Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Precarious Ownership of the Internet of Things in the Age of Data

verfasst von : Natasha Tusikov

Erschienen in: Information, Technology and Control in a Changing World

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT)—internet-connected software embedded within physical products—has the potential to shift fundamentally traditional conceptions of ownership and the ways people can access, use, and control information. Drawing upon a knowledge regulation framework influenced by Susan Strange, this chapter argues that the IoT industry exemplifies the central role that knowledge governance now plays in the global political economy. The chapter examines how companies that own the knowledge integral to the IoT’s functionality (the software) control that knowledge through intellectual property laws, especially copyright, and the ubiquitous surveillance of their customers. These companies retain control over the software even after its purchase, meaning they have a newly expanded regulatory capacity to monitor and control how their products are used. The private post-purchase control that IoT companies exert over smart goods represents a significant change in private actors’ regulatory capacity to set rules governing knowledge.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
John Deere made this statement in its 2014 contribution to the U.S. Copyright Office, which was holding hearings into whether the copyright law should be amended to allow the diagnosis, repair, or modification to vehicle software (see Bartholomew 2014).
 
2
For comparisons of real property and intangible intellectual property in legal history, see Mulligan (2016).
 
3
John Deere, for example, explains that the vehicle manufacturer (i.e., Deere) may not own the copyright to the vehicle software or software systems (Bartholomew 2014, 5). While John Deere does not provide further clarification on this point, the company appears to be saying that in some cases, the smart manufacturer may not necessarily own the copyright over all the software systems within the smart product, especially in the cases of complex machinery such as tractors or vehicles. This statement demonstrates the complicated nature of copyright ownership and the complexity of determining ownership in regards to objects with embedded software.
 
4
The U.S. 1998 Digital Millennium CopyrightAct’s Section 1201 prohibits most circumstances of bypassing or breakingTechnological Protection Measures (TPMs) set by copyright owners. Similarly, Canada’s Copyright Act, amended in 2012, makes it illegal to break or circumvent a digital lock (Sec. 41.1).
 
5
For a detailed analysis of EULAs, their origins in the software industry, and their implications for ownership, see Perzanowski and Schultz (2016).
 
6
In addition to EULAs, technology companies may use terms-of-service agreements (also called terms of use or terms and conditions), which are much broader than EULAs and set out terms governing issues such as copyright ownership and penalties for violation, the collection and use of customers’ data, as well as rules governing payment and security of the website or application in question. For the sake of clarity, this chapter refers to EULAs only, but recognises that companies may incorporate policies governing their software under the terms-of-service agreements.
 
7
Interview in 2016 with a lawyer in Ottawa, Canada, specialising in internet law.
 
8
The Repair Association, for example, a U.S. non-governmental umbrella association of industry and civil-society groups, advocates for consumers to have the right to access product information, parts and tools, unlock products for repair and reuse, as well as unencumbered resale and repairable products. See https://​repair.​org/​association.
 
9
Cracked software generally refers to code that has been modified, typically without the permission of the copyright owner and in violation of copyright law, in order to allow users to bypass authentication or authorisation security features such as passwords.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andrejevic, Mark, and Mark Burdon. 2015. Defining the Sensor Society. Television & New Media 16 (1): 19–36.CrossRef Andrejevic, Mark, and Mark Burdon. 2015. Defining the Sensor Society. Television & New Media 16 (1): 19–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baack, Stephan. 2015. Datafication and Empowerment: How the Open Data Movement Re-articulates Notions of Democracy, Participation, and Journalism. Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1–11.CrossRef Baack, Stephan. 2015. Datafication and Empowerment: How the Open Data Movement Re-articulates Notions of Democracy, Participation, and Journalism. Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bakos, Yannis, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, and David R. Trossen. 2014. Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies 43 (1): 1–35.CrossRef Bakos, Yannis, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, and David R. Trossen. 2014. Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies 43 (1): 1–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banner, Stuart. 2011. American Property: A History of How, Why, and What We Own. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Banner, Stuart. 2011. American Property: A History of How, Why, and What We Own. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belli, Luca, and Jamila Venturini. 2016. Private Ordering and the Rise of Terms of Service as Cyberregulation. Internet Policy Review 5 (4): 1–17.CrossRef Belli, Luca, and Jamila Venturini. 2016. Private Ordering and the Rise of Terms of Service as Cyberregulation. Internet Policy Review 5 (4): 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carolan, Michael. 2017. ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not-So-Neoliberal Worlds. Sociologia Ruralis 58 (4): 745–764.CrossRef Carolan, Michael. 2017. ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not-So-Neoliberal Worlds. Sociologia Ruralis 58 (4): 745–764.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, Kate, Kate Miltner, and Mary L. Gray. 2014. Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology. International Journal of Communication 8: 1663–1672. Crawford, Kate, Kate Miltner, and Mary L. Gray. 2014. Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology. International Journal of Communication 8: 1663–1672.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, Kate, Jessa Lingel, and Tero Karppi. 2015. Our Metrics, Ourselves: A Hundred Years of Self-tracking from Weight Scale to the Wrist Wearable Device. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 479–496.CrossRef Crawford, Kate, Jessa Lingel, and Tero Karppi. 2015. Our Metrics, Ourselves: A Hundred Years of Self-tracking from Weight Scale to the Wrist Wearable Device. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 479–496.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DeNardis, Laura, and Mark Raymond. 2017. The Internet of Things as a Global Policy Frontier. UC Davis Law Review 51: 475–497. DeNardis, Laura, and Mark Raymond. 2017. The Internet of Things as a Global Policy Frontier. UC Davis Law Review 51: 475–497.
Zurück zum Zitat Deschamps-Sonsino, Alexandra, and Usman Haque. 2018. Principles for an Open Internet of Things Certification Mark. Updates as of June 13, 2018. Accessed September 15, 2018. Copy on file with author. Deschamps-Sonsino, Alexandra, and Usman Haque. 2018. Principles for an Open Internet of Things Certification Mark. Updates as of June 13, 2018. Accessed September 15, 2018. Copy on file with author.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberlein, Burkhard, and Edgar Grande. 2005. Beyond Deregulation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (1): 89–112.CrossRef Eberlein, Burkhard, and Edgar Grande. 2005. Beyond Deregulation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (1): 89–112.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fairfield, Joshua A.T. 2017. Owned: Property, Privacy, and the New Digital Serfdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Fairfield, Joshua A.T. 2017. Owned: Property, Privacy, and the New Digital Serfdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fernback, Jan, and Zizi Papacharissi. 2007. Online Privacy as Legal Safeguard: The Relationship among Consumer, Online Portal, and Privacy Policies. New Media & Society 9 (5): 715–734.CrossRef Fernback, Jan, and Zizi Papacharissi. 2007. Online Privacy as Legal Safeguard: The Relationship among Consumer, Online Portal, and Privacy Policies. New Media & Society 9 (5): 715–734.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland, Steven L. 2017. Drinking from the Fire Hose: How Massive Self-Surveillance and the Internet of Things Are Changing Constitutional Privacy. West Virginia Law Review 119: 100–122. Friedland, Steven L. 2017. Drinking from the Fire Hose: How Massive Self-Surveillance and the Internet of Things Are Changing Constitutional Privacy. West Virginia Law Review 119: 100–122.
Zurück zum Zitat Haggart, Blayne. 2017. Incorporating the Study of Knowledge into the IPE Mainstream, or, When Does a Trade Agreement Stop Being a Trade Agreement? Journal of Information Policy 7: 176–203.CrossRef Haggart, Blayne. 2017. Incorporating the Study of Knowledge into the IPE Mainstream, or, When Does a Trade Agreement Stop Being a Trade Agreement? Journal of Information Policy 7: 176–203.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kerr, Ian. 2007. To Observe and Protect? How Digital Rights Management Systems Threaten Privacy and What Policy Makers Should Do About It. In Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Copyright and Related Rights, ed. Peter Yu, vol. 1. London: Praeger Publishers. Kerr, Ian. 2007. To Observe and Protect? How Digital Rights Management Systems Threaten Privacy and What Policy Makers Should Do About It. In Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Copyright and Related Rights, ed. Peter Yu, vol. 1. London: Praeger Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal 79: 1–14.CrossRef Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal 79: 1–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Langenderfer, Jeff. 2009. End-User License Agreements: A New Era of Intellectual Property Control. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 28 (2): 202–211.CrossRef Langenderfer, Jeff. 2009. End-User License Agreements: A New Era of Intellectual Property Control. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 28 (2): 202–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulligan, Christina. 2016. Personal Property Servitudes on the Internet of Things. Georgia Law Review 50: 1121–1168. Mulligan, Christina. 2016. Personal Property Servitudes on the Internet of Things. Georgia Law Review 50: 1121–1168.
Zurück zum Zitat Perzanowski, Aaron, and Chris Jay Hoofnagle. 2017. What We Buy When We Buy Now. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 165 (2): 315–378. Perzanowski, Aaron, and Chris Jay Hoofnagle. 2017. What We Buy When We Buy Now. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 165 (2): 315–378.
Zurück zum Zitat Perzanowski, Aaron, and Jason Schultz. 2016. The End of Ownership: Personal Property in the Digital Economy. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Perzanowski, Aaron, and Jason Schultz. 2016. The End of Ownership: Personal Property in the Digital Economy. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Picciotto, Sol. 2002. Introduction: Reconceptualising Regulation in the Era of Globalisation. Journal of Law and Society 29 (1): 1–11.CrossRef Picciotto, Sol. 2002. Introduction: Reconceptualising Regulation in the Era of Globalisation. Journal of Law and Society 29 (1): 1–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powers, Shawn, and Michael Jablonski. 2015. The Real Cyber War: The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.CrossRef Powers, Shawn, and Michael Jablonski. 2015. The Real Cyber War: The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, Pamela. 2016. Freedom to Tinker. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17: 563.CrossRef Samuelson, Pamela. 2016. Freedom to Tinker. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17: 563.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz, Wolfgang, and Kevin Dankert. 2016. ‘Governance by Things’ as a Challenge to Regulation by Law. Internet Policy Review 5 (2): 1–19.CrossRef Schulz, Wolfgang, and Kevin Dankert. 2016. ‘Governance by Things’ as a Challenge to Regulation by Law. Internet Policy Review 5 (2): 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sell, Susan. 2004. Intellectual Property and Public Policy in Historical Perspective: Contestation and Settlement. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38: 267–322. Sell, Susan. 2004. Intellectual Property and Public Policy in Historical Perspective: Contestation and Settlement. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38: 267–322.
Zurück zum Zitat Shelton, Taylor, Matthew Zook, and Alan Wiig. 2015. The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 13–25.CrossRef Shelton, Taylor, Matthew Zook, and Alan Wiig. 2015. The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 13–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Strange, Susan. 1994. States and Markets. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum. Strange, Susan. 1994. States and Markets. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Tene, Omer, and Jules Polonetsky. 2013. A Theory of Creepy: Technology, Privacy and Shifting Social Norms. Yale Journal of Law & Technology 16 (1): 59–102. Tene, Omer, and Jules Polonetsky. 2013. A Theory of Creepy: Technology, Privacy and Shifting Social Norms. Yale Journal of Law & Technology 16 (1): 59–102.
Zurück zum Zitat Tusikov, Natasha. 2016. Chokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef Tusikov, Natasha. 2016. Chokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat West, Sarah Myers. 2017. Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy. Business & Society 58: 20–41.CrossRef West, Sarah Myers. 2017. Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy. Business & Society 58: 20–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zittrain, Jonathan L. 2008. The Future of the Internet – And How to Stop It. New Haven: Yale University Press. Zittrain, Jonathan L. 2008. The Future of the Internet – And How to Stop It. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89.CrossRef Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Precarious Ownership of the Internet of Things in the Age of Data
verfasst von
Natasha Tusikov
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14540-8_6