Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Folklore: Locating India in the Global Framework

verfasst von : R. Rajesh Babu

Erschienen in: Locating India in the Contemporary International Legal Order

Verlag: Springer India

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

India is host to a rich source of traditional knowledge and folklore. India is also one of the countries which have been on the receiving end of misappropriation and patenting of traditional knowledge. There is no shortage of instruments to protect TK and folklore, both nationally and internationally. Most of these attempts are through using traditional intellectual property rights such as the copyright, patent, geographical indicators, or trademarks, and in some cases through the adoption of sui generis laws that applies specifically to TK. However, these protections are fragmented and have their share of drawbacks. Focussing on the role and experience of India, this chapter argues the need for a comprehensive international treaty for the protection of TK in all its dimensions supplemented by a model law for the States to emulate. In the interim, given the diverse approaches to TK protection and the lack of consensus on various issues, India and other developing countries efforts must equally be focussed on incorporating suitable amendments to existing norms, in particular, the TRIPS Agreement.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
2
WIPO (19981999), p. 25.
 
3
Folklore or “Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE)” has been defined as “productions consisting of characteristic elements of the artistic heritage developed and maintained by a community. It particularly includes- verbal expressions- (such as folk tales, folk poetry and riddles), musical expressions (such as folk songs and instrumental music), expression by actions (such as folk dances, plays) and tangible expressions (like drawings, paintings, carvings, terracotta, pottery, musical instrument and architecture).” See, Kutty (2002).
 
4
Indigenous and Traditional Knowledge <http://​www.​icimod.​org/​?​q=​1248> accessed on 17 June 2015.
 
5
Barsh (1999), p. 73.
 
6
Arewa (2006), p. 164.
 
7
Bratspies (2007), p. 6. See also, Varadarajan (2011), p. 379.
 
8
Ibid. Exploitation of biological and genetic diversity has also been seen as a careful crafting of res nullius that advantages newcomers to the resource at the expense of traditional users.
 
9
“It has been estimated that of the 35 plant-derived drugs in the top 150 best-selling drugs, 94% contained at least one compound that has been used by indigenous and local communities.” Ruiz (2002), p. 4.
 
10
Varadarajan (2011), p. 379.
 
11
The legal and policy framework for such an international instrument has been discussed in a number of fora, such as the WIPO, WTO, FAO, CBD, UNCTAD, UNESCO, etc. In all the fora, the active participants have been the Developing countries, who are pushing for comprehensive an effective framework for the protection of traditional knowledge.
 
12
Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, ‘Chronology of Events of Basmati Rice Battle’ <http://​www.​navdanya.​org/​articles/​chronology_​basmati_​battle.​htm> 8 November 2005.
 
13
Freudenberg (2014), p. 164.
 
14
“Biopiracy of Traditional Knowledge” available at <http://​www.​tkdl.​res.​in/​tkdl/​langdefault/​Common/​Biopiracy.​asp?​GL=​Eng.> accessed on 20th June 2015.
 
15
Chouhan (2012), pp. 35–42.
 
16
IPPRO (2008).
 
17
Chouhan (2012), pp. 35–42.
 
18
Bhattacharya (2014), pp. 49–56.
 
19
“Colgate accused of stealing 1000 year old Indian toothpaste recipe” Daily Mail (22nd October 2010) <http://​www.​dailymail.​co.​uk/​news/​article-1322863/​Colgate-accused-stealing-1-000-year-old-Indian-toothpaste-recipe.​html> accessed on 22nd June 2015.
 
20
Dewan (2010).
 
21
Ibid.
 
22
Gupta (2013).
 
23
Ficsor (2005).
 
24
WIPO (2000).
 
25
WIPO (2002).
 
26
WIPO (2003a, b).
 
27
Ibid.
 
28
Ibid.
 
29
Srinivas (2008), p. 86.
 
30
“Seminar on the Protection of Traditional knowledge: The international dimension of TK protection”, <http://​www.​unctad.​org/​trade_​env/​test1/​meetings/​delhi/​Countriestext/​brazil.​doc>.
 
31
“It is enough that someone, somewhere, sometime previously has described or shown or made something that contains a use of technology that is very similar to your invention.” What is Prior Art? European Patent Office, <https://​www.​epo.​org/​learning-events/​materials/​inventors-handbook/​novelty/​prior-art.​html>.
 
32
Art. 15.4(a), Berne Convention.
 
33
Art. 5, Tunis Model Law. See von Lewinski (2004), p. 341.
 
34
‘Domaine Public Payant’, system, “a work that has fallen into the public domain may be used without restriction, subjected to the payment of a fee calculated as a percentage of the receipts produced by the use of the work or its adaptations”. Sect. 17, Tunis Model Law. See also, the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) Bangui Agreement 1977.
 
35
Bannerman (2015), pp. 90–91.
 
36
Lewinski, supra note 47, p. 341.
 
37
Kutty, supra note 3.
 
38
Bannerman, supra note 36, p. 91.
 
39
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) entered into force on 29 December 1993.
 
40
Art. 1, CBD.
 
41
Art. 8(j), CBD. See also Art. 10(c): “Protect and encourage customary use of biological resources in accordance with traditional cultural practices that are compatible with conservation or sustainable use requirements”.
 
42
Ullrich (2005).
 
44
Art. 9.2, FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2001.
 
45
Adoption in Geneva, 76th ILC session, 27 Jun 1989 and entry into force on 5 Sep 1991. The Convention revised the Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention, 1957.
 
46
Art. 7(1), ILO Convention 1989.
 
47
Art. 31, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007, A/61/L.67 and Add.1. 143 countries voted in favour of the Declaration, with Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US voted against it.
 
48
Agenda 21, UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, 3014 June 1992 (“The Earth Summit”) available at http://​www.​un.​org/​geninfo/​bp/​enviro.​html.
 
49
Blakeney (1998), p. 986.
 
50
Ibid.
 
51
The TRIPS Agreement is Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization signed in Marrakesh, Morocco on 15 April 1994.
 
52
WIPO Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (Paris Convention) 1967.
 
53
WIPO Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention) 1971. See International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations, 1961 (Rome Convention) and Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits, 1989.
 
55
Sects. 1 to 7, Part II, TRIPS Agreement.
 
56
Art. 27.1 of the TRIPs Agreement, provides that in order for the subject matter to receive patent protection the invention must be “new, involve an inventive step and capable of industrial application”.
 
57
Pacón (2000), p. 5.
 
58
“Traditional knowledge and the need to give it adequate Intellectual property protection,” Documents prepared by the Group of Countries of Latin America and the Caribbean (GRULAC) September 14, 2000, WO/GA/26/9.
 
59
Gervais (2005), p. 141.
 
60
See UNCTAD (2002).
 
61
WIPO (2003a, b).
 
62
Mara (2008).
 
63
See Para. 19, WT/MIN(01).DEC/1. Paragraph 19 of the 2001 Doha Declaration says the TRIPS Council should also look at the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, the protection of traditional knowledge and folklore.
 
64
Art. 27.3(b) of the TRIPs: “Members may also exclude from patentability: (b) plants and animals other than microorganisms, and essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals other than non-biological and microbiological processes. However, Members shall provide for the protection of plant varieties either by patents or by an effective sui generis system or by any combination thereof. The provisions of this subparagraph shall be reviewed four years after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement.”
 
65
See, Drahos (2004).
 
66
Dutfield (2003).
 
67
Manley (2006), p. 113
 
68
See Da Costa, Mitzi Gurgel Valente Genetic Resources and Intellectual Property Rights First Meeting of Like-Minded Megadiverse Countries, in Drahos (2004).
 
69
Art. 27(3)(b) allows Members to exclude from patentability plants, animals, biological processes for the production of plants or animals and plant varieties. Gervais (2005), p. 141.
 
70
See WTO, IP/C/M/25, December 22, 1999.
 
71
Drahos (2004).
 
72
WTO Trade Negotiations Committee, “Draft Modalities For TRIPS Related Issues,” Communication from Albania, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, the European Communities, Iceland, India, Indonesia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Liechtenstein, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Pakistan, Peru, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, the ACP Group and the African Group, TN/C/W/52, 19 July 2008.
 
73
As amended in 2012.
 
74
Sect. 31A. Compulsory licence in unpublished Indian works, Copyright Act 1957.
 
75
Sect. 52, Copyright Act 1957.
 
76
“Protecting Indian Traditional Knowledge as International Property” <http://​www.​mondaq.​com/​india/​x/​344510/​Trade+Secrets/​protecting+india​n+traditional+kn​owledge+as+intel​lectual+property​> (accessed on 22nd June 2015).
 
77
Milpurrurru, G. & Ors v. Indofurn P/L & Ors, [1994] FCA 975; 54 FCR 240; 130 ALR 659; (1995) AIPC 91-116; 30 IPR 209. See also Blakene (1995), p. 4.
 
78
Traditional Knowledge, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, <https://​cyber.​harvard.​edu/​copyrightforlibr​arians/​Module_​8:​_​Traditional_​Knowledge>.
 
79
Janke (2003), p. 14.
 
80
Kirby (1998) in Janke (2003), p. 22.
 
81
Goswami and Nandi (2008).
 
82
Algeria, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chile, Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Rwanda, Seychelles, Togo, Tanzania, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe.
 
83
Egypt, Jordan, Malawi, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Qatar.
 
84
Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Congo) 1982.
 
85
See also Nigerian Copyright Council.
 
86
“Folklore shall be the property of the state, and the Ministry shall exercise the copyright pertaining thereto.” Article 7(1) of the Copyright Law of 2003, Royal Decree No. M/41 (KSA).
 
87
Varadarajan (2011), p. 379.
 
88
Chhaba and Chabba (2015).
 
89
Art. 39, Section 7: Protection of Undisclosed Information, TRIPS Agreement. Pooley (2013). The US Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sect. 1(4) defines “Trade secret” as: “information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (i) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (ii) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.”
 
90
Varadarajan (2011), p. 380.
 
91
Ibid.
 
92
Pooley (2013).
 
93
Chhaba and Chabba (2015).
 
94
“Protection of Traditional Knowledge as Trade Secrets” available at <http://​www.​mondaq.​com/​india/​x/​279342/​Patent/​Protection+Of+Tr​aditional+Knowle​dge+As+Trade+Sec​rets> accessed on 17th June 2015.
 
95
Ibid.
 
96
Art. 27.1 of the TRIPs Agreement, provides that in order for the subject matter to receive patent protection the invention must be “new, involve an inventive step and capable of industrial application”.
 
97
Pacón (2000), p. 5.
 
98
“Protecting Indian Traditional Knowledge as Intellectual Property” <http://​www.​mondaq.​com/​india/​x/​344510/​Trade+Secrets/​protecting+india​n+traditional+kn​owledge+as+intel​lectual+property​> accessed on 20th June 2015.
 
99
Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act No. 15 of 2005).
 
100
See Ministry of Commerce and Industry (2006).
 
101
Sect. 25(2), Patent Act.
 
102
Venkataraman and Latha (2008).
 
103
Venkataraman (2009).
 
104
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (No. 18 of 2003)
 
105
Sect. 36(iv), Biological Diversity Act 2002.
 
106
Preamble, Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
 
108
Sect. 41(1), Biodiversity Act. The BMC will be constituted by the local body with members of the Participatory forest/natural resources management committees members, including from members of horticulture/vaids/foot botanists/tribal heads, etc., based on the local conditions. Guidelines for Operationalization of Biodiversity, Management Committees (BMCs) National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), January 2013 <http://​nbaindia.​org/​uploaded/​pdf/​Guidelines_​BMC_​1.​pdf>.
 
109
Art. 2, CBD and Sect. 2(b), Act.
 
110
Swamy (2014).
 
111
Sect. 3 of the DB Act provides that all foreigners must get prior approval of the NBA to “obtain any biological resources occurring in India or knowledge associated thereto, for research or for commercial utilization or for bio-survey or bio-utilization”.
 
112
See also Art. 8(j) of the CBD.
 
113
Sect. 21(2), Act. Venkataram K. and Latha S.S., “Intellectual Property Rights, Traditional Knowledge and Biodiversity of India” JIPR 13(4) 326–335, July 2008 <http://​nopr.​niscair.​res.​in/​bitstream/​123456789/​1781/​1/​JIPR%20​13%284%29%20​326-335.​pdf> accessed on 23rd June 2015.
 
114
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. At least 150 million people, including almost 90 million tribals, live in communities would benefit from CFR rights recognition. Potential for Recognition of Community Forest Resource Rights Under India’s Forest Rights Act: A Preliminary Assessment, Rights and Resources Initiative, Vasundhara and Natural Resources Management Consultants July 2015.
 
115
Sect. 3(k), Forest Act 2006.
 
116
Dewan (2010).
 
117
Art. 22.1: Protection of Geographical Indications.
 
118
“Geographical Indications and Traditional Knowledge” (9th June 2015) <https://​ipsnipe.​wordpress.​com/​2015/​06/​09/​geographical-indications-and-traditional-knowledge/​> accessed on 6th July 2015.
 
119
Ibid.
 
121
TKDL is a collaborative project of CSIR and Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India <http://​www.​tkdl.​res.​in/​tkdl/​langdefault/​common/​Abouttkdl.​asp?​GL=​Eng>.
 
123
Ibid.
 
124
“Biopiracy of Traditional Knowledge”. <http://​www.​tkdl.​res.​in/​tkdl/​langdefault/​Common/​Biopiracy.​asp?​GL=​Eng>. Accessed on 16th June 2015.
 
126
Ibid.
 
127
India has signed TKDL Access Agreements with the EPO and the patent offices of Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK and the US. Protecting India’s Traditional Knowledge, June 2011. http://​www.​wipo.​int/​wipo_​magazine/​en/​2011/​03/​article_​0002.​html.
 
128
Nandakumar (2015).
 
129
Murthy (2015)
 
130
Ibid.
 
131
Venkataram and Latha (2008).
 
132
NKC (2009).
 
133
Ibid., p. 146.
 
136
Art. 246, List I (Union List), Constitution of India.
 
137
Panama’s Act No. 20 of 2000.
 
138
Members include Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. The following countries have associate membership: New Caledonia and French Polynesia.
 
139
The Pacific Model Laws on the Protection of TK & Expression Of Culture and Genetic Resources.
 
141
Clause 7 of Part I of the Framework makes clear who owns the protected TCEs. Traditional owners are defined as: “a group, clan, or community of people, or the individual who is recognized by a group, clan, or community of people as the individual, in whom the custody or protection of the traditional knowledge or expressions of culture are entrusted in accordance with customary law and the practices of that group, clan, or community.”
 
142
Arts. 8 and 9, Pacific Model Law.
 
143
Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act 2000 (Australia): The moral rights give creators the “right to protect the integrity of their works, the right to have their works attributed to them and the right not to have someone else’s work falsely attributed to them.”
 
144
Art. 11, Model Law. Clause 7(2) of Part I – “traditional cultural rights include the right to reproduce, publish, perform, make available online, and create derivative works, among many others. These are said to be both exclusive and inalienable.”
 
145
Self-identification as indigenous or tribal shall be regarded as a fundamental criterion for determining the groups to which the provisions of this Convention apply. Art. 1.2, ILO Convention 1989.
 
146
One fruitful approach as stated by the UN, “is to identify, rather than define indigenous peoples. This is based on the fundamental criterion of self-identification as underlined in a number of human rights documents.”
 
147
Protecting Traditional Knowledge, supra n. 96, p. 4.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arewa OB (2006) TRIPS and traditional knowledge: local communities, local knowledge, and global intellectual property frameworks. Case research paper series in legal studies working paper, 06-05 Mar 2006. http://ssrn.com/abstract=889384 Arewa OB (2006) TRIPS and traditional knowledge: local communities, local knowledge, and global intellectual property frameworks. Case research paper series in legal studies working paper, 06-05 Mar 2006. http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​889384
Zurück zum Zitat Bannerman S (2015) The world intellectual property organization and traditional knowledge. In Rimmer M (ed) Indigenous intellectual property: a handbook of contemporary research. Edward Elger Publishing Bannerman S (2015) The world intellectual property organization and traditional knowledge. In Rimmer M (ed) Indigenous intellectual property: a handbook of contemporary research. Edward Elger Publishing
Zurück zum Zitat Barsh RL (1999) Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity, in indigenous peoples, their environments and territories. In: Posey D (ed) Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. IT Publications/UNEP Barsh RL (1999) Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity, in indigenous peoples, their environments and territories. In: Posey D (ed) Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. IT Publications/UNEP
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharya S (2014) Biopropsecting, biopiracy and food security India: the emerging sides of neoliberalism. Int Lett Soc Humanist Sci 23:49–56 Bhattacharya S (2014) Biopropsecting, biopiracy and food security India: the emerging sides of neoliberalism. Int Lett Soc Humanist Sci 23:49–56
Zurück zum Zitat Blakene M (1995) Milpurrurru and Ors. vs. Indofurn Pty Ltd and Ors—protecting expressions of aboriginal folklore under Copyright Law. Murdoch Univ Electron J Law 2(1):4 Blakene M (1995) Milpurrurru and Ors. vs. Indofurn Pty Ltd and Ors—protecting expressions of aboriginal folklore under Copyright Law. Murdoch Univ Electron J Law 2(1):4
Zurück zum Zitat Blakeney M (1998) Communal intellectual property rights of indigenous peoples in cultural expressions. J World Intell Prop 1:985 Blakeney M (1998) Communal intellectual property rights of indigenous peoples in cultural expressions. J World Intell Prop 1:985
Zurück zum Zitat Chouhan VK (2012) Protection of traditional knowledge in India by patent: legal aspect. J Humanit Soc Sci 3(1) Chouhan VK (2012) Protection of traditional knowledge in India by patent: legal aspect. J Humanit Soc Sci 3(1)
Zurück zum Zitat Da Costa MGV. Genetic resources and intellectual property rights. First meeting of like-minded Megadiverse Countries. Available at www.megadiverse.org Da Costa MGV. Genetic resources and intellectual property rights. First meeting of like-minded Megadiverse Countries. Available at www.​megadiverse.​org
Zurück zum Zitat Drahos P (2004) Towards an international framework for the protection of traditional group knowledge and practice. UNCTAD-commonwealth secretariat workshop on elements of National Sui Generis Systems for the preservation, protection and promotion of traditional knowledge, innovations and practices and options for an international framework, Geneva, 4–6 Feb 2004 Drahos P (2004) Towards an international framework for the protection of traditional group knowledge and practice. UNCTAD-commonwealth secretariat workshop on elements of National Sui Generis Systems for the preservation, protection and promotion of traditional knowledge, innovations and practices and options for an international framework, Geneva, 4–6 Feb 2004
Zurück zum Zitat Dutfield G (2003) Intellectual property rights and sustainable development. UNCTAD-ICTSD project on IPRs and sustainable development protecting traditional knowledge and folklore: a review of process in diplomacy and policy formulation. Issue Paper 1, ICSID, June 2003 Dutfield G (2003) Intellectual property rights and sustainable development. UNCTAD-ICTSD project on IPRs and sustainable development protecting traditional knowledge and folklore: a review of process in diplomacy and policy formulation. Issue Paper 1, ICSID, June 2003
Zurück zum Zitat Freudenberg N (2014) Lethal but legal: corporations, consumption, and protecting public health. OUP Freudenberg N (2014) Lethal but legal: corporations, consumption, and protecting public health. OUP
Zurück zum Zitat Gervais D (2005) Traditional knowledge & intellectual property: a TRIPS compatible approach. Symposium on intellectual property, sustainable development, and endangered species: understanding the dynamics of the information ecosystem. Michigan State Law Rev 141 Gervais D (2005) Traditional knowledge & intellectual property: a TRIPS compatible approach. Symposium on intellectual property, sustainable development, and endangered species: understanding the dynamics of the information ecosystem. Michigan State Law Rev 141
Zurück zum Zitat Goswami R, Nandi K (2008) Naming the unnamed: intellectual property rights of women artists from India. J Gend Soc Policy Law 16:2 Goswami R, Nandi K (2008) Naming the unnamed: intellectual property rights of women artists from India. J Gend Soc Policy Law 16:2
Zurück zum Zitat Manley R (2006) Developmental perspectives on the TRIPs and traditional knowledge. Macquarie J Int Comp Environ Law 3:113 Manley R (2006) Developmental perspectives on the TRIPs and traditional knowledge. Macquarie J Int Comp Environ Law 3:113
Zurück zum Zitat Mara K (2008) No Agreement for WIPO Committee on traditional knowledge and folklore. Third World Network, 18 Oct Mara K (2008) No Agreement for WIPO Committee on traditional knowledge and folklore. Third World Network, 18 Oct
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Commerce and Industry (2006) Protecting traditional knowledge—the international dimension. India & the WTO—A Monthly Newsletter of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry 8(1–2) Ministry of Commerce and Industry (2006) Protecting traditional knowledge—the international dimension. India & the WTO—A Monthly Newsletter of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry 8(1–2)
Zurück zum Zitat Nandakumar T (2015) Caution on classifying traditional knowledge under IPR. The Hindu, 28 Aug 2015 Nandakumar T (2015) Caution on classifying traditional knowledge under IPR. The Hindu, 28 Aug 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Pacón AM (2000) The peruvian proposal on the protection of traditional knowledge UNCTAD expert meeting on systems and national experiences for protecting traditional knowledge. Innov Pract Pacón AM (2000) The peruvian proposal on the protection of traditional knowledge UNCTAD expert meeting on systems and national experiences for protecting traditional knowledge. Innov Pract
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas KR (2008) Traditional knowledge and intellectual property rights: a note on issues, some solutions and some suggestions. Asian J WTO Int Health Law Policy 3:81 Srinivas KR (2008) Traditional knowledge and intellectual property rights: a note on issues, some solutions and some suggestions. Asian J WTO Int Health Law Policy 3:81
Zurück zum Zitat Ullrich H (2005) Traditional knowledge, biodiversity, benefit sharing and the patent system. Romantics v. economics? European University Institute (EUI) Working Paper, No. 2005/07. ssrn.com/abstract=838107. Accessed on 24 June 2015 Ullrich H (2005) Traditional knowledge, biodiversity, benefit sharing and the patent system. Romantics v. economics? European University Institute (EUI) Working Paper, No. 2005/07. ssrn.com/abstract=838107. Accessed on 24 June 2015
Zurück zum Zitat UNCTAD and the Indian Government (2002) Report of the international seminar on systems for the protection and commercialization of traditional knowledge, New Delhi, 3–5 Apr 2002 UNCTAD and the Indian Government (2002) Report of the international seminar on systems for the protection and commercialization of traditional knowledge, New Delhi, 3–5 Apr 2002
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajan D (2011) A trade secret approach to protecting traditional knowledge. Yale J Int Law 36 Varadarajan D (2011) A trade secret approach to protecting traditional knowledge. Yale J Int Law 36
Zurück zum Zitat Venkataraman K, Latha SS (2008) Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India. J Intellect Prop Rights 13(4):326–335 Venkataraman K, Latha SS (2008) Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India. J Intellect Prop Rights 13(4):326–335
Zurück zum Zitat von Lewinski S (2004) Indigenous heritage and intellectual property: genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore. Kluwer Law Int von Lewinski S (2004) Indigenous heritage and intellectual property: genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore. Kluwer Law Int
Zurück zum Zitat WIPO (2002) Elements of a sui generis system for the protection of traditional knowledge, delivered to the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property & Genetic resources, traditional knowledge & folklore. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/4/8, 30 Sept 2002 WIPO (2002) Elements of a sui generis system for the protection of traditional knowledge, delivered to the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property & Genetic resources, traditional knowledge & folklore. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/4/8, 30 Sept 2002
Zurück zum Zitat WIPO (2003) Overview of activities and outcomes of the Intergovernmental Committee. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/12, 3 Apr 2003 WIPO (2003) Overview of activities and outcomes of the Intergovernmental Committee. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/12, 3 Apr 2003
Metadaten
Titel
Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Folklore: Locating India in the Global Framework
verfasst von
R. Rajesh Babu
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer India
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3580-4_8