Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In this study, the under-examined area of privacy perception and protection on Chinese social media is investigated. The prevalence of digital technology shapes the social, political and cultural aspects of the lives of urban young adults. The influential Chinese social media platform WeChat is taken as a case study, and the ease of connection, communication and transaction combined with issues of commercialisation and surveillance are discussed in the framework of the privacy paradox. Protective behaviour and tactics are examined through different perceptions of privacy in the digital age. The findings of this study suggest that users possess certain amount of freedoms on WeChat. However, users’ individual privacy attitudes and behaviour in practice suggest they have a declined sense of their own freedom and right to privacy. A privacy paradox exists when users, while holding a high level of concerns, in reality do little to further the protection of their personal information on WeChat. We argue that once a user has ingrained part of their social engagement within the WeChat system, the incentive for them to remain a part of the system outweighs their requirement to secure their privacy online as their decision-making is largely based on a simple cost-benefit analysis. The power and social capital yielded via WeChat is too valuable to give up as WeChat is widely used not only for private conversations, but also for study or work-related purposes. It further blurs the boundaries between the public, the professional and the private, which is a rather unique case compared with other social media around the world.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Al-Kandari, A., Melkote, S. R., & Sharif, A. (2016). Needs and motives of Instagram users that predict self-disclosure use: A case study of young adults in Kuwait. Journal of Creative Communications, 11(2), 85–101. CrossRef
Bae, Y. H., Jun, J. W., & Hough, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital signage and relationships with user interface. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(5), 323–331. CrossRef
Bartsch, M., & Dienlin, T. (2016). Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 147–154. CrossRef
Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2017). Caring is not enough: The importance of Internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1261–1278. CrossRef
Choi, B. C., Jiang, Z., Xiao, B., & Kim, S. (2015). Embarrassing exposures in online social networks: An integrated perspective of privacy invasion and relationship bonding. Information Systems Research, 26(4), 675–694. CrossRef
Clover, C. (2017). Overloaded China users battle ‘WeChat fatigue’. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/51dfa598-0189-11e6-99cb-83242733f755.
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A. K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. CrossRef
Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Chen, S., & Lonka, K. (2016). Understanding online regret experience in Facebook use—effects of brand participation, accessibility and problematic use. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 420–430. CrossRef
Du, P. (2015). Intercultural communication in the Chinese workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Fei, X. (1992). From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society: A translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo (G. G. Hamilton & Z. Wang, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fisk, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. CrossRef
Fox, J., & Moreland, J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. CrossRef
Fulco, M. (2017). The WeChat economy, from messaging to payment and more. Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business. http://knowledge.ckgsb.edu.cn/2017/08/28/mobile-commerce/wechat-economy-messaging-wechat-pay/.
Fulton, J. M., & Kibby, M. D. (2017). Millennials and the normalization of surveillance on Facebook. Continuum-Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 31(2), 189–199. CrossRef
Hodkinson, P. (2017). Bedrooms and beyond: Youth, identity and privacy on social network sites. New Media & Society, 19(2), 272–288. CrossRef
Jeong, Y., & Coyle, E. (2014). What are you worrying about on Facebook and Twitter? An empirical investigation of young social network site users’ privacy perceptions and behaviors. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(2), 51–59. CrossRef
Jeong, Y., & Kim, Y. (2017). Privacy concerns on social networking sites: Interplay among posting types, content, and audiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 302–310. CrossRef
Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. CrossRef
Lee, H., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on social network services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users’ behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71(9), 862–877. CrossRef
Li, H. S. (2016). Narrative dissidence, spoof videos and alternative memory in China. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(5), 501–517. CrossRef
McLaren, R. M., Dillard, J. P., Tusing, K. J., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Relational framing theory: Utterance form and relational context as antecedents of frame salience. Communication Quarterly, 62(5), 518–535. CrossRef
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. CrossRef
Morando, F., Iemma, R., & Raiteri, E. (2014). Privacy evaluation: What empirical research on users’ valuation of personal data tells us. Internet Policy Review, 3(2), 1–11.
Norberg, P. A., Horne, D., & Horne, D. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. CrossRef
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 11(2), 169–174. CrossRef
Rachels, J. (1975). Why privacy is important. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(4), 323–333.
Rubinstein, I. S. (2013). Big data: The end of privacy or a new beginning? International Data Privacy Law, 3(2), 74–87. CrossRef
Smith, C. (2018). 110 amazing WeChat statistics and facts (January 2018). DMR. https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/wechat-statistics/.
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167–196. CrossRef
Spottswood, E. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Should I share that? Prompting social norms that influence privacy behaviors on a social networking site. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 55–70. CrossRef
Tengyun. (2017). Creator economy: A new era of the ‘Internet + Cultural and Creative’—social reception, industry ecology and policy system. Beijing: Development Research Centre of the State Council, Tencent Social Research Centre.
Walsh, M. J., & Baker, S. A. (2017). The selfie and the transformation of the public–private distinction. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1185–1203. CrossRef
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S. Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49. CrossRef
Yang, C.-C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2014). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16(1), 5–23. CrossRef
Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 479–500. CrossRef
Zarouali, B., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Poels, K. (2017). “Do you like cookies?” Adolescents’ skeptical processing of retargeted Facebook-ads and the moderating role of privacy concern and a textual debriefing. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 157–165. CrossRef
Zlatolas, L., Welzer, T., Hericko, M., & Holbl, M. (2015). Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 158–167. CrossRef
- Privacy perception and protection on Chinese social media: a case study of WeChat
Zhen Troy Chen
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA