Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The first chapter of this book summarized how we undertake economics, and our explanation for that approach in the modern Western world. The second chapter introduced the idea that this contemporary view of understanding economics is just one of many ways that humans have understood how the economy operates. The last century has seen the ascendancy, indeed intellectual dominance, of neoclassical economics (NCE, also known as Walrasian economics). The basic NCE model represents the economy as a self-maintaining circular flow among firms and households, driven by the psychological assumptions that humans act principally in a materialistic, self-regarding, and predictable way. Unfortunately, the NCE model violates a number of physical laws and is inconsistent actual human behavior, rendering it to be an unrealistic and a poor predictor of people’s actions. Recently, an array of experimental and physical evidence and theoretical breakthroughs demonstrate the disconnect between evidence and neoclassical theory. Despite the abundance and validity of these critiques, few economists seriously question the neoclassical paradigm that forms the foundation of their applied work. This is a problem because policy makers, scientists, and others turn to economists for answers to important questions. The supposed virtues of «privatization,» «free markets,» «consumer choice,» and «cost-benefit analysis» are considered to be self-evident by most practicing economists, as well as many in business and government. In fact, the evidence that these concepts are correct is rather slim and contradictory. Thus, this chapter is a strong critique of economic theory, in this case NCE.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
This chapter is derived in part from Gowdy, J., C. Hall, K. Klitgaard, and L. Krall. 2010. The end of faith-based economics. The Corporate Examiner 37: 5–11, and Hall, C., D. Lindenberger, R. Kummel, T. Kroeger, and W. Eichhorn. 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience 51: 663–673.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal 41: 347–381. CrossRef
Daly, H. 1977. Steady-state economics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Cleveland, C., R. Costanza, C. Hall, and R. Kaufmann. 1984. Energy and the U.S. economy: A Biophysical perspective. Science 225: 890–897. CrossRef
Hall, C., C. Cleveland, and R. Kaufmann. 1986. Energy and resource quality: The ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Hall, C., D. Lindenberger, R. Kummel, T. Kroeger, and W. Eichhorn. 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience 51: 663–673. Also: Kummel, R., J. Henn, and D. Lindenberger. 2002. Capital, labor, energy and creativity: Modeling. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 3 (2002): 415–433.
Wilson, E. 1998. Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Denison, E.F. 1989. Estimates of productivity change by industry, an evaluation and an alternative. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Ayres, R., and D. Warr. 2005. Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Change and Economic Dynamics 16: 211–220. CrossRef
Cleveland, C.J. 1991. Natural resource scarcity and economic growth revisited: Economic and biophysical perspectives. In Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability, ed. R. Costanza, 289–317. New York: Columbia University Press.
Solow, R.M. 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review 66: 1–14. Also Solow, R.M. 1994. Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45–54.
Leontief, W. 1982. Academic economics. Science 217: 104. CrossRef
Mirowski, P. 1989. More heat than light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gintis, H. 2000. Beyond Homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics. 35: 311–322. CrossRef
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., 2004. Behavioral economics: past present and future. In: Camerer, C, Loewenstein, G. Rabin, M (Editors), Advances in behavioral economics, Princeton/Oxford, Princeton University Press 3–52.
Henrich, J., et al. 2001. Cooperation, reciprocity and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. American Economics Review 91: 73–78. CrossRef
Ackerman, F., and L. Heinzerling. 2004. Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York/London: The New Press.
Frey, B., and A. Stutzer. 2002. Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brickman, P., D. Coates, and R. Janoff-Bulman. 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 917–927. CrossRef
Blanchflower, D., and D. Oswald. 2000. Well-being over time in Britain and the U.S.A., NBER working paper no.7481. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Analysis. CrossRef
Lane, R. 2000. The loss of happiness in market economies. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Meyers, D. 2000. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist 55: 56–56. CrossRef
Arrow, K., P. Dasgupta, L. Goulder, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, G. Heal, S. Levin, K. Goran-Maler, S. Schneider, D. Starrett, and B. Walker. 2004. Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 147–172. CrossRef
Gowdy, J. 2004. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation. Land Economics 80: 239–257. CrossRef
Gowdy, J., and J. Erickson. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 29 (2): 207–222. CrossRef
Makgetla, N., and R. Sideman. 1989. The applicability of law and economics to policymaking in the third world. Journal of Economic Issues 23: 35–78. CrossRef
Hall, C. 2000. Quantifying sustainable development: The future of tropical economies. San Diego: Academic Press.
LeClerc, G., and Charles Hall, eds. 2008. Making development work: A new Role for science. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Hall, C.A.S., R.G. Pontius, L. Coleman, and J.-Y. Ko. 1994. The environmental consequences of having a baby in the United State. Population and the Environment 15: 505–523. CrossRef
Sekera, June. 2016. The Public Economy in Crisis. New York: Springer; Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press.
Barnett, H., and C. Morse. 1963. Scarcity and Growth. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
- Problems with How We Do Economics Today
Charles A. S. Hall
Fallstudie Überschwemmungskarten/© Thaut Images | Fotolia