Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
A persuasion dialogue is a dialogue in which a conflict between agents with respect to their points of view arises at the beginning of the talk and the agents have the shared, global goal of resolving the conflict and at least one agent has the persuasive aim to convince the other party to accept an opposing point of view. I argue that the persuasive force of argument may have not only extreme values but also intermediate strength. That is, I wish to introduce two additional types of the effects of persuasion in addition to successful and unsuccessful ones (cf. Van Eemeren and Houtlosser in Argumentation 14(3):293–305, 2000; Advances in pragma-dialectics. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, 2002; Walton in A pragmatic theory of fallacy. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 1995; Walton and Krabbe in Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1995). I propose a model which provides for modified versions of the standpoint of an agent needed in order to bring about two possible outcomes of a persuasion dialogue. These two outcomes I label partially-successful and over-successful. I call the potential, not yet verbalised, standpoint of an agent here the original topic t. Based on some aspects of relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson in Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, 1986; Wilson and Sperber in The handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, 2006), I explain that the modified version of the original topic t is an implicature created from the original topic t and from a specific mental topic which belongs to, what I call the beneficial cognitive model (hence BCM). I define BCMi,t as a set of topics which are within the area of agent i’s interest of persuasion with respect to t.
Aristotle. 1955. The organon. Vol. 1: Prior analytics. (Translated by Harold P. Cooke and Hugh Tredennick; 1st standard edition in Greek by Andronicus of Rhodes, 1st century B.C.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle. 1959. The art of rhetoric. (Translated by John Henry Freese; 1st standard edition in Greek by Andronicus of Rhodes, 1st century B.C.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Budzynska, Katarzyna, and Magdalena Kacprzak. 2008. A logic for reasoning about persuasion. Fundamenta Informaticae 85: 51–65.
Budzynska, Katarzyna, and Magdalena Kacprzak. 2011. Model checking of persuasion in multi-agent systems. In Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, special issue on argument and computation, vol. 23, ed. M. Koszowy, 99–122.
Budzynska, Katarzyna, and Kamila Debowska. 2010. Dialogues with conflict resolution: Goals and effects. In Aspects of semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, ed. Pawel Lupkowski, and Mathew Purver, 59–66. Poznan: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.
Budzynska, Katarzyna and Maciej Witek. 2014. Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum. In Argumentation, special issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, vol. 3, eds. K. Budzynska and M. Koszowy. doi: 10.1007/s10503-014-9322-6.
Cap, Piotr. 2010. Pragmatics, micropragmatics macropragmatics. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6(2): 195–228. CrossRef
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRef
Castelfranchi, Cristiano, and Fabio Paglieri. 2007. The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: Prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions. Synthese 155: 237–263. CrossRef
Debowska, Kamila, Paweł Łoziński, and Chris Reed. 2009. Building bridges between everyday argument and formal representations of reasoning. In Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, special issue on informal logic and argumentation theory, vol. 16, ed. M. Koszowy, 95–135.
Garssen, Bart. 2001. Argument Schemes. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 81–99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Grice, Paul Herbert. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, Paul Herbert. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, ed. P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen. [Reprinted, 1993], Virginia: Vale Press.
Houtlosser, Peter. 2001. Points of view. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 27–50. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kacprzak, M., and O. Yaskorska. 2014. Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies. In Argumentation, special issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, vol. 3, eds. K. Budzynska and M. Koszowy. doi: 10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4.
Katriel, Tamar, and Marcelo Dascal. 1989. Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse. In From sign to text: A semiotic view of communication, ed. Yishai Tobin, 275–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossRef
Kopytko, Roman. 2002. The mental aspects of pragmatic theory. Poznan: Motivex.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Paglieri, Fabio, and Castelfranchi Cristiano. 2010. Why arguing? Towards a costs-benefits analysis of argumentation. Argument and Computation 1: 71–91. CrossRef
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (Translated by John Wilkinson—Purcell Weaver.) Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2007. Can classical topics be revived within the contemporary theory of argumentation? In Proceedings of the sixth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation. 1155–1163. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2010. Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: the procedural and material components. Argumentation 24: 489–512. CrossRef
Searle, John. 1970. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2001. The state of art in argumentation theory. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, 11–26. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossRef
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2009. Strategic Manoeuvring Between Rhetorical Effectiveness and Dialectical Reasonableness, In Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, special issue “informal logic and argumentation theory”, vol. 16, ed. M. Koszowy, 69–91.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossRef
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2000. Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. Argumentation 14(3): 293–305. CrossRef
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In Advances in pragma- dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 13–27. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Peter Houtlosser. 2004. A pragma-dialectical analysis of the burden of proof. [Unpublished seminar paper. University of Amsterdam: Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric].
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tucaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Walaszewska, Ewa, and Agnieszka Piskorska 2012. Relevance theory: More than understanding. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Walton, Douglas. 1995. A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, New York : State University of New York. Press.
Wilson, Deirdre. 1994. Relevance and understanding. In Language and understanding, ed. Gillian Brown, Kirsten Malmkjær, Alastair Pollitt, and John Williams, 35–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective, ed. D. Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2006. Relevance theory. In The handbook of pragmatics (2nd edition, 1st edition 2004.), ed. L.R. Horn, and G. Ward, 607–632. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Yus, Francisco. 2006. Relevance theory. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. Keith Brown, 512–519. Oxford: Elsevier.
- Processing Topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion Dialogues
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta