Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Preparing for the Transfer of Research Results to Practice: Best Practice Heuristics

verfasst von : Lucienne Blessing, Warren Seering

Erschienen in: Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although the development of methods and tools was for many decades the main focus of design research, transfer of research results to practice has been fragmented and limited and, hence, had a low impact. Various studies into the problems involved in transfer have been undertaken  the uptake of the recommended improvements has been limited. One of the reasons, in our opinion, is the lack of a coherent, and agreed upon set of heuristics. This is where we intend to contribute. In this chapter we focus on the transfer of design research results into practice as experienced by those who have been involved in their development. Our aim is to propose a preliminary set of best practice heuristics for researchers to enhance the chances of successful transfer of research results into practice as a starting point for discussion and further research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Are Methods the Key to Product Development Success? An Empirical Analysis of Method Application in New Product Development
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The term support refers to “the possible means, aids and measures that can be used to improve design. This includes strategies, methodologies, procedures, methods, techniques, software tools, guidelines, information sources, etc., addressing one or more aspects of design” (Blessing and Chakrabarti 2009).
 
2
Gregory (1984) speaks of Design Technology comprising “general design technology and broadly applicable techniques, domain specific procedures and techniques, and CAD systems and processes” “It includes all the essentials for the execution of design work.”
 
3
The percentage indicates the percentage of participants who agreed that a particular heuristic applies to the successfully transferred research result.
 
Literatur
Andreasen, M. M. (1987). Design strategy. In Proceedings of ICED 1987, Boston, ASME, New York.
Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement inknowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit. TEchnovation, 22(2013), 50–65.CrossRef
Araujo, C. S., Benedetto-Neto, H., Campello Segre, F. M., & Wright, I. C. (1996). The utilization of product development methods: A survey of UK industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 7(3), 265–277.CrossRef
Blessing, L. T. M. (2002). What is this thing called design research? In Proceedings of 2002 international CIRP design seminar (pp. 1–6), 16–18 May, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University for Science and Technology.
Blessing, L. T. M. (2003). Future issues in design research. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behaviour in design. individuals, teams, tools (pp. 298–303). Berlin: Springer.
Blessing, L., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. Berlin: Springer.
Birkhofer, H. (2011). From design practice to design science: The evolution of a career in design methodology research. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(5), 333–359.
Bodas Freitas, I. M., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2012). The governance of formal university-industry interactions: Understanding the rationales for alternative models. Prometheus, 30(1), 29–45.CrossRef
Booker, J. (2012). A survey-based methodology for prioritising the industrial implementation qualities of design tools. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), 507–525.CrossRefMATH
Bruneel, J., Düeste, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(2010), 858–868.CrossRef
Cantamessa, M. (1999). Design best practices, capabilities and performance. Journal of Engineering Design, 10(4), 305–328.CrossRef
Cantamessa, M. (2003). An empirical perspective upon design research. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRef
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, J. P., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.CrossRef
Gill, H. (1990). Adoption of design science by industry—why so Slow? Journal of Engineering Design, 1(3), 289–295.CrossRef
Horvath, I. (2001). A contemporary survey of scientific research into engineering design. In Design research—Theories, methodologies and product modelling, Proceedings of ICED2001, Glasgow, pp. 13–20.
Kelli, A., Metz, T., Jonsson, L., Pisuke, H., & Adamsoo, R. (2013). The changing approach in academia-indsury collaboration: From profit orientation to innovation support. TRAMES, 17(67/62), 3, 215–241.
Kozlinska, I. (2012). Obstacles to the university-industry cooperation in the domain of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Management, 6, 153–161.
López-Mesa, B., & Bylund, N. (2011). A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company. Research in Engineering Design, 22, 7–27.CrossRef
Mowery, D. C. (2011). Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university-industry technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1827–1853.CrossRef
O’Hare, J., et al. (2010). Adapting innovation tools to the eco-innovation requirements of industry: case study results. International Journal of Design Engineering, 3(2), 172–194.CrossRef
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, S., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2013), 423–442.CrossRef
Ramos-Vielba, I., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university-industry linkages. Higher Education, 64, 237–265.CrossRef
Seering, W., Oehmen, J. (2012). Engineering design research, White Paper No. 1/2012: Results of a workshop on directions for engineering design research organized by the Advisory Board of the Design Society, Rome, Italy, March 17 and 18, 2011.
Sheldon, D. F. (2004). A review on the relevance of design science in a global product development arena. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(6), 541–550.CrossRef
Thia, C. W., et al. (2005). An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development. The TQM Magazine, 17(5), 406–424.CrossRef
Yeh, T.-M., Pai, F.-Y., & Tang, C.-C. (2010). Performance improvement in new product development with effective tools and techniques adoption for high-tech industries. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 131–152.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preparing for the Transfer of Research Results to Practice: Best Practice Heuristics
verfasst von
Lucienne Blessing
Warren Seering
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19448-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-19449-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_1

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise