Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Practice-Based Approaches to Learning and Innovating

verfasst von : Katri Kallio, Tiziana Russo-Spena, Inka Lappalainen, Cristina Mele

Erschienen in: Innovating in Practice

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines how practice-based learning perspectives allow to approach the broad, service-based view of innovation and its processes as a collaborative learning process of creating something new in a better way. We focus on studying three practice-based learning approaches through their key concepts. More specifically, we are interested in how these theories interpret the creation of new social structures, learning processes, practices and tools in the cultural-historic context for the creation of new knowledge and activity. The study brings new conceptual insights to the topical phenomena about various learning mechanisms in order to contribute especially to the processes of innovation and enhance as well as facilitate innovation activities within and between organisations in a purposeful manner. Thus, as our conclusion, we state that, by increasing the in-depth understanding of different mechanisms of learning in action and between actors, we can create better conditions for innovation to take place.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534.CrossRef Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2009). Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40(2), 145–159.CrossRef Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2009). Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40(2), 145–159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization, 7(2), 277–300.CrossRef Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization, 7(2), 277–300.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackler, F., & Regan, S. (2009). Intentionality, agency, change: practice theory and management. Management Learning, 40(2), 161–176.CrossRef Blackler, F., & Regan, S. (2009). Intentionality, agency, change: practice theory and management. Management Learning, 40(2), 161–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRef Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.CrossRef Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calborg, C., Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). The evolution of service innovation research: A critical review and synthesis. The Service Industries Journal, 34(5), 373–398.CrossRef Calborg, C., Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). The evolution of service innovation research: A critical review and synthesis. The Service Industries Journal, 34(5), 373–398.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.CrossRef Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. [Hardcover]. San Francisco: Wiley. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. [Hardcover]. San Francisco: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRef Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, S. D. N., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373–390.CrossRef Cook, S. D. N., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, R. G. (1994). Third-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3–14.CrossRef Cooper, R. G. (1994). Third-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.CrossRef Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 35–64.CrossRef Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 35–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140–164.CrossRef Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in SD logic and service system. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31.CrossRef Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in SD logic and service system. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellström, P. E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.CrossRef Ellström, P. E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Jyväskylä: Orienta-konsultit. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Jyväskylä: Orienta-konsultit.
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 11–21.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 11–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys towards co-configuration. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1/2), 23–39.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys towards co-configuration. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1/2), 23–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRef Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art- so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893–904.CrossRef Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art- so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893–904.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRef Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge. The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge. The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization. London: Sage. Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2009a). Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359.CrossRef Gherardi, S. (2009a). Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2009b). Introduction the critical power of the practice lens. Management Learning, 40(2), 115–128.CrossRef Gherardi, S. (2009b). Introduction the critical power of the practice lens. Management Learning, 40(2), 115–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2012a). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In S. Gherardi & A. Strati (Eds.), Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Gherardi, S. (2012a). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In S. Gherardi & A. Strati (Eds.), Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2012b). Why do practices change and why do they persist? Models of explanations. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning, professional and practice-based learn. Australia: Springer. Gherardi, S. (2012b). Why do practices change and why do they persist? Models of explanations. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning, professional and practice-based learn. Australia: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2014). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Gherardi, S. (2014). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organisation, 2(Special Issue), 329–334. Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organisation, 2(Special Issue), 329–334.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436.CrossRef Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S., & Strati, A. (2012). Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Gherardi, S., & Strati, A. (2012). Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottfridsson, P. (2010). Development of personalised services in small business: An iterative learning process. Managing Service Quality, 20(4), 388–400.CrossRef Gottfridsson, P. (2010). Development of personalised services in small business: An iterative learning process. Managing Service Quality, 20(4), 388–400.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gottfridsson, P. (2012). Joint service development – The creations of the prerequisite for the service development. Managing Service Quality, 22(1), 21–37.CrossRef Gottfridsson, P. (2012). Joint service development – The creations of the prerequisite for the service development. Managing Service Quality, 22(1), 21–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greer, C., & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative innovation with customers: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 63–84.CrossRef Greer, C., & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative innovation with customers: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 63–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kallio, K. (2015). Collaborative learning with users as an enabler of service innovation. Doctoral dissertation in VTT science series, Espoo, Finland (VTT science 110). Kallio, K. (2015). Collaborative learning with users as an enabler of service innovation. Doctoral dissertation in VTT science series, Espoo, Finland (VTT science 110).
Zurück zum Zitat Kallio, K., & Lappalainen, I. (2014). Learning about service-orientation in KIBS: Understanding the customer as an active actor. Service Science, 6(2), 78–91.CrossRef Kallio, K., & Lappalainen, I. (2014). Learning about service-orientation in KIBS: Understanding the customer as an active actor. Service Science, 6(2), 78–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRef Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, NY: Routledge. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: University Press.CrossRef Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.CrossRef Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.CrossRef Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175.
Zurück zum Zitat Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Springer.CrossRef Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mele, C., Colurcio, M., & Russo-Spena, T. (2014). Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 26(6), 612–642.CrossRef Mele, C., Colurcio, M., & Russo-Spena, T. (2014). Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 26(6), 612–642.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mele, C., & Russo-Spena, T. (2015). Innomediary agency and practices in shaping market innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(1), 42–53.CrossRef Mele, C., & Russo-Spena, T. (2015). Innomediary agency and practices in shaping market innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(1), 42–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2012). Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2012). Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Michel, S., Brown, S. W., & Gallan, A. S. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: Deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66.CrossRef Michel, S., Brown, S. W., & Gallan, A. S. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: Deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system. Scientific concept or political rhetoric? Helsinki: Edita. Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system. Scientific concept or political rhetoric? Helsinki: Edita.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418.CrossRef Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.CrossRef Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Organizational knowledge as practice. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Organizational knowledge as practice. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.CrossRef Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nooteboom, B. (2012). A pragmatist theory of innovation. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Nooteboom, B. (2012). A pragmatist theory of innovation. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRef Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRef Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlikowski, W. J. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 460–466.CrossRef Orlikowski, W. J. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 460–466.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.CrossRef Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russo-Spena, T., Kallio, K., Lappalainen, I., & Mele, C. (2014). Knowledge and learning in practice-based studies. In L. Freund & W. Cellary (Eds.), Advances in human factors and service engineering. Cracovia: CRC Press. Russo-Spena, T., Kallio, K., Lappalainen, I., & Mele, C. (2014). Knowledge and learning in practice-based studies. In L. Freund & W. Cellary (Eds.), Advances in human factors and service engineering. Cracovia: CRC Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo-Spena, T., & Mele, C. (2012a). Five Co-s’ in innovating: A practice-based view. Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 527–553.CrossRef Russo-Spena, T., & Mele, C. (2012a). Five Co-s’ in innovating: A practice-based view. Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 527–553.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russo-Spena, T., & Mele, C. (2012b). Creativity and learning in the practices of service innovation. In J. C. Spohrer & L. E. Freund (Eds.), Advances in human factors and service engineering. San Francisco: CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group. Russo-Spena, T., & Mele, C. (2012b). Creativity and learning in the practices of service innovation. In J. C. Spohrer & L. E. Freund (Eds.), Advances in human factors and service engineering. San Francisco: CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group.
Zurück zum Zitat Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organizations Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRef Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organizations Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Sørensen, F., Sundbo, J., & Mattsson, J. (2013). Organisational conditions for service encounter-based innovation. Research Policy, 42(8), 1446–1456.CrossRef Sørensen, F., Sundbo, J., & Mattsson, J. (2013). Organisational conditions for service encounter-based innovation. Research Policy, 42(8), 1446–1456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Star, L. S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.CrossRef Star, L. S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: The case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2), 311–327.CrossRef Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: The case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2), 311–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). User-based innovation in services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). User-based innovation in services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Svabo, C. (2009). Materiality in a practice-based approach. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 360–370.CrossRef Svabo, C. (2009). Materiality in a practice-based approach. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 360–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., & Robertson, M. (2007). The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–1837.CrossRef Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., & Robertson, M. (2007). The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–1837.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J., & Scarborough, H. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef Swan, J., & Scarborough, H. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J. A., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–497.CrossRef Swan, J. A., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Syson, F., & Perks, H. (2004). New service development: A network perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(4), 255–266.CrossRef Syson, F., & Perks, H. (2004). New service development: A network perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(4), 255–266.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Toivonen, M. (2010). Different types of innovation processes in services and their organizational implications. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services (pp. 221–249). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Toivonen, M. (2010). Different types of innovation processes in services and their organizational implications. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services (pp. 221–249). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRef Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRef Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continue the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRef Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continue the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vargo, S., Wieland, H., & Archpru Akaka, M. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(9), 63–72.CrossRef Vargo, S., Wieland, H., & Archpru Akaka, M. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(9), 63–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Victor, B., & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization’s internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Victor, B., & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization’s internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2011). Supporting expansive learning through theoretical-genetic future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2011). Supporting expansive learning through theoretical-genetic future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental function. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental function. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(22), 225–246.CrossRef Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(22), 225–246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yanow, D. (2000). Seeing organizational learning: A ‘cultural’ view. Organization, 7(2), 247–268.CrossRef Yanow, D. (2000). Seeing organizational learning: A ‘cultural’ view. Organization, 7(2), 247–268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yanow, D. (2006). Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach. In M. G. Pratt & R. Anat (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations – Beyond mere symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Yanow, D. (2006). Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach. In M. G. Pratt & R. Anat (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations – Beyond mere symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.CrossRef Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Practice-Based Approaches to Learning and Innovating
verfasst von
Katri Kallio
Tiziana Russo-Spena
Inka Lappalainen
Cristina Mele
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43380-6_5