nach oben

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

Erschienen in:

04.11.2016

Quantifying the components of the banks’ net interest margin

verfasst von: Ramona Busch, Christoph Memmel

Erschienen in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Using unique data sets on German banks, we decompose their net interest margin and quantify the different components by estimating the costs of the various functions they perform. We investigate three major functions: liquidity and payment management for customers, bearing credit risk, and term transformation. For 2013, the costs of liquidity and payment management correspond, in the median, to 47% of the net interest margin, with bearing of credit risk and earnings from term transformation accounting for 12 and 37%, respectively.

Nächster Artikel Assessing financial distress dependencies in OTC markets: a new approach using trade repositories data

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bolt et al. (2012) also model banks’ net interest margin as a function of the past and current interest rates and expected loss rates. However, their data set is much less granular (no maturity breakdown and no industry breakdown), so that they have to rely heavily on simplifying assumptions. Even in our data set, we have no information about borrowers’ creditworthiness or about soft information, which is fundamental to the German “Hausbank” relationships (see Elsas and Krahnen 1998).

If we interpret the risk premium as a contribution to the unexpected loss in the Basel formula, the relationship between the probability of default (a measure for the expected losses) and the unexpected losses is not linear, but strictly monotonic increasing. In this context, Eq. (2) can be seen as an approximation. We refrain from a more sophisticated functional form so as to have a parsimonious model.

The results are reported in Table 10, where we use Eq. (3) as a justification for how economically meaningful the quantification of the net interest margin is.

Our sample mostly consists of small and medium-sized banks that engage in little trading activity. For large banks, a significant part of the bond portfolio may belong to the trading book so that these bonds do not contribute to the interest income.

We prefer fixed effects to random effects, since the Hausman test has shown systematic differences between coefficients, indicating inconsistency of the coefficients in the random effects specification.

The literature on cost efficiency often uses customer loans and securities as bank outputs. See, for example, Fiorentino et al. (2006), Koetter and Poghosyan (2009), Bos et al. (2005), and Hauner (2005).

See Lozano-Vivas and Pasiouras (2010) and Tortosa-Ausina (2003).

Some banks, most of them regional banks, did not report the number of ATMs, cards, and transactions; we treat these as missing values.

Large banks comprise “Landesbanken”, “big banks,” and central cooperative institutions. We chose this grouping because individual groups differ in their income ratios due to differences in business models.

For ease of readability, henceforth we use “industries” instead of “industries/sectors”.

We rely on specification II-b to calculate the operating expenses for the provision of liquidity and payment management, as time trend and interaction term do not play a significant role, but the differentiation between PAYMENTS-IN and PAYMENTS-OUT does provide further information.

This could be due to a short time horizon. Even in specification I, some banks face short time series as we control for mergers.

The shares of the variances that are due to the cross-sectional variation are 98.3% for the net interest margin, 97.6% for the loans’ credit risk, 96.9% for the bonds’ credit risk, 94.1% for the earnings from term transformation, 99.0% for the cost of payment and liquidity management, and 95.9% for the variable “Other.”

Correlations between variables and their squared terms in specification I and specification II are about 90%.

Alessandri, P., Nelson, B.: Simple banking: profitability and the yield curve. Bank of England Working Paper 452 (2012)

Angbazo, L.: Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interest-rate risk, and off balance sheet banking. J. Bank. Finance 21, 55–87 (1997)CrossRef

Bliss, R.R.: Movements in the term structure of interest rates. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Fourth Quarter (1997)

Bolt, W., de Haan, L., Hoeberichts, M., van Oordt, M.R.C., Swank, J.: Bank profitability during recessions. J. Bank. Finance 36, 2552–2564 (2012)CrossRef

Bos, J.W.B., Heid, F., Koetter, M., Kolari, J.W., Koos, C.J.M.: Inefficient or just different? Effects of heterogeneity on bank efficiency scores, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 15/2005 (2005)

Carbó, S., Rodriguez, F.: The determinants of bank margins in European banking. J. Bank. Finance 31, 2043–2063 (2007)CrossRef

Carhart, M.M.: On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1), 57–82 (1997)CrossRef

Costa, A.C.A., Nakane, M.I.: Revisiting the methodology for the bank interest spread decomposition in Brazil: an application of the theory of cost allocation (2005, unpublished manuscript)

De Bondt, O.: Interest rate pass-through: empirical result for the Euro area. Ger. Econ. Rev. 6(1), 37–78 (2005)CrossRef

Deutsche Bundesbank.: Estimating the term structure of interest rates, Monthly Report, October 1997, pp. 61–66 (1997)

ECB.: Recent developments in the retail bank interest pass-through in the Euro area. ECB Mon. Bull., pp. 93–105 (2009)

Elsas, R., Krahnen, J.P.: Is relationship lending special? Evidence from credit file data. J. Bank. Finance 22, 1283–1316 (1998)CrossRef

English, W.B.: Interest rate risk in the bank net interest margins. BIS Q. Rev. (2002)

English, W.B., Van den Heuvel, S., Zakrajsek, E.: Interest rate risk and bank equity valuations. Mimeo (2012)

Entrop, O., Memmel, C., Ruprecht, B., Wilkens, M.: Determinants of bank interest margins: impact of maturity transformation. J. Bank. Finance 54, 1–19 (2015)CrossRef

Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2), 427–465 (1992)CrossRef

Fiorentino E., Karmann, A., Koetter, M.: The cost efficiency of German banks: a comparison of SFA and DEA, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 10/2006 (2006)

Georgievska, L., Kabashi, R., Manova-Trajkovska, N., Mitreska, A., Vaskov, M.: Determinants of lending interest rates and interest rates spreads. Bank of Greece Special Conference Paper 9 (2011)

Gunter, U., Krenn, G., Sigmund, M.: Macroeconomic, market and bank-specific determinants of net interest margins in Austria. Financial Stability Report Oesterreichische Nationalbank (2013)

Hauner, D.: Explaining efficiency differences among large German and Austrian banks. Appl. Econ. 37, 969–980 (2005)CrossRef

Ho, T.S.Y., Saunders, A.: The determinants of bank interest margins: theory and empirical evidence. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 16, 581–600 (1981)CrossRef

Koetter, M., Kolari, J.W., Spierdijik, L.: Enjoying the quiet life under regulation? Evidence from adjusted Lerner indices for U.S. banks. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94(2), 462–480 (2012)CrossRef

Koetter, M., Poghosyan, T.: The identification of technology regimes in banking: implications for the market power-fragility nexus. J. Bank. Finance 33, 1413–1422 (2009)CrossRef

Koetter, M., Vins, O.: The quiet life hypothesis in banking: Evidence from German savings banks. Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting 190, Department of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (2008)

Lepetit, L., Nys, E., Rous, P., Tarazi, A.: The expansion of services in European banking: implications for loan pricing and interest margins. J. Bank. Finance 32, 2325–2335 (2008)CrossRef

Lozano-Vivas, A., Pasiouras, F.: The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency. J. Bank. Finance 34, 1436–1449 (2010)CrossRef

Maudos, J., Fernández de Guevara, J.: Factors explaining the interest rate margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. J. Bank. Finance 28, 2259–2281 (2004)CrossRef

Maudos, J., Solís, L.: The determinants of net interest income in the Mexican banking system: an integrated model. J. Bank. Finance 33, 1920–1931 (2009)CrossRef

McShane, R.W., Sharpe, I.G.: A time/cross section analysis of the determinants of Australian trading bank loan/deposit interest margins: 1962–1981. J. Bank. Finance 9, 115–136 (1985)CrossRef

Memmel, C.: Banks’ exposure to interest rate risk, their earnings from term transformation, and the dynamics of the term structure. J. Bank. Finance 35, 282–289 (2011)CrossRef

Memmel, C., Schertler, A.: Banks’ management of the net interest margin: new measures. Financial Mark. Portf. Manag. 27(3), 275–297 (2013)CrossRef

Saunders, A., Schumacher, L.: The determinants of bank interest rate margins: an international study. J. Int. Money Finance 19, 813–832 (2000)CrossRef

Schlüter, T., Busch, R., Hartmann-Wendels, T., Sievers, S.: Loan pricing: do borrowers benefit from cost-efficient banking? Credit Cap. Mark. 49(1), 93–125 (2016)

Sharpe, W.F.: Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under condition of risk. J. Finance 19, 425–442 (1964)

Tortosa-Ausina, E.: Nontraditional activities and bank efficiency revisited: a distributional analysis for Spanish financial institutions. J. Econ. Bus. 55, 371–395 (2003)CrossRef

Weth, M.A.: The pass-through from market interest rates to bank lending rates in Germany. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 11/02 (2002)

Titel: Quantifying the components of the banks’ net interest margin
verfasst von: Ramona Busch
Christoph Memmel
Publikationsdatum: 04.11.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1934-4554
Elektronische ISSN: 2373-8529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-016-0279-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Assessing financial distress dependencies in OTC markets: a new approach using trade repositories data

How safe are the safe haven assets?

John F. Bovenzi: Inside the FDIC: Thirty Years of Bank Failures, Bailouts, and Regulatory Battles

Changing organizational form in the stock exchange industry and risk-taking