Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Price Theory in a Monetary Economy

verfasst von : Masayuki Otaki

Erschienen in: Keynesian Economics and Price Theory

Verlag: Springer Japan

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Price theory in a monetary economy is outlined in this chapter. Prices are considered to equalize demand and supply in a barter economy. However, the function of price changes entirely in a monetary economy. As is evident from daily life, the value of money (the inverse of the price index) is determined by rational belief concerning its future value in itself. If individuals confirm the future devaluation of money, this immediately raises the current price level. In turn, if they are confident about the value of money, the price level becomes stable. However, goods markets are adjusted not by price but by quantity. Thus, when monetary theory is recognized to have intrinsic dynamic properties, quantity adjustment such as the multiplier process emerges consistently with neoclassical microeconomic theory. In addition, the theory outlined in this chapter contains the quantity theory of money as an extraneous rational belief under conditions of market equilibrium.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Although equilibrium in the new Keynesian model suggests that resource allocation is second best, and that leisure is excessively long and consumption levels below the optimum, such properties do not emerge from the shortage of effective demand, but from distorted pricing owing to monopolistic behavior. Thus, imperfect unemployment in the new Keynesian models is rooted in distortions found on the supply side, not on the demand side.
 
2
Although it is enough to define the true index by stating that the utility function from the consumption stream is homothetic, this assumption is too weak when the level of the incentivized wage is determined.
 
3
The spurious multiplier of Mankiw (1988) is derived by the following economic causality. Since he assumes static monopolistic competition, the real wage is lower than the Walrasian equilibrium, and thus excess leisure (underemployment) occurs. When the government levies a lump-sum tax, the income effect reduces the leisure and people begin to work more. Thus, government expenditure is not essential for this model. However, it is apparent that such a policy reduces economic welfare unless the government expenditure brings about some additional utility, as shown by Startz (1994).
 
4
It can be shown that money is not super neutral in this model if \(\kappa\) is assumed to be unrelated to the inflation rate, although Lucas’ (1972) monetarist model preserves this property. Such differences stem from the money-supply rule that the government adopts. This problem is analyzed in more detail in Part 5.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Blanchard OJ, Kiyotaki N (1987) Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. Am Econ Rev 77:647–666 Blanchard OJ, Kiyotaki N (1987) Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. Am Econ Rev 77:647–666
Zurück zum Zitat Chamberlin EH (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition: a re-orientation of the theory of value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Chamberlin EH (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition: a re-orientation of the theory of value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Fukao K, Otaki M (1993) Accumulation of human capital and the business cycle. J Polit Econ 101:72–99CrossRef Fukao K, Otaki M (1993) Accumulation of human capital and the business cycle. J Polit Econ 101:72–99CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn RF (1931) The relation of home investment to unemployment. Econ J 41:73–198CrossRef Kahn RF (1931) The relation of home investment to unemployment. Econ J 41:73–198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London
Zurück zum Zitat Lucas RE Jr (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. J Econ Theory 4:103–124CrossRef Lucas RE Jr (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. J Econ Theory 4:103–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mankiw NG (1988) Imperfect competition and the Keynesian cross. Econ Lett 26:7–14CrossRef Mankiw NG (1988) Imperfect competition and the Keynesian cross. Econ Lett 26:7–14CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Otaki M (2007) The dynamically extended Keynesian cross and the welfare-improving fiscal policy. Econ Lett 96:23–29CrossRef Otaki M (2007) The dynamically extended Keynesian cross and the welfare-improving fiscal policy. Econ Lett 96:23–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Otaki M (2011) A pure theory of aggregate price determination. Theor Econ Lett 1:122–128CrossRef Otaki M (2011) A pure theory of aggregate price determination. Theor Econ Lett 1:122–128CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Otaki M (2012) The aggregation problem in employment theory: the representative individual model or the individual employees model? Theor Econ Lett 2:530–533CrossRef Otaki M (2012) The aggregation problem in employment theory: the representative individual model or the individual employees model? Theor Econ Lett 2:530–533CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Otaki M, Tamai Y (2011) On the dynamic role of monopolistic competition. Theor Econ Lett 1:114–117CrossRef Otaki M, Tamai Y (2011) On the dynamic role of monopolistic competition. Theor Econ Lett 1:114–117CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Startz R (1994) Monopolistic competition as a foundation for Keynesian macroeconomic models. Q J Econ 104:737–752CrossRef Startz R (1994) Monopolistic competition as a foundation for Keynesian macroeconomic models. Q J Econ 104:737–752CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uzawa H (1958) The Kuhn-Tucker theorem in concave programming. In: Arrow KJ, Hurwicz L, Uzawa H (eds) Studies in linear and non-linear programming. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, p 32–37 Uzawa H (1958) The Kuhn-Tucker theorem in concave programming. In: Arrow KJ, Hurwicz L, Uzawa H (eds) Studies in linear and non-linear programming. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, p 32–37
Metadaten
Titel
Price Theory in a Monetary Economy
verfasst von
Masayuki Otaki
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55345-8_2