Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1/2019

29.04.2019

Privacy and beyond: socio-ethical concerns of ‘on-the-job’ surveillance

verfasst von: Jijo James Indiparambil

Erschienen in: Asian Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Current sophisticated technologies in the workplace offer inexpensive and user-friendly devices and the means to control ‘on-the-job’ behaviour. This promises high profitability, productivity and liability alleviation. Yet, it also gives rise to a socio-ethical crisis of incessant surveillance that often overrules its anticipated benefits and motives of control and care. The dilemma is twofold: First, scholarly studies undertaken on this issue from a principally administrative and legal point of view tend to lack a moral framework and so prove unable to offer an integral understanding. Second, a majority of scholars tend to focus exclusively on individual rights, such as privacy, even at the risk of overlooking its social impact and consequences. This paper thus aims to unravel these forgotten moral and social concerns. It analyses the surveillance frameworks and the arguments for and against it; scrutinises critically the technological devices most often implemented in the workplace; examines both its individual effects (privacy) and social effects (categorising); and proposes an ethics of workplace surveillance in a framework of trust and transparency. It argues, in all these ways, for an alteration or modification of traditional organisational behaviour within a new frame of reference, situated within and going beyond questions of moral duty, principles and legal compliance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 537–548.CrossRef Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 537–548.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Albaum, G. (2014). Business-related ethical values of future business leaders in four Asia-Pacific countries. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 3(2), 127–140.CrossRef Albaum, G. (2014). Business-related ethical values of future business leaders in four Asia-Pacific countries. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 3(2), 127–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since 1984: a review and agenda. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 209–237). New York: Routledge. Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since 1984: a review and agenda. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 209–237). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797–804.CrossRef Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797–804.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen, M. W., et al. (2007). Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 172–200.CrossRef Allen, M. W., et al. (2007). Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 172–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Rjoub, H., et al. (2008). Electronic monitoring: the employees’ point of view. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 189–195.CrossRef Al-Rjoub, H., et al. (2008). Electronic monitoring: the employees’ point of view. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 189–195.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andrejevic, M. (2007). Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review, 10(4), 295–317.CrossRef Andrejevic, M. (2007). Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review, 10(4), 295–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baase, S. (2009). A gift of fire: social, legal, and ethical issues for computing and the internet (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Baase, S. (2009). A gift of fire: social, legal, and ethical issues for computing and the internet (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Ball, K. (2003). Categorizing the workers: electronic surveillance and social ordering in the call center. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 201–225). London: Routledge. Ball, K. (2003). Categorizing the workers: electronic surveillance and social ordering in the call center. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 201–225). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: an overview. Labour History, 51(1), 87–106.CrossRef Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: an overview. Labour History, 51(1), 87–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Başar, U., Siğri, Ü., & Basim, H. N. (2018). Ethics lead the way despite organizational politics. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 7(1), 81–101.CrossRef Başar, U., Siğri, Ü., & Basim, H. N. (2018). Ethics lead the way despite organizational politics. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 7(1), 81–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berggren, E., & Bernshteyn, R. (2007). Organizational transparency drives company performance. Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 411–417.CrossRef Berggren, E., & Bernshteyn, R. (2007). Organizational transparency drives company performance. Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 411–417.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhave, D. P. (2014). The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personal Psychology, 67, 605–635. Bhave, D. P. (2014). The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personal Psychology, 67, 605–635.
Zurück zum Zitat Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1996). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behaviour. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210.CrossRef Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1996). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behaviour. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bogard, W. (1996). The simulation of surveillance: hyper-control in telematic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bogard, W. (1996). The simulation of surveillance: hyper-control in telematic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Botan, C., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2005). What do employees think about electronic surveillance at work? In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 123–144). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef Botan, C., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2005). What do employees think about electronic surveillance at work? In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 123–144). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucklin, R. E., & Sismeiro, C. (2009). Click here for Internet insight: advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 35–48.CrossRef Bucklin, R. E., & Sismeiro, C. (2009). Click here for Internet insight: advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 35–48.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ciocchetti, C. A. (2011). The eavesdropping employer: a twenty-first century framework for employee monitoring. American Business Law Journal, 48(2), 285–369.CrossRef Ciocchetti, C. A. (2011). The eavesdropping employer: a twenty-first century framework for employee monitoring. American Business Law Journal, 48(2), 285–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clemmer, E. C., & Schneider, B. (1996). Fair service. In S. W. Brown, D. A. Bowen, & T. Swartz (Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management, Vol. 5 (pp. 109–126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Clemmer, E. C., & Schneider, B. (1996). Fair service. In S. W. Brown, D. A. Bowen, & T. Swartz (Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management, Vol. 5 (pp. 109–126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. B., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization: toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 455–472.CrossRef Cohen, J. B., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization: toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 455–472.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, R. (2010). Surveillance and social ordering. In D. Drake, J. Muncie, & L. Westmarland (Eds.), Criminal justice: local and global (pp. 141–176). Cullompton: Willan. Coleman, R. (2010). Surveillance and social ordering. In D. Drake, J. Muncie, & L. Westmarland (Eds.), Criminal justice: local and global (pp. 141–176). Cullompton: Willan.
Zurück zum Zitat Coultrup, S., & Fountain, P. D. (2012). Effects of electronic monitoring and surveillance on the psychological contract of employees: an exploratory study. Proceedings of ASBBS Conference, 19(1), 219–235. Coultrup, S., & Fountain, P. D. (2012). Effects of electronic monitoring and surveillance on the psychological contract of employees: an exploratory study. Proceedings of ASBBS Conference, 19(1), 219–235.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox, S., Goette, T., & Young, D. (2005). Workplace surveillance and employee privacy: implementing an effective computer use policy. Communications of the IIMA, 5(2), 57–66. Cox, S., Goette, T., & Young, D. (2005). Workplace surveillance and employee privacy: implementing an effective computer use policy. Communications of the IIMA, 5(2), 57–66.
Zurück zum Zitat Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.CrossRef Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D’Urso, S. C. (2006). Who’s watching us at work? Toward a structural-perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations. Communication Theory, 16, 281–303.CrossRef D’Urso, S. C. (2006). Who’s watching us at work? Toward a structural-perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations. Communication Theory, 16, 281–303.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
Zurück zum Zitat Denning, D. E. (1999). Information warfare and security. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Denning, D. E. (1999). Information warfare and security. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Zurück zum Zitat Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.CrossRef Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eivazi, K. (2011). Computer use monitoring and privacy at work. Computer Law and Security Review, 27, 516–523.CrossRef Eivazi, K. (2011). Computer use monitoring and privacy at work. Computer Law and Security Review, 27, 516–523.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2009). Cyberbullying: intervention and prevention strategies. National Association of School Pschologists: Communique, 38(4), 1–4. Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2009). Cyberbullying: intervention and prevention strategies. National Association of School Pschologists: Communique, 38(4), 1–4.
Zurück zum Zitat Findlay, P., & McKinlay, A. (2003). Surveillance, electronic communications technology and regulation. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(4), 305–318.CrossRef Findlay, P., & McKinlay, A. (2003). Surveillance, electronic communications technology and regulation. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(4), 305–318.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fink, J. (2014). In defence of snooping employers. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 16(2), 551–596. Fink, J. (2014). In defence of snooping employers. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 16(2), 551–596.
Zurück zum Zitat Firoz, N., Taghi, R., & Souckova, J. (2006). E-mails in the workplace: the electronic equivalent of ‘DNA’ evidence. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 71–78. Firoz, N., Taghi, R., & Souckova, J. (2006). E-mails in the workplace: the electronic equivalent of ‘DNA’ evidence. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 71–78.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Penguin Books, 1991), 201. This work was first published in 1975 as Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison by Éditions Gallimard. This translation was first published by Allen Lane in 1977. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Penguin Books, 1991), 201. This work was first published in 1975 as Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison by Éditions Gallimard. This translation was first published by Allen Lane in 1977.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Furedi, F. (2002). Culture of fear: risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Continuum. Furedi, F. (2002). Culture of fear: risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandy, O. H., Jr. (2014). Statistical surveillance: remote sensing in the digital age. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 125–132). Oxon: Routledge. Gandy, O. H., Jr. (2014). Statistical surveillance: remote sensing in the digital age. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 125–132). Oxon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, S., & Wood, D. (2007). Digitizing surveillance: categorization, space, inequality. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 218–230). Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill. Graham, S., & Wood, D. (2007). Digitizing surveillance: categorization, space, inequality. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 218–230). Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Haggerty, K. D. (2008). Tear down the walls: on demolishing the panopticon. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing surveillance: the panopticon and beyond (pp. 23–45). Cullompton: Willan publishing. Haggerty, K. D. (2008). Tear down the walls: on demolishing the panopticon. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing surveillance: the panopticon and beyond (pp. 23–45). Cullompton: Willan publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency—the key to better governance (pp. 25–43). New York: Oxford University Press. Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency—the key to better governance (pp. 25–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. (2007). Surveillance, the nation-state and social control. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 11–17). Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill. Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. (2007). Surveillance, the nation-state and social control. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 11–17). Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland, P. J., Cooper, B., & Hecker, R. (2015). Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: the effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type. Personnel Review, 44(1), 161–175.CrossRef Holland, P. J., Cooper, B., & Hecker, R. (2015). Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: the effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type. Personnel Review, 44(1), 161–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations. Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood, J. N. (2003). The relationship of leadership style and CEO values to ethical practices in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 263–273.CrossRef Hood, J. N. (2003). The relationship of leadership style and CEO values to ethical practices in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 263–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Indiparambil, J. J. (2017). An empirical study on the detrimental effects of employee surveillance in India. International Journal of Research in Computer Application & Management, 7(12), 48–51. Indiparambil, J. J. (2017). An empirical study on the detrimental effects of employee surveillance in India. International Journal of Research in Computer Application & Management, 7(12), 48–51.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Organization-stakeholder relationships: exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25(10), 942–955.CrossRef Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Organization-stakeholder relationships: exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development, 25(10), 942–955.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins, R. (2014). Identity, surveillance and modernity. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 159–166). Oxon: Routledge. Jenkins, R. (2014). Identity, surveillance and modernity. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 159–166). Oxon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Kidwell, R. E., & Sprague, R. (2009). Electronic surveillance in the global workplace: laws, ethics, research and practice. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(2), 194–208.CrossRef Kidwell, R. E., & Sprague, R. (2009). Electronic surveillance in the global workplace: laws, ethics, research and practice. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(2), 194–208.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kierkegaard, S. (2005). Privacy in electronic communication, watch your e-mail: your boss is snooping. Computer Law & Security Report, 21, 226–236.CrossRef Kierkegaard, S. (2005). Privacy in electronic communication, watch your e-mail: your boss is snooping. Computer Law & Security Report, 21, 226–236.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kizza, J. M., & Ssanyu, J. (2005). Workplace surveillance. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 1–18). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing. Kizza, J. M., & Ssanyu, J. (2005). Workplace surveillance. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 1–18). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511.CrossRef Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lane, F. S., III. (2003). The naked employee: How technology is compromising workplace privacy. New York: Amacom. Lane, F. S., III. (2003). The naked employee: How technology is compromising workplace privacy. New York: Amacom.
Zurück zum Zitat Landstrom, H. (1993). Agency theory and its application to small firms: evidence from the Swedish venture capital market. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(3), 203–218. Landstrom, H. (1993). Agency theory and its application to small firms: evidence from the Swedish venture capital market. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(3), 203–218.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, S., & Kleiner, B. H. (2003). Electronic surveillance in the workplace. Management Research News, 26(2, 3, 4), 72–81.CrossRef Lee, S., & Kleiner, B. H. (2003). Electronic surveillance in the workplace. Management Research News, 26(2, 3, 4), 72–81.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, D. C. (2018). Do managerial ethics and legal education influence online privacy policies in greater China? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 7(2), 117–136.CrossRef Li, D. C. (2018). Do managerial ethics and legal education influence online privacy policies in greater China? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 7(2), 117–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2001a). Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press. Lyon, D. (2001a). Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2001b). Facing the future: seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(3), 171–181.CrossRef Lyon, D. (2001b). Facing the future: seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(3), 171–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2003a). Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge: Polity Press. Lyon, D. (2003a). Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2003b). Surveillance as social sorting: computer codes and mobile bodies. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 13–32). London: Routledge. Lyon, D. (2003b). Surveillance as social sorting: computer codes and mobile bodies. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 13–32). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2007a). Everyday surveillance: personal data and social classifications. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 136–146). New York: McGraw-Hill. Lyon, D. (2007a). Everyday surveillance: personal data and social classifications. In S. P. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 136–146). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2007b). Surveillance studies: an overview. Cambridge: Polity Press. Lyon, D. (2007b). Surveillance studies: an overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2007c). Surveillance, security and social sorting: emerging research priorities. International Criminal Justice Review, 17(3), 161–170.CrossRef Lyon, D. (2007c). Surveillance, security and social sorting: emerging research priorities. International Criminal Justice Review, 17(3), 161–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. (2014). Introduction: surveillance as sorting. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. London: Routledge. Lyon, D. (2014). Introduction: surveillance as sorting. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Some problems with employee monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 353–361.CrossRef Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Some problems with employee monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 353–361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Balleste, A., & Solanas, A. (2009). An introduction to privacy aspects of information and communication technologies. World Scientific Review, 4(5), 1–20. Martinez-Balleste, A., & Solanas, A. (2009). An introduction to privacy aspects of information and communication technologies. World Scientific Review, 4(5), 1–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, G. T. (1998). Ethics for the new surveillance. The Information Society, 14(3), 171–185.CrossRef Marx, G. T. (1998). Ethics for the new surveillance. The Information Society, 14(3), 171–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, G. T. (2002). What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 9–29.CrossRef Marx, G. T. (2002). What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 9–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: surveillance and society in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: surveillance and society in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mason, D., Button, G., Lankshear, G., Coates, S., & Sharrock, W. (2002). On the poverty of apriorism: technology, surveillance in the workplace and employee responses. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 555–572.CrossRef Mason, D., Button, G., Lankshear, G., Coates, S., & Sharrock, W. (2002). On the poverty of apriorism: technology, surveillance in the workplace and employee responses. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 555–572.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McEvoy, S. (2002). E-mail and Internet monitoring and the workplace: do employees have a right to privacy? Communications and the Law, 24(2), 69–84. McEvoy, S. (2002). E-mail and Internet monitoring and the workplace: do employees have a right to privacy? Communications and the Law, 24(2), 69–84.
Zurück zum Zitat Minsky, M., Kurzweil, R., & Mann, S. (2013). The Society of Intelligent Veillance. International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). Minsky, M., Kurzweil, R., & Mann, S. (2013). The Society of Intelligent Veillance. International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS).
Zurück zum Zitat Monahan, K. (2012). A review of the literature concerning ethical leadership in organizations. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5(1), 56–66. Monahan, K. (2012). A review of the literature concerning ethical leadership in organizations. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5(1), 56–66.
Zurück zum Zitat Moor, J. H. (1990). The ethics of privacy protection. Library Trends, 39(1 & 2), 69–82. Moor, J. H. (1990). The ethics of privacy protection. Library Trends, 39(1 & 2), 69–82.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, A. D. (2010). Privacy rights: moral and legal foundations. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. Moore, A. D. (2010). Privacy rights: moral and legal foundations. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Moussa, M. (2015). Monitoring employee behaviour through the use of technology and issues of employee privacy in America. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–13.CrossRef Moussa, M. (2015). Monitoring employee behaviour through the use of technology and issues of employee privacy in America. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelkin, D., & Andrews, L. (2003). Surveillance creep in the genetic age). In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London: Routledge. Nelkin, D., & Andrews, L. (2003). Surveillance creep in the genetic age). In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielson, I. K., Jex, S. M., & Adams, G. A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 628–643.CrossRef Nielson, I. K., Jex, S. M., & Adams, G. A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 628–643.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nissenbaum, H. (2004a). Information technology and ethics. Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 235–239). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group. Nissenbaum, H. (2004a). Information technology and ethics. Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 235–239). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.
Zurück zum Zitat Nissenbaum, H. (2004b). Will security enhance trust online, or supplant it? In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: dilemmas and approaches (Vol. 7, pp. 155–188). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Nissenbaum, H. (2004b). Will security enhance trust online, or supplant it? In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: dilemmas and approaches (Vol. 7, pp. 155–188). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Zurück zum Zitat Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nord, G. D., McCubbins, T. F., & Nord, J. H. (2006). E-monitoring in the workplace: privacy, legislation, and surveillance software. Communications of the ACM, 49(8), 72–77.CrossRef Nord, G. D., McCubbins, T. F., & Nord, J. H. (2006). E-monitoring in the workplace: privacy, legislation, and surveillance software. Communications of the ACM, 49(8), 72–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norris, C. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 249–281). London: Routledge. Norris, C. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 249–281). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Ormerod, R. J., & Ulrich, W. (2013). Operational research and ethics: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(2), 291–307.CrossRef Ormerod, R. J., & Ulrich, W. (2013). Operational research and ethics: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(2), 291–307.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ottensmeyer, E. J., & Heroux, M. A. (1991). Ethics, public policy, and managing advanced technologies: the case of electronic surveillance. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(7), 519–526.CrossRef Ottensmeyer, E. J., & Heroux, M. A. (1991). Ethics, public policy, and managing advanced technologies: the case of electronic surveillance. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(7), 519–526.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.CrossRef Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Post, R. C. (2001). Three concepts of privacy. The Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 2087–2098. Post, R. C. (2001). Three concepts of privacy. The Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 2087–2098.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollach, I. (2007). What’s wrong with online privacy policies? Communications of the ACM, 50(9), 103–108.CrossRef Pollach, I. (2007). What’s wrong with online privacy policies? Communications of the ACM, 50(9), 103–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn, M. J. (2005). Ethics for the information age. Boston: Pearson-Addison-Wesley. Quinn, M. J. (2005). Ethics for the information age. Boston: Pearson-Addison-Wesley.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn, M. J. (2012). Ethics for the information age (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson-Prentice Hall. Quinn, M. J. (2012). Ethics for the information age (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Raven, B. H. (1993). The basis of power: origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251.CrossRef Raven, B. H. (1993). The basis of power: origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227–251.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlins, B. L. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. The Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 1–21. Rawlins, B. L. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. The Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 1–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlins, B. L. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Research, 21(1), 71–99.CrossRef Rawlins, B. L. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Research, 21(1), 71–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Regan, P. M. (2002). Privacy as a common good in the digital world. Information, Communication and Society, 5(3), 382–405.CrossRef Regan, P. M. (2002). Privacy as a common good in the digital world. Information, Communication and Society, 5(3), 382–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds, G. (2003). Ethics in information technology. Boston: Thompson. Reynolds, G. (2003). Ethics in information technology. Boston: Thompson.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds, G. (2007). Ethics in information technology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology. Reynolds, G. (2007). Ethics in information technology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards, N. M. (2013). The dangers of surveillance. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1934–1965. Richards, N. M. (2013). The dangers of surveillance. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1934–1965.
Zurück zum Zitat Rule, J., & Brantely, P. (1992). Computerized surveillance in the workplace: forms and distributions. Sociological Forum, 7(3), 405–423.CrossRef Rule, J., & Brantely, P. (1992). Computerized surveillance in the workplace: forms and distributions. Sociological Forum, 7(3), 405–423.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saini, D., & Sengupta, S. S. (2016). Responsibility, ethics, and leadership: an Indian study. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1–2), 97–109.CrossRef Saini, D., & Sengupta, S. S. (2016). Responsibility, ethics, and leadership: an Indian study. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1–2), 97–109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–289.CrossRef Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–289.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sewell, G., & Barker, J. R. (2006). Coercion versus care: using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 934–961.CrossRef Sewell, G., & Barker, J. R. (2006). Coercion versus care: using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 934–961.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegle, D. (2010). Cyberbullying and sexting: technology abuses of the 21st century. Gifted Child Today, 33(2), 14–16.CrossRef Siegle, D. (2010). Cyberbullying and sexting: technology abuses of the 21st century. Gifted Child Today, 33(2), 14–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson, K., & Byrski, M. (2010). The 21st century workplace: How personal technologies can make a difference. Asia Pacific Journal of Business and Management, 1(2), 10–20. Simpson, K., & Byrski, M. (2010). The 21st century workplace: How personal technologies can make a difference. Asia Pacific Journal of Business and Management, 1(2), 10–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl, B. C., Prior, M., Wilford, S., & Collins, D. (2005). Electronic monitoring in the workplace: if people don’t care, then what is the relevance? In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 50–78). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef Stahl, B. C., Prior, M., Wilford, S., & Collins, D. (2005). Electronic monitoring in the workplace: if people don’t care, then what is the relevance? In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 50–78). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stalder, F., & Lyon, D. (2003). Electronic identity cards and social classification. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London: Routledge. Stalder, F., & Lyon, D. (2003). Electronic identity cards and social classification. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton, J. M. (2000). Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 129–147.CrossRef Stanton, J. M. (2000). Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 129–147.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2000). Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees’ experience with new types of surveillance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 423–440.CrossRef Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2000). Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees’ experience with new types of surveillance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 423–440.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton, J. M., & Julian, A. L. (2002). The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18, 85–101.CrossRef Stanton, J. M., & Julian, A. L. (2002). The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18, 85–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton, J. M., & Stam, K. R. (2003). Information technology, privacy, and power within organizations: a view from boundary theory and social exchange perspectives. Surveillance and Society, 1(2), 152–190.CrossRef Stanton, J. M., & Stam, K. R. (2003). Information technology, privacy, and power within organizations: a view from boundary theory and social exchange perspectives. Surveillance and Society, 1(2), 152–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Staples, W. G. (1997). The culture of surveillance: discipline and social control in the United States. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Staples, W. G. (1997). The culture of surveillance: discipline and social control in the United States. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoddart, E. (2011). Theological perspectives on a surveillance society: watching and being watched. Farnham, England: Ashgate. Stoddart, E. (2011). Theological perspectives on a surveillance society: watching and being watched. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioural ethics in organizations: a review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRef Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioural ethics in organizations: a review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.CrossRef Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, T. R., & Mentovich, A. (2011). Mechanisms of legal effect: theories of procedural justice. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Public Health Law Research. Tyler, T. R., & Mentovich, A. (2011). Mechanisms of legal effect: theories of procedural justice. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Public Health Law Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Udani, Z. A. S., & Lorenzo-Molo, C. F. (2017). The utility of virtue: management spirituality and ethics for a secular business world. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 31–39. Udani, Z. A. S., & Lorenzo-Molo, C. F. (2017). The utility of virtue: management spirituality and ethics for a secular business world. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 31–39.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dijk, S. J., Duysters, G. M., & Beulens, A. J. (2003). Transparency dilemmas, information technology and alliances in agriculture and food industry (Working paper 03.23, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies). Netherlands: Eindhoven. Van Dijk, S. J., Duysters, G. M., & Beulens, A. J. (2003). Transparency dilemmas, information technology and alliances in agriculture and food industry (Working paper 03.23, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies). Netherlands: Eindhoven.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatadurai, J., Dhyani, U., & Sharma, M. (2014). Ethics and morality beyond normative theories. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 35–39.CrossRef Venkatadurai, J., Dhyani, U., & Sharma, M. (2014). Ethics and morality beyond normative theories. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 35–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, L., & Liang, X. (2017). Profit or legitimacy? What drives firms to prioritize social stakeholders? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(1), 57–79.CrossRef Wang, L., & Liang, X. (2017). Profit or legitimacy? What drives firms to prioritize social stakeholders? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(1), 57–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2016). Electronic surveillance at work: an ethical analysis. Administration and Society, 48(5), 628–651.CrossRef West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2016). Electronic surveillance at work: an ethical analysis. Administration and Society, 48(5), 628–651.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yerby, J. (2013). Legal and ethical issue of employee monitoring. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 1(2), 44–55. Yerby, J. (2013). Legal and ethical issue of employee monitoring. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 1(2), 44–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Zirkle, B. L., & Staples, W. G. (2005). Negotiating workplace surveillance. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 79–100). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef Zirkle, B. L., & Staples, W. G. (2005). Negotiating workplace surveillance. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 79–100). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zureik, E. (2003). Theorizing surveillance: the case of the workplace. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 31–56). London: Routledge. Zureik, E. (2003). Theorizing surveillance: the case of the workplace. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 31–56). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Zweig, D. (2005). Beyond privacy and fairness concerns: examining psychological boundary violations as a consequence of electronic performance monitoring. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 102–122). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing. Zweig, D. (2005). Beyond privacy and fairness concerns: examining psychological boundary violations as a consequence of electronic performance monitoring. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Electronic monitoring in the workplace: controversies and solutions (pp. 102–122). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Metadaten
Titel
Privacy and beyond: socio-ethical concerns of ‘on-the-job’ surveillance
verfasst von
Jijo James Indiparambil
Publikationsdatum
29.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Asian Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2210-6723
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-6731
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-019-00089-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe