Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2011

01.02.2011 | Research Paper

Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers

verfasst von: Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Wirt. Ing. Arne Katzmarzik

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The market for the new provisioning type Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has reached a significant size and still shows enormous growth rates. By varying size of SaaS products, providers can improve their market position and profits by successfully acting in the tension area of customer acquisition, pricing and costs. We first elaborate differences concerning product differentiation between classic software provisioning models and SaaS. Then, we introduce a micro-economic based decision model to maximize the return of a provider by finding an optimal granularity, i.e. by varying the size of services. This paper makes two contributions in this context: (1) it provides a conceptual foundation for product differentiation within the scope of SaaS and (2) it presents the first implementation of variable reproduction costs for web based software offers. The model is illustrated by a real world case with data from a SaaS provider.
Vorheriger Artikel Impact of IT Service Management Frameworks on the IT Organization
Nächster Artikel Method Support of Information Requirements Analysis for Analytical Information Systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Let a SU be a general measure for a size of software. Applying the model, this measure should be replaced by a software metric such as the Function Point Analysis or COCOMO.
 
2
Due to changing granularity, other customer clusters with different required SU and WTP may become relevant for determining β resulting in another value for β. However, β is kept fixed and these effects were modeled by the factor γ which itself is multiplied with β in the objective function.
 
3
Due to characteristics of a monopoly, both market price and sold SU will be lower than maximal RP and demand. Thus, resulting prices and demand may differ from the estimations.
 
Literatur
Albani A, Keiblinger A, Turowski K, Winnewisser C (2003) Domain based identification and modelling of business component applications. In: Proc ADBIS, pp 30–45
Albrecht AJ (1979) Measuring application development productivity. In: Proc IBM applications development symposium
Anderson C (2006) The long tail. Hyperion, New York
Arsanjani A, Ghosh S, Allam A, Abdollah T, Ganapathy S, Holley K (2008) SOMA: a method for developing service-oriented solutions. IBM Systems Journal 47(3):377–396 CrossRef
Banker RD, Datar SM, Kemerer CF (1991) A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects. Man Sci 37(1):1–18
Benlian A (2009) A transaction cost theoretical analysis of software-as-a-service (SAAS)-based sourcing in SMBS and enterprise. In: Proc 17th European conference on information systems, Verona
Benlian A, Hess T, Buxmann P (2009) Drivers of SaaS-adoption – an empirical study of different application types. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(5):357–369 CrossRef
Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2001) Information goods and vertical differentiation. J Manage Inf Syst 18(2):89–106
Bhargava HK, Sun D (2008) Pricing under quality of service uncertainty: market segmentation via statistical QoS guarantees Eur J Oper Res 191(3):1189–1204 CrossRef
Boerner R, Goeken M (2009) Identification of business services – literature review and lessons learned. In: Proc 15th Americas conference on information systems, San Francisco
Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2005) Managing piracy: pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Information Systems Research 16(4):400–417 CrossRef
Cheng HK, Tang QC (2010) Free trial or no free trial: optimal software product design with network effects. Eur J Oper Res 205(2):437–447 CrossRef
Cheng HK, Tang QC, Zhao JL (2006) Web services and service-oriented application provisioning: an analytical study of application service strategies. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(4):520–533 CrossRef
Choudhary V, Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rajan U (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Man Sci 51(7):1120–1130
Cremer H, Thisse JF (1991) Location models of horizontal differentiation: a special case of vertical differentiation models. The Journal of Industrial Economics 39(4):383–390 CrossRef
Erl T (2005) Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice, Upper Saddle River
Fan M, Kumar S, Whinston AB (2009) Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):661–671 CrossRef
Gartner (2009) Market trends: software as a service worldwide 2009–2013
Ghose A, Sundararajan A (2005) Software versioning and quality degradation? An exploratory study of the evidence. Working paper, New York University
Haesen R, Snoeck M, Lemahieu W, Poelmans S (2008) On the definition of service granularity and Its Architectural Impact. In: Proc 20th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, Montpellier, pp 375–389
Heinrich B, Fridgen M (2005) Enterprise application integration. BARev 65(1):43–61
Holschke O, Rake J, Levina O (2009) Granularity as a cognitive factor in the effectiveness of business process model reuse. In: Proc 7th international conference on business process management, Ulm
Jing B (2000) Versioning information goods with network externalities. In: Proc 21st international conference on information systems, Brisbane
Jones C (2007) Estimating software costs. McGraw-Hill, New York
Jones R, Mendelson H (2005) Information goods: development, quality and competition. Discussion paper, Stanford University
Kaplan JM (2007) SaaS: friend or foe? Business Communications Review 37(6):48–53
Kim SD, Chang SH (2004) A systematic method to identify software components. In: Proc 11th Asia-Pacific software engineering conference, Busan
Krafzig D, Banke K, Slama D (2005) Enterprise SOA – service-oriented architecture best practices. Prentice, Upper Saddle River
Lee KB, Yu S, Kim SJ (2006) Analysis of pricing strategies for e-business companies providing information goods and services. Comput Ind Eng 51(1):72–78 CrossRef
Lehmann S, Buxmann P (2009) Pricing strategies of software vendors. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(6):452–462 CrossRef
Mietzner R, Leymann F (2008) Towards provisioning the cloud: on the usage of multi-granularity flows and services to realize a unified provisioning infrastructure for Saas applications. In: Proc 2008 IEEE congress on services, Hawaii
Nault BR (1997) Quality differentiation and adoption costs: the case for interorganizational information system pricing. Ann Oper Res 71:115–142 CrossRef
Papazoglou MP, van den Heuvel W (2007) Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. The VLDB Journal 16(3):389–415 CrossRef
Papazoglou MP, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F (2007) Service-oriented computing: state of the art and research challenges. IEEE Computer 40(11):38–45
Parnas DL (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. ComACM 15(12):1053–1058
Phillips DE (2009) The software license unveiled: how legislation by license controls software access. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Raghunathan S (2000) Software editions: an application of segmentation theory to the packaged software market. J Manage Inf Syst 17(1):87–113
Sääksjärvi M, Lassila A, Nordström H (2005) Evaluating the software as a service business model: from CPU time-sharing to online innovation sharing. In: Proc IADIS international conference e-society, Malta, pp 177–186
Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Versioning: the smart way to sell information. Harv Bus Rev 76(6):106–114
Simon CP, Blume L (1994) Mathematics for economists. Norton, New York
Susarla A, Barua A, Whinston AB (2009) A transaction cost perspective of the “software as a service” business model. J Manage Inf Syst 26(2):205–240
Szyperski CA (1998) Emerging component software technologies: a strategic comparison. Software – Concepts and Tools 19(1):2–10 CrossRef
Valente P, Mitra G (2007) The evolution of web-based optimisation: from ASP to e-services. Decis Support Syst 43(4):1096–1116 CrossRef
Varian HR (1997) Versioning information goods. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley
Varian HR (2000) Buying sharing and renting information goods. The Journal of Industrial Economics 48(4):473–488
Varian HR (2009) Intermediate microeconomics. Norton, New York
Walsh KR (2003) Analyzing the application ASP concept: technologies, economies, and strategies. Commun ACM 46(8):103–107 CrossRef
Wang ZJ, Xu X, Zhan D (2005) A survey of business component identification methods and related techniques. International Journal of Information Technology 2(4):229–238
Weber TA (2001) Mixed differentiation of information goods under incomplete information. In: Proc 22nd international conference on information systems, New Orleans
Weber TA (2008) Delayed multiattribute product differentiation. Decis Support Syst 44(2):447–468 CrossRef
Wei X, Nault BR (2006) Vertically differentiated information goods: entry deterrence, rivalry clear-out or coexistence. In: Proc 2006 INFORMS conference on information systems and technology, Pittsburgh
Zhang J, Seidmann A (2002) The optimal software licensing policy under quality uncertainty. In: Proc 23rd international conference on information systems, Barcelona
Zhang Z, Tan Y, Dey D (2009) Price competition with service level guarantee in web services. Decis Support Syst 47(2):93–104 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers
verfasst von
Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Wirt. Ing. Arne Katzmarzik
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2011
Verlag
SP Gabler Verlag
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0142-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Profile

Interview with Douglas J. King on “The Impact of Virtualization and Cloud Computing on IT Service Management”

Editorial Notes

Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE) is AIS Affiliated Journal

Editorial

IT Service Management and IT Automation

Imprint

Imprint

State of the Art

Method Support of Information Requirements Analysis for Analytical Information Systems

Erratum

Erratum to: Enterprise Microblogging