Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Vegetation at Northern High Latitudes Under Global Warming Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

32. Possibilities of Improving the Bioethanol Production from Cornmeal by Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus

verfasst von : Svetlana Nikolić, Ljiljana Mojović, Aleksandra Djukić-Vuković

Erschienen in: Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Bioethanol has become one of the most promising biofuels today. In Serbia, the most suitable and available raw materials are conventional starch-based energy crops such as corn and triticale. Bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process of cornmeal using free and immobilized cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus yeast, with and without media supplementation (mineral salts ZnSO4·7H2O and MgSO4·7H2O), in a batch system is studied. The ethanol concentration after 48 h of SSF is increased for 6.68 % by yeast immobilization compared to the free cell system, and a percentage of the theoretical ethanol yield of 86.66 % is achieved. Further improvement is accomplished with the addition of mineral salts which contributed to the highest increase in ethanol concentration by 15.86 % compared to the SSF process with free yeast and without yeast activators. In this case, ethanol concentration of 10.23 % (w/w), percentage of the theoretical ethanol yield of 94.11 %, and glucose consumption of 98.32 % are achieved after 48 h of the SSF process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Assessment of Sewage Sludge Potential from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants for Sustainable Biogas and Hydrogen Productions in Turkey
Nächstes Kapitel Utilizing Bamboo Biochar for Carbon Sequestration and Local Economic Development
Literatur
1.
Balat M, Balat H (2009) Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl Energy 86:2273–2282CrossRef
2.
Mojović L, Pejin D, Grujić O, Markov S, Pejin J, Rakin M, Vukašinović M, Nikolić S, Savić D (2009) Progress in the production of bioethanol on starch-based feedstocks, Review paper. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q (CI&CEQ) 15:211–226CrossRef
3.
International Energy Agency (2009) World energy outlook. OECD Publishing, Paris
4.
Pejin DJ, Mojović LV, Pejin JD, Olgica S, Grujić OS, Markov SL, Nikolić SB, Marković MN (2012) Increase in bioethanol production yield from triticale by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with application of ultrasound. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:170–176CrossRef
5.
6.
Nigam PA, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37:52–68CrossRef
7.
8.
Nitin V (2010) Bioethanol from biomass: a review. J Biofuels 1:245–225CrossRef
9.
10.
Chum HL, Overend RP (2001) Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Process Technol 71:187–195CrossRef
11.
Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Environmental aspects of ethanol derived from no-tilled corn grain: nonrenewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 28:475–489CrossRef
12.
Demirbas A (2008) The importance of bioethanol and biodiesel from biomass. Energy Sources Part B 3:177–185CrossRef
13.
Oliveria MED, Vaughan BE, Rykiel EJ Jr (2005) Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. Bioscience 55:593–602CrossRef
14.
Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kammen DM (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508CrossRef
15.
Nikolić S, Mojović L, Rakin M, Pejin D, Pejin J (2011) Utilization of microwave and ultrasound pretreatments in the production of bioethanol from corn. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:587–594CrossRef
16.
Mielenz J (2001) Ethanol production from biomass: technology and commercialization status. Curr Opin Microbiol 4:324–329CrossRef
17.
Zhang L, Zhao H, Gan M, Jin Y, Gao X, Chen Q, Guan J, Wang Z (2011) Application of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) from viscosity reducing of raw sweet potato for bioethanol production at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales. Bioresource Technol 102:4573–4579CrossRef
18.
Karimi K, Emtiazi G, Taherzadeh MJ (2006) Ethanol production from diluteacid pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with Mucor indicus, Rhizopus oryzae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:138–144CrossRef
19.
Öhgren K, Bura R, Lesnicki G, Saddler J, Zacchi G (2007) A comparison between simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and separate hydrolysis and fermentation using steam-pretreatment corn stover. Process Biochem 42:834–839CrossRef
20.
Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania RR, Vikram S, Devi L, Nagalakshmi S, Kurien N, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A (2010) Bioethanol production from rice straw: an overview. Bioresour Technol 101:4767–4774CrossRef
21.
Alfenore S, Molina-Jouve C, Guillouet SE, Uribelarrea JL, Goma G, Benbadis L (2002) Improving ethanol production and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a vitamin feeding strategy during fed-batch process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:67–72CrossRef
22.
Lee KH, Choi IS, Kim YG, Yang DJ, Bae HJ (2011) Enhanced production of bioethanol and ultrastructural characteristics of reused Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized calcium alginate beads. Bioresour Technol 102:8191–8198CrossRef
23.
Virkajarvi I, Pohjala N (2000) Primary fermentation with immobilized yeast: some effects of carrier materials on the flavour of the beer. J Inst Brew 106:311–318CrossRef
24.
Öztop HN, Yasemin Öztop A, Karadağ E, Işikver Y, Saraydin D (2003) Immobilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on to acrylamide–sodium acrylate hydrogels for production of ethyl alcohol. Enzyme Microb Technol 32:114–119CrossRef
25.
Razmovski R, Pejin D (1996) Immobilization of Saccharomyces diastaticus on wood chips for ethanol production. Folia Microbiol 41:201–207CrossRef
26.
Vidgren V, Virkajarvi I, Ruohonen L, Salusjarvi L, Londensborough J (2003) The free and carrier-bound yeast population from a two-stage immobilized yeast reactor are in different physiological conditions. Proc Eur Brew Conv 29:609–617
27.
Bezbradica D, Obradovic B, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Bugarski B, Nedovic V (2007) Immobilization of yeast cells in PVA particles for beer fermentation. Process Biochem 42:1338–1351CrossRef
28.
Plessas S, Bekatorou A, Koutinas AA, Soupioni M, Banat IM, Marchant R (2007) Use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilized on orange peel as biocatalyst for alcoholic fermentation. Bioresource Technol 98:860–865CrossRef
29.
Shinonaga M, Kawamura Y, Yamane T (1992) Immobilization of yeast cells with cross-linked chitosan beads. J Ferment Bioeng 74:90–94CrossRef
30.
Sakurai A, Nishid Y, Saito H, Sakakibara M (2000) Ethanol production by repeated batch culture using yeast cells immobilized within porous cellulose carriers. J Biosci Bioeng 90:526–529
31.
Behera S, Kar S, Mohanty RC, Ray RC (2010) Comparative study of bio-ethanol production from mahula (Madhuca latifolia L.) flowers by Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilized in agar agar and Ca-alginate matrices. Appl Energy 87:96–100CrossRef
32.
Yu J, Zhang X, Tan T (2007) Novel immobilization method of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to sorghum bagasse for ethanol production. J Biotechnol 129:415–420CrossRef
33.
Farmakis L, Kapolos J, Koliadima A, Karaiskakis G (2007) Study of the growth rate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains using wheat starch granules as support for yeast immobilization monitoring by sedimentation/steric field-flow fractionation. Food Res Int 40:717–724CrossRef
34.
Tata M, Bower P, Bromberg S, Duncombe D, Fehring J, Lau V, Ryder D, Stassi P (1999) Immobilized yeast bioreactor systems for continuous beer fermentation. Biotechnol Prog 15:105–113CrossRef
35.
Branyik T, Vicente AA, Machado Cruz JM, Teixeira JA (2001) Spent grains—a new support for brewing yeast immobilization. Biotechnol Lett 23:1073–1078CrossRef
36.
Ciesarová Z, Dömény Z, Šmogrovičová D, Pátková J, Šturdík E (1998) Comparison of ethanol tolerance of free and immobilized Saccharomyces uvarum yeasts. Folia Microbiol 43:55–58CrossRef
37.
Groboillot A, Boadi DK, Poncelet D, Neufeld RJ (1994) Immobilization of cells for application in the food industry. Crit Rev Biotechnol 14:75–107CrossRef
38.
Kourkoutas Y, Bekatorou A, Banat IM, Marchant R, Koutinas AA (2004) Immobilization technologies and support materials suitable in alcohol beverages production: a review. Food Microbiol 21:377–397CrossRef
39.
Prasad B (1995) On the kinetics and effectiveness of immobilized whole-cell batch cultures. Bioresource Technol 53:269–275
40.
Razmovski R, Vučurović V (2012) Bioethanol production from sugar beet molasses and thick juice using Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on maize stem ground tissue. Fuel 92:1–8CrossRef
41.
Nikolić S, Mojović L, Rakin M, Pejin D, Savić D (2008) A microwave-assisted liquefaction as a pretreatment for the bioethanol production by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of corn meal. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q (CI&CEQ) 14:231–234CrossRef
42.
Mojović L, Nikolić S, Rakin M, Vukašinović M (2006) Production of bioethanol from corn meal hydrolyzates. Fuel 85:1750–1755CrossRef
43.
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalycilic acid for determining reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRef
44.
Official Method 942.06 (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 17th edn. AOAC International, Gaithersburg
45.
Margaritis A, Kilonzo PM (2005) Production of ethanol using immobilised cell bioreactor systems. In: Nedović V, Willaert R (eds) Applications of cell immobilisation in biotechnology. Springer, Netherlands
46.
Vogelsang C, Wijffels RH, Østgaard K (2000) Rheological properties and mechanical stability of new gel-entrapment system applied in bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 70:247–253CrossRef
47.
Nikolić S, Mojović L, Rakin M, Pejin D, Nedović V (2009) Effect of different fermentation parameters on bioethanol production from corn meal hydrolyzates by free and immobilized cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:497–503CrossRef
48.
Choi GW, Moon SK, Kang HW, Min J, Chung BW (2008) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of sludge-containing cassava mash for batch and repeated batch production of bioethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CHFY0321. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:547–553CrossRef
49.
Zhu S, Wu Y, Yu Z, Zhang X, Wang C, Yu F, Jin S, Zhao Y, Tu S, Xue Y (2005) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of microwave/alkali pre-treated rice straw to ethanol. Biosyst Eng 92:229–235CrossRef
50.
Torija MJ, Rozes N, Poblet M, Guillamon JM, Mas A (2003) Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 80:47–53CrossRef
51.
Lucero P, Peňalver E, Moreno E, Lagunas R (2000) Internal trehalose protects endocytosis from inhibition by ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4456–4461CrossRef
52.
Verbelen PJ, De Schutter DP, Delvaux F, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR (2006) Immobilized yeast cell systems for continuous fermentation applications. Biotechnol Lett 28:1515–1525CrossRef
53.
Kotarska K, Czupryński B, Kłosowski G (2006) Effect of various activators on the course of alcoholic fermentation. J Food Eng 77:965–971CrossRef
54.
Birch RM, Walker GM (2000) Influence of magnesium ions on heat shock and ethanol stress responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:678–687CrossRef
55.
Mayalagu S, Patturajan M, Chatterji D (1997) The presence of two tightly bound Zn2+ ions is essential for the structural and functional integrity of yeast RNA polymerase II. Gene 190:77–85CrossRef
56.
Rees EMR, Stewart GG (1999) The effects of increased magnesium and calcium concentrations on yeast fermentation performance in high gravity worts. J Inst Brew 103:287–291CrossRef
57.
Dombek KM, Ingram LO (1986) Magnesium limitation and its role in apparent toxicity of ethanol during yeast fermentation. Appl Eviron Microbiol 52:975–981
58.
Magonet E, Hayen P, Delforge D, Delaive E, Remacle J (1992) Importance of the structural zinc atom for the stability of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase. J Biochem 287:361–365
59.
Filipović-Kovačević Ž, Mikšaj M, Berčuk N, Jukić M (2002) Amperometric biosensor for monitoring respiration activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of cobalt and zinc. Food Technol Biotechnol 40:111–117
60.
Stehlik-Thomas V, Grba S, Runjic-Peric V (1997) Zinc uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its impact on alcoholic fermentation. Chem Biochem Eng Q 11:147–151
Metadaten
Titel
Possibilities of Improving the Bioethanol Production from Cornmeal by Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus
verfasst von
Svetlana Nikolić
Ljiljana Mojović
Aleksandra Djukić-Vuković
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer New York
Buch
Causes, Impacts and Solutions to Global Warming

Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7587-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-7588-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7588-0_32