nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Passive Prosthetic Ankle and Foot with Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic: Biomechanical Design, Simulation, and Optimization

verfasst von : Thanh-Phong Dao, Ngoc Le Chau

Erschienen in: Biomaterials in Orthopaedics and Bone Regeneration

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter dedicates an innovative design, analysis, and computational optimization for a novel passive prosthetic ankle and foot 1.0 and 2.0. The glass fiber reinforced plastic material is used as for the proposed prosthesis. The biomechanical design is inspired by the concept of compliant mechanism and bioengineering. Several shapes and topology of the ankle–foot are developed. Then, simulations are conducted to monitor the structural behaviors and dynamic characteristics. Three basic phases, heel strike, midstance, and toe-off, of the prosthesis 1.0 and 2.0 are analyzed by finite element method. The results found that the maximum Von Mises stresses are concentrated on the shank at toe-off. To improve the performance, a hybrid integration of Taguchi method, response surface methodology, and differential evolution algorithm is developed. The Taguchi method is used to construct the number of numerical experiments, and the response surface methodology is utilized to establish the input factors and the output strain energy. Based on the well-established mathematical model, the differential evolution algorithm is applied to the best geometric parameters of the ankle–foot. The result showed that the optimal strain energy is approximately improved 155% compared to initial design. In addition, the optimal energy strain is about 93.914 mJ. The ankle–foot 1.0 and 2.0 can be monolithically manufactured by using 3D printing. The proposed prosthetic ankle–foot may be appropriate for an amputee’s weight of 100 kg.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Squeeze Film Bearing Characteristics for Synovial Joint Applications

Nächstes Kapitel Biomaterials in Tooth Tissue Engineering

Grabowski A, D’Andrea S, Herr H (2011) Bionic leg prosthesis emulates biological ankle joint during walking. Proc Ann Meeting Am Soc Biomech, 1–2

Casillas JM, Dulieu V, Cohen M, Marcer I, Didier JP (1995) Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76(1):39–44CrossRef

Rao SS, Boyd LA, Mulroy SJ, Bontrager EL, Gronley J, Perry J (1998) Segment velocities in normal and tarsotibial amputees: prosthetic design implications. Trans Rehabil Eng 6(2):219–226CrossRef

Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL (1990) Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 27(4):369CrossRef

Lehmann J, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K, DeLateur B (1993) Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: flex foot and seattle foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74(11):1225–1231

Macfarlane PA, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Meier K (1991) Gait comparisons for below-knee amputees using a flex-foottm versus a conventional prosthetic foot. J Pros Ortho 3(4):150–161CrossRef

Postema K, Hermens H, De-Vries J, Koopman H, Eisma W (1997) Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Pros Ortho Int 21(1):17–27

Postema K, Hermens H, De-Vries J, Koopman H, Eisma W (1997) Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor. Pros Ortho Int 21(1):28–34

Linden M, Solomonidis S, Spence W, Li N, Paul J (1999) A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait. J Biomech 32(9):877–889CrossRef

10.

Hafner BJ, Sanders JE, Czerniecki J, Fergason J (2002) Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? Clin Biomech 17(5):325–344CrossRef

11.

Hafner BJ, Sanders JE, Czerniecki JM, Fergason J (2002) Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. J Rehabil Res Dev 39(1):1CrossRef

12.

Fey NP, Klute GK, Neptune RR (2011) The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees. Clin Biomech 26(10):1025–1032CrossRef

13.

Zmitrewicz RJ, Neptune RR, Sasaki K (2007) Mechanical energetic contributions from individual muscles and elastic prosthetic feet during symmetric unilateral transtibial amputee walking: a theoretical study. J Biomech 40(8):1824–1831CrossRef

14.

Bedaiwi BA, Chiad JS (2012) Vibration analysis and measurement in the below knee prosthetic limb: part I-experimental work. Proc ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Exposition, 851–858

15.

Cherelle P, Grosu V, Matthys A, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D (2014) Design and validation of the ankle mimicking prosthetic (AMP-) foot 2.0. Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 22(1):138–148CrossRef

16.

Cherelle P, Grosu V, Van-Damme M, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D (2013) Use of compliant actuators in prosthetic feet and the design of the AMP-foot 2.0. Model Simul Optim Bipedal Walking, 17–30

17.

Cherelle P, Junius K, Grosu V, Cuypers H, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D (2014) The amp-foot 2.1: actuator design, control and experiments with an amputee. Robo 32(8):1347–1361CrossRef

18.

Cherelle P, Mathijssen G, Wang Q, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D (2014) Advances in propulsive bionic feet and their actuation principles. Adv Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/984046CrossRef

19.

Starker F, Schneider U, Hansen AH, Childress DS, Pauli J, Pauli C (2015) Artificial ankle, artificial foot and artificial leg. Google Patents

20.

Ko CY, Kim SB, Kim JK, Chang Y, Cho H, Kim S, Ryu J, Mun M (2016) Biomechanical features of level walking by transtibial amputees wearing prosthetic feet with and without adaptive ankles. J Mech Sci Technol 30(6):2907–2914CrossRef

21.

Ghaith FA, Khan FA (2012) Nonlinear finite element modeling of prosthetic lower limbs. Proc Int Conf Adv Robo Mech Eng Des. 02.ARMED.2012.2.3

22.

Jimenez-Fabian R, Flynn L, Geeroms J, Vitiello N, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D (2015) Sliding-bar MACCEPA for a powered ankle prosthesis. J Mech Rob 7(4):041011CrossRef

23.

Kerkum YL, Al Buizer, Noort JC, Becher JG, Harlaar J, Brehm MA (2015) The effects of varying ankle foot orthosis stiffness on gait in children with spastic cerebral palsy who walk with excessive knee flexion. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142878CrossRef

24.

Leardini A, O’Connor JJ, Giannini S (2014) Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint. J Foot Ankle Res 7(1):8CrossRef

25.

Noroozi S, Rahman AGA, Dupac M, Vinney JE (2012) Dynamic characteristics of prosthetic feet: a comparison between modal parameters of walking, running and sprinting foot. Adv Mech Design, 339–344

26.

Omasta M, Palousek D, Navrat T, Rosicky J (2012) Finite element analysis for the evaluation of the structural behaviour of a prosthesis for trans-tibial amputees. Med Eng Phys 34(1):38–45CrossRef

27.

Rigney SM, Simmons A, Kark L (2015) Concurrent multibody and Finite Element analysis of the lower-limb during amputee running. Proc Eng Med Biol Soc, 2434–2437

28.

Veneva I, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D, Cherelle P (2013) Propulsion system with pneumatic artificial muscles for powering ankle-foot orthosis. J Theor Appl Mech 43(4):3–16CrossRef

29.

30.

Rao SS, Boyd LA, Mulroy SJ, Bontrager EL, Gronley J, Perry J (1998) Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications. Trans Rehabil Eng 6:219–226CrossRef

31.

Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL (1990) Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 27:369CrossRef

32.

33.

Macfarlane PA, Nielsen DA, Shurr DG, Meier K (1991) Gait comparisons for below-knee amputees using a flex-foot versus a conventional prosthetic foot. J Pros Ortho 3:150–161CrossRef

34.

Au S, Berniker M, Herr H (2008) Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Neural Netw 21:654–666CrossRef

35.

Sun J, Voglewede PA (2014) Powered transtibial prosthetic device control system design, implementation, and bench testing. J Med Devices 8:011004CrossRef

36.

Collins SH, Kuo AD (2010) Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking. PLoS ONE 5:e9307CrossRef

37.

Howell LL, Magleby SP, Olsen BM (2013) Handbook of compliant mechanisms. Wiley

38.

Dao TP, Huang SC (2015) Design, fabrication, and predictive model of a 1-dof translational, flexible bearing for high precision mechanism. Trans Canad Soc Mech Eng 39(3):419–429CrossRef

39.

Dao TP, Huang SC (2017) Compliant thin-walled joint based on zygoptera nonlinear geometry. J Mech Sci Technol 31(3):1293–1303CrossRef

40.

Dao TP (2016) Multiresponse optimization of a compliant guiding mechanism using hybrid Taguchi-grey based fuzzy logic approach. Math Prob Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5386893CrossRef

41.

Huang SC, Dao TP (2016) Design and computational optimization of a flexure-based XY positioning platform using FEA-based response surface methodology. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 17(8):1035–1048CrossRef

42.

Dao TP, Huang SC (2016) Design and analysis of a compliant micro-positioning platform with embedded strain gauges and viscoelastic damper. Microsyst Technol, 1–16

43.

Huang SC, Dao TP (2016) Multi-objective optimal design of a 2-DOF flexure-based mechanism using hybrid approach of grey-taguchi coupled response surface methodology and entropy measurement. Arabian J Sci Eng 41(12):5215–5231CrossRef

44.

Dhote S, Jean Z, Yang Z (2015) A nonlinear multi-mode wideband piezoelectric vibration-based energy harvester using compliant orthoplanar spring. Appl Phys Lett 106(16):163903CrossRef

45.

Dhote S, Zhengbao Y, Jean Z (2018) Modeling and experimental parametric study of a tri-leg compliant orthoplanar spring based multi-mode piezoelectric energy harvester. Mech Syst Sig Process 98:268–280CrossRef

46.

Bains PS, Singh S, Sidhu SS, Kaur S, Ablyaz TR (2018) Investigation of surface properties of Al–SiC composites in hybrid electrical discharge machining. In: Futuristic composites. Springer, Berlin, pp 181–196CrossRef

47.

Bhui AS, Singh G, Sidhu SS, Bains PS (2018) Experimental investigation of optimal ED machining parameters for Ti-6Al-4 V biomaterial. FU Ser Mech Eng 16(3):337–345CrossRef

48.

Sidhu SS, Bains PS, Yazdani M, Zolfaniab SH (2018) Application of MCDM techniques on nonconventional machining of composites. In: Futuristic composites. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–144CrossRef

49.

Nguyen TT, Dao TP, Huang SC (2017) Biomechanical design of a novel six dof compliant prosthetic ankle-foot 2.0 for rehabilitation of amputee. ASME Int Des Eng Tech Conf Comp Info Eng, V05AT08A013–V05AT08A013

50.

Nguyen TT, Le HG, Dao TP, Huang SC (2017) Evaluation of structural behaviour of a novel compliant prosthetic ankle-foot. IEEE Int Conf Mech Sys Cont Eng, 58–62

Titel: Passive Prosthetic Ankle and Foot with Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic: Biomechanical Design, Simulation, and Optimization
verfasst von: Thanh-Phong Dao
Ngoc Le Chau
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Biomaterials in Orthopaedics and Bone Regeneration
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9976-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-9977-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9977-0_6

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht