Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Experiences of E-Government Development Implementation in Developing Countries: Challenges and Solutions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Public Value Co-creation via Gov2.0 Complexity Cube

verfasst von : Mohammed Aladalah, Yen Cheung, Vicent C. S. Lee, Sultan Alamri

Erschienen in: International E-Government Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Whilst digital connectivity via platforms such as Gov2.0 has provided huge opportunities for governments and citizens to interact and create public value, actual usage of these platforms is below expectations. This chapter explains the complexity of government-citizen interactions using a co-creation perspective via the proposed Gov2.0 complexity cube. The chapter discusses the results of Australian government agencies’ (Government dimension) use of Twitter to identify the co-creation modes. Via the proposed Gov2.0 complexity cube, the degree and understanding of co-creation in the Gov2.0 context can be enhanced. Further testing of the Gov2.0 complexity cube involves validating the other two dimensions, i.e. community and citizens, to reveal other types of co-creation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Progress in Global Assessments of E-Democracy: Refined Measurements and New Findings
Nächstes Kapitel Learning from Opening Data in the Context of E-Governance: Finland, with Special Reference to Government Location Data
Literatur
Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2014). Towards sustainability of Emarket places. Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2014, 24–28 June), Chengdu, China.
Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015a). GOV2.0: A service science perspective. Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2015, 5–9 July), Singapore.
Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015b). Enabling citizen participation in Gov 2.0: An empowerment perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(2), 77–93.
Aladalah M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2016a). Delivering public value: Synergistic integration via Gov 2.0. Paper presented at the 49th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (HICSS 2016, January 5–8), Hawaii.
Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2016b). Winning digital citizens: A model and instrument. Paper presented at the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (PACIS 2016, June 27–July 1), Chiayi, Taiwan.
Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191.CrossRef
Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and facts of e-government: A review of impacts of egovernment (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 564–579.CrossRef
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRef
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.CrossRef
Benington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 232–249.CrossRef
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91.CrossRef
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132.CrossRef
Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2004). The emergence of social enterprise (Vol. 4). London and New York: Routledge.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRef
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.CrossRef
Bryer, T. A., & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social media and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 325–340.CrossRef
Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49.CrossRef
Burris, E. R. (2016). Can your employees really speak freely? Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 80–87.
eC3. (2007). Government in the age of YouTube: The implications of internet social networks to government. eC3 Symposium White Paper, presented at the 2007 eC3 Annual Conference, December 3–5, Austin, Texas.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.
Chang, A.-M., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging Web 2.0 in government. E-Government/Technology Series, IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC.
Choudary, S. P., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Parker, G. G. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy—And how to make them work for you. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326.CrossRef
Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.CrossRef
Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. The emergence of social enterprise.
Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). (2002). Social enterprise: A strategy for success. London: Department for Trade and Industry.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2016). Can your employees really speak freely? Harvard Business Review, 94(1–2), 80–87.
Ferro, E., & Molinari, F. (2010). Making sense of Gov 2.0 strategies: “No citizens, no party”. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 2(1), 56–68.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of egovernment: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290.CrossRef
Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.
Grover, V., & Kohli, R. (2012). Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225–232.
Hand, L. C., & Ching, B. D. (2011). “You have one friend request”: An exploration of power and citizen engagement in local governments’ use of social media. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 362–382.CrossRef
Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 325–344.CrossRef
Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Paper presented at the 42th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (HICSS, January), Hawaii.
Islam, M. S. (2008). Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. European Journal of ePractice, 5(10), 1–12.
Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331.CrossRef
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (pp. 56–65).
Kaplan, D. (2005). e-Inclusion: New challenges and policy recommendations. Brussels: eEurope Advisory Group.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRef
Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., Natsev, A., & Xie, L. (2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 480–491.CrossRef
Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform. London: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.
Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23.
Le Grand, J. (2009). The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRef
Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172.CrossRef
Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference the System Sciences, 2004.
Mergel, I. (2012a). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Mergel, I. (2012b). Measuring the impact of social media use in the public sector. Public Service, Governance and Web 2.0 Technologies: Future Trends in Social Media, 48.
Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. C. (2013). Implementing open innovation in the public sector: The case of Challenge. gov. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 882–890.CrossRef
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 12–20.CrossRef
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1–24.
Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of it-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 10.
O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.CrossRef
O’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations, 6(1), 13–40.CrossRef
Peristeras, V., Mentzas, G., Tarabanis, K. A., & Abecker, A. (2009). Transforming E-government and E-participation through IT. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 24(5), 14–19.CrossRef
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.CrossRef
Rapoport, A. (1966). Mathematical aspects of general systems analysis. General Systems, 11(3), 1–28.
Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for US cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64.CrossRef
Rowley, J. (2011). e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53–62.CrossRef
Sahraoui, S. (2007). E-inclusion as a further stage of e-government?.Transforming. Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(1), 44–58.CrossRef
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S72–S81.CrossRef
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012). Exploring value co-creation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 317–338.
Sarno, D. (2009). Twitter creator Jack Dorsey illuminates the site’s founding document. Part I. Los Angeles Times, 18.
Scholl, H. J. (2008). Discipline or interdisciplinary study domain? Challenges and promises in electronic government research. In Digital government (pp. 21–41). Boston, MA: Springer.
Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7–25.CrossRef
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.CrossRef
Thompson, F. J., & Riccucci, N. M. (1998). Reinventing government. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–257.CrossRef
UK Cabinet Office. (2002). In the service of democracy – A consultation paper on a policy for electronic government.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157.CrossRef
West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.CrossRef
Yin, J., Lampert, A., Cameron, M., Robinson, B., & Power, R. (2012). Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6), 52–59.CrossRef
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Public Value Co-creation via Gov2.0 Complexity Cube
verfasst von
Mohammed Aladalah
Yen Cheung
Vicent C. S. Lee
Sultan Alamri
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
International E-Government Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63283-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63284-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_10