nach oben

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics

Erschienen in:

01.02.2022 | GENERAL SECTION

Predicting the Development of Scientific Trends on the Basis of Analysis of Conflicts between Fields of Knowledge

verfasst von: P. A. Kalachikhin

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

General ideas about the structure and types of conflicts are systematized. The typology of scientific conflicts is supplemented with the concept of a conflict between fields of knowledge. A classification of conflict situations in science along the lines of demarcation between fields of knowledge is carried out. The interrelation of ways to end conflicts between fields of knowledge and conflict situations is indicated. A methodology for predicting the outcomes of knowledge conflicts based on heuristics has been developed. Tuple notation is used to record the format of data structures at the input and output of the predicting procedure.

Vorheriger Artikel An Adaptive Data-Exchange System

Nächster Artikel Structural and Functional Modeling of Processes with a Dedicated Control Subject

Faleeva, A.A. and Koishigulova, L.E., Conflict is a conflict situation plus incident, Int. Sci. Pract. Conf. World Sci., 2017, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 5–7.

Svetlov, V.A., Vvedenie v konfliktologiyu. Uchebnoe posobie (Introduction to Conflictology: Handbook), Moscow: Flinta, 2014.

Troyanovskii, V.M. and Zapevalina, A.A., Via radical doubts to the labyrinth of knowledge, Ekon. Sots.-Guman. Issled., 2016, no. 2, pp. 44–46.

Yartsev, R.A., Controversy and scientific knowledge, Istor., Filos., Politicheskie Yuridicheskie Nauki, Kul’turol. Iskusstvovedenie. Vopr. Teorii Praktiki, 2012, no. 8-2, pp. 229–233.

Sukhotin, A.K., Paradoksy nauki (Paradoxes of Science), Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 1978.

Savinova, L.G., Difference between scientific conflict and other types of dispute, Simbirskii Nauchn. Vestn., 2017, no. 3, pp. 66–71.

Konflikty v nauke i filosofii (Conflicts in Science and Philosophy), Baranets, N.G. and Kudryashova, E.V., Eds., Ul’yanovsk: Kachalin Aleksandr Vasil’evich, 2013.

Baranets, N.G., Verevkin, A.B., and Savinova, L.G., On reasons of scientific conflicts, Vlast’, 2012, no. 4, pp. 115–117.

Kon’kova, K.S. and Pen’kovskaya, V.E., Modern approaches to classification of conflicts, Territoriya Nauki, 2018, no. 4, pp. 171–175.

10.

Zharova, A.K., On the conflict of interests of subjects in information relations, Gosudarstvo Pravo, 2011, no. 4, pp. 42–49.

11.

Shubina, N.L., Features of a research paper in peer-reviewed scientific publications: Conflict between the author and the recipient, Univ. Nauchn. Zh., 2019, no. 50, pp. 26–32. https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22225064.2019.50.26.32

12.

Solovyeva, G.M., Conflicts of interest associated with complex scientific and technical results (a single technology), and the mechanisms of their prevention, Nauka. Innovatsii. Obraz., 2012, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 269–289.

13.

Strel’nik, O.N., Osnovy filosofii. Uchebnik dlya SPO i prikladnogo bakalavriata (Foundations of Philosophy: Handbook for Applied Bachelor’ Degree Program), Moscow: Yurait, 2016.

14.

Konopkin, A.M., Features of structuring the near-science knowledge, Izv. Vyssch. Uchebn. Zaved. Povolzhskii Region. Guman. Nauki, 2009, no. 3, pp. 39–47.

15.

Kun, T., Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii (Structure of Science Revolutions), Moscow: Progress, 1975.

16.

Rozenberg, N.V., PR as a way of controlling the conflict, Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo, Rozenberg, N.V., Ed., Penza: Penza Gos. Univ., 2019, pp. 247–249.

17.

Small, H., Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: a preliminary investigation, Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0349-2CrossRef

18.

Antsupov, A.Ya. and Shipilov, A.I., Konfliktologiya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov (Conflictology: Handbook for Universities), Moscow: YuNITI, 2000.

19.

Mazov, N.A., Gureev, V.N., and Glinskikh, V.N., The methodological basis of defining research trends and fronts, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2020, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 221–231. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220040036CrossRef

Titel: Predicting the Development of Scientific Trends on the Basis of Analysis of Conflicts between Fields of Knowledge
verfasst von: P. A. Kalachikhin
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2022
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105522010071

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

An Adaptive Data-Exchange System

Indexing Languages for Digital Humanities

On the Incorrect Use of Citation Indices for Assessment by Comparison of Divisions of Science

Prospective Scientific Research Trend Identification Methods (Based on the Analysis of Gas Fuel-Related Publications)

Structural and Functional Modeling of Processes with a Dedicated Control Subject