Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2/2017

01.02.2017 | Perspectives

Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework

verfasst von: Rajani Ganesh Pillai, Achintya N. Bezbaruah

Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Existing literature in people’s attitude toward nanotechnology and acceptance of nanotechnology applications has generally investigated the impact of factors at the individual or context levels. While this vast body of research is very informative, a comprehensive understanding of how attitude toward nanotechnology are formed and factors influencing the acceptance of nanotechnology are elusive. This paper proposes an exploratory nanotechnology perception-attitude-acceptance framework (Nano-PAAF) to build a systematic understanding of the phenomenon. The framework proposes that perceptions of risks and benefits of nanotechnology are influenced by cognitive, affective, and sociocultural factors. The sociodemographic factors of consumers and contextual factors mitigate the influence of cognitive, affective, and sociocultural factors on the perception of risks and benefits. The perceived risks and benefits in turn influence people’s attitude toward nanotechnology, which then influences acceptance of nanotechnology products. This framework will need further development over time to incorporate emerging knowledge and is expected to be useful for researchers, decision and policy makers, industry, and business entities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (2000) Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know. J Consum Res 27(2):123–156CrossRef Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (2000) Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know. J Consum Res 27(2):123–156CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 17(1):35–54CrossRef Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 17(1):35–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amenta V, Aschberger K, Arena M, Bouwmeester H, Moniz FB, Brandhoff P, Gottardo S, Marvin HJP, Mech A, Pesudo LQ, Rauscher H, Schoonjans R, Vettori MV, Weigel S, Peters RJ (2015) Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73(1):463–476CrossRef Amenta V, Aschberger K, Arena M, Bouwmeester H, Moniz FB, Brandhoff P, Gottardo S, Marvin HJP, Mech A, Pesudo LQ, Rauscher H, Schoonjans R, Vettori MV, Weigel S, Peters RJ (2015) Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73(1):463–476CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Areni CS, Ferrell ME, Wilcox JB (2000) The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psychol Mark 17(10):855–875CrossRef Areni CS, Ferrell ME, Wilcox JB (2000) The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psychol Mark 17(10):855–875CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(4):243–254 Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(4):243–254
Zurück zum Zitat Beaudrie CEH, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH (2013) Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLoS One 8(11) Beaudrie CEH, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH (2013) Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLoS One 8(11)
Zurück zum Zitat Berube DM, Cummings CL, Frith JH, Binder AR, Oldendick R (2011) Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks. J Nanopart Res 13(8):3089–3099CrossRef Berube DM, Cummings CL, Frith JH, Binder AR, Oldendick R (2011) Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks. J Nanopart Res 13(8):3089–3099CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Besley J (2010) Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerging Health Threats 3:e8 Besley J (2010) Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerging Health Threats 3:e8
Zurück zum Zitat Besley JC, Kramer VL, Priest SH (2008) Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 10(4):549–558CrossRef Besley JC, Kramer VL, Priest SH (2008) Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 10(4):549–558CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bickerstaff K (2004) Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int 30(6):827–840CrossRef Bickerstaff K (2004) Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int 30(6):827–840CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV (2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(5):546–558CrossRef Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV (2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(5):546–558CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown J, Kuzma J (2013) Hungry for information: public attitudes toward food nanotechnology and labeling. Rev Policy Res 30(5):512–548CrossRef Brown J, Kuzma J (2013) Hungry for information: public attitudes toward food nanotechnology and labeling. Rev Policy Res 30(5):512–548CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20(3):385–404CrossRef Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20(3):385–404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):752–766CrossRef Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):752–766CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Roco MC, Son J, Jiang S, Larson CA, Gao Q (2013) Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(9) Chen H, Roco MC, Son J, Jiang S, Larson CA, Gao Q (2013) Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(9)
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb MD (2005) Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Sci Commun 27(2):221–239CrossRef Cobb MD (2005) Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Sci Commun 27(2):221–239CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and trust. Sci Commun 6:240–267 Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and trust. Sci Commun 6:240–267
Zurück zum Zitat Costa-Font J, Mossialos E (2006) The public as a limit to technology transfer: the influence of knowledge and beliefs in attitudes towards biotechnology in the UK. J Technol Transf 31(6):629–645CrossRef Costa-Font J, Mossialos E (2006) The public as a limit to technology transfer: the influence of knowledge and beliefs in attitudes towards biotechnology in the UK. J Technol Transf 31(6):629–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340CrossRef Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dizon F, Costa S, Rock C, Harris A, Husk C, Mei J (2016) Genetically modified (GM) foods and ethical eating. J Food Sci 81(2):R287–R291CrossRef Dizon F, Costa S, Rock C, Harris A, Husk C, Mei J (2016) Genetically modified (GM) foods and ethical eating. J Food Sci 81(2):R287–R291CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dragojlovic N, Einsiedel E (2013) Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology. Public Underst Sci 22(7):869–885CrossRef Dragojlovic N, Einsiedel E (2013) Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology. Public Underst Sci 22(7):869–885CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Druckman JN (2004) Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. Am Polit Sci Rev 98(4):671–686CrossRef Druckman JN (2004) Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. Am Polit Sci Rev 98(4):671–686CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Druckman JN, Bolsen T (2011) Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. J Commun 61(4):659–688CrossRef Druckman JN, Bolsen T (2011) Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. J Commun 61(4):659–688CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dudo A, Kahlor L, AbiGhannam N, Lazard A, Liang M-C (2014) An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators. Nat Nanotechnol 9(10):841–844CrossRef Dudo A, Kahlor L, AbiGhannam N, Lazard A, Liang M-C (2014) An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators. Nat Nanotechnol 9(10):841–844CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Earle TC, Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2007) Trust, risk perception, and the TCC model of cooperation. In: Trust in cooperative risk management: uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. Earthscan, London, pp 1–49 Earle TC, Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2007) Trust, risk perception, and the TCC model of cooperation. In: Trust in cooperative risk management: uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. Earthscan, London, pp 1–49
Zurück zum Zitat Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58CrossRef Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer ARH, van Dijk H, de Jonge J, Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2013) Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production. Public Underst Sci 22(7):817–831CrossRef Fischer ARH, van Dijk H, de Jonge J, Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2013) Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production. Public Underst Sci 22(7):817–831CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher E, Maricle G (2015) Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Sci Public Policy 42(1):72–85CrossRef Fisher E, Maricle G (2015) Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Sci Public Policy 42(1):72–85CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill
Zurück zum Zitat Gasparro A (2015) Chipotle says it has finished removing GMO ingredients from menu. In The Wall Street Journal, April 27 Gasparro A (2015) Chipotle says it has finished removing GMO ingredients from menu. In The Wall Street Journal, April 27
Zurück zum Zitat George S, Kaptan G, Lee J, Frewer L (2014) Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore. J Nanopart Res 16(12):1–11CrossRef George S, Kaptan G, Lee J, Frewer L (2014) Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore. J Nanopart Res 16(12):1–11CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giles EL, Kuznesof S, Clark B, Hubbard C, Frewer LJ (2015) Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. J Nanopart Res 17(12) Giles EL, Kuznesof S, Clark B, Hubbard C, Frewer LJ (2015) Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. J Nanopart Res 17(12)
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ (2012) Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review. Public Underst Sci 21(7):782–795CrossRef Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ (2012) Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review. Public Underst Sci 21(7):782–795CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N, Fischer ARH, George S, Frewer LJ (2013) Expert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(8) Gupta N, Fischer ARH, George S, Frewer LJ (2013) Expert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(8)
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ (2015) Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: a comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance. NanoEthics 9(2):93–108CrossRef Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ (2015) Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: a comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance. NanoEthics 9(2):93–108CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J Consum Res 16(4):393–408CrossRef Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J Consum Res 16(4):393–408CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ho SS, Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2008) Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. Int J Public Opin Res 20(2):171–192CrossRef Ho SS, Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2008) Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. Int J Public Opin Res 20(2):171–192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2010) Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12(8):2703–2715CrossRef Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2010) Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12(8):2703–2715CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun 33(2):167–200CrossRef Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun 33(2):167–200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeffler S (2003) Measuring preferences for really new products. J Mark Res 40(4):406–420CrossRef Hoeffler S (2003) Measuring preferences for really new products. J Mark Res 40(4):406–420CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huijts NMA, Molin EJE, Steg L (2012) Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):525–531CrossRef Huijts NMA, Molin EJE, Steg L (2012) Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):525–531CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janiszewski C (1993) Preattentive mere exposure effects. J Consum Res 20(3):376–392CrossRef Janiszewski C (1993) Preattentive mere exposure effects. J Consum Res 20(3):376–392CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones AR, Anderson AA, Yeo SK, Greenberg AE, Brossard D, Moore JW (2014) Using a deliberative exercise to Foster public engagement in nanotechnology. J Chem Educ 91(2):179–187CrossRef Jones AR, Anderson AA, Yeo SK, Greenberg AE, Brossard D, Moore JW (2014) Using a deliberative exercise to Foster public engagement in nanotechnology. J Chem Educ 91(2):179–187CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):87–90CrossRef Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):87–90CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ladwig P, Dalrymple KE, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2012) Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Sci Public Policy 39(6):761–774CrossRef Ladwig P, Dalrymple KE, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2012) Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Sci Public Policy 39(6):761–774CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Landau J, Groscurth CR, Wright L, Condit CM (2009) Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(3):325–337CrossRef Landau J, Groscurth CR, Wright L, Condit CM (2009) Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(3):325–337CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EWJ, Ho SS (2015) The perceived familiarity gap hypothesis: examining how media attention and reflective integration relate to perceived familiarity with nanotechnology in Singapore. J Nanopart Res 17(5):1–15CrossRef Lee EWJ, Ho SS (2015) The perceived familiarity gap hypothesis: examining how media attention and reflective integration relate to perceived familiarity with nanotechnology in Singapore. J Nanopart Res 17(5):1–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee C-J, Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Sci Commun 27(2):240–267CrossRef Lee C-J, Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Sci Commun 27(2):240–267CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis D (2015) Some brands are labeling products “GMO-free” even if they don’t have genes. Smithsonian Magazine, August 27 Lewis D (2015) Some brands are labeling products “GMO-free” even if they don’t have genes. Smithsonian Magazine, August 27
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Priest S (2009) Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Underst Sci 18(6):704–718CrossRef Liu H, Priest S (2009) Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Underst Sci 18(6):704–718CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lucht JM (2015) Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses-Basel 7(8):4254–4281CrossRef Lucht JM (2015) Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses-Basel 7(8):4254–4281CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maclnnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ (1991) Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J Mark 55(4):32–53CrossRef Maclnnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ (1991) Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J Mark 55(4):32–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15(2):221–241CrossRef Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15(2):221–241CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mao H, Mariadoss BJ, Echambadi R, Chennamaneni PR (2012) Brand extensions via complements or substitutes: the moderating role of manufacturing transferability. Mark Lett 23(1):279–292CrossRef Mao H, Mariadoss BJ, Echambadi R, Chennamaneni PR (2012) Brand extensions via complements or substitutes: the moderating role of manufacturing transferability. Mark Lett 23(1):279–292CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McAlea EM, Mullins M, Murphy F, Tofail SAM, Carroll AG (2016) Engineered nanomaterials: risk perception, regulation and insurance. J Risk Res 19(4):444–460CrossRef McAlea EM, Mullins M, Murphy F, Tofail SAM, Carroll AG (2016) Engineered nanomaterials: risk perception, regulation and insurance. J Risk Res 19(4):444–460CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Michelson ES (2013) “The train has left the station”: the project on emerging nanotechnologies and the shaping of nanotechnology policy in the United States. Rev Policy Res 30(5):464–487CrossRef Michelson ES (2013) “The train has left the station”: the project on emerging nanotechnologies and the shaping of nanotechnology policy in the United States. Rev Policy Res 30(5):464–487CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system-theory of personality—reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invarience in personality structure. Psychol Rev 102(2):246–268CrossRef Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system-theory of personality—reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invarience in personality structure. Psychol Rev 102(2):246–268CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Monga AB, John DR (2007) Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: the influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. J Consum Res 33(4):529–536CrossRef Monga AB, John DR (2007) Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: the influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. J Consum Res 33(4):529–536CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nisbet MC (2005) The competition for worldviews: values, information, and public support for stem cell research. Int J Public Opin Res 17(1):90–112CrossRef Nisbet MC (2005) The competition for worldviews: values, information, and public support for stem cell research. Int J Public Opin Res 17(1):90–112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nisbet MC, Goidel RK (2007) Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide. Public Underst Sci 16(4):421–440CrossRef Nisbet MC, Goidel RK (2007) Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide. Public Underst Sci 16(4):421–440CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nisbett R, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev 108(2):291–310CrossRef Nisbett R, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev 108(2):291–310CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In communication and persuasion. Springer, New York, pp 1–24 Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In communication and persuasion. Springer, New York, pp 1–24
Zurück zum Zitat Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):95–98CrossRef Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):95–98CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pillai RG, Bindroo V (2014) The moderating roles of perceived complementarity and substitutability on the perceived manufacturing difficulty–extension attitude relationship. J Bus Res 67(7):1353–1359CrossRef Pillai RG, Bindroo V (2014) The moderating roles of perceived complementarity and substitutability on the perceived manufacturing difficulty–extension attitude relationship. J Bus Res 67(7):1353–1359CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Retzbach A, Marschall J, Rahnke M, Otto L, Maier M (2011) Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science. J Nanopart Res 13(12):6231–6244CrossRef Retzbach A, Marschall J, Rahnke M, Otto L, Maier M (2011) Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science. J Nanopart Res 13(12):6231–6244CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat RNCOS (2015) Global Nanotechnology Market Outlook 2022 Accessed June 2016 RNCOS (2015) Global Nanotechnology Market Outlook 2022 Accessed June 2016
Zurück zum Zitat Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2013) The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(9) Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2013) The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(9)
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ, Frewer LJ (2007) Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49(1):1–17CrossRef Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ, Frewer LJ (2007) Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49(1):1–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ronteltap A, Fischer ARH, Tobi H (2011) Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies-converging societal response research? J Nanopart Res 13(10):4399–4410CrossRef Ronteltap A, Fischer ARH, Tobi H (2011) Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies-converging societal response research? J Nanopart Res 13(10):4399–4410CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russell AW (2013) Improving legitimacy in nanotechnology policy development through stakeholder and community engagement: forging new pathways. Rev Policy Res 30(5):566–587CrossRef Russell AW (2013) Improving legitimacy in nanotechnology policy development through stakeholder and community engagement: forging new pathways. Rev Policy Res 30(5):566–587CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie CEH, Conti J, Harthorn BH (2009) Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. Nat Nanotechnol 4:752–758CrossRef Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie CEH, Conti J, Harthorn BH (2009) Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. Nat Nanotechnol 4:752–758CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scheufele DA (2006) Messages and heuristics: how audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. In: Engaging science: thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. The Wellcome Trust, London, pp 20–25 Scheufele DA (2006) Messages and heuristics: how audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. In: Engaging science: thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. The Wellcome Trust, London, pp 20–25
Zurück zum Zitat Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7(6):659–667CrossRef Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7(6):659–667CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scheufele DA, Corley EA, T-j S, Dalrymple KE, Ho SS (2009) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):91–94CrossRef Scheufele DA, Corley EA, T-j S, Dalrymple KE, Ho SS (2009) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):91–94CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schütz H, Wiedemann PM (2008) Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 17(3):369–379CrossRef Schütz H, Wiedemann PM (2008) Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 17(3):369–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007a) Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27(1):59–69CrossRef Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007a) Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27(1):59–69CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegrist M, Cousin M-E, Kastenholz H, Wiek A (2007b) Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49(2):459–466CrossRef Siegrist M, Cousin M-E, Kastenholz H, Wiek A (2007b) Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49(2):459–466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H, Keller C (2008) Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51(2):283–290CrossRef Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H, Keller C (2008) Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51(2):283–290CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G-F (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11(7):1555–1571CrossRef Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G-F (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11(7):1555–1571CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slovic P (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19(4):689–701 Slovic P (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19(4):689–701
Zurück zum Zitat Steenis ND, Fischer ARH (2016) Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnology in food products: an attribute-based analysis. Br Food J 118(5):1254–1267CrossRef Steenis ND, Fischer ARH (2016) Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnology in food products: an attribute-based analysis. Br Food J 118(5):1254–1267CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trumbo CW (1999) Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Anal 19(3):391–400 Trumbo CW (1999) Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Anal 19(3):391–400
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Giesen RI, Fischer ARH, van Dijk H, van Trijp HCM (2015) Affect and cognition in attitude formation toward familiar and unfamiliar attitude objects. Plos One, 10(10) van Giesen RI, Fischer ARH, van Dijk H, van Trijp HCM (2015) Affect and cognition in attitude formation toward familiar and unfamiliar attitude objects. Plos One, 10(10)
Zurück zum Zitat Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2010) The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature. J Nanopart Res 12(2):373–381CrossRef Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2010) The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature. J Nanopart Res 12(2):373–381CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204CrossRef Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technoogy: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178 Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technoogy: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178
Zurück zum Zitat Wiedemann P, Schutz H, Spangenberg A, Krug HF (2011) Evidence maps: communicating risk assessments in societal controversies: the case of engineered nanoparticles. Risk Anal 31(11):1770–1783CrossRef Wiedemann P, Schutz H, Spangenberg A, Krug HF (2011) Evidence maps: communicating risk assessments in societal controversies: the case of engineered nanoparticles. Risk Anal 31(11):1770–1783CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yue C, Zhao S, Cummings C, Kuzma J (2015) Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food. J Nanopart Res 17(7) Yue C, Zhao S, Cummings C, Kuzma J (2015) Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food. J Nanopart Res 17(7)
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2009) The role of imagination-focused visualization on new product evaluation. J Mark Res 46(1):46–55CrossRef Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2009) The role of imagination-focused visualization on new product evaluation. J Mark Res 46(1):46–55CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Zauberman G (2011) Mental simulation and product evaluation: the affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation. J Mark Res 48(5):827–839CrossRef Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Zauberman G (2011) Mental simulation and product evaluation: the affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation. J Mark Res 48(5):827–839CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2012) Imagination difficulty and new product evaluation. J Prod Innov Manag 29(S1):76–90CrossRef Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2012) Imagination difficulty and new product evaluation. J Prod Innov Manag 29(S1):76–90CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zwikael O, Ahn M (2011) The effectiveness of risk management: an analysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. Risk Anal 31(1):25–37CrossRef Zwikael O, Ahn M (2011) The effectiveness of risk management: an analysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. Risk Anal 31(1):25–37CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework
verfasst von
Rajani Ganesh Pillai
Achintya N. Bezbaruah
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3733-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.