nach oben

vorheriger Artikel Assessing Voter Registration Among Transgender ...

nächster Artikel Anxious Voters in the 2016 U.S. Election: An An...

Tipp

Policy Responsiveness and Electoral Incentives: A (Re)assessment

Zeitschrift:: Political Behavior > Ausgabe 1/2020

Autor:: Luca Bernardi

Ergänzende Inhalte

» Jetzt Zugang zum Volltext erhalten

Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9490-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Competitive democratic theory predicts that electoral factors enhance policy makers' responsiveness to public opinion. Yet findings on the effects of electoral incentives on policy responsiveness point in different directions and comparative research remains limited, lacking of a systematic evaluation. We draw on previous work, expand the range of electoral incentives, and re-assess their role in influencing policy responsiveness by using spending preferences. We provide extensive tests of an Electoral Vulnerability Hypothesis and an Electoral Proximity Hypothesis. Contra competitive democratic theory, time-series analysis from Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States in twenty policy domains and nine different indicators for electoral incentives finds limited support for these hypotheses. Our findings have implications for democracy and question the importance of electoral pressures in explaining policy responsiveness.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Jetzt einloggen Kostenlos registrieren

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Jetzt informieren

Nur für berechtigte Nutzer zugänglich

Abou-Chadi, T., & Orlowski, M. (2016). Moderate as necessary: The role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 868–881. CrossRef

Achen, C. H. (2000). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, UCLA, July 20–22.

Adler, S. E., & Wilkerson, J. D. (2012). Congress and the politics of problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

André, A., Depaw, S., & Martin, S. (2014). Electoral systems and legislators’ constituency effort: The mediating effect of electoral vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies., 48, 464–496. CrossRef

Bartolini, S. (1999). Collusion, competition and democracy: Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(4), 435–470. CrossRef

Bartolini, S. (2000). Collusion, competition and democracy: Part II. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(1), 33–65. CrossRef

Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. CrossRef

Bernardi, L. (2018). From popularity to vulnerability: An application to dynamic representation in coalition governments. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818790117. CrossRef

Bernardi, L., & Adams, J. (2017). Does government support respond to governments’ social welfare rhetoric or their spending? An analysis of government support in Britain, Spain and the United States. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000199. CrossRef

Bevan, S., & Jennings, W. (2014). Representation, agendas and institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 37–56. CrossRef

Bischof, D. (2018). Ideological congruence between party rhetoric and policy-making. West European Politics, 41(2), 310–328. CrossRef

Blais, A., & Lago, I. (2009). A general measure of district competitiveness. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 94–100. CrossRef

Bonafont, L. C., & Palau, A. M. (2011). Assessing the responsiveness of Spanish policymakers to the priorities of their citizens. West European Politics, 34(4), 706–730. CrossRef

Breunig, C. (2006). The more things change, the more things stay the same: A comparative analysis of budget punctuations. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1065–1081. CrossRef

Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy? Social Forces, 77(1), 27–62. CrossRef

Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. CrossRef

Canes-Wrone, B. (2004). The public presidency, personal approval ratings, and policy making. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 477–492. CrossRef

Canes-Wrone, B., & Park, J.-K. (2012). Electoral business cycles in OECD countries. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 103–122. CrossRef

Canes-Wrone, B., & Shotts, K. W. (2004). The conditional nature of presidential responsiveness to public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 690–706. CrossRef

Cohen, J. E. (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 87–107. CrossRef

Cohen, J. E. (1997). Presidential responsiveness and public policy-making. The public and the policies that Presidents choose. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Coleman, J. J. (1999). Unified government, divided government, and party responsiveness. The American Political Science Review, 93(4), 821–835. CrossRef

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Elkins, D. J. (1974). The measurement of party competition. The American Political Science Review, 68(2), 682–700. CrossRef

Endersby, J. W., Galatas, S. E., & Rackaway, C. B. (2002). Closeness Counts in Canada: Voter participation in the 1993 and 1997 Federal Elections. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 610–631. CrossRef

Epp, D. A., Lovett, J., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Partisan priorities and public budgeting. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 864–878. CrossRef

Erikson, R. S., Mackuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fagan, E. J., Jones, B. D., & Wlezien, C. (2017). Representative systems and policy punctuations. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(6), 809–831. CrossRef

Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1977). U.S. house members in their constituencies: An exploration. The American Political Science Review, 71(3), 883–917. CrossRef

Ferejohn, J. A. (1977). On the decline of competition in congressional elections. The American Political Science Review, 71(1), 166–176. CrossRef

Fortunato, D., & Stevenson, R. T. (2013). Perceptions of Partisan ideologies: The effect of coalition participation. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 459–477. CrossRef

Franzese, R. J. (2002). Electoral and Partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 369–421. CrossRef

Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Man and his government. New York: McGraw Hill.

Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2), 145–177.

Green, J., & Jennings, W. (2012). Valence as macro-competence: An analysis of mood in party competence evaluations in Great Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 311–343. CrossRef

Green, J., & Jennings, W. (2017). Party reputations and policy priorities: How issue ownership shapes executive and legislative agendas. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000636. CrossRef

Grofman, B., & Selb, P. (2009). A fully general index of political competition. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 291–296. CrossRef

Hakhverdian, A. (2010). Political representation and its mechanisms: A dynamic left-right approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 835–856. CrossRef

Hakhverdian, A. (2012). The causal flow between public opinion and policy: Government responsiveness, leadership, or counter movement? West European Politics, 35(6), 1386–1406. CrossRef

Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2005). Responsive government? Public opinion and government policy preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies, 53(2), 379–402. CrossRef

Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 309–337. CrossRef

Immergut, E. M., & Abou-Chadi, T. (2014). How electoral vulnerability affects pension politics: Introducing a concept, measure and empirical application. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 269–287. CrossRef

Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians Don’t Pander. Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Jennings, W. (2013). Error-correction as a concept and as a method: Time series analysis of policy-opinion responsiveness. In M. Bruter & M. Lodge (Eds.), Political science research methods in action (pp. 203–228). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

Jennings, W., & John, P. (2009). The dynamics of political attention: Public opinion and the queen’s speech in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 838–854. CrossRef

Jennings, W., & Wlezien, C. (2015). Preferences, problems and representation. Political Science Research and Methods., 3, 659–681. CrossRef

Jennings, W., & Wlezien, C. (2016). The timeline of elections: A comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 219–233. CrossRef

John, P., Bevan, S., & Jennings, W. (2011). The policy-opinion link and institutional change: The legislative agenda of the UK and Scottish Parliaments. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 1052–1068. CrossRef

Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2004). Representation and agenda setting. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 1–24. CrossRef

Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jones, B. D., et al. (2009). A general empirical law of public budgets: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 855–873. CrossRef

Kayser, M. A., & Lindstädt, R. (2015). A cross-national measure of electoral competitiveness. Political Analysis, 23, 242–253. CrossRef

Kroh, M., van der Brug, W., & van der Eijk, C. (2007). Prospects for electoral change. In W. van der Brug & C. van der Eijk (Eds.), European elections and domestic politics. Lessons from the past and scenarios for the future (pp. 209–225). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Lau, R., & Redlawski, D. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971. CrossRef

Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386. CrossRef

Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the States. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148–166. CrossRef

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lindeboom, G.-J. (2012). Public priorities in government’s hands: Corresponding policy agendas in the Netherlands? Acta Politica, 47(4), 443–467. CrossRef

Lipsmeyer, C. S., Philips, A. Q., & Whitten, G. D. (2017). The effects of immigration and integration on European budgetary trade-offs. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(6), 912–930. CrossRef

Loftis, M. W., & Mortensen, P. B. (2017). A new approach to the study of partisan effects on social policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(6), 890–911. CrossRef

Lühiste, M., Morales, L., Bernardi, L., Bischof, D., Sabaté, O., & Visconti, F. (2017). “ResponsiveGov’s codebook and appendices.” Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:wlfV9HEyxkYtEGXMcITAdQ== https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PINCO4.

Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy. London: Verso.

Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. C. (1999). Elections and representation. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation (pp. 29–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). The impact of public opinion on public policy: The state of the debate. In J. Manza, F. L. Cook, & B. I. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy and the future of American democracy (pp. 17–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, L. W., & Stevenson, R. T. (2001). Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 33–50. CrossRef

Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

McGann, A. J., & Latner, M. (2013). The calculus of consensus democracy: Rethinking patterns of democracy without veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 823–850. CrossRef

Meltz, D. B. (1973). An index of the measurement of interparty competition. Behavioral Science, 18(1), 60–63. CrossRef

Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56. CrossRef

Nordhaus, W. P. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190. CrossRef

Page, B. I., & Jacobs, L. R. (2009). Class war? What American really think about economic inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. CrossRef

Patterson, S. C., & Caldeira, G. A. (1984). The etiology of partisan competition. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 691–707. CrossRef

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics. Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002). Do electoral cycles differ across political systems? IGIER Working Paper No. 232.

Pickup, M., & Hobolt, S. B. (2015). The conditionality of the trade-off between government responsiveness and effectiveness: The impact of minority status and polls in the Canadian house of commons. Electoral Studies, 40, 517–530. CrossRef

Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. CrossRef

Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and political analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef

Plümper, T., Troeger, V. E., & Manow, P. (2005). Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 327–354. CrossRef

Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy. Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Powell, G. B., & Whitten, G. D. (1993). a cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 391–414. CrossRef

Ranney, A. (1965). Parties in state politics. In H. Jacob & K. Vines (Eds.), Politics in American states (pp. 62–71). Boston: Little Brown.

Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sartori, G. (1977). Democrazia Competitiva Ed Elites Politiche. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 7, 327–355. CrossRef

Schlesinger, J. A. (1955). A two-dimensional scheme for classifying the states according to degree of inter-party competition. The American Political Science Review, 49(4), 1120–1128. CrossRef

Schlesinger, J. A. (1960). The structure of competition for office in the American States. Behavioral Science, 5(3), 197–210. CrossRef

Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies. Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2005). Opinion-policy dynamics: Public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 665–689. CrossRef

Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2015). The majoritarian and proportional visions and democratic responsiveness. Electoral Studies., 40, 539–547. CrossRef

Soroka, S. N., Wlezien, C., & McLean, I. (2006). Public expenditure in the UK: How measures matter. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 169, 255–271. CrossRef

Stern, M. (1972). Measuring interparty competition: A proposal and a test of a method. The Journal of Politics, 34(3), 889–904. CrossRef

Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565. CrossRef

Strøm, K. (1989). Inter-party competition in advanced democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(3), 277–300. CrossRef

Strøm, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. CrossRef

Strom, K. (1992). Democracy as political competition. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(4/5), 375–396. CrossRef

Tillie, J. (1995). Party utility and voting behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289–325. CrossRef

Tufte, E. R. (1975). Political control of the economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

van der Eijk, C., & Oppenhuis, E. V. (1991). European parties’ performance in electoral competition. European Journal of Political Research, 19(1), 55–80. CrossRef

Visconti, F. (2018). The legislative representation of public opinion policy priorities in Italy. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2018.4. CrossRef

Warwick, P. V. (1996). Coalition government membership in West European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 471. CrossRef

Wittman, D. (1977). Candidates with policy preferences: A dynamic model. Journal of Economic Theory, 14(1), 180–189. CrossRef

Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 142–157. CrossRef

Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981–1000. CrossRef

Wlezien, C. (2004). Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 1–24. CrossRef

Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘Most Important Problem’. Electoral Studies, 24, 555–579. CrossRef

Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2003). Measures and models of budgetary policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 31(2), 273–286. CrossRef

Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion-policy link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432. CrossRef

Wlezien, C., et al. (2013). Polls and the vote in Britain. Political Studies, 61, 66–91. CrossRef

Titel: Policy Responsiveness and Electoral Incentives: A (Re)assessment
Autor:: Luca Bernardi
Publikationsdatum: 13.08.2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9490-4
Verlag: Springer US
Zeitschrift: Political Behavior
Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687

Premium Partner

Bildnachweise

Springer Professional

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Electronic supplementary material

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

It’s a Group Thing: How Voters go to the Polls Together

Beyond Keeping the Peace: Can Peacekeepers Reduce Ethnic Divisions After Violence?

More Important, but for What Exactly? The Insignificant Role of Subjective Issue Importance in Vote Decisions

Selfish and Cooperative Voting: Can the Majority Restrain Themselves?

Fit for the Job: Candidate Qualifications and Vote Choice in Low Information Elections

Assessing Voter Registration Among Transgender and Gender Non-conforming Individuals

Premium Partner