Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022

06.06.2022 | Original Paper

Preference aggregation for couples

verfasst von: Rouzbeh Ghouchani, Szilvia Pápai

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the aggregation of a couple’s preferences over their respective jobs when the couple enters a centralized labor market jointly, such as the market for hospital residencies. In such markets couples usually need to submit a joint preference ordering over pairs of jobs and thus we are interested in preference aggregation rules which start with two individual preference orderings over single jobs and produce a preference ordering of pairs of jobs. We first study the Lexicographic and the Rank-Based Leximin aggregation rules, as well as a large class of preference aggregation rules which contains these two rules. Then we propose a smaller family of parametric aggregation rules, the k-Lexi-Pairing rules, which call for a systematic way of compromising between the two partners. The parameter k indicates the degree to which one partner is prioritized, with the most equitable Rank-Based Leximin rule at one extreme and the least equitable Lexicographic rule at the other extreme. Since couples care about geographic proximity, a parametric family of preference aggregation rules which build on the k-Lexi-Pairing rules and express the couple’s preference for togetherness is also identified. We provide axiomatic characterizations of the proposed preference aggregation rules.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
A recent paper, Afacan et al. (2022), studies the assignment of arbiters to pairs of agents, where the two agents in a pair have their own individual preferences. Although related to couples’ matching, the arbiter assignment problem differs from it in several aspects; for example, each pair of agents is restricted to be matched to the same arbiter jointly and only pairs of agents are matched, while in couples’ matching there are both couples and singles.
 
2
Bossert and Weymark (2004) provide a comprehensive treatment of the literature on social choice with interpersonal utility comparisons.
 
3
This is possible because all these rules are neutral, that is, the hospitals’ names don’t matter.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Afacan MO, Anbarci N, Kibris O (2022) Arbiter assignment. Working paper Afacan MO, Anbarci N, Kibris O (2022) Arbiter assignment. Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Bordes G, Le Breton M (1990) Arrovian theorems for economic domains: assignments, matchings and pairings. Soc Choice Welf 7:193–208CrossRef Bordes G, Le Breton M (1990) Arrovian theorems for economic domains: assignments, matchings and pairings. Soc Choice Welf 7:193–208CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bossert W, Weymark JA (2004) Utility in social choice. In: Handbook of utility theory. Springer, Boston, pp 1099–1177 Bossert W, Weymark JA (2004) Utility in social choice. In: Handbook of utility theory. Springer, Boston, pp 1099–1177
Zurück zum Zitat Bossert W, Weymark JA (2008) Social choice (new developments). In: The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 6012–6021 Bossert W, Weymark JA (2008) Social choice (new developments). In: The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 6012–6021
Zurück zum Zitat Cantala D (2004) Matching markets: the particular case of couples. Econ Bull 3:1–11 Cantala D (2004) Matching markets: the particular case of couples. Econ Bull 3:1–11
Zurück zum Zitat Delacrétaz D (2019) Stability in matching markets with sizes. Working paper Delacrétaz D (2019) Stability in matching markets with sizes. Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta B, Massó J (1997) Stability of matchings when individuals have preferences over colleagues. J Econ Theory 75:464–475CrossRef Dutta B, Massó J (1997) Stability of matchings when individuals have preferences over colleagues. J Econ Theory 75:464–475CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holzman R, Samet D (2014) Matching of like rank and the size of the core in the marriage problem. Games Econ Behav 88:277–285CrossRef Holzman R, Samet D (2014) Matching of like rank and the size of the core in the marriage problem. Games Econ Behav 88:277–285CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jaramillo P, Kayı Ç, Klijn F (2019) The core of roommate problems: size and rank-fairness within matched pairs. Int J Game Theory 48:157–179CrossRef Jaramillo P, Kayı Ç, Klijn F (2019) The core of roommate problems: size and rank-fairness within matched pairs. Int J Game Theory 48:157–179CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalai E, Ritz Z (1980) Characterization of the private alternatives domains admitting Arrow social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 22:23–36CrossRef Kalai E, Ritz Z (1980) Characterization of the private alternatives domains admitting Arrow social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 22:23–36CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khare S, Roy S (2018) Stability in matching with couples having non-responsive preferences. Working paper Khare S, Roy S (2018) Stability in matching with couples having non-responsive preferences. Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Khare S, Roy S, Storcken T (2018) Stability in matching with couples having responsive preferences. Working paper Khare S, Roy S, Storcken T (2018) Stability in matching with couples having responsive preferences. Working paper
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Klijn F (2005) Stable matchings and preferences of couples. J Econ Theory 121:75–106CrossRef Klaus B, Klijn F (2005) Stable matchings and preferences of couples. J Econ Theory 121:75–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Klijn F, Massó J (2007) Some things couples always wanted to know about stable matchings (but were afraid to ask). Rev Econ Des 11:175–184 Klaus B, Klijn F, Massó J (2007) Some things couples always wanted to know about stable matchings (but were afraid to ask). Rev Econ Des 11:175–184
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Klijn F, Nakamura T (2009) Corrigendum to “Stable matchings and preferences of couples [J. Econ. Theory 121 (1) (2005) 75-106]”. J Econ Theory 144: 2227–2233 Klaus B, Klijn F, Nakamura T (2009) Corrigendum to “Stable matchings and preferences of couples [J. Econ. Theory 121 (1) (2005) 75-106]”. J Econ Theory 144: 2227–2233
Zurück zum Zitat Klijn F, Walzl M, Kah C (2021) Almost mutually best in matching markets: rank gaps and size of the core. Soc Choice Welf 57:797–816CrossRef Klijn F, Walzl M, Kah C (2021) Almost mutually best in matching markets: rank gaps and size of the core. Soc Choice Welf 57:797–816CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Le Breton M, Weymark JA (2011) Arrovian social choice theory on economic domains. Handbook of social choice and welfare 2:191–299CrossRef Le Breton M, Weymark JA (2011) Arrovian social choice theory on economic domains. Handbook of social choice and welfare 2:191–299CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth AE (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J Polit Econ 92:991–1016CrossRef Roth AE (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J Polit Econ 92:991–1016CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89:748–780CrossRef Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89:748–780CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sethuraman J, Teo CP, Qian L (2006) Many-to-one stable matching: geometry and fairness. Math Oper Res 31:581–596CrossRef Sethuraman J, Teo CP, Qian L (2006) Many-to-one stable matching: geometry and fairness. Math Oper Res 31:581–596CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sidibé AK (2020) Many-to-one matching with sized agents and size-monotonic priorities. Working paper Sidibé AK (2020) Many-to-one matching with sized agents and size-monotonic priorities. Working paper
Metadaten
Titel
Preference aggregation for couples
verfasst von
Rouzbeh Ghouchani
Szilvia Pápai
Publikationsdatum
06.06.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01413-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe