge sharing discussions in online communities. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–12. doi:10.​1007/​s10796-015-9566-1.
Zurück zum Zitat Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: the impact of organizational structure dimensions. International Journal of Information Management, 29(2), 151–160.CrossRef Willem, A., & Buelens, M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: the impact of organizational structure dimensions. International Journal of Information Management, 29(2), 151–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, L., Kessler, R. R., Cunningham, W., & Jeffries, R. (2000). Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, 17(4), 19–25.CrossRef Williams, L., Kessler, R. R., Cunningham, W., & Jeffries, R. (2000). Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, 17(4), 19–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60–82.CrossRef Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wray, S. (2010). How pair programming really works. IEEE Software, 27(1), 50–55.CrossRef Wray, S. (2010). How pair programming really works. IEEE Software, 27(1), 50–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zacharis, N. Z. (2011). Measuring the effects of virtual pair programming in an introductory programming java course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 168–170.CrossRef Zacharis, N. Z. (2011). Measuring the effects of virtual pair programming in an introductory programming java course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 168–170.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures
verfasst von
Shahla Ghobadi
John Campbell
Stewart Clegg
Publikationsdatum
22.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9603-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Information Systems Frontiers 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe