Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The growing literature on corporate responsibility (CR) has drawn attention to how different CR practices complement each other and interact in the form of configurations. This study investigated CR patterns associated with high financial performance for 466 firms in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. We applied a set-theoretic approach using qualitative comparative analysis to identify similarities and differences across these three societies in configurations of CR practices relating to customer, employee, investor, community, and environmental stakeholder groups. The extent to which the financial benefits of various configurations of CR practices are attributable to institutional factors is examined.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525. CrossRef
Aguilera, R., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28, 447–465.
Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in CSR: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. CrossRef
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. CrossRef
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463. CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. CrossRef
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122. CrossRef
Bowen, F. E. (2002). Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13(4), 305–316. CrossRef
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343. CrossRef
Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2002). Eco-sustainability orientation in China and Japan: Differences between proactive and reactive firms. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 85–122). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 185–216.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. CrossRef
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. CrossRef
Cheung, Y., Tan, W., Ahn, H.-J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility matter in Asian emerging markets? Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 401–413. CrossRef
Child, J., & Tsai, T. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 95–125. CrossRef
Chow, F. H.-S. (2004). The impact of institutional context on human resource management in three Chinese societies. Employee Relations, 26(6), 626–642. CrossRef
Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (2002). Applied multiple regression: Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crilly, D. (2011). Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational corporation: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 694–717. CrossRef
Daub, C.-H., & Ergenizinger, R. (2005). Enabling sustainable management through a new multi-disciplinary concept of customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9–10), 998–1012.
Delery, J., & Doty, D. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835. CrossRef
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. CrossRef
Dixon-Fowler, H. R., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond ‘‘does it pay to be green?’’ A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353–366. CrossRef
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Egri, C. P., & Hornal, R. C. (2002). Strategic environmental human resource management and perceived organizational performance: An explanatory study of the Canadian manufacturing sector. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 205–236). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Falkenberg, J., & Brunsæl, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A strategic advantage or a strategic necessity? Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 9–16. CrossRef
Fiss, P. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. CrossRef
Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393–420. CrossRef
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. CrossRef
Fransen, L. (2013). The embeddedness of responsible business practice: Exploring the interaction between national-institutional environments and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 213–227. CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Books.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421. CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9. CrossRef
Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (2000). Beyond built to last… stakeholder relations in “built-to-last” companies. Business and Society Review, 105(4), 393–418. CrossRef
Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 403–428.
Hicks, G. L., & Redding, S. G. (1983). The story of the East Asian “economic miracle”, parts I and II. Euro-Asia Business Review, 2(3), 24–32.
Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. CrossRef
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433. CrossRef
Hopkins, M. (2003). The planetary bargain: Corporate social responsibility matters. London: Earthscan Publications.
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–849. CrossRef
IMD International. (2010). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook. http://www.imd.org/research/.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ip, P. (2009). Is confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 463–476. CrossRef
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators (1996– 2008). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Combs, J. G., Russell, C. J., Shook, C., Dean, M. A., Runge, J., et al. (1997). Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 223–240. CrossRef
Kogut, B., MacDuffie, J., & Ragin, C. (2004). Prototypes and strategy: Assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets. European Management Review, 1(2), 114–131. CrossRef
Kolk, A., Hong, P., & van Dolen, W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: An analysis of domestic and foreign retailers’ sustainability dimensions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 289–303.
Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.
Ma, X., & Ortolano, L. (2000). Environmental regulation in China: Institutions, enforcement, and compliance. New York: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469. CrossRef
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514. CrossRef
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. CrossRef
Marquis, C., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Regulatory uncertainty and corporate responses to environmental protection in China. California Management Review, 54(1), 39–63. CrossRef
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. CrossRef
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. CrossRef
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. CrossRef
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 179–208. CrossRef
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21(3), 245–269. CrossRef
Moon, J., & Shen, X. (2010). CSR in China research: Salience, focus and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 613–629. CrossRef
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 409–444. CrossRef
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. CrossRef
Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35, 1518–1541. CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. CrossRef
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. CrossRef
Ragin, C. (2008a). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Ragin, C. (2008b). Measurement versus calibration. In J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 174–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ragin, C., & Fiss, P. (2009). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Set relations in social research (pp. 190–212). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C., & Sonnett, J. (2005). Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In S. Kropp, & M. Minkenberg (Eds.), Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 180–197). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559. CrossRef
Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The influence of global marketing standardization on performance. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 1–17. CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). The changing role of business in global society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 327–347. CrossRef
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. CrossRef
Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of U.S. firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862. CrossRef
Swanson, K. E., Kuhn, R. G., & Wei, X. (2001). Environmental policy implementation in rural China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang. Environmental Management, 27(4), 481–491. CrossRef
Taneja, S., Taneja, P., & Gupta, R. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 343–364. CrossRef
Tang, S. Y., Lo, C. W. H., & Fryxell, G. E. (2003). Enforcement styles, organizational commitment, and enforcement effectiveness: an empirical study of local environmental protection officials in urban China. Environment and Planning, 35(1), 75–94. CrossRef
Tang, S. Y., & Zhan, X. Y. (2008). Civic environmental NGOs, civil society, and democratisation in China. Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 425–448. CrossRef
Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1–24. CrossRef
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. (2009). World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. CrossRef
Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159. CrossRef
Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2012). Corporate philanthropy and financial performance of Chinese firms: The roles of social expectations and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181. CrossRef
Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xun J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in China: A preferential stakeholder model and effects. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi: 10.1002/bse.1757.
Yang, G. B. (2005). Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China. The China Quarterly, 181, 46–66. CrossRef
Yu, B. B., & Egri, C. P. (2005). Human resource management practices and organizational commitment: A comparison of Chinese employees in a state-owned enterprise and a joint venture. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 332–360. CrossRef
- Patterns of Corporate Responsibility Practices for High Financial Performance: Evidence from Three Chinese Societies
Carol Yeh-Yun Lin
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia