Skip to main content
Registrieren
Springer Professional
SUCHE
MENÜ 1 2 3 4
nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:
Concept, Definition, Enabling Technologies, and Challenges of Energy Integration in Whole Energy Systems To Create Integrated Energy Systems Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Power-to-X for Renewable-Based Hybrid Energy Systems

verfasst von : Sahar Davoudi, Amirhosein Khalili-Garakani, Kazem Kashefi

Erschienen in: Whole Energy Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

The development of renewable energy infrastructure and technologies is accelerating. One of the main concerns in renewable electricity production is the emergence of generation intermittency and fluctuation along with existing load variability. Power-to-X could play a critical role in providing many technological methods to handle power supplies with the consistency and reliability of future energy systems. A comprehensive investigation of the various power-to-X technologies is provided in this chapter, which could be utilized to integrate the benefits of renewable energies whereas avoiding the limitations when used alone. As well, the latest advances in PtX technologies are investigated and discussed in detail since limitations must be overcome to implement infrastructures around the world.

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Concept, Definition, Enabling Technologies, and Challenges of Energy Integration in Whole Energy Systems To Create Integrated Energy Systems
Nächstes Kapitel Whole Energy Systems Evaluation: A Methodological Framework and Case Study
Literatur
1.
Van de Krol, R., & Grätzel, M. (2012). Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Springer. CrossRef
2.
Khalilpour, K. R. (2019). Interconnected electricity and natural gas supply chains: The roles of power to gas and gas to power. In Polygeneration with Polystorage for chemical and energy hubs (pp. 133–155). Elsevier. CrossRef
3.
Koj, J. C., Wulf, C., & Zapp, P. (2019). Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems-a review of technological and methodological choices in life cycle assessments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 865–879. CrossRef
4.
Fuss, S., et al. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 850–853. CrossRef
5.
Pleßmann, G., Erdmann, M., Hlusiak, M., & Breyer, C. (2014). Global energy storage demand for a 100% renewable electricity supply. Energy Procedia, 46(0), 22–31. CrossRef
6.
Bosman, A., & Van Daal, H. (1970). Small-polaron versus band conduction in some transition-metal oxides. Advances in Physics, 19(77), 1–117. CrossRef
7.
de Rego Vasconcelos, B., & Lavoie, J.-M. (2019). Recent advances in power-to-X technology for the production of fuels and chemicals. Frontiers in Chemistry, 7, 392. CrossRef
8.
Buffo, G., Ferrero, D., Santarelli, M., & Lanzini, A. (2019). Reversible solid oxide cell (ReSOC) as flexible polygeneration plant integrated with CO2 capture and reuse. E3S Web of Conferences, 113, 02009. EDP Sciences. CrossRef
9.
Bailera, M., Lisbona, P., Romeo, L. M., & Espatolero, S. (2017). Power to gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 292–312. CrossRef
10.
Schnuelle, C., Thoeming, J., Wassermann, T., Thier, P., von Gleich, A., & Goessling-Reisemann, S. (2019). Socio-technical-economic assessment of power-to-X: Potentials and limitations for an integration into the German energy system. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 187–197. CrossRef
11.
Storage, E. E. (2011). International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). White Paper, Geneva, Switzerland.
12.
Daiyan, R., MacGill, I., & Amal, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges for renewable power-to-X. ACS Publications. CrossRef
13.
Buffo, G., Marocco, P., Ferrero, D., Lanzini, A., & Santarelli, M. (2019). Power-to-X and power-to-power routes. In Solar hydrogen production (pp. 529–557). Elsevier. CrossRef
14.
Vázquez, F. V., et al. (2018). Power-to-X technology using renewable electricity and carbon dioxide from ambient air: SOLETAIR proof-of-concept and improved process concept. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 28, 235–246. CrossRef
15.
Gür, T. M. (2018). Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: Challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(10), 2696–2767. CrossRef
16.
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018). Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2440–2454. CrossRef
17.
Sternberg, A., & Bardow, A. (2015). Power-to-what?–environmental assessment of energy storage systems. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(2), 389–400. CrossRef
18.
Naims, H. (2016). Economics of carbon dioxide capture and utilization—A supply and demand perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(22), 22226–22241. CrossRef
19.
Wulf, C., Linssen, J., & Zapp, P. (2018). Power-to-gas—Concepts, demonstration, and prospects. In Hydrogen supply chains (pp. 309–345). Elsevier. CrossRef
20.
Lewandowska-Bernat, A., & Desideri, U. (2017). Opportunities of power-to-gas technology. Energy Procedia, 105, 4569–4574. CrossRef
21.
Kumar, S. S., & Himabindu, V. (2019). Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis–a review. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2(3), 442–454. CrossRef
22.
Rajeshwar, K., McConnell, R., & Licht, S. (2008). Solar hydrogen generation. Springer. CrossRef
23.
Chi, J., & Yu, H. (2018). Water electrolysis based on renewable energy for hydrogen production. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 39(3), 390–394. CrossRef
24.
Acar, C., & Dincer, I. (2014). Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(1), 1–12. CrossRef
25.
Lee, B., et al. (2018). Economic feasibility studies of high pressure PEM water electrolysis for distributed H2 refueling stations. Energy Conversion and Management, 162, 139–144. CrossRef
26.
Borgschulte, A. (2016). The hydrogen grand challenge. Frontiers in Energy Research, 4, 11. CrossRef
27.
Ferreira-Aparicio, P., Benito, M., & Sanz, J. (2005). New trends in reforming technologies: From hydrogen industrial plants to multifuel microreformers. Catalysis Reviews, 47(4), 491–588. CrossRef
28.
Carmo, M., Fritz, D. L., Mergel, J., & Stolten, D. (2013). A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(12), 4901–4934. CrossRef
29.
Rashid, M. M., Al Mesfer, M. K., Naseem, H., & Danish, M. (2015). Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: A review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 4(3), 2249–8958.
30.
Damyanova, S., Pawelec, B., Arishtirova, K., & Fierro, J. (2012). Ni-based catalysts for reforming of methane with CO2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(21), 15966–15975. CrossRef
31.
Iida, S., & Sakata, K. (2019). Hydrogen technologies and developments in Japan. Clean Energy, 3(2), 105–113. CrossRef
32.
Bruce, S., et al. (2018). National hydrogen roadmap. CSIRO.
33.
FCH, J. (2019). Hydrogen roadmap Europe: A sustainable pathway for the European energy transition. Bietlot.
34.
Baccioli, A., et al. (2020). Cost effective power-to-X plant using carbon dioxide from a geothermal plant to increase renewable energy penetration. Energy Conversion and Management, 226, 113494. CrossRef
35.
Lehner, M., Tichler, R., Steinmüller, H., & Koppe, M. (2014). Power-to-gas: Technology and business models. Springer.
36.
Dhabi, A. (2017). Geothermal power: Technology brief. IRENA.
37.
Tractebel, H. (2017). Study of early business cases for H2 in energy Storage and more broadly power to H2 applications. In Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU): Brussels, Belgium.
38.
Dresp, S. R., Dionigi, F., Klingenhof, M., & Strasser, P. (2019). Direct electrolytic splitting of seawater: Opportunities and challenges. ACS Energy Letters, 4(4), 933–942. CrossRef
39.
Paudel, S., Kang, Y., Yoo, Y.-S., & Seo, G. T. (2015). Hydrogen production in the anaerobic treatment of domestic-grade synthetic wastewater. Sustainability, 7(12), 16260–16272. CrossRef
40.
Leaver, J. D., Gillingham, K. T., & Leaver, L. H. (2009). Assessment of primary impacts of a hydrogen economy in New Zealand using UniSyD. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(7), 2855–2865. CrossRef
41.
Balat, M. (2008). Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(15), 4013–4029. CrossRef
42.
Cipriani, G., et al. (2014). Perspective on hydrogen energy carrier and its automotive applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(16), 8482–8494. CrossRef
43.
Hermesmann, M., Grübel, K., Scherotzki, L., & Müller, T. Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110644.
44.
Reich, G., & Reppich, M. (2013). Regenerative Energietechnik. Springer. CrossRef
45.
Ursua, A., Gandia, L. M., & Sanchis, P. (2011). Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Current status and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(2), 410–426. CrossRef
46.
Holladay, J. D., Hu, J., King, D. L., & Wang, Y. (2009). An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today, 139(4), 244–260. CrossRef
47.
Yan, X. L., & Hino, R. (2016). Nuclear hydrogen production handbook. CRC press. CrossRef
48.
49.
Götz, M., et al. (2016). Renewable power-to-gas: A technological and economic review. Renewable Energy, 85, 1371–1390. CrossRef
50.
Steinmüller, H., Tichler, R., & Reiter, G. (2014). Power-to-gas–eine Systemanalyse. In Markt-und Technologiescouting und–analyse. Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, TU Wien, MU Leoben, JKU Linz.
51.
Shiva Kumar, S., Ramakrishna, S., Srinivasulu Reddy, D., Bhagawan, D., & Himabindu, V. (2017). Synthesis of polysulfone and zirconium oxide coated asbestos composite separators for alkaline water electrolysis. Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology, 3(1035), 1–1035.
52.
Zeng, K., & Zhang, D. (2010). Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(3), 307–326. CrossRef
53.
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A., Nelson, J., & Few, S. (2017). Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(52), 30470–30492. CrossRef
54.
Coutanceau, C., Baranton, S., & Audichon, T. (2018). Hydrogen production from water electrolysis. Hydrogen Electrochemical Production, 17–62.
55.
Russell, J., Nuttall, L., & Fickett, A. (1973). Hydrogen generation by solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. American Chemical Society and Division of Fuel Chemistry Preprints, 18, 24–40.
56.
Martinson, C. A., Van Schoor, G., Uren, K., & Bessarabov, D. (2014). Characterisation of a PEM electrolyser using the current interrupt method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(36), 20865–20878. CrossRef
57.
Grigor’ev, S., Khaliullin, M., Kuleshov, N., & Fateev, V. (2001). Electrolysis of water in a system with a solid polymer electrolyte at elevated pressure. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 37(8), 819–822. CrossRef
58.
Millet, P., Ngameni, R., Grigoriev, S., & Fateev, V. (2011). Scientific and engineering issues related to PEM technology: Water electrolysers, fuel cells and unitized regenerative systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(6), 4156–4163. CrossRef
59.
Giovanni, C. D., et al. (2016). Low-cost nanostructured iron sulfide electrocatalysts for PEM water electrolysis. ACS Catalysis, 6(4), 2626–2631. CrossRef
60.
Datta, M. K., et al. (2013). High performance robust F-doped tin oxide based oxygen evolution electro-catalysts for PEM based water electrolysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 1(12), 4026–4037. CrossRef
61.
Brisse, A., Schefold, J., & Zahid, M. (2008). High temperature water electrolysis in solid oxide cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(20), 5375–5382. CrossRef
62.
Huynh, H. L., & Yu, Z. (2020). CO2 Methanation on Hydrotalcite-derived catalysts and structured reactors: A review. Energy Technology, 8(5), 1901475. CrossRef
63.
De Saint Jean, M., Baurens, P., Bouallou, C., & Couturier, K. (2015). Economic assessment of a power-to-substitute-natural-gas process including high-temperature steam electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(20), 6487–6500. CrossRef
64.
Manthiram, K., Beberwyck, B. J., & Alivisatos, A. P. (2014). Enhanced electrochemical methanation of carbon dioxide with a dispersible nanoscale copper catalyst. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136(38), 13319–13325. CrossRef
65.
Thema, M., Bauer, F., & Sterner, M. (2019). Power-to-gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 775–787. CrossRef
66.
Lewandowska-Bernat, A., & Desideri, U. (2018). Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures. Applied Energy, 228, 57–67. CrossRef
67.
Machado, A. S. R., Nunes, A. V., & da Ponte, M. N. (2018). Carbon dioxide utilization—Electrochemical reduction to fuels and synthesis of polycarbonates. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 134, 150–156. CrossRef
68.
Kaneco, S., Katsumata, H., Suzuki, T., & Ohta, K. (2006). Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to methane at the cu electrode in methanol with sodium supporting salts and its comparison with other alkaline salts. Energy & Fuels, 20(1), 409–414. CrossRef
69.
Taubner, R.-S., Schleper, C., Firneis, M. G., & Rittmann, S. K.-M. (2015). Assessing the ecophysiology of methanogens in the context of recent astrobiological and planetological studies. Life, 5(4), 1652–1686. CrossRef
70.
Rittmann, S., Seifert, A., & Herwig, C. (2015). Essential prerequisites for successful bioprocess development of biological CH4 production from CO2 and H2. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 35(2), 141–151. CrossRef
71.
Van Dael, M., et al. (2018). Techno-economic assessment of a microbial power-to-gas plant–case study in Belgium. Applied Energy, 215, 416–425. CrossRef
72.
Lecker, B., Illi, L., Lemmer, A., & Oechsner, H. (2017). Biological hydrogen methanation–a review. Bioresource Technology, 245, 1220–1228. CrossRef
73.
Seifert, A., Rittmann, S., Bernacchi, S., & Herwig, C. (2013). Method for assessing the impact of emission gasses on physiology and productivity in biological methanogenesis. Bioresource Technology, 136, 747–751. CrossRef
74.
Voelklein, M., Rusmanis, D., & Murphy, J. (2019). Biological methanation: Strategies for in-situ and ex-situ upgrading in anaerobic digestion. Applied Energy, 235, 1061–1071. CrossRef
75.
Schmidt, P., Batteiger, V., Roth, A., Weindorf, W., & Raksha, T. (2018). Power-to-liquids as renewable fuel option for aviation: A review. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 90(1–2), 127–140. CrossRef
76.
Kasten, P., Blanck, R., Loreck, C., & Hacker, F. (2013). Strombasierte Kraftstoffe im Vergleich-Stand heute und die Langfristperspektive. Öko-Institut Working Paper, 1, 2013.
77.
Kaiser, P., Pöhlmann, F., & Jess, A. (2014). Intrinsic and effective kinetics of cobalt-catalyzed Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in view of a power-to-liquid process based on renewable energy. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 37(6), 964–972. CrossRef
78.
Schmidt, P., Weindorf, W., Roth, A., Batteiger, V., & Riegel, F. (2016). Power-to-liquids: Potentials and perspectives for the future supply of renewable aviation fuel. German Environment Agency.
79.
Panzone, C., Philippe, R., Chappaz, A., Fongarland, P., & Bengaouer, A. (2020). Power-to-liquid catalytic CO2 valorization into fuels and chemicals: Focus on the Fischer-Tropsch route. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 38, 314–347. CrossRef
80.
Hank, C., et al. (2018). Economics & carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide–power-to-methanol. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2(6), 1244–1261. CrossRef
81.
Bellotti, D., Rivarolo, M., Magistri, L., & Massardo, A. (2017). Feasibility study of methanol production plant from hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 21, 132–138. CrossRef
82.
Ikäheimo, J., Kiviluoma, J., Weiss, R., & Holttinen, H. (2018). Power-to-ammonia in future north European 100% renewable power and heat system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(36), 17295–17308. CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Power-to-X for Renewable-Based Hybrid Energy Systems
verfasst von
Sahar Davoudi
Amirhosein Khalili-Garakani
Kazem Kashefi
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
Whole Energy Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87652-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-87653-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87653-1_2