nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.05.2021 | Thematic Issue

Predicting sediment deposition rate in check-dams using machine learning techniques and high-resolution DEMs

verfasst von: Christian Conoscenti, Chiara Martinello, Alberto Alfonso-Torreño, Álvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Sediments accumulated in check dams are a valuable measure to estimate soil erosion rates. Here, geographic information systems (GIS) and three machine learning techniques (MARS-multivariate adaptive regression splines, RF-random forest and SVM-support vector machine) were used, for the first time, to predict sediment deposition rate (SR) in check-dams located in six watersheds in SW Spain. There, 160 dry-stone check dams (~ 77.8 check-dams km⁻²), accumulated sediments during a period that varied from 11 to 23 years. The SR was estimated in former research using a topographical method and a high-resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) (average of 0.14 m³ ha⁻¹ year⁻¹). Nine environmental-topographic parameters were calculated and employed as predictors of the SR. The ability of MARS, RF and SVM was evaluated by using a five-fold cross-validation, considering the entire area (ALL), the check dams on the hillslope (HILL) and the valley-bottoms (VALLEY), as well as the three catchments (B, C and D) with the highest number of check dams. The accuracy of the models was assessed by the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). The results revealed that RF and SVM are able to predict SR with higher and more stable accuracy than MARS. This is evident for the datasets ALL, VALLEY and D, where errors of prediction exhibited by MARS were from 44 to 77% (RRMSE) and from 37 to 62% (MAE) higher than those achieved by RF and SVM, but it also held for the datasets HILL and B where the difference of RRMSE and MAE was 7–10% and 12–17%, respectively.

Vorheriger Artikel Lead contamination and isotopic composition of the bulk and < 2.5 μm fraction of soils in Xuzhou, China

Nächster Artikel Discharge of treated wastewater: hydrodynamic and hydrogeochemical impacts on the Kairouan plain aquifer (Central Tunisia)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alatorre LC, Beguería S, García-Ruiz JM (2010) Regional scale modeling of hillslope sediment delivery: a case study in the Barasona Reservoir watershed (Spain) using WATEM/SEDEM. J Hydrol 391:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.010CrossRef

Alfonso-Torreño A, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S, Lavado-Contador JF, de Sanjosé Blasco JJ, Sánchez Fernández M (2019) sUAS, SfM-MVS photogrammetry and a topographic algorithm method to quantify the volume of sediments retained in check-dams. Sci Total Environ 678:369–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.332CrossRef

Alfonso-Torreño A, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S (2021) Dynamics of erosion and deposition in a partially restored valley-bottom gully. Land 10:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010062CrossRef

Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaei K, Kerle N (2018) Spatial modelling of gully erosion using GIS and R programing: a comparison among three data mining algorithms. Appl Sci 8:1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081369CrossRef

Baade J, Franz S, Reichel A (2012) Reservoir siltation and sediment yield in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: a first assessment. Land Degrad Dev 23:586–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2173CrossRef

Bachiller AR, Rodríguez JLG, Sánchez JCR, Gómez DL (2019) Specific sediment yield model for reservoirs with medium-sized basins in Spain: an empirical and statistical approach. Sci Total Environ 681:82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.029CrossRef

Bangash RF, Passuello A, Sanchez-Canales M, Terrado M, López A, Elorza FJ, Ziv G, Acuña V, Schuhmacher M (2013) Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. Sci Total Environ 458–460C:246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.025CrossRef

Bellin N, Vanacker V, van Wesemael B, Solé-Benet A, Bakker MM (2011) Natural and anthropogenic controls on soil erosion in the Internal Betic Cordillera (southeast Spain). CATENA 87:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.05.022CrossRef

Belmonte Serrato F, Romero Díaz A, Martínez-Lloris M (2005) Erosión en cauces afectados por obras de corrección hidrológica (Cuenca del Río Quípar, Murcia). Papeles De Geografía 41–42:71–83

Boix-Fayos C, de Vente J, Martínez-Mena M, Barberá GG, Castillo V (2008) The impact of land use change and check-dams on catchment sediment yield. Hydrol Process 22:4922–4935. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7115CrossRef

Bombino G, Gurnell AM, Tamburino V, Zema DA, Zimbone SM (2009) Adjustements in channel form, sediment calibre and vegetation around check-dams in the headwater reaches of mountain torrents, Calabria, Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf 34(7):1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1791CrossRef

Borrelli P, Märker M, Schütt B (2015) Modelling post-tree-harvesting soil and sediment deposition potential in the Turano river basin (Italian Central Apennine). Land Degrad Dev 26(4):356–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2214CrossRef

Borselli L, Cassi P, Torri D (2008) Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape: a GIS and field numerical assessment. CATENA 75:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.07.006CrossRef

Bou Kheir R, Wilson J, Deng Y (2007) Use of terrain variables for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in Lebanon. Earth Surf Process Landf 32:1770–1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp1501CrossRef

Bouchnak H, Felfoul MS, Boussema MR, Snane MH (2009) Slope and rainfall effects on the volume of sediment yield by gully erosion in the souar lithologic formation (Tunisia). CATENA 78(2):170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.04.003CrossRef

Boyce RC (1975) Sediment routing with sediment delivery ratios. In Present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources. US Department of Agriculture, Publication ARS-S-40:61–65

Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRef

Bussi G, Rodríguez-Lloveras X, Francés F, Benito G, Sánchez-Moya Y, Sopeña A (2013) Sediment yield model implementation based on check dam infill stratigraphy in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3339–3354. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3339-2013CrossRef

Bussi G, Francés F, Horel E, López-Tarazón JA, Batalla RJ (2014) Modelling the impact of climate change on sediment yield in a highly erodible Mediterranean catchment. J Soils Sediment 14(12):1921–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0956-7CrossRef

Buyukyildiz M, Kumcu SY (2017) An estimation of the suspended sediment load using adaptive network based fuzzy inference system, support vector machine and artificial neural network models. Water Resour Manag 31:1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1581-1CrossRef

Castillo VM, Mosch WM, Conesa García C, Barberá GG, Navarro Cano JA, López-Bermúdez F (2007) Effectiveness and geomorphological impacts of check dams for soil erosion control in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment: El Cárcavo (Murcia, Spain). CATENA 70(3):416–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.11.009CrossRef

Catella M, Paris E, Solari L (2005) Case study: efficiency of slit-check dams in the Mountain region of Versilia Bain. J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:3(145)CrossRef

Cavalli M, Trevisani S, Comiti F, Marchi L (2013) Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments. Geomorphology 188:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.007CrossRef

Cerdà A (2002) The effect of season and parent material on water erosion on highly eroded soils in eastern Spain. J Arid Environ 52:319–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2002.1009CrossRef

Chen W, Xie X, Wang J, Pradhan B, Hong H, Bui DT, Duan Z, Ma J (2017) A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA 151:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032CrossRef

Chen W, Xie X, Peng J et al (2018) GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using a novel hybrid integration approach of bivariate statistical based random forest method. CATENA 164:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.012CrossRef

Çimen M (2008) Estimation of daily suspended sediments using support vector machines. Hydrol Sci J 53:656–666. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.656CrossRef

Conesa C (2004) Los diques de retención en cuencas de régimen torrencial: diseño, tipos y funciones. Nimbus 16–14:125–132

Conesa García C, García Lorenzo R (2007) Litofacies de relleno y modelo de sedimentación de los diques de retención en el tramo inferior de la Rambla del Cárcavo (Cuenca del Segura). Cuaternario y Geomorfología 21(3–4):77–100

Conoscenti C, Rotigliano E (2020) Predicting gully occurrence at watershed scale: comparing topographic indices and multivariate statistical models. Geomorphology 359:107123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107123CrossRef

Conoscenti C, Angileri S, Cappadonia C, Rotigliano E, Agnesi V, Märker M (2014) Gully erosion susceptibility assessment by means of GIS-based logistic regression: a case of Sicily (Italy). Geomorphology 204:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.021CrossRef

Conoscenti C, Ciaccio M, Caraballo-Arias NA, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Rotigliano E, Agnesi V (2015) Assessment of susceptibility to earth-flow landslide using logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines: a case of the Belice River basin (western Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology 242:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.09.020CrossRef

Conoscenti C, Agnesi V, Cama M, Caraballo-Arias NA, Rotigliano E (2018) Assessment of gully erosion susceptibility using multivariate adaptive regression splines and accounting for terrain connectivity. Land Degrad Dev 29:724–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2772CrossRef

Cucchiaro S, Cavalli M, Vericat D, Crema S, Llena M, Beinat A, Marchi L, Cazorzi F (2019) Geomorphic effectiveness of check dams in a debris-flow catchment using multi-temporal topographic surveys. CATENA 174:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.004CrossRef

De Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth-Sci Rev 71:95–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.02.002CrossRef

De Vente J, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, Van Rompaey A, Govers G (2008) Spatially distributed modelling of soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales in Spain. Glob Planet Change 60:393–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.05.002CrossRef

Delmas M, Cerdan O, Mouchel JM, Garcin M (2009) A method for developing a large-scale sediment yield index for European river basins. J Soils Sediment 9:613–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0126-5CrossRef

Francke T, López-Tarazón JA, Schröder B (2008) Estimation of suspended sediment concentration and yield using linear models, random forests and quantile regression forests. Hydrol Process 22:4892–4904. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7110CrossRef

Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19:1–141

Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Porghasemi HR, Besalatpour AA, Conoscenti C, Van Oost K (2018) Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. Geoderma 330:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.027CrossRef

Garosi Y, Sheklabadi M, Conoscenti C, Pourghasemi HR, Van Oost K (2019) Assessing the performance of GIS-based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion. Sci Total Environ 664:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.093CrossRef

Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Saha S, Keesstra S, Bai S (2019) Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ 668:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.436CrossRef

Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S, Felicísimo ÁM (2009a) Modelling the occurrence of gullies in rangelands of southwest Spain. Earth Surf Process Landf 34:1894–1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp1881CrossRef

Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S, Lavado Contador F (2009b) Using and comparing two nonparametric methods (CART and MARS) to model the potential distribution of gullies. Ecol Model 220:3630–3637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.020CrossRef

Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Schnabel S, De Sanjosé JJ, Lavado Contador JF (2012) Exploring the relationships between gully erosion and hydrology in rangelands of SW Spain. Z Geomorphol Suppl Issues 56:27–44. https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00071CrossRef

Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Conoscenti C, Angileri SE, Rotigliano E, Schnabel S (2015) Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations. Nat Hazards 79:291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1703-0CrossRef

Grauso S, Pagano A, Fattoruso G, De Bonis P, Onori F, Regina P, Tebano C (2008) Relations between climatic-geomorphological parameters and sediment yield in a mediterranean semi-arid area (Sicily, southern Italy). Environ Geol 54:219–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0809-4CrossRef

Heckmann T, Gegg K, Gegg A, Becht M (2014) Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:259–278. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-259-2014CrossRef

Herguido Sevillano E, Lavado Contador JF, Pulido M, Schnabel S (2017) Spatial patterns of lost and remaining trees in the Iberian wooded rangeland. Appl Geogr 87:170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.011CrossRef

Hovius N (1998) Controls on sediment supply by large rivers, relative role of eustasy, climate and tectonismin continental rocks. Society of Sedimentray Geology. Special Publication 59:3–16. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.98.59.0002

Javernick L, Brasington J, Caruso B (2014) Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 213:166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006CrossRef

Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS (2014) Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens Environ 152:150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013CrossRef

Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I, Sahin EK (2019) Machine learning techniques in landslide susceptibility mapping: a survey and a case study. In: Pradhan S, Vishal V, Singh T (eds) Landslides: theory, practice and modelling. Advances in natural and technological hazards research, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77377-3_13CrossRef

Keesstra SD (2007) Impact of natural reforestation on floodplain sedimentation in the Dragonja basin, SW Slovenia. Earth Surf Proc Land 32(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1360CrossRef

Keesstra SD, van Dam O, Verstraeten G, van Huissteden J (2009) Changing sediment dynamics due to natural reforestation in the dragonja catchment, SW Slovenia. Catena 78(1):60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.02.021CrossRef

Keestra SD, Maroulis J, Argaman E, Voogt A, Wittenberg L (2014) Effects of controlled fire on hydrology and erosion under simulated rainfall. Cuad Investig Geogr 40(2):269–293. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2532CrossRef

Kuhn S, Egert B, Neumann S, Steinbeck C (2008) Building blocks for automated elucidation of metabolites: machine learning methods for NMR prediction. BMC Bioinform 9:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-400CrossRef

Leathwick JR, Elith J, Hastie T (2006) Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecol Model 199:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.022CrossRef

Ma Z, Mei G, Piccialli F (2020) Machine learning for landslides prevention: a survey. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05529-8CrossRef

Martinello C, Cappadonia C, Conoscenti C, Agnesi V, Rotigliano E (2020) Optimal slope units partitioning in landslide susceptibility mapping. J Maps. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2020.1805807CrossRef

Martínez-Murillo JF, López-Vicente M (2018) Effect of salvage logging and check dams on simulated hydrological connectivity in a burned area. Land Degrad Dev 29:701–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2735CrossRef

Martín-Rosales W, Pulido-Bosch A, Gisbert J, Vallejos A (2003) Sediment yield estimation and check dams in a semiarid area (Sierra de Gádor, southern Spain), in Erosion Prediction in Ungauged Basins: integrating methods and techniques. IAHS Publ 279:51–58

Mekonnen M, Keesstra SD, Baartman JE, Ritsema CJ, Melesse AM (2015) Evaluating sediment storage dams: structural off-site sediment trapping measures in northwest Ethiopia. Cuad Investig Geogr 41(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2643CrossRef

Middelkoop H, Daamen K, Gellens D, Grabs W, Kwadijk JCJ, Lang H, Parmet BWAH, Schädler B, Schulla J, Wilke K (2001) Impact of climate change on hydrological regimes and water resources management in the Rhine Basin. Clim Change 49:105–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010784727448CrossRef

Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, Ghazali AH (2017) Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 8:1080–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113CrossRef

Mutua BM, Klik A, Loiskandl W (2006) Modelling soil erosion and sediment yield at a catchment scale: the case of Masinga catchment, Kenya. Land Degrad Dev 17(5):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.753CrossRef

Nadal-Romero E, Martínez-Murillo JF, Vanmaercke M, Poesen J (2011) Scale-dependency of sediment yield from badland areas in Mediterranean environments. Prog Phys Geogr Earth Environ 35:297–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311400330CrossRef

Naimi B, Hamm N, Groen TA, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling. Ecography (cop) 37:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.xCrossRef

Nguyen KA, Chen W, Lin B-S, Seeboonruang U (2020) Using machine learning-based algorithms to analyze erosion rates of a watershed in northern Taiwan. Sustainability 12(5):2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052022CrossRef

Nunes JP, Seixas J, Pacheco NR (2008) Vulnerability of water resources vegetation productivity and soil erosion to climate change in Mediterranean watersheds. Hydrol Process 22:3115–3134. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6897CrossRef

Peterson BG, Carl P (2020) PerformanceAnalytics: econometric tools for performance and risk analysis. R package version 2.0.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PerformanceAnalytics

Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province. Iran J Earth Syst Sci 122:349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0282-2CrossRef

Pourghasemi HR, Sadhasivam N, Kariminejad N, Collins AL (2020) Gully erosion spatial modelling: role of machine learning algorithms in selection of the best controlling factors and modelling process. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.005CrossRef

Pulido M, Schnabel S, Lavado Contador JF, Lozano-Parra J, González F (2018) The impacto of heavy grazing on soil quality and pasture production in rangelands of SW Spain. Land Degrad Dev 29(2):219–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2501CrossRef

Quiñonero-Rubio JM, Nadeu E, Boix-Fayos C, Vente J (2016) Evaluation of the effectiveness of forest restoration and check dams to reduce catchment sediment yield. Land Degrad Dev 27(4):1018–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2331CrossRef

R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

Rahmati O, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Noormohamadi F (2016) Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: the role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison. Nat Hazards 82:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2239-7CrossRef

Rahmati O, Tahmasebipour N, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Feizizadeh B (2017) Evaluation of different machine learning models for predicting and mapping the susceptibility of gully erosion. Geomorphology 298:118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.006CrossRef

Restrepo JD, Kjerfve B, Hermelin M, Restrepo JC (2006) Factors controlling sediment yield in a major south American drainage basin: the Magdalena river, Colombia. J Hydrol 316:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.002CrossRef

Romero A (2008) Los diques de corrección hidrológica como instrumentos de cuantificación de la erosión. Cuad Investig Geogr 34:89–99. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.1208CrossRef

Rotigliano E, Martinello C, Hernandéz MA, Agnesi V, Conoscenti C (2019) Predicting the landslides triggered by the 2009 96E/Ida tropical storms in the Ilopango caldera area (El Salvador, CA): optimizing MARS-based model building and validation strategies. Environ Earth Sci 78:210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8214-3CrossRef

Rubio-Delgado J, Guillén J, Corbacho JA, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Baeza A, Schnabel S (2017) Comparison of two methodologies used to estimate erosion rates in Mediterranean ecosystems: 137Cs and exposed tree roots. Sci Total Environ 605–606:541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.248CrossRef

Sarangi A, Madramootoo C, Enright P, Prasher S, Patel R (2005) Performance evaluation of ANN and geomorphology-based models for runoff and sediment yield prediction for a Canadian watershed. Curr Sci 89:2022–2033

Schnabel S, Ceballos Barbancho A, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á (2010) Erosión hídrica en la dehesa extremeña. In: Schnabel S, Lavado Contador JF, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, García Marín R (eds) Aportaciones a la Geografía Física de Extremadura con especial referencia a las dehesas, Asociación Profesional para la Ordenación del Territorio, el Ambiente y el Desarrollo Sostenible, España, p 153–185

Schnabel S, Dahlgren RA, Moreno-Marcos G (2013) Soil and water dynamics. In: Campos P, Oviedo JS, Díaz M, Montero G (eds) Mediterranean oak woodland working landscapes. Dehesas of Spain and Ranchlands of California, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 91–122CrossRef

Smith MW, Vericat D (2015) From experimental plots to experimental landscapes: topography, erosion and deposition in sub-humid badlands from Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry. Earth Surf Proc Land 40(12):1656–1671. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3747CrossRef

Sougnez N, van Wesemael B, Vanacker V (2011) Low erosion rates measured for steep, sparsely vegetated catchments in southeast Spain. CATENA 84:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.08.010CrossRef

Tamene L, Park SJ, Dikau R, Vlek PLG (2006) Analysis of factors determining sediment yield variability in the highlands of northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology 76:76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.10.007CrossRef

Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N (2015) Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. CATENA 125:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017CrossRef

Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2015) Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001CrossRef

Ullman S (1979) The interpretation of structure from motion. Proc R Soc B 203:405-426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0006

Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. CATENA 63:132–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.06.001CrossRef

Van Rompaey AJJ, Verstraeten G, Van Oost K, Govers G, Poesen J (2001) Modelling mean annual sediment yield using a distributed approach. Earth Surf Process Landf 26:1221–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.275CrossRef

Vanmaercke M, Poesen J, Verstraeten G, de Vente J, Ocakoglu F (2011) Sediment yield in Europe; spatial patterns and scale dependency. Geomorphology 130(3–4):142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.010CrossRef

Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

Vargas-Cuervo G, Rotigliano E, Conoscenti C (2019) Prediction of debris-avalanches and -flows triggered by a tropical storm by using a stochastic approach: an application to the events occurred in Mocoa (Colombia) on 1 April 2017. Geomorphology 339:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.023CrossRef

Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2001) Factors controlling sediment yield from small intensively cultivated catchments in a temperate humid climate. Geomorphology 40:123–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00040-XCrossRef

Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2002) Regional scale variability in sediment and nutrient delivery from small agricultural watersheds. J Environ Qual 31(3):870–879. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.8700CrossRef

Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B (2012) How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? Ecol Model 239:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.007CrossRef

Wei T, Simko V (2017) R package “corrplot”: visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84). Available from https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot

Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM (2012) “Structure-from-Motion” photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179:300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021CrossRef

Wheaton JM, Brasington J, Darby SE, Sear DA (2010) Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets. Earth Surf Proc Landf 35:136–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1886CrossRef

Wilby RL, Hay LE, Leavesley GH (1999) A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin Colorado. J Hydrol 225:67–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00136-5CrossRef

Wing J, Kuhn M (2018) caret: classification and regression training. https://cran.r-project.org/package=caret

Woodget AS, Carbonneau PE, Visser F, Maddock IP (2015) Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surf Proc Landf 40:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3613CrossRef

Yilmaz B, Aras E, Nacar S, Kankal M (2018) Estimating suspended sediment load with multivariate adaptive regression spline, teaching-learning based optimization, and artificial bee colony models. Sci Total Environ 639:826–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.153CrossRef

Zhao G, Kondolf GM, Mu X, Han M, He Z, Rubin Z, Wang F, Gao P, Sun W (2017) Sediment yield reduction associated with land use changes and check dams in a catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA 148:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATENA.2016.05.010CrossRef

Zimmermann A, Francke T, Elsenbeer H (2012) Forests and erosion: insights from a study of suspended-sediment dynamics in an overland flow-prone rainforest catchment. J Hydrol 428–429:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.039CrossRef

Zucca C, Canu A, Della Peruta R (2006) Effects of land use and landscape on spatial distribution and morphological features of gullies in an agropastoral area in Sardinia (Italy). CATENA 68:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.03.015CrossRef

Titel: Predicting sediment deposition rate in check-dams using machine learning techniques and high-resolution DEMs
verfasst von: Christian Conoscenti
Chiara Martinello
Alberto Alfonso-Torreño
Álvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2021
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09695-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2021

Comparing arsenic(V) adsorption by two types of red soil weathered from granite and sandstone in Hunan, China

Health risk profile of natural radionuclides in soils, sediments, tailings and rocks around mining sites in Nigeria

Spolic Technosols pollution assessment based on the cumulative maximum concentration index: a case study for the north-east of the Eastern Carpathians (Romania)

Experiments on the characteristics of breach variations due to natural dam overtopping

Lead contamination and isotopic composition of the bulk and < 2.5 μm fraction of soils in Xuzhou, China

Speciation and correlation of boron and lithium in surficial sediments of the eastern and western Taijinar Salt Lake