Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(03): 304-309
DOI: 10.1055/a-2218-7297
Original Article

Nasal Patency Measurement: State of the Art of Acoustic Rhinometry

Giancarlo Ottaviano 
1   Department of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Nasal obstruction is one of the main symptoms of different nasal pathologies. Many physiological and pathological conditions can produce nasal airflow impairment causing nasal obstruction and affecting patients' quality of life. There are different methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction, but in clinical practice the most common used are acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow. This review describes the fundamentals of acoustic rhinometry, its normal values, the different physiological and pathological conditions that can modify nasal patency, and the utility of this instrument for the measurement of nasal obstruction in clinical practice. Acoustic rhinometry is a simple test, so it is suitable for measurements in the pediatric population, i.e., for evaluating adenoid hypertrophy. Acoustic rhinometry normal values are available, unilaterally and bilaterally for pediatric and adult populations. Acoustic rhinometry has been demonstrated to be reproducible and even superior to rhinomanometry when measuring nasal modifications during challenges. It is possible to use acoustic rhinometry before and after nasal surgery. Measuring nasal cavities volume and cross-sectional area, acoustic rhinometry is particularly indicated in rhinosurgery, especially for the evaluation of spreader grafts. Brief considerations about the correlation between nasal symptoms, in particular the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction, and the acoustic rhinometry results as well as the correlation of acoustic rhinometry with other methods for the measurement of nasal obstruction are also reported. Objective and subjective evaluation of nasal obstruction gives different information that together optimizes the diagnosis and the treatment of rhinologic patients. Acoustic rhinometry alone or in combination of other instruments for the measurement of nasal obstruction or patency should be used regularly in every outpatient clinic that treats patients with nasal obstruction as there is an increasing need of evidence-based therapies.

Keywords

nasal patency - nasal obstruction - acoustic rhinometry


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 November 2023

Article published online:
10 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Eccles R. Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120 (05) 580-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Flanagan P, Eccles R. Physiological versus pharmacological decongestion of the nose in healthy human subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118 (01) 110-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Williams M, Eccles R. A model for the central control of airflow patterns within the human nasal cycle. J Laryngol Otol 2016; 130 (01) 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pendolino AL, Scarpa B, Ottaviano G. Relationship between nasal cycle, nasal symptoms and nasal cytology. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2019; 33 (06) 644-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cole P. The nasal valve and current technology. Am J Rhinol 1996; 10: 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ottaviano G, Fokkens WJ. Measurements of nasal airflow and patency: a critical review with emphasis on the use of peak nasal inspiratory flow in daily practice. Allergy 2016; 71 (02) 162-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jones AS, Willatt DJ, Durham LM. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103 (10) 909-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 McCaffrey TV, Kern EB. Clinical evaluation of nasal obstruction. A study of 1,000 patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105 (09) 542-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Adams L, Chronos N, Lane R, Guz A. The measurement of breathlessness induced in normal subjects: validity of two scaling techniques. Clin Sci (Lond) 1985; 69 (01) 7-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Meltzer EO. Evaluating rhinitis: clinical, rhinomanometric, and cytologic assessments. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 82 (5 Pt 2): 900-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Silvoniemi P, Laippala P. Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1995; 57 (05) 260-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (02) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mozzanica F, Preti A, Gera R. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SNOT-22 into Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (02) 887-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jalessi M, Farhadi M, Asghari A, Hosseini M, Amini E, Pousti SB. Impact of endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery on nasal airway patency. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016; 30: 379
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lenders H, Pirsig W. Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and vasomotor rhinitis compared with normal controls. Rhinology 1990; 28 (01) 5-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66 (01) 295-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Holmstrom M. The use of objective measures in selecting patients for septal surgery. Rhinology 2010; 48 (04) 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jackson AC, Butler JP, Millet EJ, Hoppin Jr FG, Dawson SV. Airway geometry by analysis of acoustic pulse response measurements. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43 (03) 523-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Clement PAR, Gordts F. Standardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, IRS, and ERS. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2005; 43 (03) 169-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lal D, Gorges ML, Ungkhara G, Reidy PM, Corey JP. Physiological change in nasal patency in response to changes in posture, temperature, and humidity measured by acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (05) 456-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Harar RP, Kalan A, Kenyon GS. Improving the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry in the assessment of nasal function. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64 (01) 22-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Giotakis AI, Tomazic PV, Riechelmann H, Vent J. Objective assessment of nasal patency. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (04) 378-387
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chang GH, Hsu CM, Huang EI. et al. Effects of supine and prone positions on nasal patency in healthy individuals. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 102 (07) 460-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nigro CE, Nigro JF, Voegels RL, Mion O, Mello Junior JF. Acoustic rhinometry: anatomic correlation of the first two notches found in the nasal echogram. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2005; 71 (02) 149-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rimmer J, Hellings P, Lund VJ. et al. European position paper on diagnostic tools in rhinology. Rhinology 2019; 57 (Suppl S28): 1-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mamikoglu B, Houser SM, Corey JP. An interpretation method for objective assessment of nasal congestion with acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (05) 926-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Liu X, Fredberg J. Normative standards for nasal cross-sectional areas by race as measured by acoustic rhinometry. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 119 (04) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol Suppl 2000; 16: 3-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Parvez L, Erasala G, Noronha A. Novel techniques, standardization tools to enhance reliability of acoustic rhinometry measurements. Rhinol Suppl 2000; 16: 18-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wartelle S, Simon F, Louis B. et al. Endonasal measurements by acoustic rhinometry in children: a preliminary study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 107: 93-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Prediction of nasal obstruction based on clinical examination and acoustic rhinometry. Rhinology 1997; 35 (02) 53-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chawes BLK, Kreiner-Møller E, Bisgaard H. Objective assessments of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in young children. Allergy 2009; 64 (10) 1547-1553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Haavisto LE, Vahlberg TJ, Sipila JI. Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in children at baseline and after decongestion. Rhinology 2011; 49 (02) 243-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nurminen M, Hytönen M, Sala E. Modelling the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry. Stat Med 2000; 19 (09) 1179-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Al Ahmari MD, Wedzicha JA, Hurst JR. Intersession repeatability of acoustic rhinometry measurements in healthy volunteers. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 5 (03) 156-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Toyserkani NM, Frisch T, Von Buchwald C. Postoperative improvement in acoustic rhinometry measurements after septoplasty correlates with long-term satisfaction. Rhinology 2013; 51 (02) 171-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Erdivanli OC, Coskun ZO, Ozgur A, Ogurlu M, Demirci M, Dursun E. Comparison of quality of life before and after septoplasty with Short Form-36. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (03) 832-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zhang K, Pipaliya RM, Miglani A, Nguyen SA, Schlosser RJ. Systematic review of surgical interventions for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2023; 37 (01) 110-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Alobid I, Benitez P, Valero A, Munoz R, Langdon C, Mullol J. Oral and intranasal steroid treatments improve nasal patency and paradoxically increase nasal nitric oxide in patients with severe nasal polyposis. Rhinology 2012; 50 (02) 171-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Thulesius HL, Cervin A, Jessen M. Treatment with a topical glucocorticoid, budesonide, reduced the variability of rhinomanometric nasal airway resistance. Rhinology 2014; 52 (01) 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Möbs C, Wiedemann D, Pfützner W. Evaluation of a modified skin prick test for diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergo J Int 2019; 28: 43-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Dreborg S. Histamine reactivity of the skin. Allergy 2001; 56 (05) 359-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Huang Y, Lou H, Wang C, Zhang L. Cold dry air provocation is a reliable diagnostic tool in nonallergic rhinitis. Rhinology 2019; 57 (03) 225-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Uzzaman A, Metcalfe DD, Komarow HD. Acoustic rhinometry in the practice of allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 97 (06) 745-751 , quiz 751–752, 799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Krzych-Fałta E, Szczęsnowicz-Dąbrowska P, Samoliński B, Grzanka A, Wojas O. The normal ranges of selected acoustic rhinometry parameters depending on age and sex-component of standardization in nasal provocation test. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2022; 39 (01) 171-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Uyar M, Tekat A, Koyuncu M, Ünal R, Şeşen T, Tanyeri Y. Validity of acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of patients with adenoid hypertrophy. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (04) 1230-1235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Distinguin L, Louis B, Baujat G. et al. Evaluation of nasal obstruction in children by acoustic rhinometry: a prospective study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 127: 109665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gokce G, Gode S, Ozturk A, Kirazlı T, Veli I. Evaluation of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion appliances on airway by acoustic rhinometry: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 155: 111074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Muñoz-Cano R, Salvador R, Valero A. et al. Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry versus computed tomography in the evaluation of nasal cavity in patients with nasal polyposis. Rhinology 2010; 48 (02) 224-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Elbrønd O, Felding JU, Gustavsen KM. Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to monitor the effect of intramuscular injection of steroid in the treatment of nasal polyps. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105 (03) 178-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Veit JA, Nordmann M, Dietz B. et al. Three different turbinoplasty techniques combined with septoplasty: prospective randomized trial. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (02) 303-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Martin MM, Hauck K, von Witzleben A. et al. Treatment success after rhinosurgery: an evaluation of subjective and objective parameters. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279 (01) 205-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Paul MA, Kamali P, Chen AD. et al. Assessment of functional rhinoplasty with spreader grafting using acoustic rhinomanometry and validated outcome measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (03) e1615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Wei H, Wan L, Zhang Y. et al. Value of opening the middle meatus in patients with nasal airway obstruction. Ear Nose Throat J 2023; 102 (10) NP489-NP498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Ottaviano G, Lund VJ, Nardello E. et al. Comparison between unilateral PNIF and rhinomanometry in healthy and obstructed noses. Rhinology 2014; 52 (01) 25-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Tompos T, Garai T, Zemplén B, Gerlinger I. Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (12) 1887-1891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Larsson C, Millqvist E, Bende M. Relationship between subjective nasal stuffiness and nasal patency measured by acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15 (06) 403-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Hopkins C, Earnshaw J, Roberts D. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol 2010; 35 (04) 337-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Pendolino AL, Nardello E, Lund VJ. et al. Comparison between unilateral PNIF and rhinomanometry in the evaluation of nasal cycle. Rhinology 2018; 56 (02) 122-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Barreto SM, Szalai JP, Zamel N. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study. J Otolaryngol 1994; 23 (06) 454-458
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 André RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenité GJ. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol 2009; 34 (06) 518-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Lara-Sánchez H, Álvarez Nuño C, Gil-Carcedo Sañudo E, Mayo Iscar A, Vallejo Valdezate LÁ. Assessment of nasal obstruction with rhinomanometry and subjective scales and outcomes of surgical and medical treatment. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed) 2017; 68 (03) 145-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Desvant C, Guislain J, Vandenhende-Szymanski C, Mortuaire G. The correlation between active anterior rhinomanometry results and nasal obstruction symptoms scores after inferior turbinate reduction: a prospective cohort study about sixty-five patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2018; 43 (04) 1153-1156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Zahedi FD, Husain S, Gendeh BS. Functional outcome evaluation of septorhinoplasty for nasal obstruction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 68 (02) 218-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Marais J, Murray JA, Marshall I, Douglas N, Martin S. Minimal cross-sectional areas, nasal peak flow and patients' satisfaction in septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy. Rhinology 1994; 32 (03) 145-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Ansari E, Rogister F, Lefebvre P, Tombu S, Poirrier AL. Responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to septorhinoplasty by comparison with rhinomanometry and subjective instruments. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (05) 778-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Ottaviano G, Lund VJ, Nardello E. et al. Peak nasal inspiratory flow: a useful and handy tool for the diagnosis of nasal obstruction in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271 (09) 2427-2431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Ottaviano G, Frasson G, Favero V. et al. N-butanol olfactory threshold and nasal patency before and after palatal expansion in children. A preliminary study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (10) 1618-1623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Ottaviano G, Pendolino AL, Scarpa B. et al. Correlations between peak nasal inspiratory flow, acoustic rhinometry, 4-phase rhinomanometry and reported nasal symptoms. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (09) 1513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Mendes AI, Wandalsen GF, Solé D. Objective and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2012; 88 (05) 389-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Zhang G, Solomon P, Rival R, Fenton RS, Cole P. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (04) 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Scadding GK, Darby YC, Austin CE. Acoustic rhinometry compared with anterior rhinomanometry in the assessment of the response to nasal allergen challenge. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994; 19 (05) 451-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Austin CE, Foreman JC. Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 37 (01) 33-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Compadretti GC, Tasca I, Bonetti GA. Nasal airway measurements in children treated by rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (04) 385-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK. Does nasal obstruction mean that the nose is obstructed?. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (08) 1476-1481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Proimos EK, Kiagiadaki DE, Chimona TS, Seferlis FG, Maroudias NJ, Papadakis CE. Comparison of acoustic rhinometry and nasal inspiratory peak flow as objective tools for nasal obstruction assessment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 2015; 53 (01) 66-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Bartra J, Muñoz-Cano R. et al. Assessment of nasal obstruction: correlation between subjective and objective techniques. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2013; 41 (06) 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Robb F, Cockburn W, Lipworth BJ. Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge. Rhinology 2003; 41 (01) 16-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Eren SB, Tugrul S, Dogan R, Ozucer B, Ozturan O. Objective and subjective evaluation of operation success in patients with nasal septal deviation based on septum type. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014; 28 (04) e158-e162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Menger DJ, Swart KM, Nolst Trenité GJ, Georgalas C, Grolman W. Surgery of the external nasal valve: the correlation between subjective and objective measurements. Clin Otolaryngol 2014; 39 (03) 150-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Ottaviano G, Pendolino AL, Nardello E. et al. Peak nasal inspiratory flow measurement and visual analogue scale in a large adult population. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (04) 541-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Ottaviano G, Ermolao A, Nardello E. et al. Breathing parameters associated to two different external nasal dilator strips in endurance athletes. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 44 (06) 713-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar