CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(04): 254-256
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.111472
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Selective doxorubicin drug eluting beads chemoembolization of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma using cone beam computed tomography

Naveen Kalra
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
,
Divyesh Mahajan
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
,
Yogesh Chawla
Department of Hepatology, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
,
N Khandelwal
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Nill.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of the liver is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Only one-third of patients with HCC are suitable candidates for hepatic resection. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed in unresectable HCC. Drug-eluting beads (DEB) TACE is a modification of TACE, in which doxorubicin beads are used as embolizing material.These beads deliver the drug and embolize the vessels; however, it carries the risk of non-target embolization and it is difficult in cases with absent arterial blush on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This is resolved using C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in the DSA suite. It identifies the tumor-feeding vessels, their area of supply, and differentiates between tumor and normal liver parenchyma. In addition, it is very useful in the embolization of hypovascular HCC. It helps and guides the radiologist in performing TACE effectively and also prevents non-target embolization of normal liver parenchyma.



Publication History

Article published online:
04 October 2021

© 2012. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2003;362:1907-17.
  • 2 Itsubo M, Koike K, Tsuno S, Osada M, Komuro O, Shimada N, et al. Subsegmental transcatheter arterial embolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:735-9.
  • 3 Del PP, Maddeo A, Zabbialini G, Piti A. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads. J Hepatol 2007;47:157-8.
  • 4 Lin M, Loffroy R, Noordhoek N, Taguchi K, Radaelli A, Blijd J, et al. Evaluating tumors in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using dual-phase cone-beam CT. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011;20:276-81.
  • 5 Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Mitani T, Abe H, Hashimoto N, Hamuro M, et al. Identifying feeding arteries during TACE of hepatic tumors: Comparison of C-arm CT and digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1057-63.
  • 6 Lewis AL, Gonzalez MV, Leppard SW, Brown JE, Stratford PW, Phillips GJ, et al. Doxorubicin eluting beads-1: Effects of drug loading on bead characteristics and drug distribution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:1691-9.
  • 7 Meyer BC, Frericks BB, Voges M, Borchert M, Martus P, Justiz J, et al. Visualization of hypervascular liver lesions during TACE: Comparison of angiographic C-arm CT and MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W263-9.
  • 8 Kim S, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Yoo S, Yin FF. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;132:339-45.