Skip to main content

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Public Evaluation of the Effects of River Restoration Projects on Social Benefits

verfasst von : Yang Chen, Yuhong Wang, Charissa Chi Yan Leung

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

River systems worldwide are severely degraded due to diverse threats. River restoration aiming to reverse negative impacts has become a priority strategy for enhancing social benefits and river ecosystems in urban development. River restoration projects provide multiple ecosystem services to human beings, and social benefits derived from cultural services have been underestimated and have attracted increasing interest from researchers and policymakers. The purpose of this research is to investigate the public evaluation of the impacts of river restoration projects on social benefits. Two restored river sites in Hong Kong were selected as the case sites. The questionnaire survey was implemented to collect the public evaluation of the social benefits derived from the cultural services of the restored projects, and their visiting patterns and feelings. Regarding the evaluation of the cultural services, the public thought the restored rivers contribute to public health, quality of life, and recreation activities. Additionally, the respondents thought there is a substantial improvement in the aesthetics of the environment. Many people are supportive of similar projects in future implementation. The results summarized from the 158 responses show that local citizens frequently visit the restored river sites for diverse motivations. People generally feel good about air condition and sounds at the restored sites. Most people are in a good mood when staying at the restored sites, indicating that river restoration contributes to the public’s healthy living. A large proportion of people think there are no negative impacts of projects though some people are concerned about insects, guano, and animal disease. Generally, the public holds a positive view of the projects. The research finding enables policymakers to understand the public’s opinions on the river restoration projects and increase their confidence in implementing more similar projects in the urban environment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Deffner, J., Haase, P.: The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecol. Soc. 23(4) (2018) Deffner, J., Haase, P.: The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecol. Soc. 23(4) (2018)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinha, R.K., Kannan, K.: Ganges River dolphin: an overview of biology, ecology, and conservation status in India. Ambio 43(8), 1029–1046 (2014)CrossRef Sinha, R.K., Kannan, K.: Ganges River dolphin: an overview of biology, ecology, and conservation status in India. Ambio 43(8), 1029–1046 (2014)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Basak, S.M., Hossain, M.S., Tusznio, J., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M.: Social benefits of river restoration from ecosystem services perspective: a systematic review. Environ. Sci. Policy 124, 90–100 (2021)CrossRef Basak, S.M., Hossain, M.S., Tusznio, J., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M.: Social benefits of river restoration from ecosystem services perspective: a systematic review. Environ. Sci. Policy 124, 90–100 (2021)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beechie, T.J., et al.: Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60(3), 209–222 (2010)CrossRef Beechie, T.J., et al.: Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60(3), 209–222 (2010)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Logar, I., Brouwer, R., Paillex, A.: Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 232, 1075–1085 (2019)CrossRef Logar, I., Brouwer, R., Paillex, A.: Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost-benefit analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 232, 1075–1085 (2019)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerner, N.V., et al.: Large-scale river restoration pays off: a case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosyst. Serv. 30, 327–338 (2018)CrossRef Gerner, N.V., et al.: Large-scale river restoration pays off: a case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosyst. Serv. 30, 327–338 (2018)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, K., Sachse, R., Walz, A.: Current role of social benefits in ecosystem service assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 149, 49–64 (2016)CrossRef Schmidt, K., Sachse, R., Walz, A.: Current role of social benefits in ecosystem service assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 149, 49–64 (2016)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Díaz, S., et al.: Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373), 270–272 (2018)CrossRef Díaz, S., et al.: Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373), 270–272 (2018)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna, D.E., Tomscha, S.A., Ouellet Dallaire, C., Bennett, E.M.: A review of riverine ecosystem service quantification: research gaps and recommendations. J. Appl. Ecol. 55(3), 1299–1311 (2018)CrossRef Hanna, D.E., Tomscha, S.A., Ouellet Dallaire, C., Bennett, E.M.: A review of riverine ecosystem service quantification: research gaps and recommendations. J. Appl. Ecol. 55(3), 1299–1311 (2018)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Chia, B., Wang, D.: Upstream-downstream water quality comparisons of restored channelized streams. Ecol. Eng. 170, 106367 (2021)CrossRef Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Chia, B., Wang, D.: Upstream-downstream water quality comparisons of restored channelized streams. Ecol. Eng. 170, 106367 (2021)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat England, J., et al.: Best practices for monitoring and assessing the ecological response to river restoration. Water 13(23), 3352 (2021)CrossRef England, J., et al.: Best practices for monitoring and assessing the ecological response to river restoration. Water 13(23), 3352 (2021)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jähnig, S.C., et al.: River restoration success: a question of perception. Ecol. Appl. 21(6), 2007–2015 (2011)CrossRef Jähnig, S.C., et al.: River restoration success: a question of perception. Ecol. Appl. 21(6), 2007–2015 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Alam, K.: Factors affecting public participation in river ecosystem restoration: using the contingent valuation method. J. Dev. Areas 47, 223–240 (2013)CrossRef Alam, K.: Factors affecting public participation in river ecosystem restoration: using the contingent valuation method. J. Dev. Areas 47, 223–240 (2013)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Calcagni, F., Amorim Maia, A.T., Connolly, J.J.T., Langemeyer, J.: Digital co-construction of relational values: understanding the role of social media for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 14(5), 1309–1321 (2019)CrossRef Calcagni, F., Amorim Maia, A.T., Connolly, J.J.T., Langemeyer, J.: Digital co-construction of relational values: understanding the role of social media for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 14(5), 1309–1321 (2019)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser, N.N., Feld, C.K., Stoll, S.: Does river restoration increase ecosystem services? Ecosyst. Serv. 46, 101206 (2020)CrossRef Kaiser, N.N., Feld, C.K., Stoll, S.: Does river restoration increase ecosystem services? Ecosyst. Serv. 46, 101206 (2020)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidl, R., Stauffacher, M.: Evaluation of river restoration by local residents. Water Resour. Res. 49, 7077–7087 (2013)CrossRef Seidl, R., Stauffacher, M.: Evaluation of river restoration by local residents. Water Resour. Res. 49, 7077–7087 (2013)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolarinwa, O.A.: Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger. Postgrad. Med. J. 22(4), 195 (2015)CrossRef Bolarinwa, O.A.: Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger. Postgrad. Med. J. 22(4), 195 (2015)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorgensen, B.S., Stedman, R.C.: A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. J. Environ. Manage. 79(3), 316–327 (2006)CrossRef Jorgensen, B.S., Stedman, R.C.: A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. J. Environ. Manage. 79(3), 316–327 (2006)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Public Evaluation of the Effects of River Restoration Projects on Social Benefits
verfasst von
Yang Chen
Yuhong Wang
Charissa Chi Yan Leung
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_130