Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(04): 246-250
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.111469
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Radiology and the mobile device: Radiology in motion

Sridhar G Panughpath
Department of Radiology, Teleradiology Solutions Private Limited, Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka
,
Arjun Kalyanpur
Department of Radiology, Teleradiology Solutions Private Limited, Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka
› Author Affiliations Source of Support: Nill.
› Further Information
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The use of mobile devices is revolutionizing the way we communicate, interact, are entertained, and organize our lives. With healthcare in general and radiology in particular becoming increasingly digital, the use of such devices in radiologic practice is inevitable. This article reviews the current status of the use of mobile devices in the clinical practice of radiology, namely in emergency teleradiology. Technical parameters such as luminance and resolution are discussed. The article also discusses the benefits of such mobility vis-à-vis the current limitations of the technologies available.

Keywords

iPad - mobile - smartphone - tablet PC - teleradiology - workflow


Publication History

Article published online:
04 October 2021

© 2012. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, Bhargavan M. Radiology practices′ use of external off-hours teleradiology services in 2007 and changes since 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1333-9.
  • 2 Teleradiology in the European Union-white paper. Vienna: European society of radiology; 2006. Available from: http://www.myesr.org/html/img/pool/ESR_2006_VII_Telerad_Summary_Web.pdf. [Last cited on 2011 Nov 6].
  • 3 Steinbrook R. The age of teleradiology. N Engl J Med 2007;357:5-7.
  • 4 Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Chakraborty DP, McNulty JP, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:469-74.
  • 5 Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill M, et al. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e31.
  • 6 Friedman S. The iPad-radiology′s sharper image? Advance for imaging and radiation oncology [internet]. 2010 September, 10. Available from: http://imaging-radiation-oncology.advanceweb.com/features/articles/the-iPad-radiologys-sharper-image.aspx. [Last cited on 2011 Nov 6].
  • 7 Jefferson E. FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration. News and Events. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm242295.htm. [Last updated on 2011 Feb 7; Last cited on 2011 Nov 6].
  • 8 Ridley EL. Is the iPad radiology′s dream device for mobile healthcare? Auntminnie.com; 2010. Available from: http://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=prtf&sub=def&pag=dis&itemId=91105&printpage=true&fsec=sup&fsub=bai. [Last cited on 2011 Nov 6].
  • 9 Kinsey TV, Horton MC, Lewis TE. Interfacing the PACS and the HIS: Results of a 5-year implementation. Radiographics 2000;20:883-91.
  • 10 Garcia FG, Criado JM, Roch C, Padial JH, Pastrana M, Crespo JS. iPad 2 and iPhone 4: Is it feasible to assess acute stroke using an apple mobile device?. Presented at RSNA. November 29, 2011.
  • 11 Gupta S, Doyle S, Schultz TB, Choy G, Singh A, Dreyer KD. First among equals: Comparison of image quality between iPad and PACS workstation for detecting pneumothorax on chest radiographs. Presented at RSNA. November 29, 2011.
  • 12 Gupta S, Doyle S, Schultz TB, Choy G, Singh A, Dreyer KD. Dealing with the mobile imaging ordeal: Assessing image quality on iPhone vs iPad for diagnosing CT Head Cases. Presented at RSNA. November 29, 2011.
  • 13 Abboud S, Weiss F, Orellana C, Orellana A, Siegel E, Jeudy J. TB or Not TB? Inter- and intrareader variability in screening diagnosis on an iPad vs a traditional display. Presented at RSNA. Novembner 29, 2011.
  • 14 John S, Poh A, Lee Y, Chong LR, Chan E, Lim CT. How good is the iPad for on-call radiology review? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. Presented at RSNA. November 29, 2011.
  • 15 Faggioni L, Neri E, Sbragia P, Angeli S, Angeli S, Bartolozzi C. Chest CT and the iPad2® : Preliminary 2D assessment of pulmonary nodules. Presented at RSNA. November 29, 2011.
  • 16 Shreter R, Rozenberg R, Eran A, Shreiber R, Simonovich R, Fischer D, et al. The utility of tablet computer technology for the on call interpretation of brain CT. Presented at RSNA, November 29, 2011.
  • 17 Kumar S, Sandeep HV, Sridhar PG, Kalyanpur A. Utility of mobile device in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage. Presented at the 65th annual conference of the Indian Radiological and Imaging Association. Hyderabad, India; January 28-31, 2012.
  • 18 Tobias RA, Kalyanpur A, Kumar S, Sandeep HV, Sridhar PG. Utility of a mobile device and web-based teleradiology in evaluation of chest CT for pulmonary embolism. Presented at the 65th annual conference of the Indian Radiological and Imaging Association. Hyderabad, India; January 28-31, 2012.