Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2018

01.12.2018 | State-of-the-Art Paper

Proposing new relationships to estimate the pressuremeter modulus of cohesive and cohesionless media

verfasst von: Shahin Razavi, Kamran Goshtasbi, Ali Noorzad, Kaveh Ahangari

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Pressuremeter is one of the most reliable geotechnical in situ tests to be utilized in estimating different soil properties. The main parameters that can be obtained from this test are soil deformation modulus. In general, the pressuremeter test is time-consuming and costly that requires suitable equipment and experienced operators. With these limitations, it is necessary to introduce models for indirect determination of the pressuremeter modulus (EPM). Based on the literature, various models and equations have been proposed to predict the modulus of pressuremeter; however, most of them are for fine-grained soils. In this paper, multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), and gene expression programming (GEP) have been used to design new relationships for prediction of the pressuremeter modulus. The main difference between this research and other studies is the use of 62 pre-bored pressuremeter tests results in cohesive and granular soils for training and testing models. The study area is in Tehran where soils show a variation from low plasticity clay to clayey gravel. The moisture content, depth of test, and grain size distribution of soils are considered as independent variables. Comparison of the predicted EPM with the actual modulus obtained from the pressuremeter tests indicates that the proposed relationships are able to estimate the pressuremeter modulus well. The results showed that the relationships obtained from nonlinear analyses performed by smart methods are more accurate and have less error in comparison to MLR method. Comparison of the coefficient of determination (R2) values and errors related to them in the testing phase show that the obtained results from the GEP method are more reliable than the ANN method. Also, sensitivity analysis revealed that the soil moisture content is the most effective parameter among the variables on the pressuremeter modulus.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollahasani A, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011) Empirical modeling of plate load test moduli via gene expression programming. Comput Geotech 38(2):281–286CrossRef Mollahasani A, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011) Empirical modeling of plate load test moduli via gene expression programming. Comput Geotech 38(2):281–286CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahnazari H, Dehnavi Y, Alavi AH (2010) Numerical modeling of stress–strain behavior of sand under cyclic loading. Eng Geol 116(1–2):53–72CrossRef Shahnazari H, Dehnavi Y, Alavi AH (2010) Numerical modeling of stress–strain behavior of sand under cyclic loading. Eng Geol 116(1–2):53–72CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthy S (2008) Geotechnical engineering: principles and practice of soil mechanics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton Murthy S (2008) Geotechnical engineering: principles and practice of soil mechanics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Menard L (1955) Pressiometre, Brevet Francais. de’invention. No 1.117.983 Menard L (1955) Pressiometre, Brevet Francais. de’invention. No 1.117.983
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Menard L (1957) Mesure In situ des Proprietes Physiques Desols. Ann Ponts Chaussees 14:357–377 Menard L (1957) Mesure In situ des Proprietes Physiques Desols. Ann Ponts Chaussees 14:357–377
6.
Zurück zum Zitat ASTM D4719 (2000) Standard test method for pre-bored pressuremeter testing in soils. ASTM International, vol 04-08 ASTM D4719 (2000) Standard test method for pre-bored pressuremeter testing in soils. ASTM International, vol 04-08
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyabasi A (2012) Prediction of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by simple and non-linear multiple regression techniques: a case study from Mersin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66:2171–2183CrossRef Keyabasi A (2012) Prediction of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by simple and non-linear multiple regression techniques: a case study from Mersin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66:2171–2183CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Adalag A, Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C (2013) Estimation of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by various artificial neural network models. Neural Comput Appl 23:333–3339CrossRef Adalag A, Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C (2013) Estimation of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by various artificial neural network models. Neural Comput Appl 23:333–3339CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Alavi AH, Gandomi AH, Chahkandi Nejad H (2013) Design equations for prediction of pressuremeter soil deformation moduli utilizing expression programming systems. Neural Comput Appl 23(6):1771–1776CrossRef Alavi AH, Gandomi AH, Chahkandi Nejad H (2013) Design equations for prediction of pressuremeter soil deformation moduli utilizing expression programming systems. Neural Comput Appl 23(6):1771–1776CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziaie Moayed R, Kordnejad A, Mola Abasi H (2018) Pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils using GMDH type neural network and genetic algorithm. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):165–178CrossRef Ziaie Moayed R, Kordnejad A, Mola Abasi H (2018) Pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils using GMDH type neural network and genetic algorithm. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):165–178CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Giakomino A, Abollino O, Malan Drino M, Mentasti E (2011) The role of chemometric in single and sequential extraction assays: a review part II, cluster analysis, multiple linear regression, mixture resolution, experimental design and other techniques. Anal Chim Acta 688:12–139 Giakomino A, Abollino O, Malan Drino M, Mentasti E (2011) The role of chemometric in single and sequential extraction assays: a review part II, cluster analysis, multiple linear regression, mixture resolution, experimental design and other techniques. Anal Chim Acta 688:12–139
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Akan R, Keskin SN, Unzundur Ukan S (2015) Multiple regression model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of jet grout columns. Procedia Earth Planet Sci 15:299–303CrossRef Akan R, Keskin SN, Unzundur Ukan S (2015) Multiple regression model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of jet grout columns. Procedia Earth Planet Sci 15:299–303CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yieldirim I, Ozashin S, Akyuz KC (2011) Prediction of the financial return of the paper sector with artificial neural networks. BioResources 6(4):4076–4091 Yieldirim I, Ozashin S, Akyuz KC (2011) Prediction of the financial return of the paper sector with artificial neural networks. BioResources 6(4):4076–4091
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan SHA, Manza RR, Ramteke RJ (2010) Generalized regression neural network and radial basis function for heart disease diagnosis. Int J Comput Appl 7(13):7–13 Hannan SHA, Manza RR, Ramteke RJ (2010) Generalized regression neural network and radial basis function for heart disease diagnosis. Int J Comput Appl 7(13):7–13
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Specht DF (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 2(6):568–576CrossRef Specht DF (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 2(6):568–576CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129 Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cevik A (2007) A new formulation for longitudinally stiffened webs subjected to patch loading. J Constr Steel Res 63(10):1328–1340CrossRef Cevik A (2007) A new formulation for longitudinally stiffened webs subjected to patch loading. J Constr Steel Res 63(10):1328–1340CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayadelen C (2011) Soil liquefaction modeling by genetic expression programming and neuro-fuzzy. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):4080–4087CrossRef Kayadelen C (2011) Soil liquefaction modeling by genetic expression programming and neuro-fuzzy. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):4080–4087CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Proposing new relationships to estimate the pressuremeter modulus of cohesive and cohesionless media
verfasst von
Shahin Razavi
Kamran Goshtasbi
Ali Noorzad
Kaveh Ahangari
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-0172-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe