Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Technology volition is the will to develop knowledge of, and use, the physical world to design products, processes and systems. The aim of this study was to contribute new knowledge of children’s technology volition when they identify, build and improve technical constructions, and how teachers support this learning. Analysis focused on moments when children’s volition was expressed in a construction activity. In total, eleven preschool teachers and 49 children, aged 4–5 years, from three preschools, participated. Data consists of video-recordings from four activities, two each in preschool A and B, showing children’s expressed technological volition, as well as field notes about the teachers’ preparations. Results show how differences among children’s expressed volition is connected to their imagination of how materials can be combined to construct ‘houses’ and ‘vehicles’ from everyday objects. Building a house resulted in a focus on how to make the building solid and water resistant, and inspired children to learn about materials for different purposes in houses such as the floor, walls and an angled roof. Building a vehicle encouraged children to talk about speed, movements and fuel. Results show how children indicate and express their discernment of how materials are combined to create constructions, and how they discover ways in which materials change during the building process. For some of the children it was difficult to see the potential of a material other than its original use, while others used their imagination to find opportunities to use materials to make new objects.
Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Early engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children Youth and Environments, 21(2), 212.
Bjurulf, V. (2008). Teknikämnets gestaltningar. En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik. Doktorsavhandling. [Technology configurations. A study of the work of teachers in the school subject technology. Dissertation.] Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies 2008:29.
Bjurulf, V. (2013). Teknikdidaktik i Förskolan. [Technology Education in Pre-school.] Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14–22. CrossRef
Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Stylianidou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in early years science. Education, 3–13, 43(4), 404–419.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
De Vries, M. J. (2005). The nature of technological knowledge: Philosophical reflections and educational consequences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 149–154. CrossRef
Elvstrand, H., Hellberg, K., & Hallström, J. (2012). Technology and gender in early childhood education: How girls and boys explore and learn technology in free play in Swedish preschools. In PATT 26 conference, technology education in the 21st century, Stockholm, Sweden, 26– 30 June, 2012 (pp. 163–171). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. CrossRef
Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 43–59. CrossRef
Fleer, M., Gomes, J., & March, S. (2014). Science learning affordances in preschool environments. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(1), 38–48.
Holmqvist, M. (2011). Teachers’ learning in a learning study. Instructional Science, 39(4), 497–511. CrossRef
Mawson, B. (2007). Factors affecting learning in technology in the early years at school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 253–269. CrossRef
Mawson, B. (2008). Children’s developing understanding of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 1–13. CrossRef
Mawson, W. B. (2013). Emergent technological literacy: What do children bring to school? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 443–453. CrossRef
Milne, L., & Edwards, R. (2013). Young children’s views of the technology process: An exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 11–21. CrossRef
Ministry of Education. (2010). Preschool in development—The background to the changes in the preschool curriculum. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, cop.
Mitcham, C. (2001). Philosophizing about technology: Why should we bother. Ethics, 17. Available at: https://ethix.org/2001/06/01/philosophizing-about-technology-why-should-we-bother. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
National Agency for Education. (2016). Curriculum for preschool. www.skolverket.se. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
Nia, M. G., & De Vries, M. J. (2016). ‘Standards’ on the bench: Do standards for technological literacy render an adequate image of technology? Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 5–18. CrossRef
Parker-Rees, R. (1997). Learning from play: Design and technology, imagination and playful thinking. In IDATER 1997 Conference. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children’s learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 93–113. CrossRef
Siraj-Blachford, J. (2001). Emergent science and technology in the early years. Paper presented at the XXIII world congress of OMEP, Santiago Chile July 31st to 4th August 2001.
Solomon, J., & Hall, S. (1996). An inquiry into progression in primary technology: A role for teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 6(3), 263–282. CrossRef
Stafström, S. (2017). Good research practice. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council. Available on internet: https://publikationer.vr.se/produkt/god-forskningssed. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
Sundberg, B., & Ottander, C. (2013). The conflict within the role: A longitudinal study of preschool student teacher’s point of view. Journal of Childhood Teacher Education, 34(1), 80–94. CrossRef
Sundqvist, P., & Nilsson, T. (2016). Technology education in preschool: Providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1, 1–23.
Sundqvist, P., & Nilsson, T. (2018). Technology education in preschool: Providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 29–51. CrossRef
Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2016). Förskolans pedagogiska uppdrag. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Turja, L., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Chatoney, M. (2009). A conceptual framework for developing the curriculum and delivery of technology education in early childhood. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 353–365. CrossRef
- Pre-school children’s expressed technological volition during construction play
- Springer Netherlands
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
Neuer Inhalt, AVL List GmbH/© AVL List GmbH, dSpace, BorgWarner, Neuer Inhalt, Neuer Inhalt, Smalley, Valeo Logo/© Valeo, FEV