Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Probabilistic Group Decision-Making Using BWT

verfasst von : Majid Mohammadi, Fuqi Liang, Matteo Brunelli, Jafar Rezaei

Erschienen in: Advances in Best-Worst Method

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this study, we propose a probabilistic group decision-making method based on the Best-Worst Tradeoff method (BWT) and the Bayesian approach. BWT is a pairwise comparison method that is used to elicit the tradeoffs among a set of attributes (criteria) in a multi-criteria decision-making problem. While BWT is suitable for a single decision-maker situation, Bayesian BWT is suitable for aggregating the tradeoffs among a number of criteria coming from a number of decision-makers or experts. The proposed method aggregates the scaling constants (weights), and assigns a confidence number (between zero and one), to inform about the confidence we have about the ranking order of the criteria. We demonstrate how the method is used in a real-world setting. Data is collected from three experts on ranking a number of European seaports that are performing differently with respect to a number of relevant criteria. We think that the method has great potential in real-world group decision-making problems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunelli, M. (2023). Why should not a decision analyst be content with only (\(n-1\)) pairwise comparisons? Echoes from the literature. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Best-Worst Method (BWM2022) (pp. 33–40). Advances in Best-Worst Method. Springer. Brunelli, M. (2023). Why should not a decision analyst be content with only (\(n-1\)) pairwise comparisons? Echoes from the literature. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Best-Worst Method (BWM2022) (pp. 33–40). Advances in Best-Worst Method. Springer.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dyer, J. S., & Sarin, R. K. (1979). Measurable multiattribute value functions. Operations Research, 27(4), 810–822.CrossRef Dyer, J. S., & Sarin, R. K. (1979). Measurable multiattribute value functions. Operations Research, 27(4), 810–822.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Methods of estimating additive utilities. Management Science, 13(7), 435–453.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Methods of estimating additive utilities. Management Science, 13(7), 435–453.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (2nd ed.). International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (2nd ed.). International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. John Wiley & Sons. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. John Wiley & Sons.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press. Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2022). Best-worst tradeoff method. Information Sciences, 610, 957–976.CrossRef Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2022). Best-worst tradeoff method. Information Sciences, 610, 957–976.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 102075.CrossRef Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 102075.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Plummer, M. (2012). Jags version 3.3.0 user manual. Plummer, M. (2012). Jags version 3.3.0 user manual.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.CrossRef Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaei, J., van Wulfften Palthe, L., Tavasszy, L., Wiegmans, B., & van der Laan, F. (2019). Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an mcda approach. Management Decision 57(2), 396–417, identifier: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0482 Rezaei, J., van Wulfften Palthe, L., Tavasszy, L., Wiegmans, B., & van der Laan, F. (2019). Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an mcda approach. Management Decision 57(2), 396–417, identifier: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1108/​MD-04-2018-0482
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zardari, N. H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S. M., & Yusop, Z. B. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer International Publishing. Zardari, N. H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S. M., & Yusop, Z. B. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer International Publishing.
Metadaten
Titel
Probabilistic Group Decision-Making Using BWT
verfasst von
Majid Mohammadi
Fuqi Liang
Matteo Brunelli
Jafar Rezaei
Copyright-Jahr
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40328-6_1

Premium Partner