Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Physical Model Testing for Dynamic Characteristics of Seismic Soil Liquefaction

verfasst von : Yu Huang, Miao Yu

Erschienen in: Hazard Analysis of Seismic Soil Liquefaction

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Model tests are commonly adopted to study soil liquefaction. The dynamic features of soil liquefaction problems in the field can be modelled by constructing scale models of soil deposits. Geotechnical models are usually tested using shaking tables and centrifugal devices. Shaking tables can conduct large model tests, but a centrifuge can reproduce the in situ stress level. For seismic soil liquefaction problems, centrifugal shaking table or dynamic centrifuge tests, combination of shaking tables and centrifugal devices, are widely used. Both dynamic characteristics of soil liquefaction and flow liquefaction are important for engineering safety. In this chapter, we focus on the dynamic features of soil seismic liquefaction, using centrifugal shaking tables. The principal and scaling rules of dynamic centrifuge model tests are introduced in detail. A case study of a constructed embankment subject to earthquake conditions is presented. We conclude that physical modeling is a useful method for researching the dynamic characteristics of seismic liquefaction.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Laboratory Experimental Study on Dynamic Characteristics of Liquefiable Soil
Nächstes Kapitel Numerical Simulation for Deformation of Liquefiable Soils
Literatur
Adalier, K., & Sharp, M. K. (2004). Embankment dam on liquefiable foundation-dynamic behavior and densification remediation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(11), 1214–1224.CrossRef
Bolton, M. D., & Powrie, W. (1987). The collapse of diaphragm walls retaining clay. Geotechnique, 37(3), 335–353.CrossRef
Chen, Z. Y., & Shen, H. (2014). Dynamic centrifuge tests on isolation mechanism of tunnels subjected to seismic shaking. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 42, 67–77.CrossRef
Chen, Z., Yu, H., & Yuan, Y. (2014). Full 3D seismic analysis of a long-distance water conveyance tunnel. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(1), 128–140.CrossRef
Dewoolkar, M. M., Ko, H. Y., & Pak, R. Y. S. (1999). Centrifuge modeling of models of seismic effects on saturated earth structures. Geotechnique, 49(2), 247–266.CrossRef
Elgamal, A., Parra, E., Yang, Z., et al. (2002). Numerical analysis of embankment foundation liquefaction countermeasures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(04), 447–471.
Hou, Y. J., Xu, Z. P., & Liang, J. H. (2004). Centrifuge modeling of cutoff wall for CFRD built in deep overburden. In Proceedings of the international conference of hydropower (pp. 86–92). Yichang, China.
Huang, Z., Xie, B., Yuan, Q., et al. (2014). Microbial community study in newly established Qingcaosha Reservoir of Shanghai, China. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(23), 9849–9858.CrossRef
Huang, Y., Ye, W., & Chen, Z. (2009). Seismic response analysis of the deep saturated soil deposits in Shanghai. Environmental Geology, 56(6), 1163–1169.CrossRef
Huang, Y., Zhang, F., Yashima, A., et al. (2008). Numerical simulation of mitigation for liquefaction-induced soil deformations in a sandy ground improved by cement grouting. Environmental Geology, 55(6), 1247–1252.CrossRef
Huang, Y., & Zhu, C. (2017). Safety assessment of antiliquefaction performance of a constructed reservoir embankment. I: Experimental assessment. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 31(2): 04016101.
Idriss, I.M., & Sun, J.I. (1992). User’s Manual for SHAKE91. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis.
Ko, H. Y. (1988). Summary of the state-of-the-art in centrifuge model testing. Centrifuges in Soil Mechanics, 11–18.
Ko, H.Y. (1994). Modeling seismic problems in centrifuges. Proceedings of International Conference: Centrifuge, Singapore, Lee, and Tan, Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 3–12.
Kokusho, T., Ishizawa, T., & Koizumi, K. (2011). Energy approach to seismically induced slope failure and its application to case histories. Engineering Geology, 122(1), 115–128.CrossRef
Krinitzsky, E. L., & Hynes, M. E. (2002). The Bhuj, India, earthquake: lessons learned for earthquake safety of dams on alluvium. Engineering Geology, 66(3–4), 163–196.CrossRef
Kutter, B. L. (1995). Recent advances in centrifuge modeling of seismic shaking. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, Vol. II, Prakash, Eds., Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 927–941.
Madabhushi, S. P. G. (1994). Effect of pore fluid in dynamic centrifuge modeling. In Proceedings of international conference: Centrifuge, Singapore, Lee, and Tan, Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 127–132.
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute. (2012). Specification for test and measurement of geosynthetics (SL235-2012). Beijing: China Water Power Press. (in Chinese).
Phillips, R., Guo, P. J., & Popescu, R. (2002). Physical modeling in geotechnics: ICPMG’02. Proceedings of the International Conference, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, 10–12 July 2002. In Physical modeling in geotechnics: ICPMG’02. Proceedings of the International Conference, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, 10–12 July 2002. AA Balkema.
Saleh, S., & Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2010). An investigation into the seismic behaviour of dams using dynamic centrifuge modeling. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(6), 1479–1495.CrossRef
Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., & Arango, I. (1983). Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 109(3), 458–482.CrossRef
Singh, R., Roy, D., & Jain, S. K. (2005). Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Engineering Geology, 80(3), 282–291.CrossRef
Stewart, D. P., Chen, Y. R., & Kutter, B. L. (1998). Experience with the use of methylcellulose as a viscous pore fluid in centrifuge models. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 21(4), 365–369.CrossRef
Tokimatsu, K., & Seed, H. B. (1984). Simplified procedures for the evaluation of settlements in clean sands. College of Engineering, University of California.
Wang, K. L., & Lin, M. L. (2011). Initiation and displacement of landslide induced by earthquake-A study of shaking table model slope test. Engineering Geology, 122(1), 106–114.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Physical Model Testing for Dynamic Characteristics of Seismic Soil Liquefaction
verfasst von
Yu Huang
Miao Yu
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Hazard Analysis of Seismic Soil Liquefaction

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4378-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-4379-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4379-6_5