Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
This study aims to investigate first whether Turkey fits into a middle power status and second the tools and mechanisms it uses to pursue its middle power diplomacy at both regional and global levels. In doing so, it first focuses on the existing literature on middle powers. Then, it tries to understand Turkey’s institutional, material, and behavioral patterns that are connected to middle power concepts. In the final analysis, the present study underlines that Turkey seems eager to pursue middle power diplomacy despite its weak middle power identity, its limited middle power means, and the recent deterioration in its relations with its traditional allies, the United States and the EU. In fact, its evolving middle power identity and consciousness about its capacity to enact a middle power role may open new horizons for its developing middle powermanship. However, while constructing its middle power identity, Turkey must also craft its new international role based on its developing material power as well as its ideational and democratic power. Turkey’s strong attachment to universal values and democracy would certainly contribute positively to its middle power identity in-the-making and transform it into a complete middle power state, capable of establishing a delicate balance between its regional and global responsibilities.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Baba, Gürol, and Murat Onsoy. 2016. Between Capability and Foreign Policy: Comparing Turkey’s Small Power and Middle Power Status. Uluslararasi Iliskiler-International Relations 13 (51): 3–20.
Carr, Andrew. 2014. Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840264. CrossRef
Chapnick, Adam. 1999. The Middle Power. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 7 (2): 73–82. CrossRef
Cooper, Andrew, et al. 1993. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order Melbourne. Melbourne: University Press.
Cooper, David A. 2011. Challenging Contemporary Notions of Middle Power Influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative for ‘Middle Power Theory’. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (3): 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00140.x. CrossRef
Cooper, Andrew, and Emel Parlar Dal. 2016. Positioning the Third Wave of Middle Power Diplomacy: Institutional Elevation, Practice Limitations. International Journal 71 (4): 516–528. CrossRef
Dal, Emel Parlar, and Ali Murat Kurşun. 2016. Assessing Turkey’s Middle Power Foreign Policy in MIKTA: Goals, Means, and Impact. International Journal 71 (4): 608–629. CrossRef
Elik, Suleyman. 2013. Iran-Turkey Relations, 1979-2011: Conceptualising the Dynamics of Politics, Religion and Security in Middle-Power States. London: Routledge.
Haass, Richard N. 2009. The New ‘Informal’ Multilateral Era Röportaj yapan Bernard Gwertzman. Council of Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/interview/new-informal-multilateral-era
Higgott, Richard A., and Andrew Fenton Cooper. 1990. Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations. International Organization 44 (4): 589–632. CrossRef
Holbraad, Carsten. 1984. Middle Powers in International Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Ikeda, Naotaka. 2004. Japan-US Relations and Two “Chinas”. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.
K. SangBae. 2009. Critical Understanding of the Concept of SmartPower: A Perspectiveof Middle-Power’s Network Power. International Politics 49–4.
Lee, Sook-Jong. 2012. South Korea as New Middle Power. Seeking Complex Diplomacy. EAI Asia Security Initiative Working Paper 25:3. http://www.eai.or.kr/data/bbs/eng_report/2012091211454078.pdf
Neack, Laura. 2013. Pathways to Power: A Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy Ambitions of Turkey, Brazil, Canada, and Australia. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 14: 53.
Onis, Ziya, and Mustafa Kutlay. 2013. Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of Brics. Third World Quarterly 34 (8): 1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831541. CrossRef
———. 2017. The Dynamics of Emerging Middle-Power Influence in Regional and Global Governance: The Paradoxical Case of Turkey. Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (2): 164–183. CrossRef
Parlar Dal, Emel. 2014. On Turkey’s Trail as a “Rising Middle Power” in the Network of Global Governance: Preferences, Capabilities, and Strategies. Perception 19 (4): 107.
Parlar Dal, Emel, and Gonca Oğuz Gök. 2014. Locating Turkey as a ‘Rising Power’ in the Changing International Order: An Introduction. Perceptions 19 (4): 1–19.
Patience, Allan. 2014. Imagining Middle Powers. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (2): 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840557. CrossRef
Ping, Jonathan H. 2017. Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge.
Ravenhill, John. 2011. Global Political Economy. Oxford: OUP.
Robertson, Jeffrey. 2017. Middle-Power Definitions: Confusion Reigns Supreme. Australian Journal of International Affairs 71, no. 4 (March 2, 2017): 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608. CrossRef
Schiavon, Jorge, and Diago Dominguez. 2016. Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, and Australia (MIKTA): Middle, Regional, and Constructive Powers Providing Global Governance. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 3 (3): 495–504. CrossRef
Shin, Soon-ok. 2016. South Korea’s Elusive Middlepowermanship: Regional or Global Player? Pacific Review 29 (2): 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013494. CrossRef
Tow, William, and Richard Rigby. 2011. China’s Pragmatic Security Policy: The Middle Power Factor. The ChinaJournal 65 (1): 157–178.
Wight, Martin. 1978. Power Politics, 317. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Wood, Bernard. 1988. The Middle Powers and the General Interest. Ottawa: North-South Institute Publisher.
Yalçın, Hasan Basri. 2012. The Concept of ‘Middle Power’ and the Recent Turkish Foreign Policy Activism. Afro Eurasian Studies 1 (1): 195–213.
- Profiling Middle Powers in Global Governance and the Turkish Case: An Introduction
Emel Parlar Dal
- Chapter 1
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock