nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

18.01.2018

Persistent high-growth firms in China’s manufacturing

verfasst von: Daniele Moschella, Federico Tamagni, Xiaodan Yu

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article explores the association between persistence of high-growth and crucial dimensions of firm structure and performance (productivity, profits, investment patterns, innovation, and financial structures) to shed light on what makes a persistent high-growth firm. We employ a multidimensional definition of a high-growth firm that simultaneously accounts for growth of sales and employment, and design an empirical strategy that seeks to capture the “long-run” ability of high-growth firms to replicate their high-growth performance over time. Exploiting a large panel covering the period of the China’s miracle, we find that none of the considered firm attributes stands out as distinctive feature of persistent high-growth. This finding casts doubts on the long-run contribution of high-growth firms, in turn challenging the long-run effectiveness of policies supporting the creation and expansion of such firms.

Vorheriger Artikel Entrepreneurship in China

Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurship and industrial clusters: evidence from China industrial census

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

In 2003, the classification system was revised: some sectors were further disaggregated, while others were merged together, but consistency over time is ensured by adopting the harmonized classification proposed in Brandt et al. (2012).

Essentially, we just dropped few firms with negative values in output, sales, value added, fixed assets, and cost of labor.

We discard the first year, 1998, in order to have periods of the same length. The normalization implicitly removes sector-specific common trends, such as inflation and business cycle effects in sectoral demand.

Another alternative sometimes suggested in the literature on persistence of economic performance (e.g., in innovation studies) would have been to define HG status on a yearly basis, and then employ duration analysis to elicit the influence of focal firm characteristics on the length of the spells of HG growth status, over 1, 2, and more years. However, as expected given the well-known erratic nature of growth processes, we verified that in our data about 95% of all yearly HG events do not last more than 3 years, and actually 65% of them last just 1 year. We thank an anonymous referee for suggesting to clarify this point.

Gross margins are essentially equivalent to an EBIDTA index, taking the difference between value added and cost of labor (total wages plus social security).

“New products” are defined, according to NBS, as products adopting new technology and/or new design, or products that have been significantly improved over existing ones with respect to their structure, materials and/ or process techniques. Hence, comparing with international standards in innovation surveys as defined by the Oslo manual, “new products” in our data are new to the enterprise, but not necessarily new to the market.

According to Chinese accounting rule, interest expenses is a net measure, which equals gross interest expenses minus interest revenues, and can thus take negative values.

There are five types of registration capital in the NBS data: state, collective, legal person, individual, Hong-Kong Macao and Taiwan, and foreign. “State-control” indicates both State-absolute-control, i.e., the State capital share is greater than or equal to 50%, and State-relative-control, i.e., State capital share is less than 50% but it is greater than the other shareholders or the relative State-controlling status is regulated by the contract.

Notice that export status changes more often than ownership and this is the reason why we define the two dummies in two different ways.

More precisely, the East region includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan. The Middle region includes Shanxi, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Hunan. The West region includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqiong, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shannxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang. The Northeast region includes Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang.

The data cannot be matched with other data sources, due to confidentiality and restricted access, so we cannot exploit other sources of information to include further region-specific or sector-specific characteristics.

This is confirmed by looking at kernel densities of all variables, for both HG and other firms. Results are not reported, but available upon request.

Notice that, given the data span 10 years, young firms include only firms entering the sample exactly during the years covered in the data.

This size categorization method was adopted by the Chinese State Economic and Trade Commission in 2011.

Acs, Z., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85–100.CrossRef

Acs, Z., Parsons, J., & Tracy, W. (2011). High-impact firms: gazelles revisited. In Fritsch, M. (Ed.) Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development: National and regional perspectives (pp. 133–174). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Audretsch, D.B., Coad, A., & Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small business economics, 43(4), 743–749.CrossRef

Barney, J.B. (1997). On flipping coins and making technology choices: luck as an explanation of technological foresight and oversight. In Garud, R., Nayyar, P.R., & Shapira, Z.B. (Eds.) Technological innovation: oversights and foresights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baumol, W.J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1), 893–921.CrossRef

Baumol, W.J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. No. 9216 in economics books. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Beck, T., Demirgüċ-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177.CrossRef

Bellak, C. (2004). How domestic and foreign firms differ and why does it matter? Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(4), 483–514.CrossRef

Bianchini, S., Pellegrino, G., & Tamagni, F. (2016). Innovation strategies and firm growth. LEM Working Papers 2016/03, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM) Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy. Forthcoming in Industrial and Corporate Change.

Bianchini, S., Bottazzi, G., & Tamagni, F. (2017). What does (not) characterize persistent corporate high-growth? Small Business Economics, 48(3), 633–656.CrossRef

Birch, D.L. (1981). Who creates jobs. The Public Interest, 65, 3–14.

Birch, D.L., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In Lewis, C.S., & Alec, R.L. (Eds.) Labor markets, employment policy and job creation (pp. 159–167). Boulder: Westview Press.

Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., & Rocchetti, G. (2001). Modes of knowledge accumulation, entry regimes and patterns of industrial evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 609–38.CrossRef

Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2014). Financial constraints and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 99–116.CrossRef

Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economic, 97(2), 339–351.CrossRef

Capasso, M., Cefis, E., & Frenken, K. (2014). On the existence of persistently outperforming firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(4), 997–1036.CrossRef

Chang, W., & MacMillan, I.C. (1991). A review of entrepreneurial development in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 375–379.CrossRef

Clementi, G.L., & Hopenhayn, H.A. (2006). A theory of financing constraints and firm dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 229–265.

Coad, A. (2007). A closer look at serial growth rate correlation. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(1), 69–82.CrossRef

Coad, A., & Hölzl, W. (2009). On the autocorrelation of growth rates. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2), 139–166.CrossRef

Coad, A., & Hölzl, W. (2012). Firm growth: Empirical analysis. In Handbook on the economics and theory of the firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.

Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: a quantile regression approach. Research policy, 37(4), 633–648.CrossRef

Coad, A., Rao, R., & Tamagni, F. (2011). Growth processes of Italian manufacturing firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22(1), 54–70.CrossRef

Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S.O., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P. (2014). High-growth firms: introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91–112.CrossRef

Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400.CrossRef

Covin, J.G., Green, K.M., & Slevin, D.P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 57–81.CrossRef

Daunfeldt, S.O., & Halvarsson, D. (2015). Are high-growth firms one-hit wonders? Evidence from Sweden. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 361–383.CrossRef

Daunfeldt, S.O., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2010). The economic contribution of high-growth firms: do definitions matter? Stockholm: The Ratio Institute.

Daunfeldt, S.O., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2014). The economic contribution of high-growth firms: do policy implications depend on the choice of growth indicator? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14(3), 337–365.CrossRef

Davidsson, P., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Determinants of the prevalence of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81–104.CrossRef

Decker, R.A., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R.S., & Miranda, J. (2016). Where has all the skewness gone? The decline in high-growth (young) firms in the U.S. European Economic Review, 86, 4–23.CrossRef

Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W.B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.CrossRef

Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., & Salvatore, R. (1995). Learning, market selection and evolution of industrial structures. Small Business Economics, 7(6), 411–36.CrossRef

Dosi, G., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2001). The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford: OUP.CrossRef

Dosi, G. (2007). Statistical Regularities in the Evolution of Industries. A Guide through some Evidence and Challenges for the Theory. In Malerba, F., & Brusoni, S. (Eds.) Perspectives on Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–186.

Du, J., & Temouri, Y. (2015). High-growth firms and productivity: evidence from the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 123–143.CrossRef

Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: a framework for empirical work. Review of Economic Studies, 62(1), 53–82.CrossRef

Fligner, M.A., & Policello, G.E. (1981). Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 162–168.CrossRef

Fu, X., & Gong, Y. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China. World Development, 39(7), 1213–1225.CrossRef

Garsaa, A., & Levratto, N. (2015). Do labor tax rebates facilitate firm growth? An empirical study on French establishments in the manufacturing industry, 2004–2011. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 613–641.CrossRef

Goedhuys, M., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2010). High-growth entrepreneurial firms in africa: a quantile regression approach. Small Business Economics, 34(1), 31–51.CrossRef

Grazzi, M., & Moschella, D. (2017). Small, young, and exporters: new evidence on the determinants of firm growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0523-7.

Guarascio, D., & Tamagni, F. (2016). Persistence of innovation and patterns of firm growth. LEM Working Papers 2016/31 Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

Guariglia, A., Liu, X., & Song, L. (2011). Internal finance and growth: microeconometric evidence on Chinese firms. Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 79–94.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R.S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? small versus large versus young. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.CrossRef

Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244.CrossRef

Hobday, M., & Perini, F.A.d.B. (2009). Latecomer entrepreneurship: a policy perspective. In Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J.E. (Eds.) Industrial Policy and Development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing smes different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 59–75.CrossRef

Hölzl, W. (2014). Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria. Industrial and corporate change, 23(1), 199–231.CrossRef

Hopenhayn, H.A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, 60 (5), 1127–50.CrossRef

Hu, A.G.Z., Jefferson, G.H., & Qian, J. (2005). R&D And technology transfer: firm-level evidence from Chinese industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 780–786.CrossRef

Huang, Y. (2010). Entrepreneurship in China. The World Financial Review.

Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), 541–559.CrossRef

Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–70.CrossRef

Krasniqi, B.A., & Desai, S. (2016). Institutional drivers of high-growth firms: country-level evidence from 26 transition economies. Small Business Economics, 47(4), 1075–1094.CrossRef

Lawless, M. (2014). Age or size? Contributions to job creation. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 815–830.CrossRef

Li, H. (2013). History and development of entrepreneurship in China. In Zhang, T., & Stough, R.R. (Eds.) Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in China, World Scientific (pp. 13–33).

Li, J., & Matlay, H. (2006). Chinese entrepreneurship and small business development: an overview and research agenda. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2), 248–262.CrossRef

Lopez-Garcia, P., & Puente, S. (2012). What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1029–1041.CrossRef

Luttmer, E.G.J. (2007). Selection, growth and the size distribution of firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1103–1144.CrossRef

Metcalfe, S.J. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction London. UK: Routledge.CrossRef

Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2006). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: a dynamic analysis. Small Business Economics, 27(2), 139–156.CrossRef

Pisano, G.P. (2015). A normative theory of dynamic capabilities: connecting strategy, know-how, and competition. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt Unit Working Paper (16-036).

Robson, P.J., & Bennett, R.J. (2000). SME Growth: the relationship with business advice and external collaboration. Small Business Economics, 15(3), 193–208.CrossRef

Santi, C., & Santoleri, P. (2017). Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms. Small Business Economics, 49(2), 445–467.CrossRef

Schreyer, P. (2000). High-growth firms and employment. Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper series: 2000/03, OECD Publishing.

Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805–821.CrossRef

Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 77–89.CrossRef

Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537–556.CrossRef

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef

Winter, S.G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition under alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5(3–4), 287–320.CrossRef

Yang, J.Y., & Li, J. (2008). The development of entrepreneurship in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 335–359.CrossRef

Yu, X., Dosi, G., Lei, J., & Nuvolari, A. (2015). Institutional change and productivity growth in China’s manufacturing: the microeconomics of knowledge accumulation and “creative restructuring”. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 565–602.CrossRef

Yu, X., Dosi, G., Grazzi, M., & Lei, J. (2017). Inside the virtuous circle between productivity, profitability, investment and corporate growth: an anatomy of Chinese industrialization. Research Policy, 46(5), 1020–1038.CrossRef

Zhang, M., & Mohnen, P. (2013). Innovation and survival of new firms in Chinese manufacturing, 2000–2006 MERIT Working Papers 057. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.

Titel: Persistent high-growth firms in China’s manufacturing
verfasst von: Daniele Moschella
Federico Tamagni
Xiaodan Yu
Publikationsdatum: 18.01.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9973-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

How does the age of serial entrepreneurs influence their re-venture speed after a business failure?

Migrant entrepreneurship in China: entrepreneurial transition and firm performance

Entrepreneurship in China

Search and execution: examining the entrepreneurial cognitions behind the lean startup model

Ethnic entrepreneurship, initial financing, and business performance in China

Financial development and the geographies of startup cities: evidence from China