Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 5/2018

24.11.2016

Range extension cooperative MAC to attack energy hole in duty-cycled multi-hop WSNs

verfasst von: Jian Lin, Mary Ann Weitnauer

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Effective techniques for extending lifetime in multi-hop wireless sensor networks include duty cycling and, more recently introduced, cooperative transmission (CT) range extension. However, a scalable MAC protocol has not been presented that combines both. An On-demand Scheduling Cooperative MAC protocol (OSC-MAC) is proposed to address the energy hole problem in multi-hop wireless sensor networks (WSNs). By combining an on-demand strategy and sensor cooperation intended to extend range, OSC-MAC tackles the spatio-temporal challenges for performing CT in multi-hop WSNs: cooperating nodes are neither on the same duty cycle nor are they necessarily in the same collision domain. We use orthogonal and pipelined duty-cycle scheduling, in part to reduce traffic contention, and devise a reservation-based wake-up scheme to bring cooperating nodes into temporary synchrony to support CT range extension. The efficacy of OSC-MAC is demonstrated using extensive NS-2 simulations for different network scenarios without and with mobility. Compared with existing MAC protocols, simulation results show that while we explicitly account for the overhead of CT and practical failures of control packets in dense traffic, OSC-MAC still gives 80–200 % lifetime improvement.
Vorheriger Artikel Resource allocation for real-time traffic in unreliable wireless cellular networks
Nächster Artikel Low-cost sustainable wireless Internet service for rural areas

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Routing is typically implemented in software, and our MAC protocol could potentially be implemented with open source driver.
 
Literatur
1.
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.CrossRef
2.
Alamouti, S. M. (1998). A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(8), 1451–1458.CrossRef
3.
Anastasi, G., Falchi, A., Passarella, A., Conti, M., & Gregori, E. (2004). Performance measurements of motes sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, ACM (pp. 174–181) New York, USA, MSWiM.
4.
5.
Badia, L., Levorato, M., Librino, F., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Cooperation techniques for wireless systems from a networking perspective. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(2), 89–96.CrossRef
6.
Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535–547.CrossRef
7.
Buettner, M., Yee, G. V., Anderson, E., & Han, R. (2006). X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of sensor systems, ACM, New York, USA.
8.
Chakrabarti, A., Sabharwal, A., & Aazhang, B. (2003). Using predictable observer mobility for power efficient design of sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on information processing in sensor networks, IPSN’03 (pp 129–145). Springer.
9.
Chang, Y. J., Jung, H., & Ingram, M. A. (2010). Demonstration of a new degree of freedom in wireless routing: Concurrent cooperative transmission. In Proceedings of ACM workshop on hot topics in embedded networked sensors.
10.
Dai, H., & Han, R. (2003). A node-centric load balancing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE GLOBECOM IEEE, 1, 548–552.
11.
Fei, T., Wan, T., Rong, X., Lei, S., & Young-Chon, K. (2011). P-MAC: A cross-layer duty cycle MAC protocol towards pipelining for wireless sensor networks. IEEE ICC, 2011, 1–5.
12.
Goh, H., Sim, M., & Ewe, H. (2006). Energy efficient routing for wireless sensor networks with grid topology. Embedded and ubiquitous computing (Vol. 4096, pp. 834–843). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
13.
Gokturk, M., Gurbuz, O., & Erkip, E. (2012). Recomac: A cross-layer cooperative network protocol for wireless ad hoc networks. In 5th international conference on new technologies, mobility and security (NTMS) (pp 1–7).
14.
Guntupalli, L., Lin, J., Weitnauer, M., & Li, F. (2014). ACT-MAC: An asynchronous cooperative transmission mac protocol for WSNs. In IEEE international conference on communications Workshops (ICC) (pp. 848–853).
15.
Haykin, S., & Moher, M. (2004). Modern Wireless Communication. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
16.
Hongzhi, J., Ingram, M., & Li, F. (2011). A cooperative lifetime extension MAC protocol in duty cycle enabled wireless sensor networks. In MILCOM (pp. 896 –901).
17.
Jakllari, G., Krishnamurthy, S., Faloutsos, M., Krishnamurthy, P., & Ercetin, O. (2007). A cross-layer framework for exploiting virtual miso links in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(6), 579–594.CrossRef
18.
Jin Woo, J., & Ingram, M. A. (2010). Residual-energy-activated cooperative transmission (REACT) to avoid the energy hole. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC).
19.
Jung, J. W., & Weitnauer, M. A. (2013). On using cooperative routing for lifetime optimization of multi-hop wireless sensor networks: Analysis and guidelines. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(99), 1–11.
20.
Kansal, A., Somasundara, A. A., Jea, D. D., Srivastava, M. B. & Estrin, D. (2004). Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services, ACM, MobiSys ’04 (pp. 111–124).
21.
Kar, K., Kodialam, M., Lakshman, T., & Tassiulas, L. (2003). Routing for network capacity maximization in energy-constrained ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.
22.
Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
23.
Li, J., & Mohapatra, P. (2005). An analytical model for the energy hole problem in many-to-one sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE VTC
24.
Lian, J., Chen, L., Naik, K., Otzu, T., & Agnew, G. (2004). Modeling and enhancing the data capacity of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Monograph on Sensor Network Operations, 2, 91–138.
25.
Lian, J., Naik, K., & Agnew, G. B. (2006). Data capacity improvement of wireless sensor networks using non-uniform sensor distribution. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2(2), 121–145.CrossRef
26.
Lin, J., & Ingram, M. A. (2012). SCT-MAC: A scheduling duty cycle MAC protocol for cooperative wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international conference on Communication(ICC).
27.
Lin, J., & Ingram, M. A. (2013). OSC-MAC: Duty cycle scheduling and cooperation in multi-hop wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking (WCNC).
28.
Lin, J., Jung, H., Chang, Y. J., Jung, J. W., & Weitnauer, M. A. (2015). On cooperative transmission range extension in multi-hop wireless ad-hoc and sensor networks: A review. Ad Hoc Networks, 29, 117–134.CrossRef
29.
Lin, Q., & Weitnauer, M. A. (2015a). Diversity in synchronization for scheduled OFDM time-division cooperative transmission. In IEEE military communications conference (MILCOM).
30.
Lin, Q., & Weitnauer, M. A. (2015b). SINR analysis and energy allocation of preamble and training for time division CT with range extension. In IEEE military communications conference (MILCOM).
31.
Lin, J., & Weitnauer, M. A. (2016). Modeling of multihop wireless sensor networks with mac, queuing, and cooperation. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2016. Article ID: 5258742. doi:10.​1155/​2016/​5258742.
32.
Liu, A. F., Wu, X. Y., & Gui, W. H. (2008). Research on energy hole problem for wireless sensor networks based on alternation between dormancy and work. In The 9th international conference for Young Computer Scientists (pp. 475–480).
33.
Luo, J., & Hubaux, J. P. (2005). Joint mobility and routing for lifetime elongation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings IEEE 24th IEEE INFOCOM (Vol. 3, pp. 1735–1746).
34.
Luo, J., Blum, R., Cimini, L., Greenstein, L., & Haimovich, A. (2007). Decode-and-forward cooperative diversity with power allocation in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(3), 793–799.CrossRef
35.
Luo, J., Panchard, J., Pirkowski, M., Grossglauser, M., & Hubaux, J. P. (2006). Mobiroute: Routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks. In Distributed computing in sensor systems (Vol. 4026) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
36.
Pei, L., Zhifeng, T., Sathya, N., Thanasis, K., & Shivendra, S. P. (2007). CoopMAC: A cooperative MAC for wireless LANs. IEEE JSAC, 25(2), 340–354.
37.
Polastre, J., Hill, J., & Culler, D. (2004). Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In The second ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems (SenSys).
38.
Rappaport, T. (2001). Wireless communications: Principles and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.MATH
39.
Saad, L. B., & Tourancheau, B. (2011). Sinks mobility strategy in ipv6-based WSNs for network lifetime improvement. In 2011 4th IFIP international conference on new technologies, mobility and security (NTMS) (pp. 1–5).
40.
Salhieh, A., Weinmann, J., Kochhal, M., & Schwiebert, L. (2001). Power efficient topologies for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on parallel processing (Vol. 2001, pp. 156–163).
41.
Sangman, M., & Chansu, Y. (2011). A cooperative diversity-based robust MAC protocol in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributions Systems, 22, 353–363.CrossRef
42.
Sendonaris, A., Erkip, E., & Aazhang, B. (2003). User cooperation diversity. Part II. Implementation aspects and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 51(11), 1939–1948.CrossRef
43.
Stoleru, R., & Stankovic, J. (2004). Probability grid: A location estimation scheme for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE SECON.
44.
Sun, Y., Du, S., Gurewitz, O., & Johnson, D. B. (2008). DW-MAC: A low latency, energy efficient demand-wakeup MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of MobiHoc 2008, ACM.
45.
Sun, Y., Gurewitz, O., & Johnson, D. B. (2008). RI-MAC: A receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, ACM.
46.
Talarico, S., Matthew, C. V., & Thomas, R. H. (2014). Unicast barrage relay networks: Outage analysis and optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM (pp. 537–543).
47.
Wang, ZM., Basagni, S., Melachrinoudis, E., & Petrioli, C. (2005). Exploiting sink mobility for maximizing sensor networks lifetime. In Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS (Vol. 09).
48.
Wang, W., Srinivasan, V., & Chua, K. C. (2005). Using mobile relays to prolong the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, ACM (pp. 270–283).
49.
Wei, Y., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedigs of IEEE INFOCOM.
50.
Winter, T. (2012). RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low power and lossy networks. In rfc6550.
51.
Wu, X., Chen, G., & Das, S. K. (2008). Avoiding energy holes in wireless sensor networks with nonuniform node distribution. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 19, 710–720.CrossRef
52.
Ye, W., Silva, F., & Heidemann, J. (2006). Ultra-low duty cycle MAC with scheduled channel polling. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, ACM (pp. 321–334).
53.
Yong, Z., Ju, L., Lina, Z., Chao, Z., & He, C. (2011). Link-utility-based cooperative MAC protocol for wireless multi-hop networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(3), 995–1005.CrossRef
54.
Zhao, B., & Valenti, M. (2005). Practical relay networks: A generalization of hybrid-ARQ. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(1), 7–18.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Range extension cooperative MAC to attack energy hole in duty-cycled multi-hop WSNs
verfasst von
Jian Lin
Mary Ann Weitnauer
Publikationsdatum
24.11.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1408-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Wireless Networks 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A case for preamble compression in multi-clock-rate sampling devices for energy efficient idle listening

Erratum

Erratum to: Impact of the energy-based and location-based LEACH secondary cluster aggregation on WSN lifetime

OriginalPaper

Efficient scalable video multicast based on network-coded communication

OriginalPaper

Proportional bandwidth allocation with consideration of delay constraint over IEEE 802.11e-based wireless mesh networks

OriginalPaper

Traffic-aware stateless multipath routing for fault-tolerance in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless mesh networks

OriginalPaper

NS-2 based simulation framework for cognitive radio sensor networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise