nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

14.02.2024 | Original Paper

Predicting Special Educators’ Use of Assistive Technology in Virtual & Hybrid Learning Environments

verfasst von: Jessica Herring Watson, Ayanna Perkins, Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This predictive correlational study investigated to what extent, if at all, the constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) predicted special educators’ use of assistive technology (AT) in virtual and hybrid settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was distributed to educators (n = 104) across the United States, and a multiple regression was used to determine whether, if at all, the constructs of the UTAUT significantly predicted their use of AT to support online and hybrid learning. The results cohere with and extend previous research regarding teachers’ acceptance and use of technology and demonstrated that special educators’ positive perceptions of social influence and students’ effort expectancy were predictive of their use of AT in online and hybrid settings.

Vorheriger Artikel The Teaching Methods Classroom Meets Virtual Reality: Insights for Pre-Service Teaching Methods Instructors

Nächster Artikel The Educational Affordances and Challenges of ChatGPT: State of the Field

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Ab Jalil, H., Rajakumar, M., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2022). Teachers' acceptance of technologies for 4IR adoption: Implementation of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.2

Alghamdi, R. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of assistive technology use for students with disabilities. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1998812MathSciNetCrossRef

Basham, J. D., Carter, R. A., Rice, M. F., & Ortiz, K. (2016). Emerging state policy in online special education. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 29(2), 70–78.

Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2017). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2299

Batucan, G. B., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., & Gonzales, R. R. (2022). An extended UTAUT model to explain factors affecting online learning system amidst COVID-19 pandemic: The case of a developing economy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 768831. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.768831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bouck, E. C., & Long, H. (2021). Assistive technology for students with disabilities: An updated snapshot. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420914624CrossRef

Brenner, P. S., & DeLamater, J. (2016). Lies, damned lies, and survey self-reports? Identity as a cause of measurement bias. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516628298CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2022). Special education pre-service teachers’ acceptance of assistive technology: An approach of structural equation modeling. International Journal of ICT Research in Africa and the Middle East, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTRAME.304393CrossRef

Carl, K. (2021). Teachers' sense of efficacy and technology acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues In Information Systems, 22(4), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2021_63-73

Carloni, J., Magni, R., Veglio, E., & Ryan, S. E. (2020). Translation and preliminary validation of the Italian version of the family impact of assistive technology scale for augmentative and alternative communication (FIATS-AAC.it). Technology & Disability, 32(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-200261

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783CrossRef

Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2006). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.213CrossRef

Courduff, J., Lee, H., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., & Herring Watson, J. (2022). What have we learned? Assistive technology implementation: District to home during Covid-19. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits (ATOB), https://www.atia.org/home/at-resources/atob/, 16(1), 1–20. https://www.atia.org/atob-volume-16-issue-1

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Merrill Prentice-Hall.

Crowe, B., Machalicek, W., Wei, Q., Drew, C., & Ganz, J. (2022). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with intellectual and developmental disability: A mega-review of the literature. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 34(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-021-09790-0CrossRefPubMed

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982CrossRef

Deslonde, V., & Becerra, M. (2018). The technology acceptance model (TAM): Exploring school counselors’ acceptance and use of Naviance. The Professional Counselor, 8(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.15241/vd.8.4.369

Duran, M. (2022). Assistive Technology. In M. Duran (Ed.), Learning Technologies: Research, Trends, and Issues in the U.S. Education System (pp. 49–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18111-5_4

Erdem, R. (2017). Students with special educational needs and assistive technologies: A literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 128–146.MathSciNet

Ezra, O., Cohen, A., Bronshtein, A., Gabbay, H., & Baruth, O. (2021). Equity factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: Difficulties in emergency remote teaching (ert) through online learning. Education Information and Technology, 26(6), 7657–7681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10632-xCrossRef

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: A reasoned action approach (1st ed.). Routledge.

Fjeldvang, R. T., Nordaas, M. G., von Tetzchner, S., & Stadskleiv, K. (2023). Measuring impact of augmentative and alternative communication interventions: Adapting the family impact of assistive technology scale for augmentative and alternative communication (FIATS-AAC-No) for use in Norway. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2023.2170276CrossRefPubMed

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2015). Applying educational research: How to read, do, and use research to solve problems of practice (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.

Herring Watson, J., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2021). Predicting preservice teachers’ intention to use technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 168, 104207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104207

Herring Watson, J., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2022). Developing and validating the intention to use technology-enabled learning (I-TEL) scale. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2067798

Huat, T. S., Ling, G. M., Fern, Y. S., & Chin, E. A. H. (2022). Online teaching adoption among primary school teachers during COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4296455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2020). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: Using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213CrossRef

Kohlmeyer, K. M., & Edyburn, D. L. (2022). Virtual parent education on assistive technology: Pandemic lessons learned. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 16(1), 21–43.

Kron, A. T., Kingsnorth, S., Wright, F. V., & Ryan, S. E. (2018). Construct validity of the family impact of assistive technology scale for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1518993CrossRefPubMed

Maor, D., Currie, J., & Drewry, R. (2011). The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: A review of research-based studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.593821CrossRef

Nam, C. S., Bahn, S., & Lee, R. (2013). Acceptance of assistive technology by special education teachers: A structural equation model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.711990CrossRef

National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2019). Fast facts: Teacher characteristics and trends. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=28

Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2021). Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041CrossRef

Parmigiani, D., Benigno, V., Giusto, M., Silvaggio, C., & Sperandio, S. (2021). E-inclusion: Online special education in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856714CrossRef

Pritchard, D., English, A. R., & Ravenscroft, J. (2021). Extended cognition, assistive technology and education. Synthese, 199, 8355–8377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03166-9

Rice, M. F. (2022). Special education teachers’ use of technologies during the COVID-19 era (Spring 2020—Fall 2021). TechTrends, 66, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00700-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Robinia, K. A. (2008). Online teaching self-efficacy of nurse faculty teaching in public, accredited nursing programs in the state of Michigan. Western Michigan University.

Ryan, S. E., & Renzoni, A. M. (2019). Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (FIATS-AAC) Manual. (Vol. 2.0). Holland-Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital.

Schaaf, D. N. (2018). Assistive technology instruction in teacher professional development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417753561

Siyam, N. (2019). Factors impacting special education teachers’ acceptance and actual use of technology. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2035–2057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09859-yCrossRef

Supovitz, J. A., Hemphill, A. A., Manghani, O., & Watson, C. (2023). Cogs of inequity: How structural inequities impeded school efforts to support students and families at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Equity in Education & Society, 275264612311536. https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461231153666

Taie, S., and Goldring, R. (2020). Characteristics of Public and Private Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the United States: Results From the 2017–18 National Teacher and Principal Survey First Look (NCES 2020- 142rev). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 14, 2023 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020142rev.

Teo, T. (2015). Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers’ acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers & Education, 83, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015CrossRef

Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641674CrossRef

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.008CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540CrossRef

Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127CrossRef

Yee, M. L. S., & Abdullah, M. S. (2021). A review of UTAUT and extended model as a conceptual framework in education research. Journal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matemati Malaysia, 11, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.1.2021

Titel: Predicting Special Educators’ Use of Assistive Technology in Virtual & Hybrid Learning Environments
verfasst von: Jessica Herring Watson
Ayanna Perkins
Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw
Publikationsdatum: 14.02.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00932-7

Springer Professional

Predicting Special Educators’ Use of Assistive Technology in Virtual & Hybrid Learning Environments

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Towards a Framework for a Nation-Wide Implementation of Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality in K-12 Technical and Vocational Education

Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Perceived Effect of Twitter Ban on Learning and Communication

Understanding College Students’ Behavioral Patterns in a Blended Learning Class

More than English: Learning Design for Multilingual Learners

Photo-Based Protocols to Support Community of Inquiry in Online Discussions

Generative AI, Teacher Knowledge and Educational Research: Bridging Short- and Long-Term Perspectives