Skip to main content

2022 | Buch

Political Philosophy in Gulliver’s Travels

Shocked by The Just Society

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book analyzes Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels from a political philosophy perspective. When authors have focused on politics in Swift’s writings, this has usually meant a study of how Swift located himself on issues of his day such as church and state, and Ireland. Robertson claims by contrast that Gulliver’s Travels is fundamentally a book about the “ancients” (e.g. Plato, Aristotle), and the “moderns” (science and technology), and their contrasting views about the human condition. The claim that the Travels is “a kind of prolegomena” to political philosophy leaves open the possibility that it does not achieve, or seek to achieve, a fusion of various teachings but rather uses the device of alien societies to point us to uncomfortable aspects of political philosophy’s “larger questions” we are prone to ignore. Swift, Robertson argues, draws our attention to some version of the classical republic, as idealized in Aristotle’s political writings and in Plato’s Republic, as opposed to a modern regime which, at its best or most intellectual, emphasizes modern science and technology in combination as a way to improve the human condition.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction
Abstract
This chapter introduces the argument that Gulliver’s Travels is best understood as a book about the contrast between ancient and modern societies, and ancient and modern books, with Swift consistently preferring the ancients. To put this argument in context I discuss how political debates today, including debates as to whether what is considered progressive is always a good thing, can point us back toward the thought of Jonathan Swift. We also need to consider Swift’s art of writing, including his use of somewhat unreliable narrators such as Gulliver. There is a discussion of the debate about ancients and moderns that was prevalent in Swift’s time, and in which he took part with Battle of the Books. As valuable as it may be to consider Swift in a context of his time and place, we must be guided to some extent by his undeniable originality.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 2. Little People and Big People
Abstract
The story about big Gulliver living among the little Lilliputians is probably the best-known part of the Travels. The story of little Gulliver among the giants is less well known. Swift shows that we can recognize a common humanity in different people, but he also suggests human nature constrains us, and the more different we are from each other, the less likely it is that we will achieve an agreement. The little people have been made little by religious and political sectarianism—arguably the more sectarian they are, the smaller they become. The big people differ from small ones in souls as much as bodies—statesmanship and soul craft as much as cleverness or what we call technology. If we try to identify a “place” where we can find the giants, some of the actual ancient republics are a promising start, but Aristotle’s Ethics is also an indispensable source.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 3. Nameless Moderns: Science, Miracles and Faith
Abstract
The third voyage of the Travels famously satirizes modern science: more theoretical science, astronomy and mathematics among the flying islanders, something like technology or engineering on the earth below. Scientists are presented as either detached from humanity, including their own, or motivated by vague hopes of making life better as they inflict terrible harm on the people in front of their eyes. Agriculture according to Swift is likely to be bad; medical research, including what might be called political-medical research, is worse. Swift seems to agree with criticisms of the old Church of the Middle Ages in the name of reason, and at a particular time and place he is likely to support some kind of prudent accommodation between faith and modernity, but he leaves a strong suggestion that no really coherent and satisfying solution is available on modern terms.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 4. A Realistic Utopia, and Human Passions
Abstract
The modern scientists introduce us to intellectual virtue beyond what we find in earlier voyages, but they also excite a yearning for a regime that makes some provision for the soul as well as the body. There is a strange, somewhat cryptic presentation of a “realistic utopia” back in the first voyage, mixed or confused with “Old Lilliput.” There is a modern acceptance of materialism, commerce, and individuals always thinking of their own benefit. There is a somewhat concealed emphasis on liberal education for the elite. This may point to Swift’s thoughts on incorporating some aspects of ancient thought in a modern regime.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 5. Heroic Ancients
Abstract
In one of the last parts of the third voyage, Gulliver gets to speak with the dead—calling up exactly the people he wishes. These passages have been less studied than others in the Travels, and they clearly suggest once again that Swift has reasons to prefer the ancients to the moderns. Not only are the possible heroes all or almost all ancients, but a serious discussion of heroism seems to belong to ancient thought rather than modern. There is also a discussion of science, with Aristotle and Descartes debating whether discoveries about physics can ever be more than conjectural. There are reminders of “afterlives” in Dante and Plato.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 6. Rational Horses and Humans
Abstract
Insofar as we can aspire to be Houyhnhnms or rational horses, they have an ideal society of justice, intellectual curiosity, and individual satisfaction. Insofar as we identify with the poor Yahoos, we must fear our fate in the unlikely event that the greatest ancient Greeks and Romans, either fictional or real, were to come back to life. Gulliver like other modern Europeans is closer to Yahoo than Houyhnhnm, without being either. He hopes he is better than his peers by virtue of his identification with the Houyhnhnms, and his famous book. Swift provides reminders that Gulliver is not exactly Swift. Swift is interested in the ancient best regime and the Socratic method, but no doubt he is not exactly Socrates.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 7. European Imperialism and the Bible
Abstract
Insofar as the Yahoos are simply vicious and disgusting, no sane person would want to emulate them; insofar as they are victims, who in a way cannot be blamed for anything, anyone who is used to identifying as a victim might experience some sympathy, even to the point of an indignant desire for justice. Remarkably, the possibilities and problems raised by trying to live according to the Bible come up here.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Chapter 8. What We Can Learn
Abstract
Given Swift’s art of writing, his known practice of satire, and his love of jokes, it may be difficult to say with confidence what he expects the reader to learn from Gulliver’s Travels. While cautiously relying on the evidence of the text, I venture into two kinds of learning: what the Houyhnhnms learn, and what the Master Houyhnhnm learns. There are hints of a possible breeding program; horses breeding with asses or donkeys producing “mules.” Gulliver’s first name is Lemuel, and he may be a cross or mixture of various kinds: Yahoo and Houyhnhnm, English and Irish, ancient and modern. The comical or exaggerated story has some connection to high and serious themes, such as enlightenment and science. Liberal education, including considering physics in the proper way, may be the thing Gulliver most wishes to emulate, but he may not be as serious about it as his creator.
Lloyd W. Robertson
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Political Philosophy in Gulliver’s Travels
verfasst von
Lloyd W. Robertson
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Electronic ISBN
978-3-030-98853-1
Print ISBN
978-3-030-98852-4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98853-1